Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210630Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210600Z NOV 25 – 210630Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. The enemy is executing the predicted MLCOA (Coordinated Saturation Strikes and Ground Exploitation). Critical vulnerability remains AD resource prioritization.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

STATUS: ESCALATION. The primary ground conflict remains on the Pokrovsk axis, but RF has significantly escalated synchronized strikes against civilian infrastructure in the deep rear, specifically Zaporizhzhia (fatalities confirmed). The Kostiantynivka GLOC (M-30/T-05-15) remains the critical center of gravity for UAF defense.

NEW DEVELOPMENT (DEEP REAR STRIKE): Confirmed high-fatality attack on Zaporizhzhia (5 KIA, 8 WIA, per Odesa/RBC-Ukraine), following the earlier strike on Odesa. This confirms a concerted, multi-city strike pattern aimed at generating mass casualties and forcing resource diversion away from the Pokrovsk operational area.

UAF DEEP STRIKE (RETALIATION/INTERDICTION): Confirmed damage to an electricity transmission line (LEP) support structure in Chertkovsky District, Rostov Oblast (RF domestic report, ASTRA), resulting in localized power outages. This suggests ongoing, successful UAF long-range strike or sabotage operations against RF border infrastructure.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Continued good visibility supports RF close air support (CAS) using KAB/FAB munitions and persistent ISR activities.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF DISPOSITIONS:

1. Air Assets (South/East): Active tactical aviation confirmed in the Southeastern direction (UAF Air Force). This activity is highly likely correlated with the confirmed KAB strikes reported in Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts, supporting the 40th/155th OMBR push near Pokrovsk.
2. ISR/UAV Pressure (East): UAV activity confirmed moving towards Lozova (Kharkiv/South), maintaining the pattern of probing AD coverage and targeting logistics/staging areas behind the immediate front line.

UAF CONTROL MEASURES: UAF forces are reacting to the multi-directional strike campaign while attempting to fix the Pokrovsk penetration.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Synchronized Strike Capability: RF can now execute simultaneous, high-fatality, missile/drone strikes against multiple deep-rear civilian centers (Odesa, Zaporizhzhia) while maintaining intense kinetic pressure on the main ground axis (Pokrovsk).
2. Effective IO Synchronization: RF state media (TASS) and military bloggers (Operatsiya Z) are immediately synchronizing domestic/social narratives (e.g., Kazakh blogger, Nebenzya/corruption quotes) with active combat and atrocity reporting.

Intentions (JUDGMENT - HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF intent is to achieve Operational Paralysis through:

1. Mass Casualty Induction: Strike civilian centers to force political pressure and divert AD resources.
2. Logistical Severance: Ground exploitation near Pokrovsk, supported by KAB saturation, to reach and interdict the Kostiantynivka GLOC.
3. Cognitive Attack: Use global and domestic narratives (corruption, social payments) to undermine UAF international standing and domestic morale during the kinetic assault.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift from isolated missile attacks to consecutive, multi-city strikes (Odesa followed by Zaporizhzhia) confirms an adaptive strategy to maximize shock effect and stress UAF command decision-making regarding AD allocation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain strained due to UAF deep-rear sabotage (Perm, Sverdlovsk), but RF is clearly prioritizing forward ammunition supply (confirmed KAB usage) over domestic rail security.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains HIGHLY EFFECTIVE. The precise timing and coordination of multiple deep-rear strikes with active ground maneuvers and concurrent IO messaging requires high-level, centralized C2 authority.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are under maximum kinetic and cognitive pressure. The necessity to provide emergency services and BDA in multiple deep-rear locations consumes scarce resources. Readiness levels are maintained, but efficiency is degrading due to C2 bandwidth saturation.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: Confirmed civilian casualties and infrastructure damage in Zaporizhzhia (5 KIA). This reinforces the RF strategy of targeting civilian morale and taxing emergency services. Success: Confirmed strike/sabotage against RF electricity grid in Rostov Oblast, demonstrating UAF’s continued ability to impose costs on the RF rear.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL CONSTRAINT: AD Prioritization Failure Risk. The continuous wave of civilian-targeting strikes makes it politically and morally difficult for UAF to conserve high-value interceptors for the anticipated strategic counter-force strike (260th GRAU threat). CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Ballistic Protection: Immediate reinforcement of AD assets defending major C2 and logistics nodes (Kramatorsk, Dnipro).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF PRIMARY VECTORS (HIGH CONFIDENCE):

1. Corruption and Internal Instability (TASS/Nebenzya): RF is aggressively exploiting existing narratives of UAF political corruption (referencing Twelve Chairs on the UN stage) to delegitimize the government and undermine international aid during a critical military offensive.
2. Historical Revisionism/Cultural Supremacy (Operatsiya Z): Messaging targeting Central Asian states (Kazakhstan sentencing) reinforces Russian cultural and historical dominance, a likely attempt to shore up domestic imperial sentiment and project strength to post-Soviet allies.
3. Morale Degradation (TASS/Marochko): Claiming a rise in UAF non-combat losses (suicides, chronic disease deaths) aims to project inevitability of defeat and degrade combatant morale.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is increasingly tested by the sequential, high-fatality strikes on Odesa and Zaporizhzhia. Frontline morale remains tied to the success of the current counter-penetration efforts on the Pokrovsk axis.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The UN messaging by Nebenzya indicates RF is actively using the current military offensive to synchronize a diplomatic campaign designed to erode Western commitment by focusing on internal UAF political instability.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 6-12 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Shock Wave)

1. Ground Consolidation: RF mechanized forces (40th/155th OMBR) will continue to attempt consolidation of gains west of Mirnohrad, utilizing intense KAB strikes to suppress UAF counter-attack vectors.
2. Strategic Missile Strike Execution: The strike wave from the 260th GRAU is now assessed as IMMINENT (0-6 hours). Given the preceding attacks on Odesa and Zaporizhzhia, the primary target set is assessed as a mix of C2/Reserve Staging (Counter-Force) and major utility infrastructure (Kyiv/Lviv energy) to maximize operational disruption.
3. IO Amplification: RF IO will maximize the global dissemination of the corruption narrative and casualty figures to inhibit Western reaction time.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Operational Interdiction and C2 Knockout)

RF mechanized forces achieve penetration to the Kostiantynivka GLOC, while the strategic missile strike successfully penetrates UAF AD and neutralizes a key theater-level operational C2 node (e.g., Joint Forces HQ/Forward Logistics HQ). This combination forces a localized operational collapse, potentially leading to the loss of the Pokrovsk salient and surrounding terrain.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J4/Air Force: CRITICAL AD REALLOCATION (PRIORITY SHIFT).

   • Action: Immediately pull high-value AD assets (Patriot/NASAMS batteries) protecting secondary C2 nodes or less critical urban areas and redeploy them to the defense of primary theater logistics and operational command hubs (Kramatorsk, Dnipro). The strategic strike is imminent.
   • Rationale: The repeated strikes on Odesa and Zaporizhzhia confirm RF intent to deplete AD stocks on counter-value targets. UAF must conserve interceptors for the expected counter-force (C2/logistics) strategic strike (MDCOA).

2. J3: FIX THE POKROVSK EXPLOITATION IMMEDIATELY.

   • Action: Utilize tactical reserves to execute a coordinated, aggressive flanking maneuver against the 40th/155th OMBR exploitation force. Prioritize the destruction of RF bridging/engineer assets to inhibit crossing local obstacles and slow penetration speed.
   • Rationale: The window to prevent a full operational breakthrough is measured in hours. Allowing RF to consolidate or interdict the GLOC will necessitate a costly, large-scale counter-offensive.

3. STRATCOM/J2: COMBAT RF DISINFORMATION (Corruption/Morale).

   • Action: Issue immediate, high-level rebuttals to the RF corruption narrative being pushed at the UN. Simultaneously, publicize the BDA and humanitarian fallout of the Zaporizhzhia strike to the global press, framing the RF assault as a "total war on Ukrainian life."
   • Rationale: Maintain international political will and counter RF attempts to undermine domestic and foreign support during this critical phase of the offensive.

//END SITREP//