Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE

DTG: 291500Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: RF Drone Attrition Escalation // BPS Doctrine Execution Confirmed // Critical Need for Frontline C-UAS Reinforcement

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE)

The operational environment is characterized by the deliberate application of the Russian Federation's (RF) formalized Drone Systems Troops (BPS) doctrine, specifically targeting Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) tactical reserves supporting the Southern Axis. RF ground maneuver remains localized but is preceded by methodical drone attrition, aimed at securing tactical air superiority.

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Southern Axis (Stepnohorsk/Novopavlivka/Vremyevsky): This area remains the RF priority. Confirmed RF BPS drone operations are targeting UAF personnel belonging to the 42nd Mechanized and 59th Motorized Infantry Brigades in the Novopavlivka area. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Pro-RF PSYOPS are actively focused on the Stepnohirsk sector, issuing ultimatums, suggesting an imminent kinetic escalation or a preparation for commitment of ground assets. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Pokrovsk (Donetsk Oblast): UAF demonstrates continued effective counter-battery fire capability, confirmed by the successful drone interdiction and destruction of an RF howitzer by the 55th Separate Artillery Brigade (55 OABR). This success confirms UAF C4ISR integrity in this sector. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kyiv/Strategic Rear: Emergency response units confirmed responding to damage following the long-range UAV strike reported in the previous SITREP.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Northern/Eastern Axes (Kharkiv): Official advisories confirm the presence of heavy fog, which will temporarily restrict low-altitude ISR and FPV drone operations, favoring ground reconnaissance and potentially masking small-scale RF infiltration attempts.
• Southern Axis: The anticipated rise in temperature (up to +12°C) is projected to increase the impact of Rasputitsa (mud) conditions, favoring the employment of RF low-profile assets (Kurier UGVs, dismounted BPS units) over heavy mechanized assaults.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF BPS units are executing methodical attrition in support of the Vostok Group maneuver force. Air assets remain focused on tactical degradation (drones) and strategic denial (long-range UAVs).
• UAF: UAF defensive posture is adapting rapidly to BPS threats, showing localized counter-successes (55 OABR). Critical UAF reserve forces (42 ombr, 59 oshpbr) are under active threat, necessitating immediate defensive reinforcement and C-UAS coverage.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capability (Drone Attrition): RF BPS units possess the capability and intent to conduct systematic, targeted attrition against UAF reserves using coordinated drone groups. This tactic aims to deplete UAF manpower and combat morale before a major ground assault. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Intention (Strategic Hybrid): RF maintains a multi-domain strategy focused on logistical disruption (Kazakh routes bypass) and strategic C4ISR paralysis (Starlink threat, C2 node targeting via A2A UAVs).
• New Messaging (Aviation): RF TASS denial regarding Airbus A320 software updates (related to Western sanctions) indicates a continued vulnerability and sensitivity in maintaining strategic airlift and dual-use components, although this does not impact immediate frontline operations.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift from general fire saturation to targeted drone attrition against specific, crucial UAF Brigades (42/59) is a significant adaptation. It confirms the BPS C2 is effective at processing and acting upon reconnaissance data to set conditions for subsequent ground exploitation in the Vremyevsky area.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The immediate logistical threat remains the Kurier UGV interdiction on the Konstiantynivka GLOC (per previous report) and the ongoing need to target the new Kazakh alternative POL routes. RF Vostok Group is buying time by prioritizing drone attrition over maneuver, allowing resupply streams to stabilize.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 demonstrates high integration across the kinetic, information, and diplomatic domains. The synchronization of PSYOPS (Stepnohirsk ultimatum, Yermak attack) with kinetic strikes (Novopavlivka) is designed to maximize psychological pressure and tactical effect.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains high in core defensive sectors, supported by effective counter-battery C4ISR processes (Pokrovsk success). However, the key reserves (42 ombr, 59 oshpbr) are currently operating under sustained drone pressure, which degrades tactical integrity and requires rapid resource redistribution.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed destruction of an RF howitzer in the Pokrovsk direction by 55 OABR, validating UAF proficiency in tactical drone/artillery coordination. Effective response and casualty care confirmed in Kyiv following infrastructure strike.
• Setbacks: UAF reserves (42/59 Brigades) are taking casualties from systematic RF BPS attacks in Novopavlivka. This attrition risks diminishing the immediate response capacity of the Southern Front reserve pool.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT INTENSIFIED: Immediate and substantial reinforcement of C-UAS/EW capability specifically for the 42nd and 59th Brigades in the Novopavlivka area to negate the RF BPS attrition campaign. The constraint remains the allocation conflict between deep rear infrastructure protection and frontline C-UAS coverage.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Internal/Leadership Attack): Intense, synchronized campaign targeting the credibility and integrity of Andriy Yermak (Head of the Office of the President). Messaging uses selective media leaks (NYT) and domestic criticism (Butusov/financial claims) to manufacture an internal political crisis and undermine the Ukrainian government's legitimacy. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF IO (Geopolitical): Utilizing the alleged Moldovan drone incident to accuse the EU of escalation and coercion, attempting to undermine Western influence in neighboring states. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF Information Operations successfully leverage rescue and response footage from the Kyiv strikes to solidify narratives of resilience and competency. However, the sustained internal political attack on leadership (Yermak) risks fracturing domestic cohesion if left unaddressed.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Geopolitical distractions (Trump/Venezuela) continue to circulate. The RF denial concerning Airbus A320 software is indicative of an underlying strategic vulnerability that UAF diplomatic channels should continue to exploit to press for tighter technological sanctions.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA: Sustained BPS Attrition and Preparatory Assault (NLT 48 hours) (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Vostok Group will sustain the high-intensity BPS attrition campaign against UAF reserves (42/59 Brigades) in the Novopavlivka sector. The objective is to achieve localized personnel and materiel depletion, coupled with localized Starlink jamming, setting the conditions for a concentrated ground assault on the Stepnohirsk/Vremyevsky line beginning NLT 010000Z DEC.

1. Attrition Phase: BPS drones achieve 20-30% attrition rate in targeted brigades, forcing UAF to withdraw or commit scarce reinforcement.
2. Logistical Recovery: POL flow stabilizes through Kazakh routes, allowing RF Vostok Group to achieve 80% operational readiness for a major push.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA: Sudden Synchronized Breach (NLT 302000Z NOV) (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF BPS units utilize confirmed A2A UAV capability to achieve a decisive, temporary aerial clearance over the Stepnohirsk salient, synchronized with a total communications blackout (Starlink denial). RF ground forces, utilizing the renewed logistics (Kazakh routes), launch a deep penetration attempt, targeting the flanks of the contained Huliaipole sector and potentially achieving an operational breakthrough.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

The immediate priority is to preserve the combat effectiveness of the tactical reserve forces under RF drone attrition and maintain offensive pressure on RF logistics.

1. PROTECT NOVOPAVLIVKA RESERVES (J3/J4):

   • ACTION: Execute an emergency deployment plan to saturate the Novopavlivka sector (AOR of 42/59 Brigades) with specialized mobile C-UAS and anti-FPV jammer systems NLT 292000Z NOV. Use EW to create localized "drone exclusion zones" to shield these critical reserves.
   • RATIONALE: Protecting the 42nd and 59th Brigades is essential to prevent RF from successfully attriting the operational reserves necessary to stabilize the Huliaipole/Vremyevsky line against the impending ground assault (MLCOA).

2. EXPLOIT TACTICAL C-BATTERY SUCCESS (J3/J6):

   • ACTION: Extract and immediately disseminate the successful drone/artillery C2 TTPs utilized by the 55 OABR in the Pokrovsk direction to all frontline artillery brigades. Prioritize the allocation of precision loitering munitions to these units to maximize the effectiveness of confirmed RF asset location data.
   • RATIONALE: Leverage proven UAF battlefield successes to maintain localized fire superiority and degrade RF artillery support ahead of ground assaults.

3. COUNTER HYBRID ATTACKS (J7/NCA):

   • ACTION: Launch an immediate, coordinated public information campaign to address the manufactured political crisis targeting leadership (Yermak). The campaign must emphasize unity, refute corruption claims with verifiable data, and confirm transparency regarding frontline commitment.
   • RATIONALE: Internal political instability is a primary RF hybrid warfare objective (D-S belief 0.0035). Maintaining national cohesion is critical for sustaining the war effort.

//END OF REPORT//