Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 031200Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment is characterized by high-intensity attrition in the Donbas coupled with synchronized RF deep strike and ISR penetration into Ukrainian rear areas.

• Donetsk Oblast (Ivanopillya/Pokrovsk): Remains the epicenter of ground combat (RBC-Ukraine). UAF 46th Separate Airmobile Brigade (OAMBr) successfully interdicted a river crossing attempt by two RF tanks and two Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFV), utilizing remote mining and FPV drones. This confirms UAF success in maintaining river lines, utilizing hybrid tactics (mines/FPV), and exploiting RF tactical attempts to advance under cover (fog). (FACT - UAF reporting/HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF sources (Alex Parker) claim the deployment of the Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK) to Pokrovsk, which, if true, suggests heightened defensive measures by UAF (using internal counter-RF forces) or RF IO intended to signal a high-value, high-casualty environment for anti-regime fighters. (JUDGMENT - RF IO/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Rear Areas (Mykolaiv/Kharkiv/Poltava/Lipetsk): RF ISR and Shahed-type UAV activity is highly active across multiple oblasts (Kharkiv toward Poltava; Mykolaiv SE; Donetsk/Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk East). RF authorities in Lipetsk Oblast have declared an air threat regime, indicating UAF long-range strike capabilities (likely drones, potentially Storm Shadow) are achieving strategic depth. (FACT - UAF Air Force/RF Governors/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Strategic Threat Focus: Ukrainian sources (RBC-Ukraine) confirm that RF has set a new "deadline" to capture all of Donetsk Oblast by the end of February, reinforcing the centrality of this operational axis. (FACT - UAF Sources/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Weather conditions (specifically fog) allowed RF armored elements to attempt a river crossing (46th OAMBr sector), suggesting visibility limitations are being exploited for mobility, increasing the need for ground-based sensors (radar/thermal optics) and persistent ISR coverage. The approaching cold season is linked to continued RF strikes on energy infrastructure, leading to unpredictable power outages (Derzhenerhonahliad).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: Highly aggressive kinetic and deep strike posture, focused on overwhelming UAF ground defenses in Donetsk and simultaneously identifying and striking strategic UAF targets far behind the lines (indicated by the Lipetsk alert). IO efforts are sustained and multi-faceted (anti-Western messaging, domestic historic propaganda via Ivan the Terrible monument).
• UAF Posture (Integrated Defense/Offense): UAF continues to demonstrate effective multi-domain defensive tactics, specifically combining legacy assets (remote mining) with high-tech capabilities (FPV units like KATRAN/FABOS) to achieve disproportionate tactical effects against RF armor. UAF strategic strike assets are active deep within RF territory (Lipetsk).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Deep Strike Capability: RF continues to utilize large-scale (Shahed) and small-scale (ISR) BPLAs across Eastern and Central Ukraine. The Lipetsk alert confirms that UAF deep strike (UAVs/Storm Shadow) remains a significant concern for RF command.
• Integrated Armored Assault: RF continues large-scale assaults, despite high attrition rates (46th OAMBr success), prioritizing movement under cover (fog) and seeking to consolidate gains in the Donbas.

Intentions:

1. Achieve Strategic Objective (Donetsk): RF leadership maintains a political deadline (end of February) for the complete capture of Donetsk Oblast, ensuring ground operations remain high-tempo throughout winter.
2. Neutralize UAF Deep Strike: The declaration of air danger in Lipetsk (a key logistics and airbase hub) indicates an RF intent to defend against and preempt further UAF long-range attacks.
3. Undermine Western Support: RF IO is actively correlating US political division (Trump/Tomahawk) with UK support (Storm Shadow) to project Western disunity and futility.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The combination of river crossing attempts under cover and the high utilization of small reconnaissance BPLAs in rear areas suggests a synchronized effort to leverage all available assets—environmental, technological, and conventional—to achieve tactical breakthroughs and strategic targeting. RF IO also attempts to mock UAF use of decoys ("cardboard Italian tanks"), suggesting UAF deception efforts are having a minor local impact. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT - MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are strained by UAF deep strikes (implied by Lipetsk alert), forcing operational pause/relocation of high-value assets. UAF logistics must now contend with unpredictable power outages, which will affect readiness and maintenance cycles (Derzhenerhonahliad). The confirmed receipt of Storm Shadow sustains UAF ability to disrupt RF logistics.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains capable of coordinating BPLA reconnaissance/strike missions across large operational areas (Mykolaiv, Poltava, Donetsk). UAF C2 is demonstrating effective tactical decentralization, evidenced by the 46th OAMBr's successful integration of remote mining and FPV drones against a local RF threat.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is high on key defensive axes. The effective tactical performance of FPV units (KATRAN Battalion, FABOS) demonstrates advanced, non-standard unit readiness and effective training integration. Strategic offensive readiness remains high, confirmed by the declaration of air danger in Lipetsk.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Successful River Barrier Defense: 46th OAMBr successfully interdicted and destroyed four RF armored vehicles attempting a river crossing, maintaining the integrity of the water obstacle. (CRITICAL TACTICAL SUCCESS)
• FPV/Drone Dominance: FPV units confirm successful strikes against RF armor and logistics (quad bikes/ATVs) at extended ranges (17-19 km), demonstrating continued asymmetric advantage.
• Strategic Strike Confirmation: The air danger alert in Lipetsk is a strong indicator of successful UAF deep strike penetration.

Setbacks:

• Energy Grid Vulnerability: The inability to forecast power outages due to constant RF strikes highlights persistent vulnerability in critical national infrastructure.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement for UAF is sustained counter-battery and mobile air defense, specifically SHORAD systems, to suppress RF ISR and Shahed activity across the Eastern axis (Kharkiv/Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk) and protect key energy infrastructure. Logistical planning must now incorporate unpredictable power supply constraints.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Anti-Western IO (Storm Shadow): RF sources (Два майора, TASS) are confirming the Storm Shadow delivery but framing it in a politically corrosive context: "Storm instead of Tomahawk," suggesting UK support is a political substitute for US non-action (Trump narrative), reinforcing the message of Western political disunity.
• RF Domestic/Historical IO: The installation of a 9-meter monument to Ivan the Terrible in Vologda (ASTRA) is part of the ongoing RF state effort to normalize extreme autocratic power and justify expansive, imperial territorial claims to a domestic audience.
• UAF Morale and Resilience IO: UAF sources (Zaporizhzhia OVA, Prisoner Coordination HQ) are actively promoting community resilience, inter-regional support, and the Rule of Law/POW support, maintaining a positive, unified narrative despite intense combat.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public morale is sustained by visible tactical successes (46th OAMBr video, FPV strikes) and the confirmation of crucial Western materiel (Storm Shadow). However, persistent air threat and unpredictable power outages (RBC-Ukraine) create ongoing civilian fatigue and require active resilience management. The Kharkiv POW solidarity action highlights persistent societal concern regarding captured personnel.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The UK Storm Shadow delivery remains the primary signal of continued Western military support. RF IO is aggressively targeting the political stability of this support, attempting to create wedges between the US and UK positions. The strategic effect of UAF deep strikes (confirmed by Lipetsk alert) continues to exert external pressure on RF logistics and domestic stability.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to intensify both kinetic and non-kinetic pressure points:

1. Deep Strike on Energy/Logistics: RF will follow up on current ISR activity (Kharkiv/Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk BPLA sightings) with coordinated Shahed/missile strikes targeting key energy substations or logistics nodes, exacerbating the already unpredictable power situation.
2. Focus on Attrition in Donetsk: Ground forces will maintain extremely high-intensity assaults on the Pokrovsk axis to meet the internal February deadline, prioritizing the destruction of UAF fixed defenses and exploiting any potential gaps created by high-attrition rates (e.g., Ivanopillya/Rodinske sectors).
3. Counter-Strike IO: RF will execute a high-volume IO campaign attempting to discredit or minimize the impact of UAF deep strikes that led to the Lipetsk air danger alert.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF conducts a high-risk, high-reward offensive designed to force operational decisions:

1. AD Saturation/Strategic Asset Strike: RF uses multi-axis BPLA/missile waves to force UAF AD batteries to deplete ordnance, immediately followed by VKS or Iskander/KN-23 strikes against a confirmed Storm Shadow storage or launch site, severely degrading UAF deep strike capability.
2. Mechanized Exploitation via River Crossing: RF attempts a major armored crossing operation on a currently defended river line (similar to the 46th OAMBr interdiction) but utilizes integrated air cover (VKS) and heavy artillery support to suppress UAF counter-mobility/FPV defenses, forcing a localized operational retreat.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/AD/EW (Counter-ISR/Strike): DYNAMIC EW/SHORAD INTERDICTION: Immediately activate all mobile EW and SHORAD units to aggressively target all identified RF BPLA corridors in the East and Center (Kharkiv/Poltava/Dnipropetrovsk). Priority must be placed on disrupting the end-phase of the reconnaissance mission to deny strike coordinates. (CRITICAL PRIORITY)
2. J7 (Strategic Counter-IO): PRE-EMPT ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE IO: Task J7 to prepare public statements and information materials that acknowledge the high risk of power disruption but emphasize UAF resilience and the deliberate targeting of civilians by the RF, contrasting it with UAF’s precision strikes on military targets (e.g., Lipetsk). (URGENT PRIORITY)
3. J3/Fires (Counter-Mobility): REINFORCE ANTI-MOBILITY BARRIERS: Increase the density of remote mining and deploy additional FPV counter-mobility assets (like FABOS/KATRAN units) to high-threat river crossing points in the Donetsk sector to guarantee RF river crossing attempts are immediately neutralized. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//