Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 040900Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 040800Z NOV 25 – 040900Z NOV 25 (Post-Deep Strike Retaliation Focus) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Focus remains on Pokrovsk urban defense and RF strategic denial strikes.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The decisive point remains the Pokrovsk Defensive Sector (Donetsk Oblast). The operational tempo is high in both the immediate frontline and the UAF strategic rear.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast): NEW CONFIRMATION: Highly detailed GUR MO footage confirms the "Timur" Special Unit is actively engaged in counter-penetration operations inside Pokrovsk, focused on clearing RF elements and securing a corridor for additional UAF ground forces to reinforce the city (FACT - Tsapliienko/GUR footage). This is a critical UAF commitment. RF sources confirm the seriousness of the UAF counter-action, noting the situation in Pokrovsk "resembles Sudzha in the final days of occupation" (FACT - НгП раZVедка), suggesting significant RF difficulty in consolidating gains.
  • RF Unit Confirmation: Russian sources confirm the 39th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade (Sakhalin elements) are utilizing UAVs (Kaira unit) for targeting UAF personnel and equipment on the Pokrovsk axis (FACT - Воин DV). This provides specific unit identification for targeting purposes.
• Northern Operational Zone (Sumy Oblast): NEW STRIKE: RF executed a strike on Sumy city using a "Molniya" munition (FACT - РБК-Україна). Official reports confirm property damage but no casualties. This demonstrates continued RF ability to strike Northern Oblasts.
• Deep Strike Domain (UAF Rear): UAF AD SUCCESS: Southern Defense Forces confirm the destruction of 14 Shahed-136 UAVs during the night attack (FACT - Сили оборони Півдня України), mitigating potential damage to critical infrastructure following the previous period's confirmed strike on Dnipropetrovsk.
• Eastern Operational Zone (Kharkiv Oblast): War Crime Allegation: RF FPV drones allegedly struck two civilians moving under a white flag in Kruhliakivka (Kharkiv Oblast), resulting in fatalities (FACT - Оперативний ЗСУ). This highlights continued RF disregard for Laws of Armed Conflict (LOAC) and the prevalence of FPV drones as a systemic threat to civilian movement near the Line of Contact (LOC).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Weather remains conducive to UAV and fixed-wing operations (KAB strikes) as well as long-range ISR/targeting. Low temperatures are now driving increased demand on the heavily targeted energy grid (FACT - Ukrenergo officials urging lower thermostat settings).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF maintains offensive pressure on Pokrovsk, relying heavily on UAV-guided precision (FPV, Kaira unit) and indirect fire to support penetrated elements. Simultaneously, RF is executing sustained, multi-axis deep strikes (Sumy, Southern Oblasts) aimed at strategic denial and exhausting UAF AD capacity.
• UAF: UAF has committed high-value special operations assets (GUR MO) to the urban fight in Pokrovsk to stabilize the line and execute aggressive counter-penetration. UAF AD remains partially effective, intercepting 14 Shaheds in the South overnight. UAF is actively managing the energy crisis in the rear.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

1. Urban Warfare Expertise (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF forces have demonstrated the capability to penetrate and attempt to entrench within Pokrovsk, utilizing coordinated UAV support for close air support and ISR (Confirmed 39th MRB Kaira unit activity).
2. Sustained Deep Strike (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to launch multi-directional (North, South, Central) deep strikes using various munitions (Molniya, Shahed) to prevent UAF force generation and resupply to the Pokrovsk sector.
3. IO Integration with Tactical Gains (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF channels are exploiting the commitment of elite UAF units (GUR MO) and claiming high enemy losses in Pokrovsk to amplify psychological pressure.

Intentions (Immediate - 0-12 hours):

1. Isolate Pokrovsk Defenders: RF aims to prevent UAF reinforcements from entering Pokrovsk via the GUR-established corridor by maintaining maximum fire pressure and localized counter-attacks on the western approaches.
2. Exploit Energy Vulnerability: RF will continue targeting energy infrastructure in Central Ukraine to further stress the grid as weather and consumption demands rise (Confirmed Ukrenergo warning).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Targeting of Surrender/Civilian Movement: The alleged FPV strike on civilians moving under a white flag (Kruhliakivka) is a tactical shift intended to deny UAF forces any local population movement for cover or extraction, further violating LOAC.
• Confirmed Unit Attribution: Identification of the 39th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade UAV element (Kaira) operating near Pokrovsk refines the RF Order of Battle (OOB) in this critical sector.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain strained but functional enough to sustain high sortie rates for UAVs and KABs. UAF deep strikes against Russian oil infrastructure and supply depots (as noted in the previous report) exert continual pressure, but RF prioritizing short-range tactical fires (KABs, FPVs) over long-range logistics is effective for the current Pokrovsk push.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is effectively synchronizing the Pokrovsk ground offensive with strategic denial strikes across multiple axes (Sumy, Southern Ukraine). The level of coordination required for the multi-domain response (Molniya/Shahed strikes) suggests strategic C2 remains robust.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is defined by the commitment of elite forces to the critical Pokrovsk sector. The GUR MO deployment indicates an all-of-government effort to prevent the collapse of this key defensive city. Readiness to defend against deep strikes is variable; while 14 Shaheds were downed in the South, the Sumy strike was successful.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. Urban Corridor Attempt (Pokrovsk): GUR MO "Timur" is actively attempting to establish a reinforcement corridor into Pokrovsk (FACT).
2. AD Mitigation: Successful interception of 14 Shaheds in the Southern Operational Zone (FACT).

Setbacks:

1. Deep Strike Success (Sumy): Confirmed successful strike by RF on Sumy city (FACT).
2. Energy Stress: Official pleas for reduced energy consumption highlight the operational success of RF strategic denial campaign against critical infrastructure (FACT - Ukrenergo).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

Constraints include an adequate supply of AD interceptors and the dispersion of AD systems to cover the widening array of RF deep strike targets (Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Southern Oblasts). Immediate requirement for specialized urban combat equipment (CQC, breaching, and counter-drone systems) for GUR MO units in Pokrovsk.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus (Desperation/Momentum): RF channels are amplifying the Pokrovsk fight, claiming success and attempting to leverage the image of the GUR commitment to signal UAF desperation ("resembles Sudzha"). They are also using media to highlight UAF energy vulnerabilities (Ukrenergo warnings) to affect public morale.
• UAF IO Focus (Elite Resilience): UAF messaging highlights the commitment and effectiveness of elite forces (GUR MO footage) and attempts to counter RF LOAC violations (Kruhliakivka FPV strike).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is subject to high tension due to the critical nature of the Pokrovsk urban fight and the proven vulnerability to deep strikes in the rear (Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy). The official warning from Ukrenergo will increase anxiety regarding winter survivability and energy availability.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to destroy the GUR MO corridor in Pokrovsk and increase pressure on UAF AD resources.

1. Decisive Fire Attack on Pokrovsk Corridor: RF will use heavy KAB saturation strikes, concentrated artillery, and targeted FPV/UAV attacks (39th MRB Kaira unit) against the identified approaches into Pokrovsk to prevent the reinforcement corridor from stabilizing. (Focus: Western/Northern Pokrovsk approaches)
2. Strategic Denial Strikes on Central Ukraine: RF will initiate the next wave of coordinated UAV/missile strikes (likely Shahed, potentially cruise missiles) targeting Poltava and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts, focusing on transformer stations, thermal power plants, and major rail interdiction points to exploit the energy vulnerabilities.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a breach of the Pokrovsk western flank supported by massive EW/ISR denial.

• Western Flank Exploitation: Should UAF reserves be fully drawn into the Pokrovsk urban fight, RF (likely utilizing fresh reserves identified in previous periods) executes a high-speed mechanized thrust targeting the undefended T-0515 highway southwest of Pokrovsk to establish a deep logistics interdiction point. This thrust would be preceded by maximum EW/SIGINT/C-UAS jamming to blind UAF ISR and C2, isolating the main Pokrovsk defensive force.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/JFSCC (Ground Operations): PRIORITIZE GUR SUPPORT. Task all available UAF fires (artillery, mortars, FPVs) on the Pokrovsk axis to directly support the GUR MO corridor operation. Fire missions should focus on suppressing or destroying the identified 39th Guards MRB UAV operating positions and known assembly areas used for reinforcement. (CRITICAL PRIORITY - FIRE SUPPORT)
2. J3/JFSCC (Air Defense): GEOGRAPHICAL DIVERSIFICATION. Given the successful strike on Sumy, re-evaluate and deploy mobile AD assets (e.g., Gepard, Avenger, or MANPADS teams) to provide point defense for critical civilian/administrative infrastructure in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts to counter low-flying drone/Molniya threats. (HIGH PRIORITY - FORCE PROTECTION)
3. GUR MO/SBU (Counter-Hybrid): INVESTIGATE FPV LOAC VIOLATION. Immediately dispatch an investigative team to Kruhliakivka (Kharkiv Oblast) to verify the circumstances of the alleged FPV strike on civilians and gather forensic evidence. If confirmed, package the evidence immediately for international disclosure to reinforce the information campaign against RF war crimes. (HIGH PRIORITY - IO/LEGAL)

//END SITREP//