Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-12-16 02:35:41Z
2 months ago
Previous (2025-12-16 02:05:35Z)

Situation Update (UTC)

DTG: 2025-12-16T02:35Z PRIORITY: CRITICAL – Defensive posture maintained amidst continued logistics interdiction and localized pressure on the Southern and Eastern axes.

Key updates since last sitrep

  • RF Information Operations (IO) claim the employment of a TOS-2 heavy flamethrower system against a UAF strongpoint near Huliaipole, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, signaling commitment of high-intensity assets to the sector. (02:06Z, TASS, MEDIUM Confidence)
  • UAF Air Force tracked an RF UAV originating from Sumy Oblast targeting Kolomak, Kharkiv region, confirming continued deep strike threats against rear echelon logistics/C2 nodes. (02:11Z, UAF Air Force, HIGH Confidence)
  • Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration issued an active alert, indicating continued hostile kinetic activity in the area following the confirmed Vostok Group advance into Peschanoye (previous reporting period). (02:21Z, Zaporizhzhia RMA, HIGH Confidence)

Operational picture (by sector)

SectorCurrent Status & GeometryKey Threat/Activity
Zaporizhzhia/HuliaipoleDefensive lines maintained, but high-intensity asset commitment by RF confirmed.RF IO promoting TOS-2 use near Huliaipole suggests preparation for clearing fixed UAF fortifications, potentially to support exploitation from the Peschanoye breach toward the north/northeast.
Dnipropetrovsk (Peschanoye)RF Vostok Group holds a bridgehead west of the Gaychur River (Baseline).Focus is on containing the breach and preventing RF forces from flanking the main Zaporizhzhia defensive concentration. No new maneuver reporting in this window.
Kharkiv/Sumy RearActive air defense posture following confirmed UAV vector toward Kolomak.The UAV target location (Kolomak, southwest Kharkiv region) indicates an attempt to strike logistic hubs or rail infrastructure outside the immediate Donbas conflict zone, supporting the theater-wide strangulation COA.
Eastern Axis (Siversk/Pokrovsk)Situation remains critical (Baseline). CQC continues in Pokrovsk; Siversk defenses are deteriorating.RF forces continue to fix UAF reserves in urban combat while preparing for the anticipated artillery surge (260th GRAU baseline).

Enemy activity / threat assessment

Ground Maneuver/Firepower: The claimed deployment of the TOS-2 heavy flamethrower system in the Huliaipole area (Zaporizhzhia) suggests RF command intends to use maximum firepower to accelerate tactical breakthroughs. The TOS-2 is specifically designed to clear fortified positions and urban areas rapidly, minimizing RF infantry exposure. This indicates RF forces are prioritizing achieving a breakthrough in the Southern sector concurrent with the existing pressure on the Dnipropetrovsk administrative boundary (Peschanoye).

Aerial/Missile Threat: The confirmed UAV flight path toward Kolomak reinforces the assessment that RF is maintaining a high tempo of deep strike interdiction. Targets likely include critical rail links, fuel depots, or rear area concentrations essential for UAF logistics supporting the Donbas front.

Logistics & Sustainment: The overarching threat remains the logistics strangulation campaign targeting Kostiantynivka and Zatoka (Baseline). The high SAR score at the 260th GRAU arsenal (30.78) indicates the theatre is saturated with munitions, pending delivery, suggesting that the next 6-12 hours could see a significant escalation in RF artillery volume along the primary axes of advance.

Friendly activity (UAF)

UAF forces are maintaining heightened readiness, evidenced by the effective tracking and immediate dissemination of air alerts (Kharkiv/Zaporizhzhia). Focus remains on resource allocation to manage the logistics deficit created by the interdiction strikes and stabilizing the flanks. No offensive maneuvers were reported during this window.

Information environment / disinformation

RF state media (TASS) is actively leveraging combat footage (TOS-2 deployment) to generate specific fear effects regarding RF breaching capabilities on the Zaporizhzhia axis. This serves to bolster domestic morale and potentially suppress UAF resolve in heavily fortified sectors like Huliaipole. There is no new intelligence countering the baseline IO regarding Western abandonment.

Outlook (next 6-12h)

MLCOA (Exploitation and Suppression): (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF forces will continue to use specialized assets (TOS-2, heavy artillery) to rapidly clear localized strong points in the Zaporizhzhia region, focusing on expanding the Peschanoye salient or creating a breakthrough along the Huliaipole line. Concurrent air strikes on rear echelon logistics nodes (mirroring the Kolomak threat) will continue to throttle UAF resupply efforts to Siversk and Pokrovsk.

MDCOA (Breakthrough to Operational Depth): (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Should the specialized firepower succeed in forcing an immediate UAF withdrawal or collapse of specific defenses near Huliaipole, RF Vostok Group will attempt rapid exploitation toward key transportation hubs northwest of the current line, widening the threat to Dnipro City access routes.

Intelligence gaps & collection requirements

PriorityGap/RequirementRationale
P1 (CRITICAL)Siversk Disposition.The "rapid deterioration" reported in the baseline requires specific RF force identification (which reserves committed? size?) to determine if UAF should commit emergency reinforcements or prepare for tactical withdrawal.
P2 (URGENT)260th GRAU Destination.Confirming the rail outflow vector (South/Vostok Group vs. East/Pokrovsk focus) is crucial for identifying the main RF operational effort over the next 72 hours.
P3 (URGENT)Peschanoye Bridgehead Depth.Confirmation of heavy armor/mechanized vehicle presence west of the Gaychur River is required to validate the maneuver potential toward Pokrovsk’s rear.
P4 (PRIORITY)TOS-2 Confirmation/Effectiveness.Tasking ISR assets to Huliaipole/Zaporizhzhia sector to confirm the physical presence and assessed target destruction caused by the TOS-2 system. This informs UAF counter-fire and target hardening protocols.
P5 (PRIORITY)Kolomak UAV Target ID.Identify the specific infrastructure asset targeted by the confirmed UAV vector to Kolomak to activate specific protection measures and redundancy planning.
Previous (2025-12-16 02:05:35Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.