Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 050800Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 050730Z NOV 25 – 050800Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Air Force data confirms the scale of the predicted RF saturation strike, providing tactical clarity. Ground situation remains critical but focused.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk): Remains the primary kinetic focus. The UAF Air Force reports confirm continuous KAB launches targeting Donetsk Oblast (070620Z NOV 25). The confirmed, urgent fundraising needs for Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka (STERNENKO, 071605Z NOV 25) underscore the acute vulnerability of the newly established reinforcement corridor.
• Sumy Axis: Air Force reports KAB launches targeting Sumy Oblast (070742Z NOV 25). This confirms RF intent to maintain multi-axis pressure, fixing UAF reserves away from the critical Donetsk sector.
• Chernihiv Oblast: Confirmed attack by drones and KABs overnight (RBC-Ukraine, 071500Z NOV 25). IMPACT: This validates the MLCOA of a multi-domain, saturation strike effort, extending RF reach into the northern rear area.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No significant new weather data since the previous report (fog in Kyiv). However, the massive, confirmed drone strike (80 platforms launched) indicates RF disregarded fog as a major constraint for low-observable platforms like the Shahed-type UAVs.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Deep Strike Assets: Confirmed launch of approximately 80 UAV platforms (UAF Air Force, 072233Z NOV 25). This validates the CRITICAL threat assessment from the previous report regarding the impending saturation strike.
• UAF Air Defense (AD) Assets: Successfully neutralized 61 of the 80 launched UAVs (76% success rate) (UAF Air Force, 072233Z NOV 25). This is a significant defensive achievement but indicates 19 platforms successfully penetrated defenses, likely targeting CNI or logistics.
• UAF Forces (Zaporizhzhia): Confirmed enemy attack on Zaporizhzhia Raion resulted in four rescue personnel wounded (Zaporizhzhia OMA, 071510Z NOV 25). IMPLICATION: This suggests RF strikes are targeting civilian/emergency response infrastructure, aiming to degrade post-strike recovery capability.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Mass Saturation Strike: RF capacity to launch 80+ UAVs simultaneously is confirmed (HIGH CONFIDENCE). This capability is paired with a rising inventory of modern, long-range glide bombs: 250 Grom-1E (110-120km range) and 500 UMPB-5R (up to 200km range) are projected for production by year-end (RBC-Ukraine, 070342Z NOV 25). This represents a severe, escalating deep strike threat.
2. Psychological Warfare (IW): RF continues to leverage state media and MILBLOGGER channels to promote narratives of internal security successes (FSB arrests) and political influence abroad (US election narrative, TASS report on Czech support reduction).

Intentions (Operational - Next 24 hours):

1. Sustain KAB/Ground Pressure on Pokrovsk: RF will maintain maximum KAB saturation (confirmed activity in Donetsk/Sumy) to exploit the tactical vulnerability of the reinforcement corridor established by UAF GUR.
2. Systemic Degradation: RF will continue to use drone strikes (the 19 penetrating platforms) to identify and test weaknesses in UAF CNI and logistics, preparing for future, larger-scale strikes aimed at systemic failure.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Targeting of Emergency Services: The confirmed wounding of rescue personnel in Zaporizhzhia suggests a tactical adaptation to attack post-strike recovery efforts, accelerating the systemic collapse of targeted infrastructure.
• Escalated Glide Bomb Capability: The confirmed production targets for high-performance guided bombs (Grom-1E, UMPB-5R) signal a shift toward greater stand-off range and precision, complementing the mass fire capabilities demonstrated by the KAB usage.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF long-range strike logistics are confirmed capable of supporting mass launch events (80+ platforms). However, the systemic increase in use of high-tech assets (Grom, UMPB) places greater demand on precision guidance components, which remains a key collection requirement (see Section 6).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF political messaging (Putin congratulating military intelligence) reinforces centralized C2 and emphasizes the strategic parity narrative, aiming to project internal stability despite UAF deep strikes.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Air Defense Effectiveness: The successful interception/suppression of 61 of 80 UAVs (76%) demonstrates high operational readiness and effective C2 within the UAF Air Force (HIGH CONFIDENCE).
• Frontline Resource Urgency: STERNENKO’s updated fundraising target (3 Million UAH towards 50 Million UAH for Pokrovsk/Kostiantynivka) confirms that despite the GUR corridor success, material needs in the critical sector remain extremely high and urgent.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Tactical Successes:

1. Mass Interception: The neutralization of 61 enemy UAVs successfully mitigated the primary kinetic threat of the current saturation strike.
2. Civilian Resilience: DeepState video emphasizes UAF civilian resilience, providing a strong counter-narrative to RF psychological operations (IW).

Setbacks:

1. Penetration and Damage: 19 UAVs successfully penetrated UAF AD. Confirmed damage in Chernihiv and the wounding of emergency personnel in Zaporizhzhia indicates RF strikes are achieving kinetic objectives against rear-area targets.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

• RF Domestic Focus (Narrative Reinforcement): TASS and MILBLOGGERS (Colonelcassad) are reinforcing narratives of internal security (FSB arrests of "traitors") and political/ideological control (approving "patriotic education" standards, celebrating RF military intelligence). INTENT: Bolster domestic support and justify continued conflict expenditure.
• RF International Focus (Degrade Support): RF media amplifies narratives of reduced Western support (Czech Republic reducing military aid) and political chaos in the US (anti-Israel candidate victory), aiming to fracture international coalition morale.
• UAF Messaging (Urgency and Resolve): UAF channels focus on high AD success rates and the critical urgency of material support for the front (STERNENKO). A media outlet also advises Ukrainians to prepare "warm shelter" for winter, implicitly acknowledging the anticipated RF energy grid campaign (072659Z NOV 25).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• UAF domestic morale appears robust, evidenced by continued massive public fundraising efforts focused on acute frontline needs.
• The Coordination Staff on POWs (071313Z NOV 25) issuing detailed instructions to families suggests active, ongoing efforts to manage the emotional and administrative burden of casualties and captured personnel, maintaining transparency and trust.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 12-24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to maximize the impact of the surviving 19 UAV platforms and follow up with dedicated KAB strikes.

1. Sustained KAB Saturation (Donetsk/Sumy): RF will intensify KAB and conventional artillery fire on the Pokrovsk corridor and secondary axes (Sumy) to exploit the vulnerability created by the saturation strike, specifically aiming to sever the GLOCs before UAF can fully consolidate the reinforcement gain.
2. Targeted Follow-Up Strikes: RF intelligence will assess the impact of the 19 penetrating UAVs and launch subsequent, smaller waves of high-precision missiles or SpN strikes against confirmed damaged CNI nodes, especially those related to emergency response (following the Zaporizhzhia precedent) or critical logistics bottlenecks.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(CRITICAL CONFIDENCE)

• GLOC Collapse Preceded by C2 Decapitation: RF launches a second, larger wave of UAVs (potentially 100+ platforms) targeting the identified C2 nodes and AD sites protecting Poltava or Dnipro, achieving a significant breakthrough (e.g., >40% penetration). Simultaneously, RF SpN/infiltration teams execute coordinated attacks on three key road/rail bridges/chokepoints on the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka axis, aiming for simultaneous, multi-axis interdiction and complete operational isolation of the central Donetsk salient.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Air) / J2 (EW): COUNTER-KAB INTERDICTION. Given the confirmed continuous KAB launches and the escalating threat from next-generation glide bombs (Grom/UMPB), immediately task UAF EW assets to dedicated, rolling jamming missions focused on disrupting the GPS/GLONASS guidance for KAB strikes targeting the Pokrovsk-Kostiantynivka corridor. This is a critical countermeasure to preserve the GLOC. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - FIRES/EW)
2. J3 (Maneuver) / J7 (Engineer): RESCUE/LOGISTICS HARDENING. Based on the attack on rescue personnel in Zaporizhzhia, mandate immediate dispersal and hardening of all Emergency Service and Forward Logistics Repair Sites operating within 50km of the front line and in the proximity of CNI. Ensure redundant C2 is available for these teams. (HIGH PRIORITY - FORCE PROTECTION)
3. J4 (Logistics) / G2 (Analysis): AIR DEFENSE REPLENISHMENT. Immediately initiate accelerated resupply and repositioning of AD interceptors, particularly for mobile systems (e.g., NASAMS, Gepard), in the Central/Northern sectors (Kyiv, Chernihiv) following the successful expenditure of munitions against the 80-UAV wave. Failure to rapidly replenish leaves AD vulnerable to an immediate follow-up strike. (HIGH PRIORITY - SUSTAINMENT)

//END SITREP//