Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (O-SITREP)

DTG: 122200Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: SKDH PINCER CLOSURE IMMINENT // MARITIME ESCALATION TRIGGER PULSED // MYRNOHRAD DEFENSIVE PRESSURE MOUNTING

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-SUM)

The operational environment is characterized by an immediate tactical crisis in the Donbas, synchronized with a strategic escalation threat driven by developments in the Black Sea and financial domains. The Russian Federation (RF) continues final preparatory actions for the kinetic saturation phase targeting the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Hub (SKDH). Critical intelligence reports suggest the escalation trigger for the Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)—RF retaliation over maritime strikes—may have been activated via media reporting.

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The RF operational objective of SKDH isolation persists following the loss of Siversk and the probable seizure of Pokrovsk.

• Myrnohrad Axis (NEW FOCUS): UAF forces are now engaged in defensive actions south of Myrnohrad. This area, located West/Southwest of Pokrovsk, represents the critical deep flank defense protecting the Konstantinovka logistics line from rapid RF exploitation. RF troop movement in the tree lines south of Myrnohrad is confirmed. (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• SKDH Nexus: The T0504/T0514 highway nexus remains the immediate center of gravity (CoG). Disruption of the imminent massed fires (260th GRAU) is paramount for survival of the SKDH.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear winter weather persists, favoring RF reconnaissance and the use of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs).

• Odesa Infrastructure: RF continues to exploit infrastructure damage for psychological and operational effect. The documented damage to the DTEK substation and follow-on IO messaging by pro-RF channels (e.g., Colonelcassad) confirms RF intent to maximize public friction and resource diversion through sustained kinetic attacks on critical services.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces: Expected initiation of preparatory fires NLT 130000Z DEC. The RF IO apparatus has begun synchronizing threats related to both potential UAF maritime strikes and EU financial sanctions (asset expropriation), signaling a pre-emptive framing for broad retaliation.
• UAF Forces: Successful stabilization in the Kupyansk sector (Kindrashivka, Radkivka) continues to provide marginal relief. Forces are establishing fortified crisis defense west of Siversk and south of Myrnohrad.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Primary Kinetic Intention: Execute Operation "Hammer Blow" (massed GRAU fires and mechanized assault) to achieve operational isolation of SKDH NLT 130000Z DEC.
• Escalation Intent (Maritime/Financial): RF messaging (Slutsky/Alex Parker Returns) now explicitly links the potential expropriation of Russian sovereign assets by the EU (€210B) to the high-threat "crossing the Rubicon" rhetoric previously reserved for potential UAF maritime strikes.
  • Judgement: The RF is broadening the set of actions that constitute an existential threat, increasing the probability of a disproportionate response should the EU proceed with asset expropriation (anticipated 18-19 DEC summit) or should the UAF execute maritime attacks on the "Shadow Fleet." (JUDGMENT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Confirmed Advance South of Myrnohrad: RF reconnaissance and maneuver units are probing the defensive depth directly south of Myrnohrad. This advance threatens the integrity of the rear lines supporting Konstantinovka. (FACT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE, based on DeepState reporting and Dempster-Shafer belief score of 0.176 for Russian troop movement).
• IO Exploitation: RF military bloggers are actively documenting and mocking the damage and subsequent repair efforts (DTEK), maximizing the psychological impact of deep strikes.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

The immediate kinetic threat remains the mobile 260th GRAU payload. Lack of confirmation on the train's specific railhead (Ilovaisk vs. Volnovakha) presents a critical targeting constraint. Continued RF reliance on internal fundraising for frontline armor protection suggests structural deficiencies in troop equipment sustainment remain unresolved.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating deep strikes and preparing the Donbas maneuver. The synchronicity between state diplomats (Slutsky) and military bloggers (Colonelcassad) in framing escalation indicates high-level synchronization of the IO campaign supporting kinetic actions.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is at maximum alert in the Donbas. The stabilization of Kupyansk is a critical tactical success, but the operational reserve remains severely strained by the simultaneous threats on the SKDH flanks and the requirements of deep rear defense (Odesa/Sumy).

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Kupyansk): Localized clearing operations are confirmed (Yuvileiny, Kindrashivka/Radkivka). The success is publicly attributed by military commentators (Operatyvny ZSU, Tsapliyenko) to Major General Mykhailo Drapatiy, Commander of the Joint Forces Grouping.
• Setback (Recognition/Morale): Public commentary highlights the alleged lack of official recognition for key operational successes (Drapatiy), indicating a potential friction point within the strategic command structure or a failure in official UAF Strategic Communications (StratCom) regarding operational credit. (JUDGMENT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraints are Mobile Air Defense (AD) assets and engineering resources.

• AD Requirement: Protecting the exposed logistics hub of Sumy/Pryluky and highly vulnerable repair crews in Odesa remains an unfulfilled dual requirement that strains AD capacity needed in the Donbas.
• Engineering Requirement: Immediate need to harden secondary lines south of Myrnohrad to counter the newly confirmed RF probing.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Escalation Deterrence: The RF is actively maximizing the perceived risk of retaliation by coupling the threats of kinetic response (maritime strikes) with financial retribution (asset expropriation). The narrative aims to deter Western political decisions due on 18-19 DEC and deter immediate UAF maritime action.
• UAF Narrative: UAF focused on confirming operational success (Kupyansk) and highlighting high-level diplomatic engagement (Zelenskyy meeting EU leaders in Germany) to stabilize domestic morale and reinforce the necessity of international support.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic morale is under stress due to the looming SKDH threat and confirmed critical infrastructure damage. The public acknowledgement of tactical successes (Kupyansk) and high-level command performance (Drapatiy commentary) is critical for counteracting RF narratives of ubiquitous UAF desperation (as cited from The Atlantic by RF channels).

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• CRITICAL MARITIME AUTHORIZATION (NEW INTEL): Media reports (DW) alleging that the U.S. has provided "green light" authorization for UAF strikes on the RF "Shadow Fleet" represents a potential operational policy shift and a critical escalation trigger. (FACT/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - based on media source reliability, requires official confirmation.)
• Financial Leverage: The EU’s firm stance (Kallas) on freezing €210B until reparations are paid strengthens UAF economic leverage but simultaneously lowers the RF's threshold for strategic retaliation.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (P-AN)

TIME HORIZON: Next 12-24 Hours (NLT 132200Z DEC 25)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

Operational Isolation of SKDH via Kinetic Saturation and Maneuver (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Massed Fires Initiation: RF Command initiates preparatory fire (260th GRAU) against the T0504/T0514 nexus NLT 130000Z DEC.
2. Exploitation: Mechanized units initiate exploitation from Pokrovsk and simultaneously pressure the defensive lines south of Myrnohrad, aiming to disrupt the rear-area UAF C2 and logistics supporting Konstantinovka.
3. Sustained Attrition: Deep strikes continue targeting Odesa/Sumy logistical assets, forcing UAF AD dispersal.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

Immediate RF Retaliation Triggered by Policy Action (HIGH CONFIDENCE IF TRIGGER PULSED):

1. MDCOA Trigger: Formal confirmation (or the perception of immediate execution based on media reports) of UAF maritime strikes against the RF "Shadow Fleet," OR the announcement of formalized EU legal steps toward expropriation of the frozen €210B assets.
2. RF Response: RF executes immediate, severe kinetic retaliation, potentially involving:
   • A significant, high-casualty Ballistic Missile strike on a major UAF C2 facility or military/governmental target, justifying the use of the "Dirty Bomb" IO narrative as pretext.
   • A coordinated attack on international shipping lanes (Black Sea) to collapse diplomatic security guarantees entirely.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CCIR)

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS (ACTION-REC)

1. PRIORITY TARGETING (J3/J2): DISRUPT GRAU DELIVERY NOW.

   • Action: Immediate execution of deep strikes on Volnovakha and Ilovaisk rail switches and transfer points. The window for disruption before massed fires initiate (NLT 130000Z DEC) is closing. Prioritize kinetic destruction of infrastructure over waiting for full cargo confirmation.

2. COUNTER-MANEUVER (OC EAST): HARDEN MYRNOHRAD SOUTH FLANK.

   • Action: Immediately divert all available engineer units and mine-laying systems to establish rapid defensive depth along the main access routes south of Myrnohrad. Use FPV/drone units to create a sustained delay zone against the confirmed RF probes in the southern tree lines.

3. STRATEGIC RESPONSE (GUR/Naval Command): PRE-EMPTIVE MDCOA ACTIVATION.

   • Action A: Based on the high-credibility media reports concerning the maritime "green light," activate OpPlan Neptune defensive posture immediately (Do not wait for formal diplomatic confirmation). This includes pre-positioning AD assets to protect coastal logistics and C2 hubs.
   • Action B (StratCom): UAF official channels must immediately utilize the Kupyansk success to boost internal morale. Provide measured, delayed, or subtle official credit to high-performing commanders (e.g., Major General Drapatiy) to leverage the positive public narrative and address internal military friction.

4. AIR DEFENSE & FORCE PROTECTION (OC SOUTH/NORTH): PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE TEAMS.

   • Action: Re-task existing VSHORAD/MANPADS assets (currently near SKDH if necessary) for dedicated, mobile escort protection of DSNS and DTEK repair teams operating in the Odesa and Sumy operational rear. RF intent to deliberately target repair crews (secondary strikes) must be countered by lethal close-range AD coverage.