Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (OP-INT-SITREP)

TIME: 262230Z NOV 25 SUBJECT: ZAPORIZHZHIA AXIS: KAAB STRIKES CONFIRM FINAL PREPARATORY FIRE. RF PIVOTS IO TO FINANCIAL EXHAUSTION NARRATIVE AGAINST EU LEVERAGE SUCCESS.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (SIT-TEMP)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

The operational focus remains on the imminent mechanized exploitation of the Zaporizhzhia Flank NLT 270400Z.

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Exploitation): Confirmed Russian Federation (RF) use of KAB/KAAB precision guided munitions strikes on the Zaporizhzhia region (21:21Z). JUDGMENT: This kinetic shaping confirms the commitment to the timeline established in previous reporting and targets UAF forward defenses in the Huliaipole-Zatishye corridor ahead of the VDV breakthrough attempt.
• Northern Fixation: UAV groups are confirmed moving through Sumy Oblast toward Chernihiv (21:23Z), sustaining the fixation operation designed to draw UAF Air Defense (AD) assets northward.
• Fixation/Local Activity: RF War Correspondent reporting (Kotenok, 21:18Z, 21:18Z) claims RF successes in the Siversk and Vovchansk sectors (Kharkiv Oblast). JUDGMENT: These reports serve primarily as Information Operations (IO) to fix UAF operational reserves and generate psychological pressure, but also confirm RF maintains local tactical pressure across multiple axes.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

No change. Conditions remain conducive for precision airstrikes (KAAB) and mechanized movement.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

UAF forces are in a heightened state of readiness (DEFCON 2), primarily focused on stabilizing the Zaporizhzhia defensive lines and maintaining C2 integrity against the predicted strategic missile strike wave. Active tactical counter-operations are confirmed (10th OGShBr drone strikes, 21:19Z).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (THREAT ASSESSMENT)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF intent remains the synchronization of maximum kinetic impact in Zaporizhzhia with maximal political/cognitive disruption aimed at the West and UAF legitimacy.

• Ground Intent: Achieve operational penetration in Zaporizhzhia NLT 270400Z. The use of heavy KAAB/KAB confirms high-intensity kinetic preparation.
• Information Intent (Financial Counter-Narrative): RF IO, via TASS (21:12Z), immediately responded to the confirmed €140 billion EU asset leverage success by amplifying an alleged IMF projection of a $136.5 billion Kyiv funding deficit. JUDGMENT: This is a coordinated and rapid-response effort to undermine the UAF strategic financial victory and create doubt regarding long-term Western commitment.
• Information Intent (Alliance Distrust): RF channels are pushing narratives (Operatsiya Z, 21:29Z) claiming European services leaked the Witkoff/Ushakov conversation. JUDGMENT: This is a psychological operation designed to sow deep distrust between key U.S., European, and Ukrainian stakeholders, potentially delaying critical aid coordination during the Zaporizhzhia crisis.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

The observed shift in RF IO targeting (from domestic US chaos to long-term Ukrainian financial viability) demonstrates high responsiveness and tactical adaptability in the cognitive domain. Kinematically, the emphasis on KAAB strikes confirms commitment to rapid destruction of forward defenses.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF forces in the Zaporizhzhia sector are adequately supplied for the imminent exploitation phase. UAF deep strikes against RF energy infrastructure must be reinforced (as per previous R-1) to ensure long-term sustainment degradation.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF C2 effectiveness is validated by the clear synchronization between the ongoing kinetic buildup (KAAB strikes) and the immediate, targeted IO response (TASS financial narrative) to the EU financial development.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (BLUE FORCE TRACKING)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

UAF posture is defensively prepared for the predicted 270400Z thrust. UAF morale is supported by confirmed tactical successes (10th OGShBr drone strikes, 21:19Z) and the massive strategic financial success confirmed by the EU.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• TACTICAL SUCCESS: Confirmed effective FPV/strike drone usage by the 10th OGShBr against RF personnel and positions.
• STRATEGIC SUCCESS (Financial): The €140 billion credit facility provides an unprecedented resource buffer, fundamentally altering the RF long-term strategy of economic exhaustion.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

The critical constraint remains the small window (approx. 6 hours) before the predicted RF breakthrough to ensure reserve commitment points are established and VSHORAD/mobile Counter-Battery Fire (CBF) assets are fully emplaced along the Huliaipole line.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

The Information Environment is characterized by intense, multi-vector RF campaigns aimed at neutralizing UAF strategic victories and promoting Western disunity.

• Vector 1: Financial Fatigue: TASS/IMF narrative claiming massive long-term financial deficit ($136.5B) directly seeks to negate the positive impact of the EU €140B leverage (21:12Z).
• Vector 2: US Instability: Continued amplification of the US National Guard fatalities (Colonelcassad, 21:22Z) to distract policymakers.
• Vector 3: Alliance Fragmentation: Attributing the US-Russia backchannel leak to European services (21:29Z) seeks to drive a wedge between NATO allies.
• UAF Counter-Messaging: Active IO efforts are visible, including domestic morale calls (Sternenko, 21:04Z) and external influence operations (Tel Aviv projection, 21:23Z) designed to sustain global attention and internal resolve.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

Domestic morale is receiving a net positive boost from confirmed successful tactical operations and the overwhelming EU financial commitment, serving as a critical buffer against the anticipated kinetic losses in Zaporizhzhia.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

The strategic shift hinges on the successful utilization of the €140 billion EU asset leverage. The diplomatic priority must be maintaining cohesion against the RF campaign attempting to drive distrust between Washington and Brussels over the leaked communications.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Course of Action (MLCOA) (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF forces will utilize the period until 270400Z for maximum kinetic shaping (KAAB/artillery) of the Huliaipole-Zatishye corridor. The coordinated mechanized VDV exploitation will commence immediately thereafter, aiming to force UAF reserve deployment. Simultaneously, RF IO will maximize the financial deficit narrative (TASS) and alliance distrust narratives to minimize rapid Western aid coordination.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Course of Action (MDCOA) (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF executes the predicted strategic high-precision missile strike wave targeting the C2 complex in Poltava/Vinnytsia and the key Kremenchuk logistics hub NLT 270100Z. The strike will utilize the intense IO focus on the US security incident and the financial debate as cover, aiming to cause a C2 blackout precisely when the Zaporizhzhia exploitation requires decisive, centralized reserve command authority.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

R-1: IMMEDIATE OPERATIONAL DEFENSE – AIR DEFENSE (J3 / AD COMMAND)

1. MDCOA Defense Confirmation: MAINTAIN AD READINESS AT BLACK (MAXIMUM) over Poltava, Vinnytsia, and Kremenchuk until 270130Z. Confirm physical dispersal of key C2 staff.
2. Targeting Verification (Zaporizhzhia): Immediately task ISR assets (SAR/IMINT) to verify the precise impact zones and effect of the latest KAAB strikes in the Huliaipole-Zatishye sector. This BDA is crucial for adjusting stabilizing unit deployment before 270400Z.
3. Northern Deception: Do not commit strategic AD assets to the UAV group tracked in Sumy/Chernihiv (21:23Z). Assume this is a kinetic deception operation. Utilize only local, mobile VSHORAD for engagement.

R-2: STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION WARFARE (NCA / J2)

1. Counter Financial Deficit Narrative (262330Z): NCA must immediately and aggressively counter the TASS/IMF deficit claim (21:12Z). Leverage the confirmed €140 billion EU asset credit facility as definitive proof that the RF strategy of economic attrition has failed. Frame the TASS report as desperate denial.
2. Mitigate Alliance Distrust: Strategic communications should issue rapid, firm statements affirming the cohesion between Kyiv, Washington, and Brussels, specifically denying the RF claim that European services are engaging in adversarial intelligence operations against US interests.
3. Morale Amplification: Ensure the operational footage of UAF tactical successes (10th OGShBr) is immediately amplified through official and non-official channels to maintain domestic morale during the kinetic exploitation phase.

R-3: OPERATIONAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (J3)

1. Counter-Logistics Prioritization: Issue new targeting directives for follow-on deep strikes against the confirmed damaged RF energy infrastructure in Luhansk/Donetsk NLT 270300Z. Continuous pressure must be applied to prevent RF repair crews from stabilizing the logistics chain.

---

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS