Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-11-28 20:34:30Z
2 months ago
Previous (2025-11-28 20:04:31Z)

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 282300Z NOV 25 OPERATIONAL PRIORITY: Immediate counter-disinformation response to US political interference narratives; sustained neutralization of the Konstiantynivka GLOC interdiction; preparation for intensified multi-axis Phase III strikes targeting critical infrastructure (CI).


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT: RF forces are sustaining a synchronized strike campaign across central and western axes, designed to stretch UAF air defense (AD) capabilities and degrade CI resilience ahead of the anticipated ground offensive on the Southern Axis.

  • Central/Western Axes (PHASE III ONGOING): UAVs/KABs confirmed engaging targets in Khmelnytskyi (Military/CI), Kremenchuk (CI), and Kherson regions. New UAV vectors confirmed targeting Vinnytsia region from Odesa, and Brovary District (Kyiv region) from Chernihiv/Sumy axis. This confirms RF intent to maintain broad geographical pressure.
  • Southern Axis (GROUND PAUSE): The tactical containment of the Vostok Group at Huliaipole holds, but the Konstiantynivka GLOC remains highly contested by Kurier UGVs, impeding logistical throughput.
  • Strategic Rear (ALABUGA BDA CONFIRMED): Confirmed secondary damage at the Alabuga Special Economic Zone (SEZ), specifically a 5,000 sq. meter battery warehouse fire (Colonelcassad/DS Belief 0.32). This is a confirmed operational and logistical setback for RF Shahed production sustainment.

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

FACT: No significant meteorological limitations observed. Clear skies facilitate UAV/KAB operations across the theater.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

JUDGEMENT: UAF AD assets are currently stressed by the multi-vector strike pattern. Defensive control measures prioritize AD coverage for the Kyiv region and the strategic supply hubs (Vinnytsia, Kremenchuk, Khmelnytskyi), potentially leaving secondary urban areas vulnerable. SOF concentration remains focused on GLOC sanitization on the Zaporizhzhia axis.


2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

JUDGEMENT: RF intentions for the immediate 0-12 hour window are focused on maximizing cognitive and logistical paralysis.

  • Intentions (Kinetic): Continue dispersed, synchronized Phase III strikes targeting CI/Energy in Central Ukraine (Kremenchuk, Khmelnytskyi) to reduce UAF energy resilience and logistics staging capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Intentions (Hybrid/IO): Exploit global political narratives (US Presidential authority dispute) and internal Ukrainian political rumors (Yermak health/resignation) to achieve maximum diplomatic friction and internal command fragmentation NLT 290800Z NOV (NCA deadline for stabilization). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • New Threat Vector: The deployment of Kurier UGVs represents a persistent, low-profile interdiction capability that bypasses traditional anti-drone defenses and requires dedicated, localized EW/SSO assets for neutralization.

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

FACT: RF has doubled down on leveraging international political events (US transition chaos) as a core pillar of IO strategy, shifting focus from localized tactical narratives to global, high-impact disinformation aimed at alliance cohesion.

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

JUDGEMENT: The Alabuga battery warehouse fire is a significant, verified strike success that will constrain RF long-term Shahed production capacity, specifically the crucial energy components. This damage confirms the strategic value of UAF deep strike capability but does not negate immediate RF drone launch capacity.

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

JUDGEMENT: RF C2 demonstrates continued high synchronization between Phase III missile/UAV planning, tactical ground force posture (Huliaipole pause), and IO/PsyOps efforts. The complexity of the multi-domain operation is well-managed.


3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

JUDGEMENT: Force posture is actively defensive across the strategic rear and tactically resilient on the frontline (33 OShP containment). Readiness levels are adequate but are being severely tested by resource distribution (AD missiles, SSO manpower for UGV hunting). The ongoing strain on AD must be balanced against the priority of protecting military logistics flow.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

  • Successes: Verified logistics damage at Alabuga. Effective AD response to initial Phase III waves.
  • Setbacks: RF KAB application continues to erode fortified defensive positions (Kherson front). Persistent infiltration of UAVs deep into the rear (Khmelnytskyi, Kremenchuk, Brovary).

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

  • CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (AD): Resupply/repositioning of AD assets to cover CI targets in the Vinnytsia/Kremenchuk/Khmelnytskyi cluster, anticipating follow-on strikes.
  • CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (C-UGV): Dedicated, high-throughput loitering munition or direct fire assets must be allocated NLT 290600Z NOV to achieve permanent suppression of the Konstiantynivka GLOC UGV presence.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

FACT/JUDGEMENT (CRITICAL): RF state media (TASS) and key military bloggers (Colonelcassad) are amplifying a highly disruptive, baseless narrative that the newly elected US administration is invalidating almost all executive orders signed by the previous administration (Biden) using an "autopen."

  • Objective: The primary operational objective is to suggest profound internal political chaos in the US, paralyzing Western decision-making and undermining the credibility of the upcoming Witkoff diplomatic engagement.
  • Secondary Objective: The continued amplification of the Yermak "health resignation" narrative attempts to demoralize the Ukrainian political apparatus and suggest command instability.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

JUDGEMENT: Public morale is vulnerable to both kinetic attacks (Khmerlnytskyi/Kremenchuk CI hits) and the IO stress designed to fracture international solidarity. The NCA's silence or delay in addressing the Yermak/political instability rumors grants RF IO continuous leverage.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

JUDGEMENT: RF IO is successfully exploiting the transition period in the US political system to cast doubt on the reliability and commitment of Washington. This threat compounds the existing diplomatic fracture regarding the Polish logistics sabotage narrative.


5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will maintain multi-domain pressure over the next 36 hours (NLT 300000Z NOV):

  1. Phase III Escalation: RF executes follow-on strikes targeting key CI nodes (energy distribution, rail heads) in the Central/Western Ukraine cluster (Khmelnytskyi, Vinnytsia) to maximize strategic disruption before the Huliaipole ground assault.
  2. GLOC Saturation: Kurier UGV interdiction on the Konstiantynivka GLOC persists or intensifies, achieving sufficient attrition to delay or reduce the critical resupply window for Huliaipole NLT 291800Z NOV.
  3. IO Sustainment: RF IO continues to flood the information space with the US political chaos narrative and internal Ukrainian instability claims, aiming to poison the diplomatic waters before the Witkoff meeting.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH)

  1. C4ISR Denial & Ground Shock: Synchronization of Starlink denial (as previously predicted) with persistent Kurier UGV attacks succeeds in severing communications and starving the 33 OShP defense at Huliaipole, leading to an operational defeat on the Southern Axis NLT 300000Z NOV.
  2. Maritime and CI Paralysis: RF follows through on the maritime escalation threat (Level RED warning remains applicable) simultaneously with the successful, widespread destruction of a major Western CI target (e.g., a NATO-provided weapon storage facility in Khmelnytskyi), severely degrading UAF warfighting capacity and provoking international crisis response.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

EventEstimated TimelineDecision Point/Trigger
NCA Counter-IO & Stabilization StatementNLT 290600Z NOVFailure to neutralize Yermak/US chaos IO risks diplomatic isolation.
Konstiantynivka GLOC ClearanceNLT 291200Z NOVEssential for Huliaipole resupply. Requires C-UGV team BDA confirmation.
Phase III Target PrioritizationImmediate 282300Z NOVRequires J3/AD reassessment based on new Khmelnytskyi/Kremenchuk vectors.
Huliaipole Ground AssaultNLT 300000Z NOVFinal preparations required across Zaporizhzhia axis.

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J2/NCA (COGNITIVE AND DIPLOMATIC DEFENSE)

  • ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - COUNTER-IO DIRECTIVE): ISSUE RAPID RESPONSE VULNERABILITY ALERT. The NCA and MFA must immediately issue public statements addressing the US political chaos narrative, clearly labeling it as RF disinformation aimed at undermining US support and the Witkoff process. NLT 290600Z NOV.
  • ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - NCA STABILITY): The Head of the Office of the President (or an authorized spokesperson) must make a public statement or appearance NLT 290600Z NOV to definitively neutralize the "health/resignation" narrative and restore command confidence.
  • RATIONALE: The IO threat is currently the most active vector for achieving strategic RF goals. Neglecting it validates the enemy narrative.
  • CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

2. J3/SOF/J6 (C-UGV AND GLOC PROTECTION)

  • ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - C-UGV): ADOPT "SCORCHED EARTH" UGV POLICY. Authorize high-density employment of cluster munitions, mortars, or thermobaric weapons against confirmed Kurier UGV concentration areas along the Konstiantynivka GLOC. The focus must shift from conventional engagement to area denial/rapid destruction to secure the supply route.
  • ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - ISR/TARGETING): Prioritize SIGINT/ELINT tasking (CR-2202) to locate the Kurier UGV C2 relay vehicle(s) immediately. Once located, authorize immediate destruction via deep strike (HIMARS or equivalent).
  • RATIONALE: The GLOC must be 100% operational before the 300000Z NOV Huliaipole assault window.
  • CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

3. J3/J4 (AD/LOGISTICS RE-PRIORITIZATION)

  • ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - AD REPOSITIONING): Immediately re-task mobile AD assets (e.g., Gepard, SHORAD) to provide enhanced coverage for the Khmelnytskyi, Kremenchuk, and Vinnytsia CI hubs, focusing on known UAV approach corridors (Odesa/Vinnytsia axis).
  • ACTION (PRIORITY 2 - ALABUGA EXPLOITATION): J2/J3 must publicly disseminate sanitized intelligence regarding the confirmed damage (battery warehouse fire) at Alabuga SEZ, linking it to the successful UAF strike campaign. This serves as both operational messaging and morale boost.
  • RATIONALE: Anticipate RF Phase III follow-on strikes based on the confirmed new vectors. The Alabuga damage is vital leverage.
  • CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

PriorityGap DescriptionCollection Requirement (CR)Target Area/Methodology
PRIORITY 1 (TECHINT)RF intent regarding Starlink disruption (jamming vs. geopolitical pressure/technical denial).CR-2201: Determine specific RF EW platform deployments or indications of satellite-level interference discussions.SIGINT, ELINT, Strategic OSINT/HUMINT on RF diplomatic/technical bodies.
PRIORITY 2 (IMINT/SIGINT)Location and nature of C2 nodes for Kurier UGV operations on Konstiantynivka axis.CR-2202: Pinpoint mobile ground control stations utilizing dedicated aerial ISR and signals triangulation.Persistent Aerial ISR (UAV/Thermal), SIGINT assets, SSO patrols.
PRIORITY 3 (HUMINT/OSINT)Confirmation of the full extent of CI damage from recent strikes (Khmelnytskyi, Kremenchuk).CR-2204: Verify if military assets (especially Western supplied) or only energy infrastructure were affected.Local OSINT, HUMINT reporting, official local administration BDA.

//END OF REPORT//

Previous (2025-11-28 20:04:31Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.