Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 112300Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: SIVERSK HOLD CONFIRMED (POSITIVE); KONSTANTINOVKA CRISIS INTENSIFIES; CRITICAL LRPF STRIKE WINDOW REMAINS.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The primary operational focus is the RF attempt to execute a dual-axis pincer movement against the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk defense hub.

• Siversk Axis (Northeast): CRITICAL FACT UPDATE: Operational Command "East" confirms Siversk remains under the control of the Defense Forces (ref: 111714Z). This significantly mitigates the threat of an immediate, catastrophic northern flank collapse, which was erroneously assessed in earlier internal reports. However, RF forces continue heavy pressure and local attacks on the immediate western outskirts, attempting to stabilize a forward line (ref: 111717Z).
• Konstantinovka Axis (Southwest): Remains the most kinetic axis. RF forces are confirmed engaged in urban combat and are employing heavy artillery preparation (MLRS/SMERCH/URAGAN) toward the approaches of the city center (ref: 111731Z, Krasnoarmeyskoye direction). The goal remains to isolate the Donbas defensive hub from the southwest.
• Air Domain: RF drone activity (Shahed) targeting rear areas remains consistent (ref: 111734Z, Chernihiv/Kyiv axis). UAF forces demonstrate increased capability against these threats (ref: 111721Z, P1-SUN interceptor success).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Conditions remain typical for early winter, supporting mechanized movement and deep fire operations. No major degradation to air support or reconnaissance flights observed.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are leveraging the successful denial of Siversk to rapidly redirect high-quality reserve forces to stabilize the Konstantinovka/Pokrovsk axis. RF forces maintain centralized strategic command but are adapting tactical logistics (hexacopters) and are rapidly positioning incoming artillery materiel.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capability: RF retains high kinetic capacity, which is expected to surge upon the deployment of the 260th GRAU materiel. RF is actively analyzing and developing countermeasures against UAF deep-strike and drone tactics (ref: 111726Z).

Intention (Kinetic): Exploit the confirmed penetration into Konstantinovka (currently contested, not secured) using overwhelming preparatory fire. The RF objective is to fix UAF forces south of Kramatorsk before the GRAU munitions arrive, allowing for a decisive breakthrough.

Intention (IO/Strategic): To project internal stability and leverage small diplomatic victories (IOC decision on athletes) to offset growing international scrutiny over RF military negligence (ref: 111728Z).

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF military bloggers are explicitly detailing the requirement to counter evolving UAF aerial tactics, particularly Mobile Fire Groups (МОГs) used for air defense against slow-moving targets. This indicates RF tactical C2 is attempting rapid adaptation but struggling with UAF technological agility and dispersion.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL UPDATE)

FACT: SAR indicates the 260th GRAU munitions surge has departed its depot (SAR 0.00). CRITICAL JUDGMENT: The interdiction window for LRPF is highly compressed. The current location is unknown (P1 Gap), but based on transit times, the convoy is likely approaching or staged at major forward rail distribution nodes (Volnovakha/Ilovaisk). Failure to strike within the next 12 hours means dispersal and high RF fire rates are guaranteed.

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF strategic C2 is effective in directing massed fires (Krasnoarmeyskoye direction). However, RF reports regarding the loss of Siversk were premature and contradicted by the subsequent UAF defense confirmation, suggesting localized tactical C2 failures or poor coordination between combat units and high-level information operations.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains strained but stabilized by the Siversk tactical success. Forces in the Konstantinovka sector are under extreme pressure, relying heavily on FPV and specialized drone defense units (P1-SUN) to maintain urban defense integrity.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Tactical Success (Siversk): The successful defense and confirmation of UAF control over Siversk denies the RF the desired immediate northern breakthrough.
• Technological Success (UAV): Successful utilization of the P1-SUN interceptor drone validates UAF investment in dedicated counter-UAV technology, crucial for rear area protection.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the need to rapidly deploy reinforcements and high-density defensive materiel (ATGM, FPV, air defense) to the Konstantinovka sector without compromising the newly stabilized Siversk flank. LRPF assets must be prioritized for the GRAU target set.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF messaging continues the dual focus:

1. Normalization (Domestic): Highlighting domestic legislation (TASS, housing) and international diplomatic gains (IOC sport decision) to project stability and undermine the image of RF as an international pariah.
2. Psychological Warfare (Internal Morale): RF channels (МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ) revealing neglect of wounded veterans (Mikhail/Egor) indicates deep-seated administrative/logistical failures that RF IO is struggling to suppress, leading to internal morale friction (Confidence: MEDIUM).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is reinforced by the Siversk defense success and successful aerial engagement footage (STERNENKO/БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС). International confidence is boosted by aggressive counter-hybrid action (Estonia conviction of pro-Russian politicians).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

CRITICAL FACT: EU progress toward an agreement on utilizing frozen Russian assets is highly favorable for Ukraine, potentially releasing up to 90 billion EUR (ref: 111739Z). This financial maneuver provides significant leverage ahead of upcoming diplomatic meetings and mitigates the impact of potential aid reduction elsewhere. NATO's leadership is simultaneously delivering stern warnings regarding future RF aggression against Europe (ref: 111730Z), maintaining political pressure on Moscow.

(Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. ARTILLERY SATURATION (12-24 HRS): RF operational tempo will be dictated by the GRAU convoy arrival. RF will execute concentrated, massed fire preparation (using MLRS/Uragan/Smerch) against Konstantinovka and UAF defensive positions south of Kramatorsk NLT 121000Z DEC.
2. KONSTANTINOVKA BREACH: RF will exploit the artillery preparation to launch a decisive ground assault to secure the center of Konstantinovka, attempting to push UAF forces west toward Druzhkivka, solidifying the southern pincer.
3. SIVERSK FIXATION: RF forces will continue localized heavy pressure west of Siversk, preventing UAF from freely withdrawing reserves to the critical Konstantinovka sector.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. OPERATIONAL BREAKTHROUGH: The combination of kinetic momentum in Konstantinovka and the arrival of the 260th GRAU materiel results in the functional collapse of UAF defenses on the Southern Kramatorsk flank, forcing a rapid, disorganized retreat.
2. IO DIPLOMATIC COERCION: RF uses the temporary tactical success in Konstantinovka, paired with Western fears of escalation (NATO warnings), to force a non-negotiable territorial demarcation in upcoming strategic talks, leveraging the narrative that further fighting is futile.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS