Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 220730Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 220630Z NOV 25 – 220730Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The RF synchronized strategic strike (MDCOA) is confirmed to be in execution.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

POKROVSK AXIS: Remains the center of gravity (CoG) for RF ground operations. The Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) vulnerability remains critical, exacerbated by the kinetic disruption detailed below. DNIPROPETROVSK OBLAST: Confirmed zone of immediate kinetic impact. The loss of a ballistic missile (0/1 Iskander-M kill) necessitates immediate BDA in this area. This region hosts critical C2 nodes for the Eastern and Southern Operational Commands. Confidence: HIGH

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist. No constraints on high-speed tactical reconnaissance (UAVs) or missile trajectory analysis. Confidence: HIGH

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS: RF forces are observed shifting tactical focus on the information domain to rapidly capitalize on the kinetic strike. Deployment of the false chemical weapon narrative near Pokrovsk (220656Z) is assessed as immediate preparation for ground exploitation or preemptive justification for RF escalation. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: AD engagement was effective against saturation assets (89/104 UAVs downed) but failed against the critical high-value ballistic asset. Immediate C2 transition to hardened/alternate sites is assumed but requires validation. Confidence: MEDIUM (Pending BDA)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities: Confirmed successful ability to penetrate priority UAF AD layers with ballistic assets (Iskander-M). RF maintains ability to conduct simultaneous high-tempo ground exploitation (Pokrovsk) and strategic IO (Vance plan). Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Maximize Strike Effect: Exploit the C2 disruption and psychological shock of the Iskander-M impact.
2. Immediate GLOC Interdiction: Initiate physical attempts to interdict the Kostiantynivka GLOC immediately, while UAF C2 is distracted by the BDA/consequence management.
3. Establish Pretext for Escalation: Reinforce the false narrative of UAF chemical weapons use near Pokrovsk to cover ground maneuver escalation.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

CRITICAL ADAPTATION: Strike Synchronization. The RF executed the ballistic strike (220648Z) during the peak psychological and political amplitude of the "Vance/Peace Plan" IO campaign (220645Z-220701Z). This confirms the RF doctrine of synchronizing multi-domain strikes to induce strategic paralysis.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The strike confirms the successful operational readiness of ballistic systems sourced from nodes like the previously identified 2652th GRAU. Sustained deep UAF strikes (Syzran) failed to sufficiently delay this launch cycle. Confidence: HIGH

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 synchronization across strategic strike assets (Air/Missile Forces) and hybrid warfare components (IO/SpN) is assessed as EXCELLENT. The execution window was precisely timed. Confidence: HIGH

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF is currently engaged in post-strike BDA and consequence management while simultaneously defending against maximum cognitive pressure. READINESS: AD effectiveness against high-speed ballistic targets is insufficient (0/1 intercept). Readiness must immediately focus on damage control and redundant C2 activation.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: High success rate against the large saturation UAV attack (89 downed). CRITICAL SETBACK: Confirmed penetration by one Iskander-M missile (220703Z). This represents a successful kinetic strike on a High Value Target (HVT) by the enemy and a critical failure in the AD kill chain against the most dangerous threat type.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate allocation of ISR assets (UAVs/HUMINT) to determine the exact impact location and extent of damage (CR 1). This task now takes precedence over all other tactical ISR requirements, including Lyman/Siversk and the exact SpN infiltration location. Confidence: HIGH

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

CAMPAIGN STATUS (MAXIMUM EFFECT): The strategic intent of the IO campaign is validated. The Vance/Trump peace negotiation narrative is currently dominating the Ukrainian public space (RBC-Ukraine, Sternenko reporting). This cognitive overload is designed to compound the confusion caused by the kinetic strike. RF DEFLECTION: The allegation of a UAF chemical weapons cache near Pokrovsk (220656Z) is highly dangerous, setting conditions for a false flag event or covering the deployment of RF tactical weapons. Confidence: HIGH

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is currently under dual strain: significant political uncertainty regarding Western support (Vance narrative) coinciding with a successful, high-profile strategic missile strike. UAF C2 communication focusing on national remembrance (Holodomor, 220700Z-220705Z) is necessary for long-term cohesion but must be immediately followed by decisive strategic messaging to counter the paralysis. Confidence: HIGH

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to successfully weaponize internal Western political friction to project instability and reduce domestic Ukrainian will to fight. Confidence: HIGH

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 2-6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Damage Exploitation and IO Amplification: RF will utilize controlled media (TASS, War Channels) to exaggerate the damage inflicted by the ballistic strike and propagate narratives of UAF C2 collapse.
2. GLOC Assault Execution: RF SpN/DRG forces will initiate confirmed interdiction efforts against the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) NLT 220900Z, targeting logistics convoys and key bridges/choke points.
3. Ground Pressure Sustained: High-tempo ground assaults will continue west of Pokrovsk to test UAF reserve response time, exploiting the predicted C2 lag.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

RF successfully cuts the Kostiantynivka GLOC, combined with significant degradation of a regional C2 node (confirmed HVT impact). This creates an operational vacuum, allowing RF mechanized forces (40th/155th OMBR) to achieve a rapid, unhindered breakthrough towards the strategic depth of the Donbas defense, forcing a major UAF retreat.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2: IMMEDIATE BDA AND C2 CONTINUITY (CRITICAL).

   • Action: Immediately initiate CR 1 (Impact BDA). All non-essential ISR must be diverted to confirm the nature and location of the strike damage. Activate secondary/tertiary C2 nodes in the Dnipropetrovsk/Kryvyi Rih area preemptively, regardless of BDA outcome.
   • Rationale: Assume the C2 HVT was hit until proven otherwise. Speed of recovery is paramount to preventing operational paralysis.

2. J3/J7: GLOC DEFENSE PRIORITY (CRITICAL).

   • Action: Task Force Raven must be reinforced and accelerated. Confirmation of a cleared GLOC (CR 2) is the top ground priority. All operational reserves must remain concentrated to block a full penetration west of Pokrovsk; no diversions for BDA or consequence management.
   • Rationale: The successful strike is a distraction designed to facilitate ground maneuver. The GLOC must be secured now.

3. STRATCOM/NCA: COUNTER-HYBRID STRIKE (CRITICAL).

   • Action: Launch a coordinated political and information response NLT 220930Z. The message must explicitly connect the successful Iskander-M terror strike with the RF’s fraudulent "Peace Plan" IO, framing the Vance narrative as a cover for murder and territorial seizure.
   • Rationale: The psychological effect of the strike must be immediately neutralized by linking RF aggression to its duplicitous political objectives.

4. J7/AIR FORCE: AD PROTOCOL REVIEW.

   • Action: Conduct a rapid Post-Action Review (PAR) for CR 3. Immediately adjust AD engagement protocols to ensure better saturation or re-targeting capability against future ballistic waves. Prepare interceptor stocks for another wave, as the enemy has achieved success and will likely repeat the tactic.
   • Rationale: The success rate (0/1) against the ballistic threat is unacceptable and requires immediate technical correction.

//END SITREP//