Archived operational intelligence briefing
TIME: 091800Z DEC 25 SUBJECT: A2/AD DEGRADATION REQUIREMENT // LOGISTICS DECAPITATION IMMINENT // CI DISPERSAL VERIFICATION CRITICAL
The operational picture is now defined by the RF establishment of a dense Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) zone protecting the Stepnohorsk-Huliaipole decisive axis (Zaporizhzhia Oblast).
Clear, cold conditions persist, favoring RF ISR and deep-strike platforms. The overriding environmental factor remains the structural damage to the Pechenihy Dam (Kharkiv), requiring continuous UAF Engineer asset allocation and mitigating localized flood risk.
RF: RF forces are synchronized, successfully utilizing the 183rd AAM shield to advance ground forces while employing hybrid pressure (CI targeting, hydro-weaponization) to force UAF internal reallocation. UAF: Execution of the "RED PLAN" for C2 relocation is confirmed, but deployment of the "BRAVO-BLOCK" reserve is still degraded by "Mangas" aerial mining along approach routes. Logistical assets (ammunition/fuel caches) known to be compromised are highly vulnerable.
RF intent is focused on achieving operational decision in Zaporizhzhia under an impenetrable AD umbrella, while simultaneously crippling UAF sustainment capabilities using compromised intelligence.
The most significant change is the critical spike in 183rd AAM activity (Score 26.43), indicating a massive, theater-level commitment to protect the Stepnohorsk drive. This denies UAF the option of relying on CAS to halt the advance.
RF deep-strike assets (KABs, precision missiles, Jet-Powered Shaheds) are prioritized for the decapitation campaign against UAF infrastructure and logistics. RF conventional logistics appear sufficient to sustain the current tempo of the Stepnohorsk offensive.
RF C2 is highly effective and synchronized. The successful integration of CI (Kuzmuk data) into kinetic strike planning demonstrates mature multi-domain capability.
POSTURE: Defensive stability is holding at Pokrovsk, but the Stepnohorsk axis is entering a critical phase due to the A2/AD denial and the speed of the 38th GMRB flanking maneuver. READINESS: General readiness is strained. Operational tempo must be maintained by ground forces without crucial CAS support. CI mitigation is ongoing ("RED PLAN" execution confirmed), but logistical exposure remains acute.
CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate capacity for Suppression/Destruction of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD/DEAD) against the 183rd AAM Regiment. CONSTRAINT: Mobile SHORAD assets are critically constrained by the requirement to defend the Fastiv bypass (strategic priority) and protect CNI (Pechenihy). Engineer assets are fragmented across frontline counter-mining operations ("Mangas") and rear-area crisis response (Pechenihy).
RF Information Operations (IO) are aggressively exploiting the internal security breach, framing the dismissal of the TrO official ("Kuzmuk") as proof of systemic UAF collapse and incompetence. A new, targeted dehumanization narrative ("Vovchansk cat-killing") has been introduced, likely designed to erode international support and military discipline. (Confidence: HIGH)
Public confidence is reliant on visible security measures. Transparency regarding the "RED PLAN" execution and flood mitigation efforts is essential to counter the RF narrative of collapse.
UAF strategic communication must urgently maintain focus on the Hydro-Terrorism aspect of the Pechenihy strike to prevent RF distraction efforts (e.g., global economic conflict narratives) from succeeding among Western security partners.
(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Probability 85%) Logistical Decapitation Strike. RF will leverage the A2/AD shield to accelerate the 37th GMRB advance NLT 101200Z DEC. The primary operational output will be a concentrated precision strike package (Kalibr/Iskander/Jet-Powered Shaheds) aimed at Kuzmuk-compromised bulk ammunition and fuel caches. The Fastiv rail bypass will be targeted by deep-strike UAVs originating from AB Millerovo, aiming for sustained interdiction.
(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Probability 65%) Operational Encirclement & Strategic Paralysis. The "Mangas" aerial mining campaign successfully paralyzes the movement of "BRAVO-BLOCK." The 38th GMRB achieves a rapid, decisive flanking maneuver, encircling forward UAF units at Stepnohorsk NLT 110600Z DEC. Simultaneously, RF launches a secondary high-yield strike against the Pechenihy Dam, triggering catastrophic localized flooding that severs critical Donbas-Kharkiv GLOCs, forcing strategic withdrawal.
| Decision Point | Event Trigger | Time Estimate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| D+0/H+6 (SEAD/DEAD Launch) | Authorization and launch of priority mission against 183rd AAM Regiment assets (Radar/Launcher components). | NLT 092400Z DEC | CRITICAL (KINETIC) |
| D+0/H+12 (Cache Verification) | Confirmation of 100% dispersal/abandonment of all Kuzmuk-compromised bulk logistics caches. | NLT 100600Z DEC | CRITICAL (CI/LOGISTICS) |
| D+0/H+18 (BRAVO-BLOCK Committal) | Verification of cleared routes and commencement of the primary reserve force's deployment toward the Huliaipole flanking threat. | NLT 101200Z DEC | URGENT (MANEUVER) |
| Priority | Gap Description | Collection Requirement (CR) | Confidence Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRIORITY 1 (A2/AD INTENT): | Is the 183rd Guards AAM Regiment's critical SAR score indicative of a defensive 'static shield' or a pre-displacement signal to move forward with the 37th GMRB? | IMINT/SIGINT Correlation: Persistent, high-resolution SAR and ELINT on the 183rd Regiment's radar footprint and vehicular activity to detect early displacement markers. | LOW (Critical) |
| PRIORITY 2 (CI/SCOPE): | Specific coordinates or operational details regarding new reserve deployment schedules for "BRAVO-BLOCK" that may have been compromised during the Kuzmuk incident. | Digital Forensics/CI Interrogation: Aggressive analysis of compromised network traffic logs and specific questioning of apprehended accomplice regarding "BRAVO-BLOCK" documents. | LOW (Critical) |
| PRIORITY 3 (BDA/ENGINEERING): | Precise Bomb Damage Assessment (BDA) on Pechenihy Dam to model remaining structural integrity and the impact tolerance of a secondary strike. | UAV/Engineering Ground Survey: Focused structural analysis, including sub-surface sonar/ground-penetrating radar if possible, to ascertain foundation stability. | MEDIUM |
//END OF REPORT//
We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.
Learn more in our Privacy Policy.