Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS UPDATE

DTG: 221000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 220900Z NOV 25 – 221000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. All indicators continue to converge toward the confirmed execution of the RF Strategic Paralysis MDCOA within the critical 0-6 hour window. The enemy is actively synchronizing kinetic degradation (Dnipropetrovsk UAVs) with tactical distraction (Lyman/Siversk IO).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: POKROVSK AXIS: CRITICAL VULNERABILITY. The threat of the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) being severed remains the highest priority ground threat. NEW INDICATOR (LYMAN/SIVERSK): RF military channels (RVvoenkor) are actively propagating the narrative of developing an offensive and forming a "Siverskyi Cauldron." This reinforces the assessment that the Lyman/Siversk area is now the primary operational deception axis used to fix UAF reserves. ACTIVE KINETIC OPERATIONS (Dnipropetrovsk): Confirmed UAV strike on infrastructure in Verbkivska community, Pavlohradskyi Raion (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast). This is assessed as localized preparatory fire, degrading C2/utility resilience ahead of the anticipated strategic missile package. Confidence: HIGH

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, cold conditions persist, enabling RF high-altitude ISR and strategic strike asset deployment. No weather constraints affect the predicted RF MDCOA execution. Confidence: HIGH

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS:

1. Air Defense (AD) Commitment: RF MOD claimed destruction of 69 UAF UAVs overnight, confirming sustained high-tempo kinetic defense in the deep rear against UAF long-range assets.
2. Kinetic Strike Posture: UAV operations against Dnipropetrovsk infrastructure are confirmed, demonstrating RF readiness to begin systematic degradation of rear-area nodes. UAF CONTROL MEASURES: AD assets are actively engaged in localized defense against UAV waves in the Eastern/Southeastern sector, prioritizing area denial for potential MDCOA impact zones. Confidence: HIGH

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities: RF demonstrates simultaneous capability to conduct strategic strikes (imminent missile launch from 2652th GRAU), localized kinetic degradation (Dnipropetrovsk UAVs), and high-tempo IO synchronization. Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Degradation and Paralysis: Execute strategic strike to maximize kinetic impact on logistical and C2 hubs.
2. Fixing Reserves: Utilize the highly publicized, but currently unsubstantiated, Lyman/Siversk "cauldron" and the Vilcha claims to force UAF reserve commitment away from the Pokrovsk sector.
3. Exploitation: Sever the Kostiantynivka GLOC while UAF C2 is distracted/degraded.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

ADAPTATION: The transition of the Lyman/Siversk narrative from a general threat to a specific, high-stakes claim ("forming a cauldron") is a significant and immediate tactical adaptation in the cognitive domain. This is designed to maximize fear of encirclement and compel rapid, suboptimal defensive decisions. Confidence: HIGH

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

Confirmed sustained readiness for high-value strategic strike operations (2652th GRAU SAR score, UAV strikes confirming fueled assets). RF is exhibiting no current constraints on kinetic operations. Confidence: HIGH

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is assessed as HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The immediate synchronization of kinetic deployment alerts (Pavlohrad UAV strike) with amplified IO narratives (Lyman/Siversk cauldron claim) confirms coordinated execution under the pre-planned MDCOA framework. Confidence: HIGH

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

POSTURE: UAF C2 is navigating a three-axis cognitive dilemma (Pokrovsk GLOC, Lyman/Siversk, Vilcha), compounded by active, localized UAV strikes in the rear. Resource allocation remains constrained by the lack of definitive ISR on the Lyman/Siversk intent. READINESS: General Staff maintains high public morale messaging (1170 RF losses reported). Defensive AD readiness remains elevated against the strategic threat.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: UAF continues to demonstrate effective deep strike reach, evidenced by the RF claim of 69 UAV shootdowns (forcing RF to expend resources defensively). SETBACK: RF IO (Lyman/Siversk cauldron) has successfully escalated the internal C2 pressure regarding reserve deployment to the North-East.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: The allocation of high-value ISR platforms and limited strategic reserves is the immediate friction point. The verification of the Lyman/Siversk threat (Priority 1 CR) is now paramount to prevent fatal misallocation.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

CAMPAIGN FOCUS: RF IO is aggressively supporting the kinetic operation by:

1. Creating Operational Panic: Fabricating the "Siverskyi Cauldron" to induce immediate military pressure and political distraction.
2. Undermining Political Support: Amplifying diplomatic narratives regarding the US "peace plan," Fico's support, and perceived Ukrainian/NATO disagreement on accession timelines (WSJ report).
3. Morale Boosting (Internal RF): Propagating claims of 69 UAV shootdowns and potential Putin visits to occupied territories. Confidence: HIGH

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Internal political friction, addressed by the NCA in the previous period, is now being directly exploited by RF IO alongside the rising kinetic threat (Dnipropetrovsk strikes). Public morale is at a vulnerable inflection point. Confidence: HIGH

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF IO successfully leveraged the Vance statement and now the Slovak stance to undermine the perception of solid Western resolve. Reports of internal Ukrainian acknowledgment of a delayed NATO timeline (WSJ) compound the strategic vulnerability. Confidence: HIGH

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1. Strategic Strike Execution: RF will launch the strategic missile strike wave targeting C2 and logistical infrastructure NLT 221200Z.
2. GLOC Interdiction: RF SpN/DRGs will attempt to physically interdict the Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) between 221000Z and 221300Z, synchronized with the strike impact.
3. Maximum Cognitive Overload: RF will escalate IO regarding the Lyman/Siversk cauldron, forcing UAF C2 to commit high-value reserves (NLT 221030Z decision point) to a secondary, potentially feigned axis.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Paralysis & Operational Breach)

RF successfully executes the strategic strike, severely degrading key regional C2 nodes and forcing AD assets to relocate/reconstitute. Simultaneously, successful deception via the Lyman/Siversk narrative results in misplaced UAF reserves. This allows RF mechanized units (40th/155th OMBR) to achieve a rapid operational breach west of Pokrovsk, severely threatening the defensive integrity of the Donbas region.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J7: IMMEDIATE ISR AND RESERVE ALLOCATION RESOLUTION.

   • Action: The Lyman/Siversk verification (CR 1) is the highest operational priority. ISR assets must confirm the severity of the "cauldron" claim NLT 221030Z. Reserves must remain fixed to the Pokrovsk counter-penetration task unless overwhelming evidence of an operational RF breakthrough at Siversk is confirmed.
   • Rationale: The enemy is aggressively trading IO narrative for UAF reserve commitment. Do not succumb to the operational deception.

2. J7/AIR FORCE: MAXIMUM AD INTEGRITY AND DEFENSE IN DEPTH.

   • Action: Transition all designated high-value Patriot/SAMP-T batteries to maximum Anti-Ballistic Mode readiness for the main MDCOA strike. Accept localized attrition by UAVs in Dnipropetrovsk as preliminary degradation, but task remaining SHORAD assets to defend C2 nodes immediately threatened by confirmed UAV activity (e.g., Pavlohrad area).
   • Rationale: Prioritize strategic intercept capability against the imminent missile strike over localized UAV defense.

3. STRATCOM/NCA: URGENT COUNTER-PROPAGANDA ON TACTICAL DECEPTION.

   • Action: NCA must launch a unified response immediately (NLT 221030Z) that directly challenges the RF Lyman/Siversk narrative as a "desperate act of informational war," while simultaneously addressing the corrosive diplomatic friction (Vance/NATO timeline claims) to maintain public confidence.
   • Rationale: Decisive communication is necessary to prevent operational panic or misinformed political pressure influencing critical J3 decisions.

4. J3: GLOC INTERDICTION PREEMPTION.

   • Action: Task Force Raven (Mobile Reserve) must be ordered to execute aggressive sweep and clear operations focused 2-10km on either side of the Kostiantynivka GLOC, initiating preemptive fires against confirmed DRG/SpN contacts, NLT 221030Z.
   • Rationale: Kinetic action is required to neutralize the most damaging ground effect of the MDCOA—the physical severance of the logistical lifeline.

//END SITREP//