Situation Report

SITREP UPDATE 121349Z DEC 25

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The operational situation remains critical in the Donetsk sector, specifically concerning the RF pincer movement targeting the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk defensive hub.

• Northern Axis (Siversk): Previous intelligence assessed Siversk as seized. Current UAF reporting (Fact) indicates active fighting continues within the Siversk area, contradicting initial RF seizure claims. The immediate northern approaches to Slovyansk remain under severe threat of exploitation.
• Southern Axis (Konstantinovka/Pokrovsk): Urban combat inside Konstantinovka persists. RF IO claims of control over Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) are assessed as premature but signify high-tempo pressure on the south-western flank, likely an effort to divert UAF reserves.
• Deep Operations: RF kinetic operations are ongoing across the depth of UAF territory, evidenced by active ballistic missile alerts in Kharkiv (Pechenihy) and Odesa/Chornomorsk. UAF maintains active deep-strike capability, causing air alerts across the RF Federation (Lipetsk Oblast).

B. Weather and Environmental Factors (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) No significant new weather data. Cold temperatures and potentially frozen ground (typical December conditions) may enhance off-road mobility for mechanized forces, favoring RF exploitation attempts in the Siversk and Pokrovsk gaps.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF forces continue to concentrate operational firepower for the convergence on Kramatorsk. UAF forces are executing localized counter-attacks and maintaining a highly structured, yet strained, defense, relying on specialized units (3 OSHB) for critical holding actions and FPV usage for attrition. Air defense assets are highly reactive to ballistic threats in the Black Sea and Kharkiv regions.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RED CELL)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Primary Intent: Achieve operational isolation of Slovyansk-Kramatorsk and influence Western aid decisions through rapid, high-profile territorial claims (e.g., Siversk, Pokrovsk).
• Artillery Surge (CRITICAL): The 260th GRAU logistical convoy remains the most significant imminent threat. Its departure confirms the intent to substantially increase fire rates across the Donbas front within the next 48 hours.
• Deep Strike: RF retains reliable ballistic missile capability to strike critical infrastructure and C2 nodes in coastal and eastern regions.

B. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF military bloggers are immediately propagating claims of major city seizures (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk), suggesting a shift toward aggressive information warfare designed to amplify tactical gains before operational control is established. This indicates an understanding that Western response timing is critical.

C. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL UNKNOWN) The status and location of the 260th GRAU cargo are unknown (Intelligence Gap P1). The successful deployment of this ordnance will directly enable the anticipated RF artillery saturation strike (expected NLT 130000Z DEC). RF is also actively targeting UAF rear-area logistics (Kupyansk tunnel strike claim), indicating continued counter-battery and interdiction focus.

D. Command and Control Effectiveness (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) UAF counter-C2/EW efforts in the Siversk sector appear to have been temporarily effective. However, the coordinated ballistic strikes on Odesa and Kharkiv demonstrate integrated long-range C2 remains intact. Incidents like the UXO drop near a kindergarten in Belgorod suggest localized tactical C2/safety protocol failure within some RF forward-deployed units.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness (HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF defenses are resilient but stretched. The commitment to using previously Unauthorized Absence (SZCh) personnel in assault units confirms acute manpower shortages, requiring careful management of unit cohesion and disciplinary risk. UAF counter-IO confirming Siversk is still contested is vital for maintaining forward unit morale and delaying RF tactical exploitation.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Successes: Confirmed capture/surrender of RF personnel in Zaporizhzhia (Novodanylivka sector). Maintenance of contested status in Siversk, preventing an immediate northern collapse. Confirmed deep strikes resulting in internal RF alerts (Lipetsk).
• Setbacks: Confirmed ballistic missile impacts in Odesa (civilian and/or critical infrastructure damage expected). Forced retrograde operations continue in Zaporizhzhia (Plan PHOENIX context).

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Immediate requirement for reconnaissance and kinetic assets to identify and interdict the mobile 260th GRAU logistical column. Sustained air defense materiel is required to counter high-speed threats (ballistics) targeting critical infrastructure in port cities (Odesa/Chornomorsk) and operational centers (Kharkiv).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IO)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• RF Narrative: Aggressive promotion of rapid operational success ("Seizure of Pokrovsk," "Siversk secured"). Focus remains on justifying the conflict by citing the destruction of NATO-supplied equipment.
• UAF Narrative: Highlighting resilience (Siversk contestation), prisoner capture (Novodanylivka), and strategic diplomatic wins (ambitious 2027 EU accession target). This accession goal directly counters the RF "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative.

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF morale faces friction due to internal resource reallocation (Kursk region suspending victim payouts) and confirmed domestic ordnance failures (Belgorod UXO). UAF morale is supported by the EU narrative but remains exposed to the critical manpower strain (SZCh policy) and daily ballistic attacks.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Diplomatic traffic is high:

• Ukraine: Promoting a clear, aggressive timeline for EU integration (2027). Scheduled high-level consultations in Berlin (Zelenskyy/Chancellor Merz).
• Russia: Attempting to leverage Turkish mediation (Putin-Erdogan meeting). RF also attempting to normalize its status internationally (ROC reinstatement discussion).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will escalate pressure along the Konstantinovka axis, attempting to utilize VKS and heavy artillery to break UAF urban defense resilience. Simultaneous heavy mechanized probing attacks will continue South of Siversk, attempting to envelop UAF defensive lines now that the city is contested rather than fully seized.

Expected Timeline: Critical decision points NLT 130000Z DEC (arrival of 260th GRAU ordnance) and 131200Z DEC (potential culmination of urban combat in Konstantinovka).

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a successful, coordinated breakthrough either north of Slovyansk (if Siversk defenses collapse) or through the Konstantinovka urban area. Exploitation units rapidly isolate the Kramatorsk-Slovyansk road network. Crucially, the 260th GRAU convoy is successfully deployed to forward positions (Volnovakha/Ilovaisk) and executes a coordinated, deep-fire mission against UAF main C2 nodes and reserve assembly areas, crippling reinforcement capacity.

C. Intelligence Gaps and Collection Requirements

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Targeting and Deep Strike (J2/J3 – IMMEDIATE PRIORITY)

1. EXECUTE LOGISTICAL INTERDICTION (260th GRAU): Shift all available long-range reconnaissance and strike assets (HIMARS, SCALP/Storm Shadow, Deep-Strike UAVs) to the identified logistical choke points (Ilovaisk/Volnovakha). Interdiction of this cargo en route is paramount to prevent mass artillery saturation.
2. AIR DEFENSE PRIORITY SHIFT: Allocate mobile air defense systems (MANPADS/SHORAD) immediately to defend logistics nodes in the Odesa/Chornomorsk area and key rail heads in the Kharkiv sector following confirmed ballistic threats.

B. Maneuver and Force Protection (OC East – URGENT PRIORITY)

1. SUPPORT SIVERSK DEFENSE: Provide immediate artillery and counter-battery support to the forces actively defending Siversk. This is not a withdrawal, but a holding action. Utilize engineering assets to rapidly emplace hasty defensive barriers (mines, obstacles) west of the city limits to prepare for potential retrograde.
2. CONSOLIDATE KRAMATORSK DEFENSE: Utilize the current combat window to expedite the transfer of critical supplies and Territorial Defense (TDF) units into Kramatorsk to fortify internal defensive sectors in anticipation of the full pincer closure.

C. Information Warfare and Strategic Communications (P7 – IMMEDIATE)

1. COUNTER NARRATIVE – SIVERSK/POKROVSK: Issue official military statements clarifying that Siversk is still contested and explicitly denying RF claims of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiysk) control. Highlight the successful capture of RF personnel (Novodanylivka) to boost internal morale.
2. LEVERAGE EU ACCESSION: Ensure the diplomatic push (Berlin visit, 2027 EU target) is widely publicized internally and internationally to contrast Ukrainian progress with Russian military setbacks and domestic economic strain (Kursk payouts).

//END OF REPORT//