Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 121300Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: CATASTROPHIC RISK WARNING: RF CLAIMS POKRSOVSK (KRASNOARMEYSK) SEIZURE. GRAU INTERDICTION WINDOW CLOSING (H-5.0).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is transitioning from critical stress to potential operational collapse in the Donetsk Sector (OC East Area of Responsibility).

• SKDA Pincer (Donetsk): The primary center of gravity is now the defense of the main logistical and defensive hub of Pokrovsk (historically Krasnoarmeysk).
  • CRITICAL UNVERIFIED INTEL (CUI): RF sources (Starshie Eddy) claim the seizure of Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmeysk and feature personnel from the 27th Guards MRD and 506th MRR holding the RF flag in the city (Analytical Judgment: Fact of Claim, HIGH Impact). If confirmed, this signifies that the pincer movement has achieved a breakthrough depth far exceeding previous assessments, bypassing Konstantinovka and critically isolating Slovyansk/Kramatorsk.
  • Konstantinovka: Urban combat confirmed, but tactical focus shifts from holding the city center to preventing exploitation routes stemming from the alleged Pokrovsk breach.
• Northern Axis (Kupiansk): UAF operational control is confirmed and stabilized. President Zelenskyy's physical visit to the city perimeter (1212Z DEC) serves as a decisive political signal of UAF victory and operational security in the sector (Fact).
• Deep Battle/Crimea: Sustained UAF kinetic action. Confirmed successful destruction of one RF AN-26 transport aircraft and two radar systems, including confirmed casualties among the aircrew (Fact).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold weather persists. Conditions favor RF long-range logistics movements (GRAU cargo) and sustained high-altitude ISR/strike operations by both sides.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are in a state of immediate crisis response. Units previously stabilizing the Kupiansk sector must now be considered the primary strategic reserve for the SKDA. All LRPF (Long-Range Precision Fire) assets must be immediately re-tasked for the GRAU interdiction mission, as the window for engagement closes NLT 121800Z DEC.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

The current RF intention is the immediate achievement of the Donbas objective via operational encirclement, backed by saturation fire capability.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary adaptation is the high-speed operational tempo demonstrated by RF forces, suggesting a successful exploitation of the Siversk/Konstantinovka breaches if the Pokrovsk claim holds. The use of long-range UAVs for anti-airfield OPSEC criticism (Fighterbomber) suggests vulnerabilities in RF tactical depth defenses, which UAF should continue to exploit.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

CRITICAL TIME SENSITIVE LOGISTICS: The 260th GRAU cargo must be interdicted NLT 121800Z DEC. Failure to achieve BDA against this high-payoff target set will allow RF forces to initiate an unsustainable saturation fire campaign.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 appears effective in coordinating multi-domain harassment (Sumy) and sustaining the offensive impetus on the main effort (SKDA). Russian military bloggers criticizing poor OPSEC near airfields indicate systemic logistical C2 failures below the strategic level, confirming that successful UAF deep strikes target genuine RF vulnerabilities.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness is currently optimized for a deep defensive fight. The stabilization of Kupiansk provides a critical operational reserve opportunity. However, the integrity of the SKDA line is now in question pending verification of the Pokrovsk claim.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Major Success (IO/Political/Operational): Zelenskyy visit to Kupiansk successfully frames the Kupiansk defense as a strategic victory and publicly refutes RF claims of control.
• Success (Deep Battle): Confirmed BDA in Crimea (AN-26, two radar systems, crew). This temporarily degrades RF ISR/transport capacity and maintains pressure on the Southern theater.
• Setback (SKDA Pincer): The penetration of Konstantinovka and the severe, unverified threat to Pokrovsk are setbacks that may mandate a pre-planned, controlled withdrawal.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. ISR/Recce Assets: All available ISR assets (fixed wing, UAV, HUMINT/SIGINT) must be immediately dedicated to verifying the operational status of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk).
2. LRPF Assets: Total commitment to the GRAU interdiction plan is non-negotiable within the next 5 hours.
3. Manpower (Critical): The SZCh policy signals extreme strain. Rapid, covert redeployment of stabilized units (e.g., NGU Khartia Corps) from the North to the SKDA rear is now the highest maneuver priority.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Narrative Shift: The immediate declaration of Pokrovsk seizure (if false) serves as a potent psychological operation (PSYOP) aimed at forcing UAF commanders into premature, panicked retrograde maneuvers. The simultaneous narrative push for "DMZ Sovereignty" provides political cover for these aggressive actions.
• UAF Narrative: Zelenskyy's visit to Kupiansk is a highly effective strategic communication operation, bolstering domestic morale and international confidence in UAF capacity to hold critical terrain.
• Disinformation Focus: MoD Russia is pushing multiple, coordinated disinformation narratives regarding UAF chemical, nuclear, and biological safety violations (D-S belief $0.16$ cumulative). This is standard deflection but must be monitored for potential False Flag precursor activity.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF tactical/political morale is HIGH following Kupiansk and Crimea BDA. RF morale may be subject to mixed signals: high battlefield success claims contrasted with internal OPSEC criticism and sustained domestic social welfare focus (Moscow senior citizens program).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF IO continues attempts to undermine Western cohesion (targeting Estonian PM during Zelenskyy address). The primary diplomatic threat is the potential success of the "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative, which could pressure Western partners to reduce long-term aid if they perceive the conflict as entering a frozen, partitioned state.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Immediate Fire Preparation: Regardless of the actual status of Pokrovsk, RF forces will initiate preparatory saturation fire on the SKDA line (likely targeting Kramatorsk/Slovyansk approaches) beginning NLT 130000Z DEC, enabled by the GRAU cargo arrival.
2. Exploitation of the Pokrovsk Axis: RF units will continue to exploit the southern pincer, forcing UAF defenders in Konstantinovka to either retreat or face encirclement. Mechanized elements (27th GMRD) will probe aggressively along the T0515 road toward Slovyansk/Kramatorsk.
3. Fixed Forces in the North: Sustained cross-border harassment and limited drone strikes (e.g., Shostka) will continue to fix UAF 1st Line defenses in the Sumy direction, preventing strategic reserve deployment.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (EXTREME Confidence)

1. SKDA Operational Breach and Collapse (The Pokrovsk Scenario): The RF claim of Pokrovsk seizure is verified. UAF forces are critically isolated in Konstantinovka and are forced into an immediate, disorganized retrograde under heavy RF saturation fire (enabled by GRAU cargo). This results in the loss of critical heavy equipment and the subsequent operational encirclement of the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration within 48 hours.
2. Massive CWM False Flag: In conjunction with the breakthrough, RF forces leverage the ongoing IO campaign (MoD chemical/nuclear claims) to conduct a chemical weapons False Flag operation, blaming Kyiv, to justify escalating military action or demanding immediate international negotiation from a position of strength.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS