Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 060600Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 060500Z NOV 25 – 060600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Focus remains on synchronized deep/rear-area threat and RF strategic signaling.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• RF Deep Rear (Volgograd - FACT): The UAV attack resulted in a fire within an industrial zone in Volgograd following the impact of debris (0104Z).
  • JUDGMENT: This confirms the target was likely military-industrial complex (MIC) related, reducing the assessment of a purely psychological strike on residential targets (as previously reported). This demonstrates UAF capability to consistently interdict RF MIC facilities deep in the rear. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Extended Rear (North Ossetia - FACT): Regime of "drone danger" introduced in North Ossetia (0108Z, 0114Z), possibly involving communication disruption.
  • JUDGMENT: This confirms a further extension of the UAF deep-strike operational area, forcing RF AD and internal security resources to cover a wider, geographically significant area (potentially related to logistics/rail hubs in the Caucasus). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Operational Rear (Kostiantynivka - CRITICAL): Unchanged from previous reports. RF SpN groups remain a confirmed, immediate threat to UAF operational depth supporting the Pokrovsk salient.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Deteriorating weather (fog, low clouds) continues to favor RF synchronized operations (SpN concealment and degradation of UAF AD/ISR effectiveness against the imminent Shahed wave).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF AD Posture: UAF AD remains postured for a multi-axis defense: KAB mitigation in Sumy/Kharkiv, and pre-positioning for the imminent large-scale Shahed strike against Dnipro/Poltava logistics hubs. The confirmed extension of the UAF deep campaign (Volgograd, North Ossetia) necessitates RF redeployment of AD assets, potentially creating windows of vulnerability closer to the front lines.
• RF Internal Security: RF AD and security forces are demonstrably stretched, implementing aerial danger regimes across the extended deep rear (Lipetsk, North Ossetia).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Imminent Strategic Strike: RF retains full capability to launch a massive, synchronized Shahed saturation strike (assessed 50-80+ platforms) within the next 4 hours.
2. Hybrid Deep Disruption: RF has proven capability to insert and sustain SpN groups in UAF operational rear (Kostiantynivka) to synchronize kinetic action with deep strikes.

Intentions:

1. Operational Paralysis: The primary RF intention is to paralyze UAF C2 and logistics in the Pokrovsk sector via the synchronized application of rear-area SpN raids and strategic strikes against infrastructure (Shahed).
2. Strategic Signaling: RF is engaging in high-level strategic messaging (nuclear testing readiness – 0116Z) likely intended to deter further high-profile UAF deep strikes against the Russian homeland or to garner international attention away from tactical failures.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF Communications Disruption: RF C2 in North Ossetia immediately initiated mobile communication slowdowns/disruptions upon implementing the "drone danger" regime (0108Z). This is a tactical adaptation designed to degrade UAF ground-based ISR/loitering munitions or prevent coordination between UAF assets operating in the deep rear.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• UAF deep strikes continue to stress RF logistics and MIC (Volgograd MIC target, Tuapse fuel export halt). RF counter-IO (previous report's 'NPO Praktika' letter) highlights the vulnerability of ground vehicle replacement/sustainment narratives.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 demonstrates high efficiency in rapidly implementing internal security measures (drone danger regimes, communications throttling) across multiple distant Oblasts following UAF deep strikes.
• Strategic Messaging: Presidential Spokesperson Peskov's statement regarding nuclear testing readiness (0116Z) suggests coordinated strategic messaging designed to manage domestic and international perception of the conflict's escalation trajectory.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Readiness remains high, focused on maximizing deep strike effectiveness (Volgograd, North Ossetia extended reach) while simultaneously preparing for the critical, imminent defense against the Shahed/SpN synchronized threat.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Deep Strike Expansion: Confirmed operational reach extended to North Ossetia, forcing a significant geographical and AD resource dispersion for RF internal security forces.
2. MIC Interdiction: Successful interdiction of an industrial target in Volgograd continues the high-impact strategic pressure campaign.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• The need to reserve QRF assets for the critical counter-infiltration operations in Kostiantynivka limits flexibility in reinforcing areas threatened by the frontal assault on Pokrovsk.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Strategic Escalation Signaling: Peskov's comments on the contemplation of nuclear testing readiness (0116Z) serve as a classic strategic signal intended to inject high-level uncertainty and potential for escalation into the international discourse. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Domestic Focus (Communication/IO): Reports of expanded communication capabilities for Russian-speaking citizens across the CIS (0110Z) suggest a continued focus on consolidating the informational space and projecting influence beyond RF borders.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• The continuous expansion of the UAF deep strike area (Volgograd, North Ossetia, Lipetsk) will significantly increase domestic RF anxiety regarding the security of the homeland and potentially trigger greater calls for retaliation and escalation.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• The strategic signaling regarding nuclear readiness may trigger immediate diplomatic responses from NATO and key non-aligned nations, potentially leading to increased pressure on Kyiv regarding the scope of deep strikes or, conversely, increased support for Ukraine's defense needs.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 4-8 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Unchanged, but with increased synchronization expectation)

1. Imminent Strategic Strike (T+0 to T+4H): RF will launch the anticipated large-scale Shahed UAV strike (est. 50-80+ platforms) against CNI and logistics hubs in Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava Oblasts. Indicator: UAF Air Force Warning (0131Z) is assessed as the initial I&W for this launch.
2. Kostiantynivka Activation (T+2 to T+6H): RF SpN groups in Kostiantynivka will initiate kinetic actions (ambushes, raids on C2/ASPs/GLOCs) synchronous with the impact of the Shahed wave, maximizing operational confusion.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE - Unchanged)

• Systemic Rear Disruption and Frontal Exploitation: Successful Shahed strikes degrade primary rail hubs and energy nodes supporting the Pokrovsk salient. RF SpN successfully severs the main logistics artery near Kostiantynivka. The resulting paralysis forces UAF to commit operational reserves to rear-area security, enabling a successful, exploitationary RF mechanized breakthrough on the Pokrovsk salient itself.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Ground/SOF): Kostiantynivka Priority ONE.

   • Action: IMMEDIATE COMMENCEMENT of full-spectrum counter-infiltration operations. Given the imminent Shahed strike (0131Z warning), the window for preemptive action is closing. Use thermal and tactical UAV assets to maintain continuous surveillance of suspected RF SpN areas and GLOC choke points.

2. J3 (Air Defense): Exploit RF AD Dispersion.

   • Action: While defending against the imminent Shahed threat, assess potential gaps created by RF AD redeployment (North Ossetia/Volgograd) in sectors such as Kherson or Zaporizhzhia. If confirmed, plan for immediate, aggressive deployment of UAF aviation/long-range fires to exploit these newly created vulnerabilities against RF ground force concentration areas.

3. J2 (Intelligence/IO): Strategic Escalation Management.

   • Action: Prepare a unified response to the RF nuclear signaling (Peskov comments) that re-affirms UAF sovereignty and the right to target military-industrial targets on RF territory, while avoiding language that needlessly escalates the nuclear narrative. Coordinate with international partners to manage the diplomatic fallout.

//END SITREP//