Situation Report

TIME: 281600Z NOV 25

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

ANALYST JUDGMENT: The operational center of gravity remains the Strategic Rear and Logistical Corridors (GLOCs). RF forces are executing the predicted delay in the Huliaipole kinetic assault (Vostok Group) to maximize the effect of a multi-domain campaign targeting NATO logistical flow (Polish crisis) and C4ISR integrity (Starlink threat, Kurier UGV interdiction). UAF must treat the Polish GLOC security crisis and C4ISR hardening as the immediate combat priority, over kinetic defense at Huliaipole, which is currently contained. The successful UAF deep strike on Dragunskoye (BDR) serves as a necessary counter-shaping operation.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1 Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Huliaipole): UAF containment (33 OShP) remains effective. RF Vostok Group continues PSYOP/Fire Saturation phase. Ground maneuver elements remain stalled in assembly areas, corroborating the predicted MLCOA delay NLT 300000Z NOV. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• GLOC Security (Konstiantynivka): Confirmed use of NTK Kurier UGVs (Unmanned Ground Vehicles) represents a persistent, high-risk physical interdiction threat to the main supply route supporting the Donbas front. This GLOC is now categorized as HIGH THREAT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Strategic Rear (RF Territory): UAF deep strike capability is confirmed successful against an electrical substation in Dragunskoye Village (Belgorod Region). This directly challenges the RF narrative of domestic security and maintains pressure on RF strategic resources following previous strikes on Lipetsk/Yasny. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Krasnolimansky Front: RF claims of tactical victories in this sector are being amplified (Colonelcassad). Assessed as an RF attempt to fix UAF reserves and inflate RF morale/IO effectiveness, rather than a decisive maneuver effort. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

1.2 Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Low visibility conditions continue to favor low-profile assets, specifically facilitating the covert deployment and operation of FPV drones and the new Kurier UGVs.

1.3 Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF (Red): RF C2 demonstrates immediate tactical integration of propaganda (targeting the UAF 125th Brigade) with strategic IO (amplifying the Krasnogorsk IED incident for domestic consumption). RF resources are concentrated on non-kinetic methods to degrade UAF combat potential.
• UAF (Blue): UAF operational efforts are appropriately focused on deep shaping fires (Dragunskoye) and tactical defense (Huliaipole). Resources must be immediately shifted to dedicated Counter-UGV and C4ISR Redundancy measures.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1 Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities: RF retains global-reach IO capabilities (leveraging TASS for domestic narrative control) and is demonstrating technological escalation on the ground (UGV deployment).
• Intentions:
  1. Deceive and Degrade: Use the Huliaipole kinetic pause to maximize psychological pressure and diplomatic leverage (Polish crisis).
  2. Strategic Narrative Control: Employ high-profile domestic narratives (Krasnogorsk IED, Putin's empathy) to rally domestic support and justify continued conflict escalation.
  3. Target Specific UAF Units: Propaganda targeting the 125th Brigade (TD/Mechanized) intends to sow mistrust between UAF high command and frontline units, suggesting negligence and high casualties.

2.2 Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed deployment of the Kurier UGV to key GLOCs shifts the immediate physical interdiction threat from fleeting FPV strikes to persistent, armored, ground-based ambush systems. This necessitates a fundamental change in UAF GLOC security protocols (from anti-drone to anti-armor/SOF clearance). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3 Logistics and Sustainment Status

No change to the assessed material strain on RF armor (ERA component shortage). The new UGV deployment suggests RF is seeking low-cost, expendable, automated solutions for tactical problems (GLOC interdiction) that would otherwise require high-value, manned vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4 Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains highly adaptive, leveraging simultaneous psychological and technological vectors. The swift, coordinated targeting of the 125th Brigade via propaganda indicates specific, up-to-date intelligence is being fed directly into IO planning. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1 Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Kinetic Posture: High readiness for deep strike confirmed by the Dragunskoye engagement. The 33 OShP is maintaining defensive integrity.
• Information Posture: UAF IO must urgently address the specific RF targeting of the 125th Brigade to prevent morale and C2 degradation within the unit and among territorial defense components.

3.2 Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Successful deep strike on Dragunskoye substation (BDR). Successful containment of the Huliaipole breach by 33 OShP.
• Setbacks: The emergence of a persistent, ground-based technological threat (Kurier UGV) on the Konstiantynivka GLOC complicates critical resupply operations.

3.3 Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL TECH REQUIREMENT: Immediate fielding of EW and SOF assets capable of detecting, jamming, and kinetically neutralizing small, low-profile UGVs (Kurier).
• STRATEGIC IO REQUIREMENT: A coordinated counter-narrative addressing the RF propaganda targeting specific UAF units (e.g., 125th Brigade).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1 Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• VECTOR 1: Unit Degradation. RF (Воин DV) explicitly targets the 125th Separate Heavy Mechanized Brigade, framing its alleged losses as evidence of reckless UAF command and the inadequacy of former Territorial Defense forces.
• VECTOR 2: Justification for Retaliation. The TASS report on the Krasnogorsk IED victim serves to globally reinforce the RF narrative of victimhood and terrorism, justifying massive, retaliatory strikes (like the infrastructure attacks previously observed in Kherson).
• VECTOR 3: Localized Victory Projection. Amplification of unverified victories on secondary fronts (Krasnolimansky) to maintain the momentum of the RF offensive narrative.

4.2 Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The simultaneous pressure from the domestic RF terrorism narrative (Krasnogorsk) and the specific targeting of UAF units (125th) increases the risk of both internal and external strategic fatigue. UAF must respond rapidly to RF unit-specific IO to maintain trust in command accountability.

4.3 International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The Polish logistical crisis remains the primary strategic threat. Mitigation efforts are required NLT 282000Z NOV before RF demands transition from diplomatic leverage to verifiable operational restrictions on NATO/UAF aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1 Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will utilize the 24-48 hour window (NLT 300000Z NOV) created by the Huliaipole pause to synchronize Phase II of the Hybrid Campaign:

1. C4ISR Denial: Targeted or phased Starlink disruptions commence NLT 290800Z NOV to test UAF C2 redundancy.
2. GLOC Attrition: Increased deployment and activity of Kurier UGVs on the Konstiantynivka axis, leading to verified logistical constraints and higher UAF vehicle losses.
3. Diplomatic Freeze: RF diplomatic channels demand immediate action regarding the Polish sabotage allegations, likely forcing Warsaw to impose temporary restrictions on aid transit.

5.2 Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(Confidence: MEDIUM) RF achieves concurrent operational paralysis:

1. A widespread, synchronized C4ISR denial across the Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk axes.
2. Polish government imposes a 72-hour or indefinite restriction on military logistics flow in response to the sabotage crisis, creating a strategic logistical vacuum.
3. RF Vostok Group executes a coordinated, massed mechanized and drone assault on Huliaipole, capitalizing on the logistical and C2 failures, achieving the MDCOA of a rapid strategic collapse of the Southern Front.

5.3 Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J4/MFA (LOGISTICAL SECURITY & COUNTER-HYBRID)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - STRATEGIC): Implement the Joint Task Force (JTF) Diplomatic Security with Poland protocol immediately. Use the UAF deep strike success (Dragunskoye) as leverage to demonstrate proactive security capability, countering RF allegations that Ukraine is a weak or unreliable security partner.
• RATIONALE: The MLCOA targets the strategic logistical foundation. Political mitigation is an operational necessity.
• CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

2. J3/SOF COMMAND (COUNTER-UGV OPERATIONS)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 1 - TACTICAL): Immediately establish Kurier UGV Hunter-Killer Teams consisting of SSO/EW assets. Equip teams with advanced thermal optics, FPV jammer backpacks, and precision anti-armor munitions (RPG/ATGM). Mission objective: Clear the Konstiantynivka GLOC of UGV threats NLT 290600Z NOV.
• RATIONALE: The Konstiantynivka GLOC is the current critical point of failure for resupplying the contained Huliaipole defense. UGVs require immediate physical and electronic neutralization.
• CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

3. J6/C4ISR (C2 HARDENING)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 2): Execute Operation Guardian Shield (Redundancy Transition) as previously recommended. Ensure all fire control and brigade-level C2 rely on non-Starlink encrypted VHF/UHF radio nets and redundant geo-stationary satellite communications (SATCOM) NLT 281800Z NOV. Log all C2 failures post-290800Z NOV for immediate TECHINT analysis (Priority 1 Collection Requirement).
• RATIONALE: Preempt the predicted C4ISR test/denial phase (MLCOA).
• CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

4. J7/IO COMMAND (COUNTER-PROPAGANDA)

• ACTION (PRIORITY 3): Launch an immediate, verified Counter-Propaganda Campaign specifically refuting the RF narrative targeting the 125th Brigade. This campaign must feature senior military leadership visiting the unit, confirming its combat effectiveness, and highlighting its role in the current defense.
• RATIONALE: Counter specific RF PSYOPS designed to degrade morale and create strategic mistrust within UAF reserves.
• CONFIDENCE: HIGH.

---

//END OF REPORT//