Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031400Z NOV 25 REPORTING PERIOD: 031300Z NOV 25 – 031400Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The situation is characterized by active RF offensive operations in Donetsk (Pokrovsk) countered by aggressive UAF deep strike and counter-air operations in Crimea and the Black Sea.

• Donetsk Axis (Pokrovsk): RF forces are confirmed to be operating inside the city's southern quarters. New RF MoD propaganda suggests active attempts to eliminate UAF formations and prevent withdrawal from "encircled areas of Krasnoarmeysk [Pokrovsk]" (MoD Russia, 13:21:13Z). This confirms RF intent to isolate and destroy UAF elements within the urban environment. (FACT - RF MoD Claim / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Northern Axis (Chernihiv): New RF UAV activity is detected heading toward Pornonytsia, Chernihiv Oblast (Air Force, 13:25:53Z), confirming continued probing of the northern border.
• Black Sea/Crimea (Key Terrain): UAF GUR/Naval Forces (NAVFOR) executed multiple successful strikes against high-value RF air defense and maritime assets, specifically targeting the 92N6E radar (S-400 component), S-400 power supply, RLS P-18 'Terek' radar, and personnel on the 'Syvash' drilling platform (GUR, NAVFOR, 13:25:05Z, 13:32:23Z). These are significant tactical and operational successes in the multi-domain battlespace. (FACT - UAF GUR/NAVFOR Imagery / HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Dobropillia Direction: RF sources confirm active fire missions, showing multiple impacts near a settlement, indicating localized heavy fire or missile use in support of the Pokrovsk offensive effort. (FACT - RF Imagery / MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change. Wet/muddy ground conditions observed in RF drone footage (MoD Russia, 13:21:14Z) suggest continued terrain restrictions for heavy mechanized movement off-road, favoring infantry and light armored/drone operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are under critical pressure in Pokrovsk but are successfully executing asymmetric counter-pressure operations at strategic depth. The successful destruction of multiple RF AD and C2 assets in Crimea significantly degrades RF air superiority and ISR capabilities in the southern theater, partially compensating for the ground pressure in Donetsk.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Precision Strike Capability: RF maintains the capability to execute deep strikes using ballistic missiles (Iskander, reported to have targeted 35th Brigade elements, Kotsnews, 13:13:35Z) and persistent UAV/drone strike campaigns across multiple sectors (Donetsk, Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk).
• Integrated Reconnaissance/Strike: Confirmed RF drone operations in the Dobropillia direction (Dva Mayora, 13:21:58Z) demonstrate the continuous ability to rapidly identify, confirm, and strike targets near the frontline settlements.

Intentions:

1. Isolate Pokrovsk: The primary intention remains the consolidation of the penetration into Pokrovsk to isolate and destroy UAF defenders.
2. Information Control: RF utilizes propaganda to amplify tactical successes (Pokrovsk) and exploit internal Ukrainian social issues (corruption claims) to erode domestic morale and international support.
3. Establish Air Dominance: Despite UAF strikes, RF continues efforts to suppress UAF AD and secure maritime assets in the Black Sea (observed targeting of UAF boat near a fixed structure, Colonelcassad, 13:20:30Z).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF has immediately shifted its information campaign to reflect the tactical penetration of Pokrovsk, framing the operation as an "encirclement" (Krasnoarmeysk/Pokrovsk). This is an attempt to define the narrative and pressure UAF C2 into premature withdrawal decisions.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The documented destruction of multiple high-value RF AD radars and power components in Crimea will critically impact RF ability to provide effective air defense for the Black Sea Fleet and logistical hubs in the peninsula. This tactical success compounds the effects of the previous SSO strikes against Luhansk logistics.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains capable of coordinating complex urban assaults while maintaining pressure and information campaigns. However, the recurring vulnerability of high-value static targets (AD systems, logistics hubs) to UAF deep strike remains a critical weakness in RF operational security.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains aggressive deep strike capability (GUR/NAVFOR) and a strong AD awareness (Air Force alerts). The confirmed destruction of multiple RF AD systems in Crimea bolsters UAF offensive freedom of maneuver in the Black Sea and potentially for long-range air assets.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• CRITICAL DEEP STRIKE: Successful GUR/NAVFOR strikes on RF S-400 radar, P-18 radar, and the Syvash drilling platform (targeting personnel and AD assets). This is the most significant tactical success in the reporting period.
• Civilian Resilience: Continued publicized efforts by the Zaporizhzhia OVA to restore civilian infrastructure damaged by RF shelling (13:27:18Z) bolsters domestic morale and demonstrates state function.

Setbacks:

• Urban Penetration: The confirmed RF penetration into Pokrovsk remains the most serious immediate tactical setback.
• Internal Welfare Concern: Social media reports highlighting the exploitation of UAF personnel by local civilians charging high rents for substandard housing near the front (Hayabusa, 13:04:49Z) pose a significant internal morale and welfare risk that requires immediate addressing by civil-military administration.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The priority remains reinforcement and resupply for Pokrovsk. New constraints include the social/internal security requirement to address the reported exploitation of UAF soldiers seeking housing, as this can severely degrade combat morale and trust in local authorities.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Strategic IO (Belarus/Soros): RF sources are promoting complex conspiracy theories claiming "Soros structures" are planning to undermine Belarus's sovereignty using Ukraine as a platform to spread "aggressive nationalism" (Dva Mayora, 13:07:01Z). Intent: This aims to further solidify the RF-Belarus alliance, justify continued Russian military presence in Belarus, and demonize UAF as an agent of Western destabilization.
• RF Tactical IO (Pokrovsk/Iskander): RF MoD focuses on claiming "encirclement" in Pokrovsk and highlighting successful missile strikes against high-value UAF units (35th Brigade, Kotsnews). Intent: Psychological operations aimed at accelerating UAF withdrawal and degrading unit cohesion.
• RF Tactical IO (Morale Degradation): RF sources are circulating videos of captured/surrendered UAF soldiers (79th Brigade) describing demoralization, ammunition shortages, and poor tactical conditions (Desantno-Shturmovi, 13:16:30Z). Intent: Direct PSYOPS targeting UAF front-line morale.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Ukrainian morale is facing complex pressures: the significant tactical success of the GUR/NAVFOR deep strikes provides a major lift, but this is counterbalanced by the confirmed RF penetration into Pokrovsk and the emergent domestic issue of civilian profiteering off military personnel housing.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

No new significant diplomatic updates within this reporting window. The previous positive signal regarding EU candidacy remains the baseline.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt maximum exploitation of the Pokrovsk penetration:

1. Mass Reinforcement of Pokrovsk: RF will prioritize the immediate introduction of follow-on forces (likely mechanized infantry and light armor) into southern Pokrovsk to expand the perimeter and establish fire control over key internal road junctions, targeting UAF logistics and C2 within the city limits.
2. Synchronized UAV Strike (Central/Northern Ukraine): Based on active UAV tracking, RF will execute a coordinated UAV strike tonight/tomorrow morning targeting critical infrastructure in Kirovohrad Oblast (confirmed trajectory) and/or military logistics near Pornonytsia, Chernihiv Oblast.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Operational Collapse in Donetsk:

1. Isolation of Myrnohrad: RF achieves a rapid breakthrough north of Pokrovsk, utilizing mobile reserves to interdict the E50 highway, effectively isolating Myrnohrad and the main logistics corridor supporting the Donetsk front, forcing a major UAF operational retreat.
2. Retaliatory Deep Strike: RF executes a massive, retaliatory missile strike using the remaining Iskander/hypersonic assets against a critical UAF strategic headquarters or a major logistics hub in response to the GUR/NAVFOR success in Crimea, severely disrupting UAF strategic C2.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Maneuver & Operations): POKROVSK COUNTER-PENETRATION FIRE: Immediately task heavy artillery and rocket systems to place sustained interdiction fire on known RF ingress routes and consolidation points within the southern quarters of Pokrovsk. Prioritize destroying light armored vehicles and troop concentrations attempting to entrench. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J2/GUR (Targeting): EXPLOIT AD GAP: Given the successful destruction of key RF AD assets in Crimea, increase ISR and strike sorties over the Black Sea and Crimean Peninsula to identify and target vulnerable RF naval logistics, repair facilities, and operational C2 before RF can deploy replacement AD systems. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
3. G5 (CIMIC) & Local Administration: MITIGATE MORALE RISK: Direct local military and civil administrations in frontline oblasts to implement emergency price controls or establish subsidized military billets to prevent the reported exploitation of UAF personnel through high housing costs. Publicize punitive actions against egregious offenders to protect troop welfare and morale. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//