Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (O-SITREP)

DTG: 121800Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: SKDH PHASE TRANSITION // BLACK SEA-CASPIAN DEEP BATTLE ESCALATION

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-SUM)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture in Donetsk Oblast indicates a critical phase transition from UAF defense-in-depth to RF terminal exploitation against the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk Defensive Hub (SKDH).

• SKDH South Flank: Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) is now assessed as CONFIRMED RF CONTROL. RF forces are leveraging the city for logistics staging and immediate information operations (IO) following "liberation" claims. This accelerates the threat to the western supply lines of Konstantinovka and Kramatorsk.
• Exploitation Axis: RF Vostok Group exploitation forces remain active near Vozdvizhevka, confirming successful deep penetration and an immediate threat to the key road network leading into Kramatorsk (T0514/T0504 axes).
• Deep Battle Geometry: UAF deep strikes have expanded their domain. The reported targeting of RF logistical vessels in the Caspian Sea creates a new, non-conventional deep battle axis, diverting RF attention and potentially disrupting strategic logistical flows.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors

• Scheduled national power blackouts (NLT 13 DEC) remain the primary non-kinetic constraint, requiring high resource prioritization for critical C2 nodes and air defense systems in the south.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF OC East: Engaged in a rapid, sequenced fighting withdrawal and defensive hardening along the axis Konstantinovka–Kramatorsk. Priority must shift to securing the western and northwestern flanks of Kramatorsk city limits.
• RF Forces: Main effort is kinetic exploitation in Donetsk, synchronized with a massive preparatory artillery surge pending the arrival of the 260th GRAU shipment. RF is actively consolidating gains and immediately deploying IO narratives in Pokrovsk.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREATCON)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Artillery Saturation (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent is to achieve maximum kinetic effect against Kramatorsk and remaining UAF positions through the immediate deployment of the 260th GRAU munitions. This is the decisive factor in the next 48 hours.
• Rapid Urban Encirclement (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The confirmed control of Pokrovsk allows RF forces to pivot north towards Kramatorsk on multiple axes simultaneously, aiming to link up with forces advancing west of the now-lost Siversk line, completing operational isolation.
• Logistical Sustainment (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF reliance on mobilized civilian assets (e.g., the 5th motor convoy of off-road vehicles for the Donetsk direction) suggests RF combat logistics for forward maneuver units are under strain, but they are adapting by leveraging civilian mobilization.

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift to IO Hubs: RF is immediately deploying state media and milbloggers into seized areas (Pokrovsk) to establish rapid control of the narrative and project stability. This includes utilizing civilian infrastructure (e.g., highlighting church damage) to generate tactical IO advantages.
• Drone Threat Persistence: Confirmed ongoing Shahed activity targeting rear areas (Chernihiv alert), concurrent with the main effort in Donetsk. This maintains pressure on UAF air defense assets.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

The 260th GRAU shipment remains the critical logistical trigger for the entire Donetsk offensive. Its arrival and offloading are assessed as imminent (NLT 130000Z DEC). UAF deep strikes against the Yaroslavl Oil Refinery (confirmed) and potential strikes in the Caspian Sea (unconfirmed but reported) are indicators of UAF efforts to interdict RF strategic energy and supply chains.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing the kinetic offensive in Donetsk with deep strikes (Odesa) and proactive information campaigns (Pokrovsk IO). The ability to rapidly utilize seized ground for propaganda purposes demonstrates centralized, flexible command direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are postured for critical defensive maneuvers around Kramatorsk. The ability to execute deep, strategic interdiction (Yaroslavl Refinery hit) and project force into the Caspian maritime domain (reported) demonstrates high strategic resolve and capability in the multi-domain warfare space.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Confirmed strike on Yaroslavl Oil Refinery, impacting RF deep logistical capacity. (FACT)
  • Reported strikes on Russian cargo vessels in the Caspian Sea, representing a significant strategic targeting expansion if confirmed. (JUDGMENT/LOW CONFIDENCE - Requires immediate verification).
• Setbacks:
  • Confirmed loss of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) and establishment of RF forward positions. (FACT/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Continued diplomatic pressure via the Turkish moratorium proposal.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate resource requirement is accurate, real-time targeting data for the GRAU shipment. A medium-term constraint is emerging from EU financial negotiations, specifically the Belgian demand regarding "reparation credit," which could complicate the delivery of necessary long-term financial aid.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (INFOWAR)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• Pokrovsk IO Saturation (FACT/JUDGMENT): RF is immediately leveraging the seizure of Pokrovsk to push narratives of "liberation" and UAF war crimes (e.g., shelling the church). This attempts to mask the operational significance of the SKDH collapse.
• Strategic Distraction: RF continues to promote its alliances (e.g., Nicaragua friendship festival) to dilute international focus from the tactical reality in Donetsk.
• Negotiation Frame (FACT): RF C2 is closely monitoring UAF negotiation efforts (Umerov/Patel meetings, Zelensky on Rammstein's focus on security guarantees). RF messaging seeks to frame UAF political moves as desperate or non-genuine.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF military morale remains robust, supported by high-level leadership engagement (Kupyansk) and perceived success in deep strikes (Yaroslavl, Caspian reports).

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Rammstein Focus Shift: UAF is successfully setting the agenda for the next Rammstein meeting toward long-term security guarantees and post-war reconstruction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• EU Financial Friction (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The emerging dispute over Belgium's demands regarding "reparation credit" and the use of frozen Russian assets indicates potential complexity and delays in securing future large-scale EU financial support. This may provide an IO opportunity for RF.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (P-AN)

TIME HORIZON: Next 24-48 Hours (NLT 14 DEC 25)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA)

Synchronized Artillery and Maneuver Assault (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF forces will execute a decisive phase of the SKDH campaign, prioritizing the operational isolation of Kramatorsk.

1. GRAU Fire: The 260th GRAU munitions will be rapidly deployed and initiate massive preparatory and suppression fires targeting UAF defensive zones and western approaches to Kramatorsk (NLT 130000Z DEC).
2. Pincer Maneuver: Vostok Group forces, having consolidated Pokrovsk, will push North/Northeast, attempting to bypass Konstantinovka (now semi-isolated) and link up with northern RF elements, cutting the last major supply routes (T0514/T0504) into Kramatorsk.
3. Blackout Exploitation: RF will increase kinetic strikes against remaining energy infrastructure (using Shaheds/missiles, as signaled by milbloggers) to coincide with scheduled national blackouts, degrading UAF C2 and EW effectiveness.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA)

Immediate Strategic Collapse and Diplomatic Stalemate (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE):

1. Massive, sustained GRAU artillery fires break UAF forward defensive lines faster than anticipated, forcing an unplanned, costly fighting withdrawal from Kramatorsk.
2. The Turkish moratorium proposal gains sufficient diplomatic traction, allowing RF to pressure Western partners into a temporary pause in heavy weapon deliveries or deep strike support, granting RF crucial consolidation time.
3. The Belgian/EU financial dispute escalates, casting immediate doubt on the viability of future large-scale EU reconstruction and support funding, undermining UAF strategic resilience messaging.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CCIR)

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS (ACTION-REC)

1. PRIORITY TARGETING (J2/J3): GRAU INTERDICTION.
   • Action: Execute pre-planned deep strikes against designated rail switches (Volnovakha/Ilovaisk) NLT 122000Z DEC. This window is closing rapidly. Failure to interdict the GRAU surge ensures a massive increase in RF kinetic advantage.
2. MANEUVER & FORCE PROTECTION (OC EAST): DEFEND KRAMATORSK REAR.
   • Action: Immediately commit the minimum essential reserves necessary to establish robust, prepared defenses (anti-armor ditches, layered minefields) along the key approaches (T0514/T0504) to Kramatorsk, prioritizing the SW axis exploited via Vozdvizhevka.
3. STRATCOM & DIPLOMACY (MFA/J7): ADDRESS CASPIAN/EU FRICTION.
   • Action A: If the Caspian Sea strike is confirmed, immediately leverage the information to demonstrate UAF long-range strategic targeting capabilities and complicate RF maritime logistics.
   • Action B: Diplomatic channels must proactively address and mitigate the Belgian "reparation credit" issue to prevent it from becoming an RF IO asset used to sow discord in the EU support coalition.
4. INFORMATION DEFENSE (SSO/J7): COUNTER POKROVSK NARRATIVE.
   • Action: Immediately deploy an information campaign focused on the forced evacuation, indiscriminate shelling, and human cost of RF seizure of Pokrovsk, preemptively neutralizing the RF church-damage narrative currently being propagated.