Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - CRITICAL TIMEFRAME EXPLOITATION

DTG: 291800Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: RF Operational Fixation Execution // Expiring Weather Window // Heightened IO and Cyber Activity

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE)

The enemy (RF) is rapidly executing the synchronized operational design, seeking to convert the tactical breach at Stepnohorsk into an operational success while simultaneously sustaining intense, multi-vector Information Operations (IO) targeting the National Command Authority (NCA). The critical window afforded by weather conditions is closing rapidly.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Southern Axis (Stepnohorsk/Vremyevsky): RF propagandist channels are claiming tactical control over Stepnohorsk (HIGH IO ACTIVITY, LOW FACTUAL CONFIDENCE). This indicates RF ground units are fully engaged in the urban area or its immediate vicinity, attempting to break the blocking line established by the UAF 3rd Assault Brigade. The integrity of the secondary defensive line is the immediate kinetic priority.
• Eastern Axis (Pokrovsk Direction): UAF 55th OABR successfully targeted and destroyed a BM-21 Grad Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) in the Pokrovsk direction (HIGH CONFIDENCE). This confirms the aggressive deployment of RF artillery assets ahead of the anticipated 27th MRD mechanized thrust, validating previous intelligence regarding the fixation effort. RF sources are also pushing IO narratives claiming active assaults on Pokrovsk itself.
• Strategic Depth: RF Sever Group of Forces confirms activation of the Tor-M2 Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) system (D-S belief 0.241), likely dedicated to protecting logistics nodes or command centers against continued UAF deep strikes, particularly in the northern/eastern sectors (Sumy/Poltava axis).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• The thick fog/mist previously suppressing UAV/BPS activity in the Huliaipole/Stepnohorsk sector is expected to dissipate NLT 300400Z. This dictates an extreme urgency for UAF forces to complete defensive engineering and logistical movements. The moment the weather lifts, an RF Air-to-Air (A2A) UAV surge is expected (HIGH CONFIDENCE).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: Focus is fixed on breaching Stepnohorsk, supported by concentrated fires in the Pokrovsk direction. RF naval assets face sustained interdiction threat following successful UAF Sea Baby drone strikes on two sanctioned tankers in the Black Sea (HIGH CONFIDENCE).
• UAF: UAF forces are attempting to stabilize the Stepnohorsk line while maintaining strategic initiative through interdiction and deep strike operations (MLRS destruction, naval attacks). UAF rescue operations in Kyiv following recent RF strikes are concluding, demonstrating continued civilian resilience management.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Intent: RF intention is to achieve a critical operational breakthrough at Stepnohorsk before UAF can achieve defensive parity, leveraging the synchronized information crisis (Yermak/OP rumors) to paralyze UAF decision-making and reserve allocation.
• Capability (Cyber/C2): The observed widespread service disruption to Yandex/Alisa (D-S belief 0.125) suggests the RF domestic information and communication infrastructure is vulnerable to external (UAF/Allied) cyber operations. While the operational impact on frontline RF tactical C2 (Troika/Azart systems) is currently unknown, disruption to RF rear area civilian networks could impact secondary logistics planning and personnel morale.
• Capability (Maritime Countermeasures): RF will likely accelerate measures to protect maritime logistics following the successful UAF naval drone strikes. This may involve shifting shadow fleet routes closer to Turkish territorial waters or increasing Black Sea Fleet air cover/escort operations (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF has rapidly integrated ground maneuver at Stepnohorsk with aggressive IO campaigns claiming success, attempting to preempt official UAF status reports and create panic. The deployment of advanced air defense (Tor-M2) to the Sever Group confirms the strategic prioritization of protecting rear logistical and offensive support hubs.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Vulnerability: The successful UAF strikes on tankers represent a significant, non-linear disruption to RF maritime resource acquisition (HIGH CONFIDENCE).
• Resilience: The established Kazakh land corridor remains the primary vector for RF logistical stabilization. Interdiction requirements against this land route remain paramount, as previously assessed.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing kinetic effort (Stepnohorsk, Pokrovsk fires) with psychological operations (Yermak crisis). The current effectiveness hinges on maintaining local battlefield momentum long enough for the information crisis to take effect.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains high operational initiative in the deep and naval domains, demonstrating the ability to strike high-value targets across multiple theaters simultaneously. Readiness is stressed by the commitment of key reserves (3rd Assault Brigade) to a decisive defensive action at Stepnohorsk.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Confirmed destruction of RF BM-21 MLRS (Pokrovsk direction), directly degrading the fire support assets for the 27th MRD fixation force. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Successful naval drone attack (Sea Baby) on two sanctioned RF tankers, maintaining high pressure on RF economic/logistical lines. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Successful release of combat footage/fundraising, maintaining cognitive dominance at the tactical level.
• Setbacks: The operational pressure at Stepnohorsk requires the 3rd Assault Brigade to commit valuable personnel and assets under extremely tight time constraints. RF IO claims regarding Stepnohorsk amplify the operational risk.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the short timeline before the weather clears. The core resource requirements remain: mobile C-UAS/EW, and long-range fires for the 27th MRD interdiction. The lack of immediate NCA public communication to counter the IO crisis remains a critical, unaddressed strategic constraint.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is at maximum effort, focusing on strategic destabilization:

1. Regime Collapse Narrative: Intense focus (Rybar, Alex Parker) framing the leadership transition rumors (Yermak/OP) as evidence of UAF corruption and system failure, directly aiming to dilute international trust and domestic morale (D-S belief 0.004).
2. Tactical Fabrication: Propagandist claims of controlling Stepnohorsk (Dva Mayor) are designed to undermine UAF command credibility and encourage internal questioning of official reports.
3. Cyber-Kinetic Link: The Yandex disruption, regardless of attribution, presents a significant event that RF IO will likely attempt to downplay or redirect, though its presence confirms a multi-domain conflict extending into the cyber realm (D-S belief 0.125).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF deep strike successes (Naval, MLRS) help sustain morale. However, the high-profile political rumors combined with continued kinetic strikes on civilian infrastructure (Kyiv debris clearance) create strategic uncertainty that risks impacting reserve mobilization and tactical unit cohesion if not rapidly mitigated.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

International focus is currently diverted by the severity of the internal IO crisis and the US political context. UAF must capitalize on the naval strike success to remind partners of UAF offensive capability and the necessity of immediate, decisive kinetic support.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Decisive Stepnohorsk Push and Aerial Surge Synchronization (NLT 300600Z) (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Vostok Group will accelerate ground assaults at Stepnohorsk, maximizing personnel commitment during the final hours of environmental cover.

1. Phase I (Ground Decisive Action): RF motorized elements, potentially utilizing UGV support, will attempt to flank or overwhelm the 3rd Assault Brigade's forward line before 300400Z.
2. Phase II (Kinetic Synchronization): The 27th MRD will increase volume and scope of preparatory fires (MLRS confirmed target) against the Pokrovsk salient to fix UAF reserves.
3. Phase III (Aerial Dominance): Upon fog lifting (estimated NLT 300400Z), RF BPS forces will saturate the Stepnohorsk-Vremyevsky airspace with A2A UAVs to achieve localized aerial supremacy, enabling ground breakthrough and targeting exposed UAF assets.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: Kinetic Retaliation and Operational Rupture (NLT 301200Z) (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) In direct retaliation for the successful naval strikes, RF executes a massed strategic missile/UAV strike (Geran/Kinzhal) package targeting critical UAF C2 hubs in the South/East, aiming to disable operational coordination immediately prior to a successful Stepnohorsk breach. The success of the ground assault allows RF Vostok Group to initiate an operational pursuit towards Velyka Novosilka, creating a major rupture in the southern front.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The tactical and strategic imperatives are time-critical: secure the line under limited environmental cover and neutralize the RF IO crisis before it affects kinetic operations.

1. MAXIMIZE WEATHER EXPLOITATION (J3/EW):

   • ACTION: Execute Operation SKY SWEEPER. Immediately deploy mobile EW assets and short-range VSHORAD/MANPADS systems to create robust, dense anti-UAV corridors along the 3rd Assault Brigade’s blocking positions at Stepnohorsk. Utilize remaining environmental cover (NLT 300400Z) to fully integrate EW coverage and establish rapid evacuation/resupply routes.
   • RATIONALE: Mitigating the expected RF A2A/BPS surge post-fog is the single greatest factor determining the outcome at Stepnohorsk (MLCOA).

2. SUSTAIN FIXATION INTERDICTION (J3/J2):

   • ACTION: Launch follow-on precision strikes NLT 30000Z targeting 27th MRD support elements, C2 nodes, and identified MLRS/HIMARS concentrations in the Krasnoarmeysk/Pokrovsk direction. Focus fire missions on identified RF counter-EW assets and troop assembly points utilizing available aerial and ground ISR.
   • RATIONALE: Continuous degradation of the fixing force prevents RF from fully dedicating its resources to the Stepnohorsk breach and protects the critical Pokrovsk salient.

3. COUNTER STRATEGIC IO CRISIS (NCA/J7):

   • ACTION: The NCA must immediately deliver a pre-recorded or live address NLT 292000Z. The message must directly address the Yermak/leadership transition, explicitly link the RF IO campaign to the Stepnohorsk kinetic assault, and affirm public confidence in UAF operational success (Naval strikes, MLRS destruction).
   • RATIONALE: Strategic silence empowers the RF IO campaign, risking the paralysis of strategic reserve commitment and eroding political capital domestically and internationally.

4. EXPLOIT CYBER VULNERABILITY (CYBER COMMAND/J2):

   • ACTION: Immediately assess the impact of the Yandex disruption and prioritize targeting RF civilian-military technology crossover points (e.g., communications, mapping, and logistics coordination platforms) for continued non-kinetic pressure.
   • RATIONALE: Leveraging cyber disruption adds a critical, disorienting dimension to the conflict, placing stress on RF C2 redundancy and rear area coordination.

//END OF REPORT//