Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031233Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by persistent RF kinetic pressure in Donetsk Oblast, particularly focused on securing key transport nodes and urban centers near Pokrovsk.

• Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad Axis): UAF 7th Corps, Air Assault Forces (DSHV), reports successful interdiction operations, halting RF expansion towards northern Pokrovsk and preventing the cutting of the critical Pokrovsk–Rodynske road link. This road remains a Key Terrain feature for UAF logistics and maneuvering. (FACT - UAF Source/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • NEW THREAT AXIS: RF forces are confirmed to be on the approaches to the southeastern outskirts of Myrnohrad. Myrnohrad is a significant urban center further west from the current front line, indicating RF intent to maintain deep pressure along the Donetsk axis. (FACT - UAF Source/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Donetsk Oblast (Air Domain): Repeat guided aerial bomb launches (KAB/FAB) are confirmed against targets in Donetsk Oblast, reinforcing the previous report's concern regarding RF reliance on massed precision air strikes. (FACT - UAF Air Force/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Kharkiv/Luhansk Axis (Kupyansk): RF claims success in urban combat, specifically stating the 6th Army has dislodged UAF from four fortified positions in the industrial zone on the left bank of the Oskil River near Kupyansk. This suggests continued, grinding RF pressure on the western side of the river. (FACT - RF Media/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - Unverified claim of success)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No new significant weather or environmental changes have been reported. The previous assessment of difficult, muddy conditions favoring asymmetric warfare (FPV/UGV) in the south (Zaporizhzhia) remains relevant, though the high-tempo urban/aerial assault in Donetsk suggests RF air superiority minimizes weather constraints on its heavy kinetic operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: Highly aggressive kinetic and geographic expansion posture in Donetsk (targeting Myrnohrad). The RF is combining deep political IO (Kremlin trophy display, previous reporting) with coordinated military pressure. RF forces are employing tactics to exploit the psychological effect of ballistic missile strikes (targeting award ceremonies, as confirmed by the casualty report). (JUDGMENT - Coordinated Hybrid Pressure/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Posture: UAF maintains a dynamic defense posture, successfully leveraging specialized units (7th DSHV Corps FPV operations confirmed) to defend critical logistics routes (Pokrovsk–Rodynske). UAF Air Defense is active, confirmed by the downing of a drone in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. (FACT - UAF Sources/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Precision Ballistic Targeting: RF demonstrated the ability to acquire and strike high-value, fixed UAF targets of opportunity (e.g., troop formation during an award ceremony) using ballistic missiles. This requires advanced ISR (likely drone or agent activity) and rapid C2 linkage.
• Sustained Deep Drone Attack Capability: Confirmed drone activity in Kharkiv (Iziumskyi and Lozivskyi Districts) and the announcement of a Red Alert for UAV attack in Russia's Lipetsk Oblast indicate continued, mutual long-range/deep strike capabilities.

Intentions:

1. Advance on Key Urban Centers (Myrnohrad): RF intends to push the line of contact (LOC) westwards, threatening the next major urban concentration (Myrnohrad) to maintain operational momentum toward the stated goal of capturing all of Donetsk Oblast.
2. Degrade UAF Morale and C2: RF deliberately targets high-profile events (award ceremonies) to inflict maximum casualties, degrade morale, and create a narrative of RF dominance over UAF organization and security.
3. Undermine Global Support (Economic/IO): RF continues high-level diplomatic outreach (PM Mishustin in China) to secure alternative economic support, mitigating the impact of US sanctions (targeting Rosneft/Lukoil) which have already reportedly caused Chinese refiners to halt some Russian oil purchases.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift in the Donetsk axis to directly threaten Myrnohrad is the most significant tactical adaptation, expanding the current area of operations and forcing UAF to divert resources to defend a new urban center.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF Sustainment: High-level diplomatic activity (Mishustin in China) suggests RF is actively working to secure long-term economic and potentially dual-use supply chains to bypass Western sanctions.
• UAF Sustainment: UAF is emphasizing internal morale and recognition (Engineer Forces Day ceremony) and continuing volunteer support (DeepState fundraiser), signaling a sustained need for localized logistical resilience.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 demonstrated effective coordination between ISR and ballistic missile assets for a successful strike on a troop formation. UAF C2 is effectively managing the defense of critical logistics routes in Pokrovsk, employing agile, specialized DSHV units.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture remains defensively robust, highlighted by the 7th DSHV Corps' success in preventing RF expansion near Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad. Readiness is high in key defensive sectors and in strategic air defense (Dnipropetrovsk shootdown). However, the successful ballistic strike on a troop formation indicates a critical vulnerability in force protection procedures.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Defense of Pokrovsk Axis: Successful interdiction and holding of the Pokrovsk–Rodynske road by 7th DSHV Corps.
• Strategic Economic Pressure: Confirmed reports of Chinese refiners halting some Russian oil purchases following US sanctions (linked to previous UAF deep strikes on RF energy infrastructure), validating UAF strategic targeting.

Setbacks:

• Ballistic Strike Casualties: The confirmed ballistic missile strike on a troop formation during an award ceremony resulted in significant, unnecessary casualties and represents a critical failure in operational security (OPSEC) regarding troop movements and fixed assembly points.
• Civilian Casualties (Chernihiv): Two civilian fatalities and one injury confirmed in Chernihiv Oblast from a Russian UAV explosion in a field, highlighting the persistent danger of unexploded ordnance and debris.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Immediate review and reinforcement of OPSEC protocols across all brigades, particularly regarding the gathering of personnel for ceremonies, briefings, or logistical staging. RF demonstrated capability to precisely target such events.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Strategic IO (China-Russia Alignment): TASS heavily promotes the Mishustin visit to China, aiming to project economic and geopolitical strength and resilience against Western sanctions.
• RF Tactical IO (Attrition Claims): RF sources (Operatsiya Z) are attempting to discredit pro-Ukrainian volunteer fighters (RDK) by claiming high attrition rates in the Pokrovsk area.
• UAF Morale IO (Professionalism/Resilience): UAF focuses on honoring specialized forces (Engineering Forces Day ceremony in Kyiv) and maintaining the narrative of societal resilience through educational outreach (Zaporizhzhia students visiting Dnipro museums).
• Hybrid War IO (Moriarty VPN): The promotion of a VPN service using aggressive anti-FSB/state surveillance imagery is a niche, but significant, indication of the normalization of digital defiance tools in the conflict zone.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF internal morale is supported by the recognition of military service (Engineer Forces Day) and public education initiatives. However, the successful ballistic strike on a high-profile gathering is a severe blow to confidence in force protection and OPSEC. RF social media is plagued by internal security issues (e.g., military personnel beating a comrade to death), suggesting latent morale and discipline problems in their ranks.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

CRITICAL ECONOMIC SHIFT: US sanctions against Rosneft/Lukoil are demonstrably impacting RF energy exports, with Chinese refiners reportedly halting purchases. This is a significant positive diplomatic and economic pressure point. The high-level Russia-China meeting aims to counter this, but the immediate economic effect remains favorable to UAF.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to convert kinetic success into tactical advances:

1. Concentrated Advance on Myrnohrad: RF forces will intensify ground and air assault operations aimed at Myrnohrad’s southeastern approaches to force UAF withdrawal or resource commitment away from other critical axes (e.g., Chasiv Yar).
2. Sustained Glide Bomb Attacks: RF VKS will continue repeat, targeted glide bomb strikes (KAB/FAB) against fixed UAF defensive positions and C2 nodes in the Donetsk sector, particularly near Pokrovsk and Konstantinovka, to maintain the current high attrition rate.
3. Increased ISR Exploitation: Following the success of the ballistic strike on the UAF assembly, RF ISR assets (Orlan/Supercam) and FPV units will prioritize searching for large UAF troop concentrations or scheduled fixed gatherings to replicate the strike's psychological and physical impact.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF attempts to force an operational decision:

1. Coordinated Myrnohrad Encirclement: RF commits reserves to execute a double envelopment or deep penetration maneuver to fully surround or bypass Myrnohrad, forcing a major UAF operational retreat westward and granting RF a critical propaganda victory.
2. Strategic Counter-Sanction Move: Following the Mishustin visit, China announces a new, large-scale long-term economic or technological agreement (e.g., microchip supply, energy pipeline construction) with Russia, effectively neutralizing recent US sanctions and stabilizing the RF economy.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J2 (Force Protection & OPSEC): IMMEDIATE STAND-DOWN ON ASSEMBLY: All brigade-level and higher commanders must immediately implement maximum force dispersion and prohibit all troop assemblies (award ceremonies, briefings, large meals) at fixed locations within 100km of the LOC unless in certified hardened bunkers. Violation of this directive carries extreme risk of high-casualty strike. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J3/J4 (Logistics & Anti-Logistics): PRIORITIZE POKROVSK–RODYNKE DEFENSE: Allocate additional counter-battery and FPV drone assets to support the 7th DSHV Corps in maintaining the Pokrovsk–Rodynske road, recognizing its critical role in sustaining the front. (HIGH PRIORITY)
3. J7/J2 (Strategic IO): COUNTER RF ATTRITION CLAIMS: Prepare and launch counter-IO specifically aimed at the RF claims of high attrition (e.g., RDK in Pokrovsk) by providing validated, positive reports of UAF defensive successes and interdiction operations in the Pokrovsk sector. (MEDIUM PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//