Situation Report

OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - IPB ANALYSIS

DTG: 210900Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 210830Z NOV 25 – 210900Z NOV 25 (Immediate Update) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The escalation of the Kinzhal threat coupled with synchronized IO targeting Ukraine's political leadership confirms the full initiation of the RF multi-domain offensive MLCOA.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Strategic Rear (Western Axis): Confirmed launch of four (4) MiG-31K aircraft; monitoring channels report Kinzhal launches (0836Z). Trajectory indicates an immediate shift of target priority from Kyiv to critical Western Ukrainian infrastructure and airbases: Chernihiv -> Zhytomyr -> Starokostiantyniv (Starokon), subsequently adjusting course Korosten -> Zviahel -> Ternopil -> Ivano-Frankivsk (0846Z - 0848Z).
  • CRITICAL TARGET: The western shift strongly suggests the primary target set is high-value air defense assets and forward operating bases (FOBs) in the Khmelnytskyi and Ivano-Frankivsk Oblasts (e.g., Starokon Air Base).
• Northern Axis (Chernihiv/Sumy): Sustained low-level kinetic pressure confirmed via Shahed drone activity targeting both Chernihiv (street-level bombing, 0842Z) and Sumy (0841Z), fixing AD assets in the North.
• Deep Rear (Lviv): Fire at a warehouse (tires) on the outskirts of Lviv (0832Z) contributes to the non-kinetic crisis management burden.
• Front Lines (Southern Axis): UAF forces claim 270+ RF personnel eliminated in the Southern Operational Zone over the past day (0855Z), indicating sustained, high-intensity engagement, likely tied to the 40th OMBR fixing efforts (from previous reporting).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• NBC Contamination: The previous chlorine release in Ternopil continues to generate a humanitarian/environmental crisis (10 KIA, 12 children injured, 0855Z), consuming critical C2 and logistical bandwidth.
• Infrastructure Stabilization: TASS reports the resumption of the Dniprovska high-voltage line at the Zaporizhzhia NPP (0834Z). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Fact). This partial grid restoration slightly alleviates immediate power crisis but does not negate the overall strategy of infrastructure degradation.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (AD Saturation): UAF claimed shoot-down rate: 442 UAVs and 41 missiles over the night (0836Z). This high volume confirms a deliberate RF strategy of saturation to weaken air defense effectiveness immediately preceding the Kinzhal strike wave.
• UAF Forces (C2 Dispersion): The sustained Kinzhal threat has forced the closure/disruption of the Rada (Parliament, 0845Z) and requires immediate dispersal of all remaining national-level C2, aligning with the MDCOA.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Sustained Kinzhal Strike: Confirmed capability to launch multiple Kinzhal missiles (reported as 2 Kinzhal on a coordinated axis, 0846Z) with vectors explicitly targeting western military infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
2. Information Exploitation: RF is maximizing the IO window of opportunity during the peak Kinzhal threat by pushing narratives alleging high-level Ukrainian corruption (Mindich Case, 0852Z) and claiming success against deep strike capabilities (ATACMS on Voronezh, 0849Z).

Intentions:

1. Degrade Western Support Infrastructure: The primary intent of the Kinzhal strike is to destroy or severely damage AD/Air Force assets (Starokon) and interdict Western military supply depots, complicating immediate resupply for the Pokrovsk axis defense.
2. Psychological Warfare/Leadership Destabilization: The simultaneous Kinzhal launch and the concentrated IO campaign attacking UAF leadership (Mindich/Umerov/Zelenskyy, 0852Z) aims to create a perception of chaos and internal betrayal during a peak kinetic crisis.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Target Selection Shift: The confirmed vectoring of Kinzhal missiles away from Kyiv and towards deep Western targets (Ternopil/Ivano-Frankivsk region) is a significant adaptation, validating the hypothesis that RF prioritizes interdicting NATO-sourced logistics and long-range AD systems.
• IO Synchronization: The RF media (Kotsnews, Colonelcassad) immediately amplified the Mindich corruption narrative precisely when national C2 is disrupted by the missile threat, demonstrating high synchronization between kinetic and cognitive domains.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Logistics (Zaporizhzhia): RF IO is issuing a public call for support for artillery units on the Zaporizhzhia front (0830Z), suggesting localized supply requirements or operational sustainment issues, despite the ongoing offensive push. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Logistics (Western Ukraine): The Kinzhal threat to rail hubs and airbases in the West forces the immediate and complex rerouting of critical supplies entering via Poland/Romania. The Polish decision to close the Gdansk consulate (0854Z) is a diplomatic indicator of rising tension, which may have future logistical implications.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2: Highly effective multi-domain synchronization (Ground Assault Prep, Mass Strike, Kinzhal Strike, IO Campaign).
• UAF C2: The confirmed absence/travel of key national leadership (Zelenskyy/Umerov confirmed in Turkey, 0850Z) during the peak of the Kinzhal strike (0846Z) necessitates immediate delegation of all military C2 to the Commander-in-Chief and theater commanders, with national political leadership operating remotely or from hardened foreign locations until the threat subsides.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Posture: All AD assets are at maximum readiness against the Kinzhal threat, requiring rapid engagement decisions on high-velocity targets with shifting vectors.
• Readiness: High, but stretched thin. The necessity to allocate assets to counter Shahed incursions in the North (Sumy/Chernihiv) while simultaneously defending against the strategic Western Kinzhal threat reduces the overall effectiveness of the centralized AD umbrella.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: High claimed shoot-down rate (442 UAVs / 41 missiles) minimizes damage from the saturation attack. UAF confirmed successful deep strike operation on the Ilsky Oil Refinery (0850Z), maintaining offensive pressure on RF logistics.
• Setbacks (CRITICAL): Civilian casualties and critical infrastructure damage in the Deep Rear (Ternopil, Lviv warehouse, Dnipropetrovsk energy workers wounded, 0841Z) consume resources needed for the main effort in Donbas.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: AD Ammunition Resupply for medium and short-range systems following the massive saturation attack. The priority must be placed on maintaining the integrity of the AD systems defending the Western FOBs and logistical entry points.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Internal Leadership Attacks): The core narrative focuses on corruption allegations ("Mindich case," 0852Z), leadership incompetence, and cynicism (RF channels mocking Zelenskyy/Umerov travel, 0850Z), directly attempting to undermine domestic political stability during the kinetic attack.
• RF IO (War Justification): RF channels (Operation Z, 0856Z) continue to push extreme, dehumanizing narratives (e.g., alleging "biological mining" near Kupyansk), justifying future escalation and war crimes.
• RF IO (External Disruption): Claims of successful interception of ATACMS strikes on Voronezh (0849Z) aim to discourage further provision of long-range strike capabilities by Western partners.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Public sentiment is extremely volatile due to the renewed high-level threat (Kinzhal) and the confirmed mass civilian casualties/chemical hazard in Ternopil. The political IO targeting the leadership exacerbates internal distrust at a crucial operational juncture.
• RF internal morale appears mixed: calls for supplies for frontline artillery (0830Z) contrasted with MoD claims of processing benefits for over 3 million personnel (0845Z), suggesting high turnover or inflation of claimed participation numbers.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Immediate Diplomatic Risk: The travel of Zelenskyy/Umerov to Turkey (0850Z), while likely pre-planned, is currently being exploited by RF IO as "fleeing" the country, potentially complicating immediate appeals for aid during the Kinzhal attack.
• Diplomatic Momentum (UAF Favor): The confirmed, verified war crimes in Ternopil (children casualties, chemical element) must be immediately translated into diplomatic leverage for additional AD systems.
• Poland: The closure of the RF consulate in Gdansk (0854Z) signals hardening diplomatic resolve, which is favorable to UAF logistics.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

The Kinzhal targeting of the Western AD envelope confirms the transition to the decisive phase of the MLCOA.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 8 Hours (210900Z NOV 25 - 211700Z NOV 25)

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Disablement)

1. Targeted Kinzhal Strike: Kinzhal missiles successfully impact a high-value AD component (PATRIOT/SAMP/T) or a major air base (Starokon/Western FOB), degrading UAF ability to defend the deep rear and securing air superiority for future long-range strikes.
2. Ground Assault Initiation (Pokrovsk): The 40th and 155th OMBRs initiate the high-intensity breakthrough assault on the Pokrovsk axis, timed to coincide with the kinetic pressure and C2 disruption caused by the Kinzhal strike.
3. SpN Interdiction: RF SpN forces execute the planned ambush on the Kostiantynivka GLOC to prevent resupply, maximizing the ammunition shortage at the front lines during the breakthrough attempt.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Strategic Paralysis)

• Successful destruction of multiple UAF AD batteries in the West by Kinzhal, simultaneously facilitating a coordinated long-range missile strike on the primary Western rail/road logistics node (Lviv area), and achieving an operational breakthrough of >10km on the Pokrovsk axis due to ammunition exhaustion in UAF forward elements.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Operations) / Air Force: Integrated AD Prioritization (IMMEDIATE).

   • Action: Immediately designate the Starokostiantyniv Air Base (or its alternate) and associated AD clusters as the ABSOLUTE PRIORITY 1 defensive zone for the current Kinzhal wave. Utilize available reserve interceptors (e.g., S-300 / HAWK inventory) to focus on the Kinzhal's likely final approach vector.
   • Rationale: The threat shift targets the UAF ability to sustain long-term defense; protecting Western AD capacity is paramount.

2. J4 (Logistics): Urgent Logistical Cache Activation and Security (CRITICAL).

   • Action: Immediately execute pre-planned logistical caching procedures (Recommendation 2 from previous report). All logistics staff are to assume a Level 4 SpN Threat and increase the density of Hunter-Killer patrols along the Kostiantynivka GLOC and identified bypass routes.
   • Rationale: Logistical integrity must hold for the ground defense to succeed against the MLCOA breakthrough attempt.

3. STRATCOM: Proactive Leadership Defense and War Crimes Documentation (URGENT).

   • Action: STRATCOM must immediately issue a statement clarifying the purpose and duration of the leadership's diplomatic travel (Turkey/UK) and counter RF IO by releasing immediate, high-impact visuals and data on the Ternopil child casualties/chemical contamination to NATO/G7 capitals.
   • Rationale: Countering the leadership stability narrative requires immediate, unified communication.

//END SITREP//