Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) - OPERATIONAL CRISIS UPDATE

TIME: 101830Z DEC 25

REFERENCE: Previous ISR 101800Z DEC 25; Daily Intelligence Summary 101501Z DEC 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational situation remains defined by the escalating crisis at the Dimitrov salient (Pokrovsk direction) and sustained UAF operational successes in the maritime and deep battle domains. RF information operations (IO) are now amplifying localized tactical claims to the strategic level.

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk): RF propagandists claim the introduction of tanks into Krasnoarmeysk (Pokrovsk) itself, directly contradicting UAF Commander-in-Chief statements. (FACT: RF Claim. JUDGMENT: Highly improbable presence within the city center, but indicative of aggressive RF penetration attempts and exploitation of the Dimitrov collapse, aiming to undermine UAF C2 credibility.) The integrity of the main defense line W of Grishino is under maximum pressure. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Black Sea: Confirmed successful Ukrainian Surface Vessel (USV) strike against a second RF shadow fleet tanker. This reinforces UAF operational control of the sea denial zone and pressures RF energy/logistics sustainment. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Logistics Corridors (NW Odesa/Dnipropetrovsk): UAF 2nd Battalion, 37th Marine Brigade (OBRMp) secured a significant tactical victory near Ivanivka, capturing 10 RF personnel. This success directly counters the previous identified RF attempt to interdict the Shyriaieve/Ivanivka logistics corridor. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Dnipropetrovsk Border: RF sources are reporting alleged tactical ground movements/reconnaissance activity near Mezheva - Novopodhorodne, suggesting a potential diversionary threat or probing action against the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border. (Confidence: MEDIUM)

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Dense fog and low visibility conditions continue to favor RF mechanized armor operations in the Pokrovsk sector. RF is exploiting the cover provided by weather and darkness to increase the tempo of heavy armor employment. (Confidence: HIGH)

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF Dispositions: UAF reserves are heavily focused on preventing a kinetic collapse west of Grishino. UAF specialized units (Marines, FPV/Artillery) are exhibiting high lethality and local success, particularly in the deep battle (USV strikes) and logistics security zones (Ivanivka).

RF Dispositions: RF C2 is synchronizing high-risk mechanized assaults (Pokrovsk) with aggressive strategic IO (Pokrovsk penetration claims, diplomatic pressure narratives). RF forces continue to use North Korean-supplied equipment (Type 75 MLRS confirmed destroyed).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RF THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

INTENTION (OPERATIONAL): RF primary operational objective remains the full encirclement and liquidation of the Dimitrov pocket NLT 110600Z DEC 25, followed by kinetic exploitation toward Pokrovsk city defenses. RF secondary intention is to establish favorable pre-summit diplomatic conditions via strategic leaks and propaganda.

CAPABILITIES:

• Coordinated IO/Kinetic Strategy: RF demonstrates the capacity to immediately generate and amplify maximalist tactical claims (tanks in Pokrovsk) to coincide with genuine battlefield pressure, specifically designed to confuse UAF command and demoralize troops. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Use of Foreign Materiel: Confirmation of the operational use of the North Korean Type 75 MLRS system validates the RF intent and capability to utilize non-domestic, proxy-sourced weapon systems to sustain kinetic pressure. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Exploitation of C2 Gaps: RF probes near Mezheva/Novopodhorodne suggest intent to exploit perceived UAF reserve deployment vulnerability or create diversionary fronts. (Confidence: MEDIUM)

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF has shifted its IO focus to include direct, time-sensitive claims of penetration into key UAF operational hubs (Pokrovsk), requiring immediate UAF command response and verification. The confirmed destruction of the Type 75 MLRS confirms the necessity of focusing Collection Requirements (CR) on locating and interdicting the supply chain for foreign-sourced equipment.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

The successful second USV strike against a tanker provides strong evidence of persistent degradation of RF maritime logistical capabilities, particularly those supporting Crimea and Southern Grouping of Forces. However, the identified threat from the 260th GRAU artillery surge remains the most critical ground logistics threat.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, coordinating multi-domain (kinetic, maritime, IO) pressure. The immediate propagation of the Pokrovsk claim shows a fast feedback loop between forward units and strategic IO apparatus.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is high in specialized, decentralized units (drone, Marine Corps, artillery). The successful defense and capture mission by the 37th Marine Brigade at Ivanivka demonstrates effective local C2 and high morale in critical defensive sectors. UAF is also improving long-term mobilization readiness through the mandated digital transition of military registration ("Резерв+").

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS (OPERATIONAL/FACT): Confirmation of the second successful USV strike against an RF tanker, validating continued strategic pressure on RF maritime logistics.
• SUCCESS (TACTICAL/FACT): Destruction of the North Korean Type 75 MLRS (45th Artillery Brigade) and the successful defense/capture at Ivanivka (37th Marine Brigade).
• SETBACK (OPERATIONAL/JUDGMENT): The escalating nature of RF claims regarding Pokrovsk penetration requires valuable ISR assets to be diverted for immediate verification, drawing focus away from the critical Dimitrov exfiltration.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: High-resolution IMINT/PAR assets must confirm the exact location and scope of RF armor elements claimed to be near/in Pokrovsk. CONSTRAINT: The synchronized RF IO/Kinetic strategy forces UAF leadership to address disinformation rapidly while managing a kinetic crisis.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is pushing two highly synchronized narratives:

1. Tactical Panic: The unsubstantiated claim of tanks in Pokrovsk, designed to undermine the Commander-in-Chief's credibility and incite panic among local UAF units and civilian populations. (Confidence: HIGH)
2. Diplomatic Concession: Reinforcing the "Korean Model" by leaking reports (via Corriere della Sera) that a key ally (Italian PM Meloni) is pressuring President Zelensky for "painful concessions." This aims to fracture the UAF negotiating position ahead of the Berlin Summit. (Confidence: HIGH)

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF StratCom must immediately counter the diplomatic concession narrative. The success of the 37th Marine Brigade (Ivanivka captures) and the persistent deep/maritime strikes must be used immediately to counter the negative psychological impact of the Pokrovsk crisis and the diplomatic pressure campaign.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF IO campaign is creating maximum friction points. The reported US pressure on the ICC further introduces uncertainty regarding the stability and resolve of the international coalition against impunity. The key decision point is the NCA's public denial of the concession narrative.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (NEXT 12 HOURS)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

RF forces achieve the liquidation of the Dimitrov pocket, utilize localized successes to saturate the information space, and then pivot to probing the Dnipropetrovsk border region. (Confidence: HIGH)

1. Pocket Closure: RF mechanized forces continue high-tempo operations under cover of darkness/fog to secure the full operational isolation and subsequent surrender/destruction of the Dimitrov garrison NLT 110400Z DEC 25.
2. Information Blitz: RF state media and affiliated channels will maximize the "Pokrovsk Breach" and "Concessions Pressure" narratives until the Berlin Summit.
3. Dnipropetrovsk Diversion: RF elements will intensify reconnaissance-in-force or probing attacks along the Mezheva/Novopodhorodne line to test UAF reserve reaction time and availability.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

A successful operational breach at Pokrovsk coupled with the successful delivery of the 260th GRAU materiel. (Confidence: MEDIUM/HIGH)

1. Main Defense Failure: RF successfully bypasses UAF covering forces west of Grishino, establishing fire control over the main Pokrovsk defensive line, forcing a large-scale, unprepared UAF retrograde.
2. Strategic Disruption: The simultaneous delivery of artillery materiel (260th GRAU) and the escalation of fighting on the Dnipropetrovsk border force UAF High Command to divide strategic reserves, leading to failure on the Stepnohorsk (PHOENIX) axis.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMAND PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION AND STRATCOM DEFEAT OF RF IO

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CR)