Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IMMEDIATE OPERATIONAL PICTURE

DTG: 040230Z DEC 25 OPERATIONAL FOCUS: Mitigation of synchronized enemy courses of action (COA) targeting the Southern Front GLOC (Pavlohrad) and the Huliaipole flank (Chervone exploitation). Immediate assessment of enemy Information Operations (IO) targeting Huliaipole stability. REFERENCE: SITREP 040215Z DEC 25; DAILY INTEL SUM 031500Z DEC 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains dominated by the synchronized dual-axis threat in the Zaporizhzhia Operational Zone.

• Huliaipole Flank (Critical): The confirmed breakthrough by the RF 38th GMRB at Chervone maintains direct pressure toward Phase Line BRAVO. This exploitation vector must be contained to prevent Huliaipole's encirclement.
• Deep Strike Threat (Executive Critical): The identified UAV wave (detected 040151Z) is confirmed on trajectory toward the Pavlohrad GLOC. Time-to-Target (TTT) remains critical, estimated NLT 040400Z.
• Control Measures: UAF AD/EW assets are being diverted to protect Pavlohrad, creating a critical resource draw from frontline defense requirements (Phase Line BRAVO).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The Geomagnetic Storm remains active. The environment continues to generate significant Electro-Magnetic Interference (EMI), complicating GPS reliability for both UAF and RF assets (PGMs, UAV control links). This complicates the UAF AD effort at Pavlohrad but offers counter-EW opportunities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF Disposition (Fact): RF forces are postured for coordinated kinetic and cognitive operations. The 38th GMRB is prepared for a mechanized push, while RF IO (TASS, 040213Z) has preemptively disseminated claims of UAF retreat near Huliaipole. UAF Control (Judgment): UAF command is currently managing severe resource constraint. The success of the "OP-DELAY" fire plan is the sole kinetic contingency compensating for the missing Phase Line BRAVO reserve commitment.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent is confirmed as achieving Operational Paralysis through dual-vector synchronization.

• Ground Intent: 38th GMRB intends to exploit the lapsed reserve decision point (BRAVO-BLOCK) before UAF can stabilize the flank via indirect fire.
• Deep Intent: Immediate disruption of the logistics spine at Pavlohrad to starve the Southern Operational Zone of sustainment.
• Information Intent (NEW): The immediate deployment of the TASS claim (040213Z) demonstrates RF capability to conduct rapid, localized IO synchronized with kinetic pressure. The intent is to degrade frontline morale, introduce uncertainty into UAF C2, and force local commanders to divert attention from defensive preparations to confirming rearward claims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The most significant adaptation is the immediate integration of the propaganda claim (UAF retreat near Huliaipole via Grad fire) to maximize the operational effect of the impending 38th GMRB push. This confirms RF is actively leveraging perceived UAF instability (lack of reserve commitment) across multiple domains.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain robust enough to support the assault phase (37th/38th GMRBs). The previously identified 260th GRAU Arsenal Score of 26.12 (CRITICAL) indicates high, sustained ammunition throughput, supporting the use of massed fire (e.g., Grad, as referenced in the TASS claim). Long-term supply security via the suspected LOONG M9 UAV procurement remains a strategic concern.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly effective and resilient to the geomagnetic storm. The seamless synchronization of kinetic activity (UAV launch) and immediate IO (TASS claim) confirms a cohesive operational headquarters structure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF units in the Huliaipole sector are under severe pressure, now compounded by the cognitive effect of RF propaganda asserting a retreat. Readiness is high, but tactical flexibility is critically constrained by the need to protect the Pavlohrad GLOC, forcing a resource diversion.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback (Cognitive/IO): The RF claim of UAF abandonment near Huliaipole requires immediate verification. Although assessed as primary propaganda (D-S belief: 0.225), the potential for local demoralization is high. Success (Mitigation): UAF J3 is executing the "OP-DELAY" fire plan, representing the only active measure to counter the 38th GMRB exploitation after the reserve commitment lapse. The success of this fire plan is currently unconfirmed (Intelligence Gap P-2).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Immediate Constraint: The conflict between Logistics Protection (Pavlohrad AD) and Frontline Stabilization (Artillery fires sustaining OP-DELAY) is the defining constraint of the next 3 hours. Requirement: Confirmed mobile AD/EW assets must be in position/operational within 60 minutes along the Pavlohrad corridor.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The new development is the RF MoD claim (040213Z) disseminated via TASS, stating that Grad artillery fire forced UAF positions to be abandoned near Huliaipole.

• Assessment: This is a localized, tactical IO effort. Dempster-Shafer analysis assigns a low belief (0.033) to actual troop retreat, placing the primary belief (0.225) on Information Warfare.
• Risk: If this claim is not rapidly countered or disproven by UAF BDA, it risks causing adjacent UAF units to perceive a tactical collapse on their flank, potentially leading to unauthorized withdrawal.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal morale in the Southern sector is vulnerable. The combination of intense kinetic pressure, the confirmed GLOC threat, and the rapid deployment of defeatist narratives demands immediate C2 reassurance and counter-narrative deployment.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

UAF strategic communications must link the aggressive, synchronized RF assault (ground + deep strike + IO) to the diplomatic narrative, highlighting that RF is escalating military actions precisely when diplomatic engagement occurs.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Kinetic Interdiction and Amplified Flank Push (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF command will execute the planned dual-axis pressure within the previously established timeline.

1. Pavlohrad Strike (040300Z - 040400Z): The UAV wave will strike high-value rail/logistics nodes. RF will then utilize supporting IO to amplify the perceived damage (even if intercepts are successful).
2. 38th GMRB Assault (NLT 040500Z): The 38th GMRB will commence mechanized assault, exploiting the expected diversion of UAF AD/EW and leveraging the confusion created by the TASS propaganda claim to reduce UAF resistance near Phase Line BRAVO.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: C2 Decapitation via Precision Follow-up Strike (HIGH Confidence) If the Pavlohrad UAV strike successfully identifies or impacts a C2/sensor node, RF will rapidly follow up with precision PGM (Iskander or Cruise Missile) strikes against remaining high-value UAF command assets within the Southern Operational Zone (e.g., 5th Assault Brigade HQ). This C2 paralysis, combined with the successful Chervone exploitation, would force a large-scale, potentially disorganized withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points (REFINED)

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1. Operational Maneuver (J3)

1. AD/EW Priority Adjustment: While AD defense of Pavlohrad is paramount, J3 must ensure that at least 50% of high-mobility EW assets remain available for immediate frontline support, ready to counter the 38th GMRB C2/UAV link exploitation during their expected push (NLT 040500Z).
2. Sustain OP-DELAY (Maximum Rate): Prioritize artillery ammunition expenditure for the "OP-DELAY" fire mission. Failure to inflict heavy casualties on the 38th GMRB now will translate directly into catastrophic losses upon their mechanized assault.

6.2. Intelligence Collection and Reconnaissance (J2)

1. IMMEDIATE TACTICAL BDA (CCIR P-2 Refined): Re-task all airborne and ground surveillance assets toward the immediate vicinity of Huliaipole/Chervone (040213Z claim area). Confirm (Fact or Fiction) the status of UAF units and if positions were genuinely abandoned or tactically repositioned due to Grad fire. (NLT 040245Z)
2. MLCOA Confirmation: Utilize SAR/ELINT assets to monitor staging areas (Zelyony Gai) for the 37th GMRB. Determination of their engine warm-up or mass movement indicators is necessary to confirm the timing of the second phase of the Dual-Axis Squeeze.

6.3. Information Operations (J7/STRATCOM)

1. Counter-Narrative Deployment: Prepare an immediate, transparent internal communication addressing the TASS claim regarding Huliaipole. If the claim is verified as false or exaggerated, release definitive evidence (e.g., drone footage of UAF holding positions) NLT 040300Z to prevent panic and stabilize frontline morale.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CCIR)