Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 112000Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: CRITICAL LOGISTICS INTERDICTION WINDOW; SLOVYANSK PINCER ESCALATION; DMZ SOVEREIGNTY NARRATIVE HARDENING

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational crisis remains centered on the defense of the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk urban agglomeration, currently threatened by a converging RF pincer movement.

• Northern Axis (Siversk): Confirmed RF seizure of Siversk is being actively exploited. RF Ministry of Defence (MoD) footage and high-level political statements confirm RF intent to use this breach to facilitate further exploitation toward Slovyansk. The axis of advance is high-priority.
• Southern Axis (Konstantinovka/Pokrovsk): Urban combat inside Konstantinovka continues. UAF 25th Sicheslav Airborne Brigade (DShV ZSU) confirms sustained defensive operations in the Pokrovsk direction, demonstrating localized tactical adaptation (UGV use for medevac).
• Deep Battle/Stand-Off: Confirmed continued RF use of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) against Zaporizhzhia Oblast targets (Air Force ZSU confirmation) and non-frontline strikes against civilian infrastructure in Sumy Oblast (Velykopysarivska). This confirms sustained RF ability to project force deep and maintain pressure on border regions.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes reported. Conditions continue to favor high-tempo mechanized assault and sustained aerial/KAB operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are prioritizing kinetic action on the Siversk-Slovyansk axis to force UAF operational commitment. The shift in the 260th GRAU logistics status implies RF is preparing for an unprecedented saturation fire period NLT 130000Z DEC. UAF defenses are highly stressed, requiring immediate reserve deployment and resource allocation to both contain the Siversk breach and interdict the mobile logistics threat.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capability (HIGH): RF maintains coordinated strategic/operational alignment. The MoD is actively showcasing tactical successes (Siversk) to reinforce political messaging (Putin confirming a planned "security strip").
• Intention (Kinetic): Immediate intention is to rapidly exploit the Siversk breach and achieve operational isolation of the Kramatorsk/Slovyansk hub before UAF reserves can stabilize the northern flank. This maneuver relies heavily on the timely arrival of the 260th GRAU materiel.
• Intention (Strategic): To solidify battlefield gains into political reality by reinforcing the "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative—claiming the current contact line and the proposed buffer zone as sovereign Russian territory.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF continues high-tempo operations and propaganda synchronization. The focus on leveraging the Siversk seizure suggests the RF 3rd Army is the immediate spearhead for the northern pincer element.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (CRITICAL UPDATE)

FACT: SAR monitoring confirms activity at the 260th Central Rocket Artillery Base (GRAU) has dropped to 0.00 (from ~25.00). This indicates the critical munitions surge has departed the depot and is currently in transit, likely via rail.

• Judgment: The logistical threat has transitioned from a fixed target (depot) to a mobile, time-sensitive target (rail convoy/choke points). Failure to interdict this convoy en route will result in sustained, overwhelming RF artillery fire NLT 130000Z DEC. (Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

Strategic C2 remains highly effective, driven by public presidential engagement and immediate IO amplification of battlefield successes. The previously identified tactical C2 vulnerability near Siversk (UAF EW strike) presents a critical, time-limited window for replication.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are adapting under extreme pressure. Readiness is characterized by high operational tempo across multiple fronts. The General Staff policy to reassign Unauthorized Absence (SZCh) personnel to assault units indicates critical manpower strain and high-risk resource management.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Adaptation): Confirmed deployment and operational use of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) by DShV units for casualty evacuation in the Pokrovsk direction, successfully reducing risk to combat medics and improving casualty survival rates.
• Success (Deep Strike): Confirmed UAF kinetic strike on the Lukoil Caspian Sea platform demonstrates maintained deep-strike reach and intent to disrupt RF energy infrastructure far from the contact line.
• Setback: Confirmed loss of Siversk, establishing an immediate, high-speed penetration threat toward Slovyansk.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The most acute constraint is the Target Acquisition (TA) and Long-Range Precision Fire (LRPF) capacity required to locate and strike the 260th GRAU mobile convoy before it disperses at the forward railheads (Volnovakha/Ilovaisk). Secondary constraints include maintaining SHORAD coverage against continuous KAB attacks and stabilizing the Northern flank with combat reserves.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF state media (TASS, MoD) is aggressively leveraging the Siversk capture to support the strategic narrative: successful kinetic operations justify the political objective. Putin's explicit statement confirming the formation of a "security strip" formalizes the DMZ Sovereignty claim, potentially preempting diplomatic leverage. RF also pushes internal IO regarding veteran financial benefits (PSB cards).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is stressed by deep strikes (Sumy civilian casualties) but is countered by examples of resilience and technological innovation (UGV deployment). Ukrainian HUR reports highlight RF psychological operations aimed at militarizing minors in occupied territories, signaling a long-term demographic and military threat.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

FACT: EU ambassadors have initiated the procedure for the long-term freezing of Russian assets, signaling sustained economic pressure and support for Ukrainian leverage. RF explicitly denies engaging with the US on updates to the peace plan, confirming their current diplomatic intransigence based on perceived battlefield success. (Confidence Assessment: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Northern Exploitation: RF 3rd Army maximizes momentum from Siversk, conducting heavy mechanized reconnaissance and advance South/Southwest toward Slovyansk (NLT 121800Z DEC) to establish forward fire positions.
2. Logistics Dispersal: The 260th GRAU convoy will successfully reach and disperse at forward railheads (Volnovakha/Ilovaisk) NLT 121200Z DEC, enabling the massive surge of artillery saturation needed for the final assault on Konstantinovka/Kramatorsk by 130000Z DEC.
3. IO Consolidation: RF media will continue to link every kinetic gain directly to the "DMZ Sovereignty" narrative, attempting to create a fait accompli for international observers.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) – (HIGH Confidence)

1. Operational Collapse (Fire Superiority): The failure to interdict the 260th GRAU mobile cargo allows RF artillery to achieve overwhelming fire superiority (up to 2x current saturation), facilitating a breakthrough on both the Siversk and Konstantinovka axes, resulting in the operational encirclement of the Kramatorsk Defensive Area.
2. Strategic Isolation: The explicit RF "DMZ Sovereignty" claim is accepted by key Western political factions, leading to a de facto freeze on long-range weapon supplies necessary to counter RF logistics and deep strike capability.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS