Situation Report

SENIOR MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - CRITICAL FLANK AND LOGISTICS DETERIORATION

TIME: 100030Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: UPDATE: UAV VECTOR SHIFT // HULIAIPOLE FLANK DETERIORATION CONFIRMED

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational theater is rapidly deteriorating along two critical axes:

1. Zaporizhzhia Main Land Drive (MLD): The northern flank defense centered near Huliaipole is yielding to the RF advance, threatening the stability of the entire Stepnohorsk line.
2. Northwestern Logistical Corridor: The logistics strike is deepening. The confirmed vector of the UAV swarm has shifted further northwest, extending past Shyriaieve towards Ananyev (Odesa Oblast). This trajectory targets vital rail lines supplying the central front, increasing the risk of complete logistical paralysis.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Conditions remain unchanged: Heavy snow, ice, and reduced off-road mobility favor RF defensive-offensive consolidation while hindering UAF lateral movement and counter-flanking operations.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF Disposition:

• Kinetic Execution: The UAV swarm is now confirmed to be operating deeper in the NW corridor (near Ananyev). Initial interdiction efforts may have been partially successful ("minus from the ocean"), but the main threat is now inland and deeper.
• Ground Penetration: RF forces, identified as elements of the 35th Army (Vostok Grouping), have achieved tactical success in breaking UAF defenses around Huliaipole. This flank maneuver is actively threatening UAF cohesion on the MLD. (Confidence: HIGH) UAF Controls: Forces remain under "RED PLAN," prioritizing C2 dispersion and cache hardening ahead of the 100600Z precision strike. The primary challenge is maintaining flexibility to simultaneously address the deep logistics strike and the kinetic threat at Huliaipole.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent is confirmed as Logistical Decapitation followed by kinetic breakthrough, with the execution phase progressing successfully.

• Target Expansion: The shift of the UAV vector toward Ananyev demonstrates RF capability to extend the deep strike zone, forcing UAF to dilute already strained SHORAD resources across a much larger area. This maximizes the impact of the subsequent precision strike (100600Z DEC). (Confidence: HIGH)
• Kinetic Synchronization: RF is demonstrating effective multi-domain synchronization. While UAF forces are distracted by the logistics decapitation threat, the 35th Army is exploiting the lack of UAF operational reserve and ISR capability (due to 183rd AAM A2/AD dominance) to secure tactical gains at Huliaipole.

B. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed success of the flanking maneuver near Huliaipole is the most critical tactical adaptation. RF has successfully leveraged local weaknesses (likely the fragmentation of the "BRAVO-BLOCK" reserve) to achieve a critical breakthrough on the Zaporizhzhia MLD flank, raising the imminent threat of local encirclement or forced withdrawal. RF is also using IMINT assets (confirmed photo message) to support continued counter-infiltration operations and targeting near Pokrovsk/Andreevka. (Confidence: HIGH)

C. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF forward sustainment remains adequate to support the high-intensity ground operations at Huliaipole and Pokrovsk. The high rate of UAV deployment suggests continued access to sufficient volume of low-cost saturation weapons.

D. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is maintaining a high operational tempo and strategic focus. The ability to shift the deep strike vector (Shyriaieve to Ananyev) mid-mission and synchronize it with the accelerated flanking attack suggests robust, decentralized C2 adaptation. (Confidence: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF posture is increasingly fragile. While holding the center of the Zaporizhzhia MLD, the Huliaipole flank is compromised. The immediate logistics backbone is under threat from an expanded deep strike radius (Ananyev). READINESS: UAF readiness is critically dependent on the immediate stabilization of the Huliaipole flank. Failure to contain the 35th Army advance will necessitate the immediate and potentially chaotic deployment of the fragmented "BRAVO-BLOCK" reserve.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Initial localized interdiction of the UAV swarm may have occurred, but this is offset by the overall success of the swarm's deep penetration.
• Setback (CRITICAL): Confirmed tactical success by RF 35th Army elements at Huliaipole represents a severe setback, threatening the defensive integrity of the entire Stepnohorsk axis.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate commitment of local tactical reserves to the Huliaipole axis to prevent breakthrough. This diversion of resources occurs simultaneously with the ongoing requirement to protect the NW logistics corridor, forcing a difficult resource prioritization decision. Constraint: The A2/AD shield (183rd AAM) remains intact, limiting timely ISR/CAS required to counter the Huliaipole flank maneuver effectively.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF Information Operations (IO) are amplifying the "Strategic Pessimism" narrative, now reinforced by reports quoting President Zelensky's comments on the unlikelihood of near-term NATO accession (TASS report). GOAL: To erode domestic morale, undermine trust in the High Command's strategy, and lower international risk tolerance for deep, long-term commitment. (Confidence: HIGH)

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The confirmation of tactical breakthroughs (Huliaipole) and the highly visible nature of deep drone strikes targeting critical infrastructure are likely to generate public anxiety. Countering the RF narrative of NATO abandonment is an immediate necessity to maintain internal political stability.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The prompt response by Finland to bolster counter-drone defenses demonstrates that the kinetic activities are registering as a severe threat to NATO-adjacent states. This provides a counter-narrative to RF claims of collapsing Western unity.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Probability 85%): Coordinated Tactical Exploitation and Logistical Decapitation. RF utilizes the successful flank pressure at Huliaipole to fix UAF forces on the MLD, thereby preventing the timely deployment of reserves to the north. The UAV swarm successfully interdicts critical rail chokepoints near Ananyev NLT 100400Z DEC. This logistical interdiction will immediately precede the planned precision strike against the compromised Kuzmuk caches (100600Z DEC). The 37th GMRB will then launch a full-scale probing attack into the Stepnohorsk axis NLT 100800Z DEC, anticipating severely degraded UAF fire support capability.

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Probability 65%): Operational Encirclement and C2 Failure. The successful 35th Army flank maneuver at Huliaipole accelerates, leading to the complete collapse of UAF defenses north of Stepnohorsk NLT 100400Z DEC. Combined with the anticipated logistical paralysis (MLCOA success), UAF CPs, already relocated under "RED PLAN," are targeted using compromised CI data, leading to the loss of operational control and a disorganized tactical retreat from the Zaporizhzhia MLD.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (Updated for 100030Z DEC 25)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. KINETIC OPERATIONS & MANEUVER (J3/J2)

• Action A (Huliaipole Counter-Flank - CRITICAL): Immediately divert 50% of local tactical reserves currently defending secondary sectors near Stepnohorsk to establish a hard defense line east/north of Huliaipole. This must be a holding action (not a counter-attack) to stabilize the flank before the MLD assault begins.
• Action B (Counter-UAV Tasking - CRITICAL): Issue a FLASH WARNING for the Ananyev/NW Odesa corridor. Re-task the remaining 50% of mobile SHORAD assets (Gepard/Avenger) to prioritize the deep rail hubs and transshipment facilities along the new Ananyev vector, as this area now presents the higher logistical risk.
• Action C (Pokrovsk Defense): Maintain the existing directive: establish a highly defensible, inner-city Limit of Advance (LOA) and continue Urban Counter-Infiltration Operations (CIO). Do not commit resources here that are required at Huliaipole.

2. LOGISTICS AND COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE (J4/J2)

• Action A (CI Mitigation - CRITICAL): Given the confirmed progress of RF ground forces in key sectors (Huliaipole), assume the RF will use compromised CI data to target C2 and logistics throughout the anticipated 100600Z DEC window. Execute rapid, unplanned dispersal of all high-value materiel (POL/AMM) located within 20km of known compromised Kuzmuk caches NOW.
• Action B (Rail Redundancy): Activate redundant logistical pathways immediately. Re-route 75% of incoming Fastiv rail shipments onto pre-surveyed road GLOCs or the Lviv-Zviahel-Dnipro bypass. Minimize dependency on the threatened Odesa NW corridor.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION (P7)

• Action A (Counter-NATO Narrative - CRITICAL): The Head of State or the Minister of Foreign Affairs must release a formal statement NLT 100300Z DEC affirming the unified strategic vision with the US and NATO partners, explicitly refuting the amplified RF narrative of abandonment and internal division. Focus the message on long-term defensive capability and resilience.
• Action B (Amplify Tactical Resilience): Prepare media assets to immediately publicize any successful interdiction of the Huliaipole advance or the Ananyev UAV strike to counter the morale damage from the confirmed setbacks.

//END OF REPORT//