Situation Report

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 300605Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: KINETIC ASSAULT CONFIRMED // C2 DEGRADATION WINDOW // DEEP STRIKE RESILIENCE

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE)

The RF Vostok Group ground assault is assessed as initiated or immediately imminent at Stepnohorsk (NLT 300600Z). The operational focus has shifted from pre-assault maneuver and information shaping to immediate kinetic defense and mitigation of RF breach attempts.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

RF forces are engaging UAF 3rd Assault Brigade (3 ABde) blocking positions in the Stepnohorsk axis. The primary objective for UAF is to hold the current Line of Contact (LOC) until reserve commitment, denying RF exploitation of the tactical collapse of UAF 33rd Separate Assault Regiment (33 OShP).

• FACT (UAF DEEP STRIKE): Confirmed drone activity targeted the Slaviansk Oil Refinery (NPZ) in Krasnodar Krai, resulting in damage to gas infrastructure (300544Z). Debris from a separate UAV incident confirmed in Anapa (300548Z).
• FACT (RF REAR DISRUPTION): Temporary flight restrictions imposed at Samara airport (300539Z), likely in response to the increased threat of UAF deep strike operations in the Volga region, which is critical to the new Kazakhstan logistics corridor.
• JUDGMENT: UAF has achieved tactical success in projecting kinetic power into the RF operational depth at the precise moment of the critical ground assault, complicating RF resource allocation and C2 focus. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change. Favorable conditions continue for RF Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) assets.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

3 ABde is in contact. The status of their Command and Control (C2) hardening (EMCON/decentralized fire control) remains the most critical intelligence gap. RF forces are likely exploiting this vulnerability in the assault's initial phase.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

RF Intent is kinetic penetration at Stepnohorsk NLT 300600Z. RF forces are highly likely to synchronize the maneuver elements with concentrated Electronic Warfare (EW) and localized strike assets against UAF fire correction and C2 nodes (MDCOA realization).

• Targeting Indicators: Dempster-Shafer analysis suggests high confidence (0.222) in active Russian surveillance of UAF tactical fire positions (e.g., mortar teams) near the forward edge, indicating RF is utilizing localized ISR superiority to degrade defensive fire support immediately upon assault initiation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Diversionary Claims: RF claimed the encirclement of UAF elements in a forest area East of Vovchansk (Kharkiv region, 300548Z). This is assessed as a localized IO effort to fix UAF reserves in the North and increase perceived pressure across multiple axes, diverting attention from Stepnohorsk.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF adaptation is currently focused on internal morale sustainment via propaganda, demonstrating resilience despite UAF deep strikes. The rapid deployment of synchronized Mother's Day messaging (300540Z, 300554Z) shows highly efficient IO C2 attempting to normalize the conflict and mobilize domestic support, even while fighting the kinetic battle.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The UAF deep strike campaign is successfully disrupting RF strategic logistics. Samara airport restrictions and the NPZ strikes directly impede the efficient transit and staging of POL stocks intended to stabilize the Vostok Group via the new Kazakh corridor. This disruption buys UAF critical time.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in the IO domain and is highly responsive to UAF actions (PR messaging following the deep strikes). The effectiveness of their tactical C2 in coordinating the complex Stepnohorsk breach while simultaneously managing rear area kinetic disruption is being tested now.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

Kinetic posture is defensive and holding at the LOC, but readiness remains psychologically degraded due to the failure of the National Command Authority (NCA) to deliver the critical address NLT 300545Z.

• Resilience Signal: The official congratulatory message to the Radio Technical Troops (RTT) (300602Z) acts as a high-level counter-IO move, suggesting military organizational cohesion persists despite political communication failure. (D-S belief 0.259)
• Local Stability: Local command structures continue to project control (Kryvyi Rih update, 300540Z), mitigating generalized panic dissemination.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Success: Successful execution of deep strike operations against key RF energy (NPZ) and probable logistics hubs (Samara restrictions). This confirms UAF capability to impose strategic friction during a major tactical defense. Operational Setback: The failure of the NCA to signal strategic survival exposes 3 ABde to maximum pressure and RF exploitation of leadership instability narratives.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The constraint remains information and C2 hardening. UAF must assume RF EW/C2 targeting is underway immediately following the 0600Z ground assault initiation.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO has pivoted from pre-assault psychological shock to sustained morale building (Mother's Day theme) and emphasizing Western abandonment (Scotland refugee claims, 300557Z). The goal is to maximize the perception of inevitable victory in the South while managing domestic opinion regarding UAF deep strikes.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Morale at the front line is assessed as critically dependent on immediate tactical success/failure and the perceived commitment of reserve forces. The official RTT message provides a necessary organizational counterweight to the NCA silence.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF activation of the Kazakh rail corridor remains the defining strategic threat. The success of UAF strikes in the Volga/Caspian region (Samara/Krasnodar) provides leverage but requires immediate diplomatic follow-up to formalize international pressure on transit states.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Sustained High-Tempo Assault with Synchronized C2 Degradation (300600Z - 300900Z) (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF forces will push heavily into the 3 ABde LOC, simultaneously employing EW to disrupt UAF fire support coordination. The enemy will exploit any confusion arising from unconfirmed C2 protocols (MDCOA) and attempt to achieve a localized operational breach before UAF reserves can be committed or before the strategic impact of the UAF deep strikes begins to affect tactical RF logistics.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: C2 Decapitation and Operational Rout via EW/Kinetic Shock (300605Z - 300700Z) (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF achieves decisive C2 superiority by successfully neutralizing 3 ABde radio and satellite communication links (Starlink denial/jamming). This prevents coordinated fire and reserve commitment, leading to the encirclement or localized destruction of forward UAF elements. The psychological impact would rapidly spread organizational panic.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

The critical kinetic defense window is now open.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The focus is now kinetic defense and exploiting the friction created by UAF deep strikes.

1. CRITICAL C2 DEFENSE AND RESILIENCE (J3 / 3 ABde Commander):

   • ACTION (CATASTROPHIC URGENCY): All 3 ABde elements must utilize pre-arranged, secure, or low-emission comms (e.g., runners, fiber, highly directional microwave) to report status. Assume all wide-band communications are compromised or denied.
   • RATIONALE: Mitigates the MDCOA of operational paralysis due to EW/kinetic C2 targeting. Fire missions must be executed based on local ISR (platoon/company level).

2. EXPLOIT RF LOGISTICS FRICTION (J2 / J3):

   • ACTION (CRITICAL): Rapidly disseminate intelligence regarding the successful NPZ strike and Samara restrictions to 3 ABde and reserve formations.
   • RATIONALE: Use successful deep strikes as a vital counter-IO message for frontline forces, validating the strategic campaign and boosting morale at the point of contact ("We are still hitting them hard in the rear").

3. FIRE SUPPORT PRIORITY SHIFT (J3 / J6):

   • ACTION (URGENT): Reserve EW assets (C-UAS/Jamming) must be immediately dedicated to providing defensive cover for the 3 ABde and the advancing reserve force C2 and ISR (A2A defense). Kinetic fire priority shifts to confirmed RF armor breakthroughs (penetration depth $> 1.5 \text{km}$) rather than localized suppressing fires.
   • RATIONALE: Prevents RF A2A UAVs from stripping UAF ISR during the critical reserve deployment phase, ensuring UAF can still observe the decisive point of battle.

4. FORMAL NCA COMMAND SIGNAL (NCA/J7):

   • ACTION (URGENT): If the NCA address cannot be released, the General Staff or the Commander-in-Chief must release a short, high-confidence video/audio message immediately (NLT 300630Z) confirming "Command Continuity" and "Commitment of Reserves".
   • RATIONALE: Organizational survival signaling is now paramount to prevent internal operational collapse triggered by RF IO.

//END OF REPORT//