Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) – OPERATION: CRITICAL DEFENSE (HULIAIPOLE AXIS)

TIME: 280600Z NOV 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SITREP)

A. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain The operational center of gravity remains the Huliaipole defensive belt. RF preparation for the mechanized assault is complete, with execution anticipated immediately upon sunrise (NLT 280600Z). The deep rear is now formally assessed as a highly contested operational space following confirmed UAF deep strikes and persistent RF ISR. Key targets confirmed under active threat:

1. Huliaipole FLOT: High ground observation points.
2. Odesa Oblast: Chornomorske/Pivdennyi port infrastructure. (UAV track confirmation 280258Z)
3. Northern Logistics: Romny Raion supply routes.

B. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations Current conditions: Pre-dawn, low visibility transitioning to sunrise. Light fog reported in the Zaporizhzhia sector (FACT). Favorable conditions for mechanized maneuver NLT 280700Z.

C. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

1. Zaporizhzhia Axis (Huliaipole): UAF forces are fixed in place. Pre-Emptive Counter-Preparation (PCP) fires continue. The immediate failure to locate critical RF TOS-2 systems places the initial defense in a high-risk posture.
2. Deep Rear (UAF Initiative): UAF successfully executed deep strikes, confirmed by RF reporting of UAV attacks repelled in Rostov Oblast (280254Z) and corresponding disruptions at Vnukovo Airport (280237Z). This confirms UAF retains the initiative to strike RF operational depth, forcing RF C2 to divert AD/security resources. (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE)
3. Deep Rear (RF Initiative): RF UAV activity targeting Odesa remains persistent (280258Z), focusing specifically on the Chornomorske/Pivdennyi port areas. This is a critical infrastructure threat synchronized with the Huliaipole assault. (FACT)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

A. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action RF intention is unchanged: Achieve operational breakthrough at Huliaipole NLT 280600Z.

• Capabilities: RF retains the capability to launch deep precision strikes (Geran on Dmytro-Daryivka 280235Z) and saturate the ground assault with thermobaric/kinetic fire (TOS-2). They demonstrate resilience by quickly lifting operational restrictions (Vnukovo 280248Z, Lipetsk 280303Z) following UAF strikes.
• Tactical Adaptations (New): RF has adapted to UAF deep strikes by hardening central AD defenses (Moscow/Lipetsk AD confirmed) while accepting increased tactical risk to logistics hubs further from the core (Rostov). RF is utilizing synchronized information operations (IO) immediately following tactical engagements (Dmytro-Daryivka video release).
• Intelligence Gaps Impact: The failure to locate the TOS-2 systems severely degrades the effectiveness of UAF counter-preparation efforts, increasing RF's probability of success in the initial breach.

B. Logistics and Sustainment Status RF sustainment remains adequate for the immediate assault. The successful UAF strike on Rostov suggests potential disruption to key border staging areas or logistics columns, forcing RF C2 to conduct rapid battle damage assessment (BDA) and possibly slightly delaying subsequent waves of the Huliaipole assault. (JUDGMENT - MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

C. Command and Control Effectiveness RF C2 remains effective in managing crises arising from UAF deep strikes (Vnukovo/Lipetsk alerts). The continued, focused ISR threat directed at Odesa/Chornomorske suggests centralized synchronization of the multi-domain operational plan.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

A. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Readiness: Forces are at Condition 1 (Imminent Attack).
• Strategic Leverage: UAF deep strike capability is the most potent operational lever currently active. The Rostov strike demonstrates capacity to impose costs on RF logistics and strategic security, forcing RF to commit AD resources away from the FLOT.
• Vulnerability: The lack of confirmed TOS-2 location and the persistent threat to the Odesa port area expose UAF to severe kinetic and economic damage.

B. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Operational): Confirmed successful deep strike against military-related targets in Rostov Oblast (280254Z). This action successfully distracts RF AD allocation and tests their border security defenses.
• Setback (Tactical): The identified UAV threat in Odesa Oblast has confirmed its vector towards the critical naval/economic infrastructure of Chornomorske/Pivdennyi. If successful, this attack would achieve a strategic economic blow concurrent with a critical military engagement.

C. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT (P1 Gap): The window to confirm/strike RF TOS-2 systems closes at 280530Z, which is now passed. UAF must rely on the execution of the authorized pre-planned saturation mission.
• CONSTRAINT (SHORAD/EW): UAF SHORAD and EW capacity is stretched to the point of operational friction. Allocation decisions must now prioritize the defense of Odesa/Chornomorske (economic/strategic) concurrently with the Northern logistics hub (Romny).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

A. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns RF IO continues to coordinate tactical military success with strategic diplomatic friction:

1. Morale Attack: Video documenting the Geran strike (Dmytro-Daryivka) is intended to reinforce the narrative of RF kinetic dominance near the Pokrovsk pocket/Huliaipole.
2. Alliance Fracture (NEW FOCUS): RF IO is now shifting the attack from high-level diplomatic rifts to the immediate existential threat to Ukrainian citizens, claiming the West is forcing Ukrainians ("to the slaughter") by planning refugee returns ("War to the last Ukrainian" 280248Z). (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE)

B. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors The successful Rostov strike provides a morale counter-balance to the imminent Huliaipole assault and the Pokrovsk encirclement. The immediate vulnerability is the IO attack targeting refugees, which can erode domestic cohesion and trust in Western support.

C. International Support and Diplomatic Developments The core diplomatic mission must now urgently address the refugee/repatriation narrative to prevent panic and maintain public confidence in Western solidarity. The focus on the US peace plan leak remains a critical vector for RF exploitation.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

A. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) MLCOA: Full Scale Huliaipole Assault and Coordinated Deep Infrastructure Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Assault Execution: RF initiates the Huliaipole mechanized assault utilizing maximum KAB saturation and unsupported TOS-2 fires (due to UAF failure to locate/strike them preemptively).
2. Infrastructure Degradation: The UAV threat targeting Odesa/Chornomorske successfully strikes port facilities (NLT 280800Z), achieving strategic economic damage concurrent with the ground assault.
3. IO Synchronization: RF releases intensified IO targeting the refugee/Western failure narrative (NLT 281000Z).

B. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) MDCOA: Early Breach, Economic Paralysis, and Operational Fragmentation (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a successful 5+ km tactical breach at Huliaipole, utilizing the unmolested TOS-2 systems to inflict devastating early casualties. Simultaneously, the Odesa port strike causes widespread disruption of Black Sea shipping, leading to immediate pressure from international economic partners, forcing UAF General Staff to reallocate critical QRF/SHORAD assets south, fragmenting the operational response along the Zaporizhzhia front.

C. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. FIRE SUPPORT & TARGETING (J3/Fire Command)

• ACTION (CRITICAL - IMMEDIATE EXECUTION): Confirmation of Saturation Fire Execution. Confirm that the pre-planned saturation fire mission against the highest-probability RF staging area west of Huliaipole was executed at 280530Z (or immediately thereafter) to mitigate the P1 gap failure.
• ACTION: Immediately task deep strike assets (HIMARS, etc.) to target confirmed RF logistics and staging areas in Rostov Oblast, leveraging the previously identified vulnerability to maintain RF AD fixation in the deep rear.

2. FORCE PROTECTION & COUNTER-ISR (J3/J2)

• ACTION (PRIORITY SHIFT): Immediate SHORAD Diversion to Odesa. Divert high-capacity SHORAD and EW assets from secondary defensive sectors (e.g., portions of the East Dnipropetrovsk axis) immediately to defend Odesa/Chornomorske/Pivdennyi port infrastructure against the confirmed UAV vector. The economic and strategic risk of a successful port strike (MDCOA driver) outweighs the marginal risk reduction offered by these assets at the FLOT. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• ACTION: Maintain the aggressive armored sweep of the Konstiantynivka GLOC. Security of this route is non-negotiable for reserve deployment to Huliaipole.

3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION & COUNTER-IO (NCA/MFA)

• ACTION (URGENT COUNTER-IO): Neutralize Refugee Narrative. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and Presidential Office must immediately coordinate with Western diplomatic partners (Germany, Poland, UK) to issue a public, multi-lingual statement guaranteeing the rights and security of Ukrainian refugees and forcefully rejecting the RF narrative of mandatory repatriation/abandonment. This must be the primary IO focus NLT 280800Z.
• ACTION: Amplify Deep Strike Success. Utilize the confirmed Rostov attack (280254Z) and the NPP restoration (280220Z) to project a dual narrative of national resilience and capability to strike deep into RF territory, countering the demoralizing impact of the POW/encirclement media.

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS