Situation Report

TIME: 101600Z DEC 25

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) - OPERATIONAL LEVEL

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The theater remains characterized by intense attrition in the Donetsk axis and increasing RF kinetic pressure on UAF rear area logistics and Command & Control (C2) centers.

• Donetsk Axis (Siversk): RF forces are actively pressuring Siversk, attempting to seize operational control. UAF claims (ЦАПЛІЄНКО) strongly deny Russian control of the area. This indicates a localized fight for key high ground or critical observation posts.
• Kupiansk Axis: Reports confirm the extreme density of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) usage, leading to significant fiber optic debris and Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) contamination. This severely complicates UAF tactical mobility and resupply efforts (FACT).
• Black Sea/Odesa: Maritime tensions remain acute. RF sources (Рыбарь) reported a new attack on a civilian tanker, sustaining the narrative of UAF "maritime terrorism" (FACT: RF report, requires BDA/verification). RF claims strikes against a UAF C2 center in Odesa Oblast (FACT: RF claim).

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The environmental threat posed by the Pechenihy Dam strike remains the primary non-kinetic factor. The lack of structural integrity data (Intelligence Gap 1) severely limits UAF consequence management planning in the Kharkiv sector.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF is engaged in stabilizing defensive lines (Pokrovsk/Siversk) while simultaneously managing RF deep fires. RF is focused on softening UAF logistics nodes, claiming strikes on logistics hubs in Dnipropetrovsk and a C2 center in Odesa Oblast (FACT: RF claims).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RF THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is shifting emphasis to operational paralysis through strategic information operations designed to influence Western peace negotiations, coupled with precision strikes intended to degrade UAF deep logistics and C2 resilience.

• Deep Strike Capability (FACT): RF forces claim successful strikes on UAF logistics in Dnipropetrovsk and a Command Post (CP) in Odesa Oblast (Confidence: MEDIUM - Aligns with previous MLCOA, but BDA required).
  • Analytical Judgment: If confirmed, the Odesa CP strike suggests RF may be exploiting intelligence derived from the Kuzmuk breach or other CI failures (Previous Report, Section 3.1).
• Information Warfare Integration (FACT): RF IO is heavily pushing the "Korean Model" (DMZ along the current Line of Contact) proposal, leveraging US diplomatic rumors to generate pressure for a frozen conflict advantageous to RF territorial gains (Confidence: HIGH).

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The RF AD umbrella continues to show localized vulnerability (as noted by previous successful UAF SAM strikes). However, RF is compensating by aggressively targeting UAF supply lines, aiming to restrict UAF deep strike packages (which rely on forward logistics staging). The pressure on Siversk is a tactical diversion to fix UAF reserves away from Pokrovsk.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF strategic focus on domestic infrastructure, evidenced by the Rosatom/Yandex partnership on EV charging, indicates long-term planning for economic and infrastructural resilience that will support sustained military effort. Logistics targeting against UAF (Dnipropetrovsk) confirms continued prioritization of interdicting NATO-supplied materiel flow.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains synchronized, seamlessly integrating kinetic operations (claimed strikes) with immediate IO output (e.g., publishing the Odesa CP strike claim alongside maritime escalation narratives). The brief disruption at Vnukovo (flight restrictions) suggests UAF deep reconnaissance or strike capability remains a nuisance but does not yet compromise Moscow's strategic C2.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Readiness remains high on the front lines, particularly within mechanized and airborne units (DShV morale content). However, operational depth continues to be degraded by persistent internal security threats (Kuzmuk CI failure) and the physical stress on logistics routes (Dnipropetrovsk targeting).

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESSES (FACT): UAF successfully maintains denial of RF control over Siversk. High-profile, successful anti-corruption activity (NABU "Midas" case, Odesa judicial ruling) supports the domestic integrity narrative. Finalizing the 20-point peace plan provides strategic diplomatic success (Zelenskiy announcement).
• SETBACKS (JUDGMENT): The claimed RF strikes on C2 and logistics hubs (Odesa/Dnipropetrovsk) represent potential operational setbacks, requiring immediate redundancy activation. The continuing fragmentation of the "BRAVO-BLOCK" reserve is a critical failure point.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Enhanced Mobile Air Defense (AD) coverage for decentralized logistics nodes and secondary rail lines in the Dnipropetrovsk/Odesa hinterlands, anticipating a shift in RF targeting from major choke points (Fastiv) to peripheral hubs.
• OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINT: The pervasive UAS/UXO contamination (Kupiansk) rapidly increases the demand for specialized engineering and clearance teams, constraining offensive maneuver options in that sector.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Objectives:
  1. Freeze the Conflict: Normalize the "Korean Model" DMZ proposal to legitimize current occupied territories (DS Belief: 0.002610).
  2. Degrade Western Support: Highlight foreign casualties (UK soldier) to increase domestic political pressure in NATO capitals regarding involvement.
  3. Frame UAF as Criminal: Continue maritime terrorism narratives (tanker attack) and allegations of strikes on civilian infrastructure (Oleshky hospital).
• UAF Counter-Messaging: Focus is strongly concentrated on proactive diplomatic engagement, emphasizing the UAF 20-point comprehensive peace plan and active coordination with the US on post-war reconstruction. This counters the RF "Western Abandonment" narrative.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Domestic sentiment is supported by official UAF statements emphasizing diplomatic autonomy ("reliable and dignified steps for ending the war") and internal accountability (anti-corruption actions). Frontline morale appears sustained (DShV recruitment and combat footage).

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

High-level UAF/US coordination is underway regarding the 20-point peace plan finalization and a detailed post-war reconstruction document (FACT). This suggests continued high-level commitment from the US, despite RF attempts to introduce the frozen conflict narrative.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

RF prioritizes C2/Logistics interdiction and escalates the diplomatic IO campaign. (Confidence: HIGH)

1. Deep Battle C2 Degradation: RF launches follow-on missile/UAV strikes (NLT 122000Z DEC 25) targeting secondary UAF C2 nodes and logistics distribution points (LDPs) in Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Odesa Oblasts, leveraging compromised intelligence from the Kuzmuk exposure.
2. Siversk Fixing Operation: RF continues high-attrition assaults near Siversk over the next 72 hours to fix UAF forces, preventing them from reinforcing the critical Pokrovsk or Zaporizhzhia axes.
3. Frozen Conflict Pressure: RF state and proxy media saturate the global information environment with the "Korean Model" DMZ proposal, aiming to influence upcoming high-level UAF-US diplomatic discussions.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

RF achieves synchronized operational exploitation across multiple domains. (Confidence: MEDIUM)

1. Logistics Collapse/Kuzmuk Exploitation: RF launches overwhelming precision strikes based on compromised data, successfully destroying several key, relocated TrO CPs or major ammunition caches, leading to critical shortages on the Southern axis and temporary UAF operational paralysis.
2. Stepnohorsk Encirclement: The 38th GMRB accelerates its flanking maneuver, achieving rapid encirclement of the Stepnohorsk salient, forcing an immediate, costly UAF operational withdrawal under constant UAS and KAB fire.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

COMMAND PRIORITY: CI THREAT MITIGATION AND LOGISTICS REDUNDANCY

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CR)