Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-12-01 15:04:34Z
2 months ago
Previous (2025-12-01 15:00:26Z)

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) – POKROVSK CRISIS AND SOUTHERN SHAPING

TIME: 011600Z DEC 25


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational center of gravity (CoG) remains the Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast).

  • STATUS: GLOC SEVERED (Confirmed). RF forces and proxies (Sparta, DNR elements) have achieved fire control and physical blockade over the western access route (Phase Line W-1/M-30 GLOC).
  • SKELIA Regiment: Isolated and engaged in decentralized Close Quarters Combat (CQC). Operational window for organized extraction is critically narrow (estimated NLT 011800Z DEC).
  • Southern Operational Area: The Stepnohorsk corridor (Zaporizhzhia Oblast) and Eastern Dnipropetrovsk are the new primary focus areas for RF shaping operations, evidenced by expanded Guided Aerial Bomb (КАБ) and deep-strike activity.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

No significant change. Persistent low ceilings continue to favor massed drone operations (UAS/FPV) over manned fixed-wing Close Air Support (CAS). Low visibility may complicate tactical extraction maneuvers in Pokrovsk.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF resources remain stretched, attempting to manage a crisis (Pokrovsk extraction) while mitigating an imminent, high-risk threat (Stepnohorsk breakthrough).

  • RF: Utilizing sophisticated multi-domain synchronization: tactical aviation/КАБ to deplete UAF Air Defense (AD) in the South while maintaining intense kinetic pressure in the East.
  • UAF AD: Severely diluted due to mandatory deployment to defend population centers (Dnipro, Kramatorsk) against deep strikes and the newly deployed Jet-Powered Shahed variants.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF intent is dual-tracked: maximize kinetic gains to inform a diplomatic ultimatum.

  • Kinetic Intent (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Achieve maximal destruction/capture of the isolated UAF garrison in Pokrovsk by NLT 012000Z DEC. Simultaneously, exploit the resulting UAF reserve fixation by launching a high-tempo mechanized operation on the Southern Axis (Stepnohorsk).
  • Technological Escalation (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The deployment of Jet-Powered Shahed UAVs represents a new capability designed to stress the UAF AD network, forcing higher expenditure of advanced interceptors or creating exploitable gaps.
  • Strategic Intent (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF aims to leverage the Pokrovsk fait accompli and the simultaneous Moscow meeting (Putin/Whitkoff) to force a ceasefire agreement based on current lines of control, bypassing the unified European/UAF negotiation track (Ireland Summit).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

  • Air Warfare: Accelerated deployment of advanced and modified Shahed variants, combined with sustained KAB use (Dnipropetrovsk), confirming the priority of achieving localized air superiority for future ground operations in the South.
  • Information Warfare (New): Immediate synchronization of kinetic victory claims (Pokrovsk severance) with targeted Information Operations (IO), specifically the Colonelcassad video surge (011501Z) claiming massed cruise missile attacks, designed to generate panic and psychological fatigue in UAF rear areas.
  • Diplomatic Signaling (New): RF Security Council messaging (011500Z) offering cybersecurity cooperation to the US. This is a classic diplomatic feint intended to portray RF as a reasonable, stable actor, despite escalating military aggression.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain SUSTAINED (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE). No indicators suggest the current high operational tempo (KAB, Jet-Shahed launches, ground offensive) is unsustainable in the immediate 72-hour window.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. Their ability to run synchronized high-risk kinetic operations (Pokrovsk) concurrently with a high-stakes diplomatic maneuvering phase (Dual-Track Diplomacy) suggests centralized, robust decision-making.


3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

CRITICAL READINESS, HIGH MORALE RISK. While UAF Strategic C2 successfully stabilized the diplomatic CoG via the Ireland Summit scheduling, the tactical situation in Pokrovsk poses an immediate material and morale risk if the SKELIA Regiment suffers catastrophic loss. Readiness is strained by the need to redeploy AD assets south without exhausting ammunition reserves.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

  • Setback (Kinetic): Confirmed GLOC severance and isolation of the Pokrovsk garrison. Failure to successfully deploy 82nd/47th reserve brigades to Phase Line W-1 by the deadline (011330Z).
  • Success (Technological/Adaptation): The validated R-60 Air-to-Air Missile (AAM) interception TTP is a crucial, low-cost countermeasure potentially capable of engaging the new, higher-altitude Jet-Powered Shaheds.
  • Success (Strategic): Formation of the United Front (Ireland Summit, Netherlands €250M pledge) counters RF psychological operations targeting Western commitment.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the lack of mobile, high-volume SHORAD capable of defending both rear cities (Dnipro, Kramatorsk) and the high-risk Stepnohorsk front simultaneously. Reliance on adapting non-conventional AD capabilities (R-60 TTP, Sting teams, UGV systems) is now mandatory.


4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (RF)

RF IO is operating at peak tempo, focusing on creating three narratives:

  1. Imminence of Collapse: Amplifying kinetic action (Colonelcassad missile claims) to break UAF domestic morale and frame the military situation as irreversible.
  2. Diplomatic Ultimatum: Using the Moscow meeting (Putin/Whitkoff) to frame UAF negotiation as pointless or disruptive to peace efforts.
  3. RF Reasonableness: The TASS cyber security messages are designed to shift blame for hybrid conflict and portray RF as a potential partner to the US, undermining Western unity before the Ireland Summit.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (UAF)

Sentiment is fragile. The rapid loss of a key operational center (Pokrovsk) combined with the psychological impact of deep strikes (Dnipro, Kramatorsk) is generating significant stress. Morale stability is contingent on: (a) successful extraction of the SKELIA Regiment, and (b) immediate, tangible positive outcomes from the Ireland Summit (NLT 02 DEC).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

STATUS: HIGH CONFIDENCE - UNITY STRENGTHENED. The coordination between the NCA (Zelenskyy/Umerov) and Western partners (Witkoff/NATO SG/EC) successfully established a legitimate negotiating path (Ireland). The Netherlands financial pledge provides immediate, tangible proof of enduring material support.


5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: POKROVSK CONSOLIDATION AND ULTIMATUM DIPLOMACY. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF forces consolidate control over Pokrovsk and the GLOC NLT 012000Z DEC. The main effort shifts immediately to diplomatic coercion, using the Moscow meeting (NLT 02 DEC) to demand a ceasefire on current lines, backed by the kinetic reality of the Pokrovsk collapse. RF will sustain high-rate interdiction fires (KAB/UAS) against UAF withdrawal routes and reserves.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: MECHANIZED BREAKTHROUGH AT STEPNOHORSK. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - UPGRADED) RF launches a synchronized, mechanized ground assault on the Stepnohorsk axis (Zaporizhzhia Oblast) NLT 020200Z DEC. The attack is preceded by massive artillery (2652th Artillery Base activity confirmed) and air preparation fires, exploiting the confirmed gaps in UAF AD coverage caused by the diversion of SHORAD to Dnipro/Kramatorsk defense. The goal is a rapid penetration to the operational depth, forcing UAF to commit strategic reserves prematurely.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

EventEstimated Timeline (ETA)ConfidenceDecision Point/Trigger
SKELIA Regiment Extraction WindowNLT 011800Z DECHIGHFailure to organize fire support for a temporary breach of Phase Line W-1.
Pokrovsk RF ConsolidationNLT 012000Z DECHIGHUAF forces complete controlled withdrawal or are encircled/annihilated.
MDCOA Trigger (Stepnohorsk Assault)020000Z - 020600Z DECHIGHRF successfully completes air shaping (KAB/Jet-Shahed attacks on Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia rear areas).
Ireland Summit OutcomeNLT 02 DECHIGHNCA must translate diplomatic unity into actionable material support commitments.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

PriorityGaps/Unresolved QuestionsCollection Requirement (CR)
PRIORITY 1 (KINETIC - URGENT)SKELIA Regiment Extraction Status. Confirm if the regiment has received the extraction order and the status of the required fire support breach (Phase Line W-1).HUMINT/IMINT: Real-time feedback from SKELIA C2; High-resolution IMINT on W-1 road density.
PRIORITY 2 (TECHINT - CRITICAL)R-60 Launch Platform Validation. What specific platform (ground-based FrankenSAM variant or limited air asset) was used for the R-60 AAM intercept? Is the capability scalable?TECHINT/HUMINT: Immediate debriefing/assessment of the UAF unit involved (011431Z). This is essential for countering Jet-Shaheds.
PRIORITY 3 (THREAT - SOUTHERN AXIS)RF Mechanized Unit Identification. Identify the specific RF ground maneuver units tasked for the Stepnohorsk MDCOA exploitation. (e.g., 58th CAA elements).SIGINT/ELINT: Prioritized collection on RF C2 chatter related to movement orders in Zaporizhzhia sector; High-tempo SAR Score correlation with known unit signatures.

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1. Operations and Fire Support (J-3/J-5)

  1. Phase Line W-1 Breach (CRITICAL - NLT 011700Z DEC): Re-task all surviving long-range fire assets (HIMARS, heavy artillery) to execute a coordinated, high-density counter-blockade fire mission targeting the identified RF proxy units on Phase Line W-1. This mission's sole objective is to create a porous, temporary corridor for the SKELIA Regiment controlled extraction NLT 011800Z DEC.
  2. MDCOA Counter-Shaping (URGENT): Immediately prioritize and deploy the 5th Assault Brigade (5 OShB) elements with their established UGV counter-mobility TTPs and Sting/ManPADS teams to the Stepnohorsk/Orikhiv corridor. Accept the operational risk of Pokrovsk to mitigate the catastrophic risk of the Southern breakthrough.
  3. AD Adaptation (IMMEDIATE): Based on the successful TTP, authorize the highest priority resource allocation for technical validation and mass production/adaptation of the R-60 AAM counter-UAS platform (FrankenSAM variant hypothesis) for deployment to major urban defense rings (Dnipro) to free up conventional SHORAD for the front line.

7.2. Strategic Communications and Diplomacy (NCA/J-7)

  1. Counter-IO (IMMEDIATE): Issue a clear public statement NLT 011730Z DEC explicitly addressing the Colonelcassad missile surge and RF claims of operational victory. Frame this surge as a desperate psychological operation synchronized with the political maneuvering in Moscow. Reinforce that the only legitimate negotiating track is the unified, sovereign dialogue commencing in Ireland.
  2. Cyber Readiness Alert: Issue a high-level alert regarding potential RF kinetic or non-kinetic response coinciding with the Ireland Summit (02 DEC). The TASS cybersecurity messaging may be deflection or a preparation phase for a significant cyber operation.

7.3. Logistics and Sustainment (J-4)

  1. Materiel Prioritization: Re-route all available high-caliber artillery ammunition (especially 155mm) destined for the Donetsk sector to the Stepnohorsk operational reserves immediately to support the MDCOA response plan.
  2. Resource Acquisition Shift: Leverage the confirmed belief regarding Resource Acquisition from Civilian Markets (D-S Belief 0.174) to accelerate NGO/Support Network procurement of low-cost, high-volume counter-UAS assets (FPV jammers, Sting missiles) required for the Stepnohorsk defense.
Previous (2025-12-01 15:00:26Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.