Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-12-28 23:36:06Z
1 month ago
Previous (2025-12-28 23:06:06Z)

Situation Update (2335Z 28 DEC 25)

Key updates since last sitrep

  • TECHNOLOGICAL (UAF): Successful high-intensity deployment of fiber-optic FPV drones by the "Signum" Battalion (53rd Mechanized Brigade) in the Lyman direction, resulting in significant RF personnel and light vehicle losses (2315Z, Operativno ZSU, HIGH).
  • STRATEGIC NARRATIVE: Donald Trump claimed the "Donbas questions are resolved," though specific terms remain undisclosed; concurrent reports from the EU Commission President note "good progress" in tripartite frameworks (2309Z, 2317Z, RBK-Ukraine, MEDIUM).
  • KINETIC (RF REAR): UAF drone strikes targeted Krasnodar Krai, specifically damaging infrastructure in Kushchevskaya (gas pipeline) and residential areas in Industrialny; Kushchevskaya is a known node for RF tactical aviation (2324Z, ASTRA, HIGH).
  • KINETIC (KHERSON): RF artillery/drone strikes on Kherson city throughout Sunday resulted in at least 10 civilian casualties and further damage to urban infrastructure (2331Z, ASTRA, HIGH).
  • DIPLOMATIC (UA-US): President Zelenskyy confirmed that technical teams will meet "next week" to finalize the documentation discussed at the Mar-a-Lago summit (2335Z, ASTRA, HIGH).
  • SPACE/ISR: Analytical assessment by Ukrainian OSINT groups questions the immediate operational utility of the recently launched Russian SAR satellite, suggesting its resolution or data-processing speed may lag behind commercial Western standards (2335Z, CyberBoroshno, MEDIUM).

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB)

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

The operational tempo is increasingly influenced by the "diplomatic sprint" following the Trump-Zelenskyy summit. While political actors signal that major territorial questions (Donbas) are nearing a framework for resolution, the tactical reality remains one of attrition and technological competition. The frontline geometry is static but highly lethal, with both sides utilizing the "interim period" before next week's technical meetings to improve their tactical positioning.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

  • Capabilities & Intentions: RF forces continue to focus on "punitive" strikes against civilian centers (Kherson) to maintain domestic pressure on the UAF leadership. The recruitment efforts in the Russian Far East (Khabarovsk) indicate a sustained requirement for long-term manpower despite "peace talk" narratives (2321Z, Khabarovsk Police).
  • Tactical Adaptations: RF mil-bloggers (e.g., Starshiy Edda) are expressing skepticism regarding the "unresolved questions" in negotiations, suggesting a potential rift between the RF political leadership's willingness to freeze the conflict and the hardline military desire for total victory (2308Z).
  • Sustainment: Damage to the gas pipeline in Kushchevskaya (Krasnodar Krai) may temporarily impact local logistics, though it is likely a secondary effect of strikes targeting the nearby airbase.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

  • Tactical Success: The 53rd Mechanized Brigade's use of fiber-optic drones in the Lyman sector confirms the operational viability of this technology to bypass RF Electronic Warfare (EW) umbrellas. This is a critical counter-capability against RF "blind and cut" tactics.
  • Strategic Posture: UAF command is transitioning toward a "dual-track" posture: maintaining defensive integrity while preparing the technical/military annexes for the upcoming US-UA documentation meetings.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

  • Diplomatic Messaging: A coordinated push by both US (Trump) and EU (von der Leyen) sources suggests a unified Western front on the "progress" of negotiations, likely intended to signal to Moscow that the window for maximalist military gains is closing.
  • RF Domestic Narratives: RF state media is balancing reports on "peace" with economic updates (silver price surges) and social conservatism (marriage age debates), likely to distract the domestic audience from the high casualty rates in sectors like Kherson.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

  • Most Likely Course of Action (MLCOA): RF will maintain high-intensity shelling and drone pressure on Kherson and the Donbas salient to "negotiate with fire" before the next round of technical talks. UAF will likely increase deep-rear drone strikes on RF logistics and aviation hubs in Krasnodar to disrupt RF sortie rates.
  • Most Dangerous Course of Action (MDCOA): RF interprets the "Donbas resolved" narrative as a signal to launch a final, high-risk mechanized push to seize the remaining industrial sectors of the Donbas (e.g., Pokrovsk/Lyman) before a formal ceasefire documentation is signed next week.

Operational picture (by sector)

  • Lyman Sector: UAF TACTICAL ADVANTAGE. Successful integration of fiber-optic UAVs has localized RF movements and increased enemy attrition rates in the forestry areas.
  • Kherson: RF ATTRITION ZONE. Focus remains on civilian/infrastructure terror strikes. No significant change in frontline control, but humanitarian conditions are degrading.
  • Krasnodar Krai (RF Rear): ACTIVE. Emerging target zone for UAF long-range assets. Focus on energy and aviation support infrastructure.
  • Donbas (General): CONTESTED. Despite political claims of "resolution," kinetic intensity remains high.

Outlook (next 6-12h)

  • Kinetic: Expect continued UAF drone activity over Krasnodar and Crimea to capitalize on the current "Air Danger" confusion in the RF rear.
  • Political: Monitor for "spoiler" statements from RF hardliners (mil-bloggers/Duma members) reacting to the Trump "resolved" claim.
  • Technological: Increased deployment of fiber-optic FPVs in sectors with heavy RF EW (Pokrovsk) is anticipated following the 53rd OMBr's success.

Intelligence gaps & collection requirements

  1. Kushchevskaya BDA: Confirm if the drone strikes impacted the flight line or ammunition storage at the Kushchevskaya Airbase beyond the reported civilian/gas pipe damage.
  2. "Donbas Resolution" Specifics: Clarify if the "resolved" status refers to a specific Line of Control (LOC) or a demilitarized zone (DMZ) framework.
  3. RF SAR Satellite Capability: Further technical ELINT required to confirm if the new RF satellite is providing real-time targeting data for missile strikes or is limited to static mapping.

//ANALYSIS ENDS//

Previous (2025-12-28 23:06:06Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.