Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 051000Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 050900Z NOV 25 – 051000Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Continued confirmation of RF strategic strike campaign coinciding with intense tactical pressure on the Pokrovsk salient, threatening UAF logistics and C2.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk): The operational focus remains on the encirclement threat.
  • RF Claims: RF channels (Podoubny, Kotsnews) assert assault groups from the 2nd and 51st Combined Arms Armies are continuing the "destruction of encircled formations" in the Prygorodny micro-district and Central districts of Krasnoarmiysk, claiming 12 UAF counterattacks were repelled (0943Z, 0945Z). JUDGMENT: This confirms intense, close-quarters fighting within Krasnoarmiysk, contradicting the RF MoD's previous claims of full encirclement but aligning with the tactical objective to eliminate UAF pockets and sever the reinforcement corridor.
  • Tactical Targeting: RF forces claim the destruction of a UAF ground robotic platform near Krasnoarmiysk (0947Z). This indicates RF adaptation to UAF unmanned systems and the close integration of drone ISR with tactical fire units (5th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade).
• Logistics Interdiction (Deep Rear): The strategic strike campaign confirmed in the previous report is transitioning to the operational level, directly impacting UAF logistics. Ukrzaliznytsia (Ukrainian Railways) officially warned that the railway network "may stop" and has "lost half its power" due to the strikes (0939Z, 1002Z). FACT: This confirms the high effectiveness of RF deep strikes against railway power/traction substations, posing an immediate threat to UAF operational mobility and sustainment.
• Kramatorsk: RF strike against rescue services in Kramatorsk confirmed (0938Z). IMPLICATION: This constitutes a direct attack on civil resilience and emergency response capability in a critical logistics hub for the Donbas front.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Air Force reports of UAV activity south of Zaporizhzhia and southwest of Nikopol (0935Z, 0947Z) confirm continued RF fixed-wing and rotary-wing drone operations, suggesting conditions remain permissive for low-altitude air assets.
• The widespread power outages reported across Ukraine (1001Z) severely degrade C2, CNI operations, and civilian logistics, creating favorable conditions for RF ground maneuvering in the dark/disrupted environment.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Logistics: UAF is actively procuring Electronic Warfare (EW) means through the DOT-Chain Defence marketplace (0937Z). IMPLICATION: This indicates UAF command recognizes the EW threat as paramount and is shifting procurement to counter the RF tactical drone/FPV advantage.
• RF AD/C-UAS Adaptation: RF military bloggers are actively publishing analysis and doctrine on countering UAF heavy multicopter drones ("Baba Yaga") using FPV interceptors and lower-tier AD systems (0937Z, 0942Z). IMPLICATION: This confirms the effectiveness of UAF heavy drones and indicates RF rapid tactical adaptation to establish counter-UAS superiority.
• UAF Counter-Intelligence (CI): SBU claims success in disrupting an FSB agent who was "correcting strikes on the energy sector of Kyiv" (0948Z). IMPLICATION: The RF targeting mechanism utilizes HUMINT/local agents to refine strikes against CNI, underscoring the necessity of aggressive CI operations in conjunction with AD.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Systemic Logistics Disruption: RF has demonstrated the capability to rapidly degrade UAF national logistics (railways) through synchronized deep strikes, threatening the sustainment pipeline to the front lines. CONFIDENCE: HIGH.
2. Tactical Anti-UAS Supremacy: RF is rapidly developing and disseminating doctrine/technology (FPV interceptors, integrated AD analysis) to counter UAF's primary asymmetric advantages (heavy FPV, night bomber drones). CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM.

Intentions (Operational - Next 12 hours):

1. Complete Rail Paralysis: RF will prioritize follow-on strikes targeting remaining operational railway hubs, especially traction and switching stations supporting the Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia axes, to fully paralyze military rail traffic.
2. Exploit CNI Disruption at Pokrovsk: RF ground forces will use the chaos created by the nationwide power disruption to launch a maximal effort to penetrate the newly established UAF reinforcement corridor west of Pokrovsk.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF CNI Targeting Precision: The strike on rescue services in Kramatorsk (0938Z) and the reported use of an FSB agent for strike correction (0948Z) indicates highly precise targeting focused on degrading both physical CNI and civil resilience assets required for recovery.
• RF IW Pivot (Internal Blame): RF-aligned media are immediately seizing on reports (Bild) that UAF leadership (Zelensky) is being blamed by own forces for the Pokrovsk encirclement (1001Z). AIM: To amplify internal friction and degrade Ukrainian political-military cohesion.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• UAF Rail Logistics CRITICAL: The loss of significant railway power capability confirms that the UAF sustainment mechanism is under severe stress. This will mandate an urgent, mass shift to road transport, placing extreme strain on fuel reserves and vulnerable GLOCs.
• RF Internal Security/Morale: RF domestic news emphasizes the conviction of those involved in the Kirillov assassination (0938Z) and refutes rumors of food rationing (0946Z). This suggests the Kremlin is actively managing domestic messaging regarding internal security and economic stability while prosecuting the war.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2: Highly centralized and synchronized, effectively linking strategic missile/UAV strikes with tactical objectives in the Donbas.
• UAF C2: The focus on telecommunications hardening (previous report) and immediate EW procurement indicates UAF C2 is actively mitigating the hybrid threat. However, the confirmed rail power loss presents a major challenge to operational command's ability to redistribute reserves and supplies.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Operational Readiness (EW): UAF demonstrates high awareness of the evolving drone threat and is rapidly institutionalizing procurement of EW assets (0937Z).
• Defensive Posture (Popasna/Luhansk): Elements of the 92nd Brigade are observed conducting morale/PsyOps broadcasts, confirming active reconnaissance (ISR) and preparation for aggressive action in the Popasna direction (0939Z). This suggests UAF forces are attempting to maintain pressure on secondary axes to prevent RF force concentration solely on Pokrovsk.
• Vulnerability (Logistics): The railway network is the single most vulnerable and currently degraded military logistics asset.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. CI Success: Disruption of an FSB agent network targeting Kyiv energy infrastructure (0948Z). Confidence: HIGH.
2. Popasna ISR: Confirmed active ISR targeting RF CPs in the Popasna direction (0939Z). Confidence: MEDIUM.

Setbacks:

1. Critical Logistics Damage: Rail power loss (estimated 50%) due to RF strikes (0939Z, 1002Z). Confidence: HIGH.
2. Civil Resilience Degradation: Strike against rescue personnel in Kramatorsk (0938Z). Confidence: HIGH.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

• RF IW Main Effort: Defeat Narrative: RF media is fully engaged in pushing the narrative of UAF defeat and encirclement in Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiysk and simultaneously amplifying alleged internal Ukrainian dissent against President Zelensky (1001Z, 1002Z). AIM: To break the will of frontline defenders and discourage reinforcement.
• RF Hybrid Consolidation: RF-aligned channels are circulating propaganda celebrating the Russia-DPRK alliance, linking it historically to the Korean War (0946Z). AIM: To normalize and justify the likely military cooperation (including rumored DPRK troops) to both domestic and international audiences.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Public sentiment is likely severely impacted by the widespread power outages and the confirmed critical threat to the railway network, demanding strong, visible resilience efforts from the government.
• The SBU success in arresting the FSB agent (0948Z) serves as a critical morale boost, demonstrating effective CI response to the hybrid CNI threat.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• No new diplomatic developments in this reporting period. The alleged deployment of DPRK troops remains a critical unconfirmed factor shaping the geopolitical domain (CRITICAL Collection Requirement remains).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will maximize the exploitation of the national logistics crisis while maintaining pressure on the decisive point (Pokrovsk).

1. GLOC Attrition: RF will commit high volumes of KABs and long-range artillery to interdict the road network serving Pokrovsk, knowing that UAF forces must now rely heavily on road transport due to rail power loss. Specific targets will include bottlenecks, bridges, and known staging areas west of Pokrovsk.
2. Renewed Shahed Wave: A second, smaller wave of Shahed UAVs will be launched within the next 12 hours, specifically targeting the AD assets that successfully intercepted the initial wave, or targeting alternative high-value CNI nodes (e.g., major water supply or communication towers) to complicate relief efforts.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Massed просачивание Assault: RF infiltration teams (просачивание) supported by heavy fire (KAB/artillery) will achieve a successful breakthrough of the Pokrovsk corridor bottleneck, exploiting a temporary lapse in UAF FPV/C-UAS coverage due to the simultaneous CNI and rail disruption. This could lead to RF establishing fire control over the main supply route, achieving a de facto operational encirclement.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J4 (Logistics): SHIFT TO ROAD PRIORITY AND FUEL SECURITY (CRITICAL PRIORITY). Assume all rail service to the East is critically degraded for the next 48 hours. Secure road-based fuel (POL) convoys with dedicated air and EW/C-UAS escort, as these are now the single point of failure for the Pokrovsk operation. Immediately establish dispersed, temporary fuel depots near front-line logistics nodes.
2. J3 (AD) / J2 (CI): INTEGRATE AD AND CI (HIGH PRIORITY). Leverage the SBU success (0948Z). Prioritize defensive AD fire for CNI targets that are known to have had recent civilian or non-military access/surveillance risk. Increase counter-intelligence efforts around all remaining high-voltage rail traction substations.
3. J3 (Maneuver): FORCE GENERATION FOR POPASNA (MEDIUM PRIORITY). If UAF forces are conducting ISR near Popasna (0939Z), consider a limited, localized spoiling attack to draw RF reserve forces away from the Donetsk axis, mitigating the pressure on Pokrovsk during this critical logistics window.

//END SITREP//