Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 030700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational focus remains split between the attritional ground fight in Donetsk and RF deep strike campaigns targeting UAF rear areas and critical infrastructure. The Pokrovsk axis remains the strategic objective for RF, with Ivanopillya serving as the immediate tactical choke point.

• Donetsk Axis (Ivanopillya/Pokrovsk): The high-intensity ground battle continues. Previous reports of RF success against UAF fixed defenses (blindages) near Ivanopillya are now corroborated by sustained high UAF-reported RF loss figures (1,160 personnel), confirming the sector remains the center of gravity for ground attrition. (FACT - UAF GSAF/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Operations (Dnipropetrovsk/Zaporizhzhia): RF forces conducted focused missile/air attacks on urban centers and industrial targets overnight. Confirmed impacts include:
  • Dnipropetrovsk: Missile strike hit a commercial enterprise (підприємство), causing significant damage and injuring one civilian. (FACT - UAF ODA/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Zaporizhzhia: Confirmed enemy attack resulting in three civilian injuries. (FACT - UAF ODA/HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Effectiveness (Saratov NPZ): UAF IO reinforces the success of the overnight strike on the Saratov Oil Refinery (NPZ), visually confirming the facility is "in abargev" (on fire). This maintains pressure on RF logistics. (FACT - UAF IO/MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Air Defense Watch: UAF Air Force reports a Shahed-type UAV threat in Nizhyn Raion, Chernihiv Oblast, indicating continuous RF attempts to penetrate UAF air defense networks outside the immediate contact line. (FACT - UAF AF/HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from previous reporting. Ground conditions permit sustained maneuver. RF appears to be exploiting clear airspace for deep strike missions (missiles and UAVs).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF forces are employing a two-pronged strategy: (1) high-intensity attritional assault in the Donetsk axis to force an operational breakthrough toward Kostiantynivka/Pokrovsk, and (2) synchronized deep strikes targeting UAF industrial capacity and civilian morale (Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia). RF UAVs are confirmed active on the Zaporizhzhia axis and near the northern border (Chernihiv).
• UAF Posture: UAF maintains a strong defensive posture characterized by effective counter-attrition (high reported RF losses) while simultaneously maintaining a robust, offensive deep-strike capability. UAF C2 is actively managing air defense against renewed RF deep strike efforts.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Synchronized Deep Strike: RF retains the capability to conduct synchronized missile/drone attacks against multiple strategic targets simultaneously (Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Chernihiv UAV detection). This capability is designed to degrade UAF defensive industries and exhaust AD inventories. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Information Warfare (IO): RF continues its sophisticated IO campaign, immediately amplifying statements by influential US political figures (Trump) regarding US policy/aid ("Tomahawk decision") to create uncertainty in the UAF coalition. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Ground Attrition: RF has demonstrated the capability to sustain heavy losses (1,160 personnel/day) while maintaining offensive pressure in the decisive Donetsk sector. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Intentions:

1. Degrade UAF Industrial Capacity: RF attacks on industrial targets (Dnipropetrovsk enterprise) are intended to directly compromise UAF warfighting material sustainment.
2. Exploit Political Friction: RF seeks to leverage foreign political statements to create a narrative of wavering Western commitment and hasten UAF/NATO concessions.
3. Achieve Tactical Decisive Point: RF intends to force a breakthrough at Ivanopillya to gain operational momentum toward Kostiantynivka, the strategic objective before Pokrovsk.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The renewed high tempo and multi-axis nature of RF deep strikes (Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Chernihiv) suggests an adaptation to UAF successes (Saratov NPZ). This likely aims to divert UAF AD resources and demonstrate RF's own capacity to impose costs in the UAF rear. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed damage at Saratov NPZ will create a short-to-medium term strain on RF fuel logistics, potentially impacting ground and air operations, especially in theaters reliant on that supply node. RF forces must now prioritize fuel delivery and potentially introduce rationing for non-critical assets.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing deep strike assets (missile/UAV) with IO efforts, indicating cohesive multi-domain planning.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains high, actively engaging the threat across multiple domains:

• Counter-Attritional Effectiveness: Sustained high enemy loss rates (1,160 personnel) indicate successful, if costly, defensive operations.
• Air Defense Response: Active engagement and tracking of UAVs (Chernihiv) show UAF AD systems are operational and responsive.
• Regional Control: Local authorities (Kryvyi Rih) report controlled situations despite ongoing external threats, suggesting strong civil-military coordination.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

SUCCESS: The confirmed fire at Saratov NPZ (UAF IO) provides strategic leverage by degrading RF logistics and justifying continued deep strike capability investment.

SETBACK: Confirmed missile strikes on industrial targets in Dnipro and civilian areas in Zaporizhzhia highlight the continued vulnerability of UAF critical infrastructure and the civilian population to RF deep strike campaigns.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The renewed focus on deep strikes on industrial targets demands immediate allocation of resources to enhance active and passive defense for high-value manufacturing and energy sites. The high casualty count for RF forces suggests UAF fire resources (artillery ammunition, precision munitions) must be sustained to maintain the attritional advantage.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• US Policy Exploitation: RF IO is aggressively exploiting political statements by figures like Donald Trump, who suggests the war could end quickly if he is in power, and confirmation that Tomahawk transfer is not currently under consideration. This aims to foster doubt within Ukraine and among NATO partners regarding sustained long-term support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Internal RF IO: RF internal IO focuses on promoting minor domestic issues (college graduate bonuses, Moscow scooter accidents) to maintain a veneer of domestic normalcy and distract from war losses.
• Counter-Moral Boosting: UAF IO is effectively using images of successful deep strikes (Saratov) and high RF loss figures to sustain public morale.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is likely hardening following renewed attacks on urban centers (Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia), increasing resolve but also concern over personal safety and infrastructure resilience heading into winter.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The report on US political figures backing away from Tomahawk missile provision is significant (previously noted, now re-amplified by IO). This constraint on high-end capability requires UAF leadership to focus diplomatic efforts on securing alternatives or maximizing existing long-range systems.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will prioritize tactical and strategic convergence:

1. Ivanopillya Breakthrough Attempt: RF forces will commit further reserves to sustain the current operational tempo at Ivanopillya, seeking a localized breakthrough toward Kostiantynivka before UAF can fully organize reinforcement/counterattack efforts.
2. Sustained Deep Strikes (Energy/Industrial): RF will launch follow-on wave(s) of missile and UAV attacks targeting UAF industrial and energy infrastructure in central and southern Ukraine to exploit perceived vulnerabilities exposed in the last 24 hours.
3. Trump Quote Amplification: RF state media and aligned IO channels will spend the next 24 hours heavily promoting and interpreting Donald Trump’s statements to maximize the political impact in Western capitals.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves operational exploitation:

1. Kostiantynivka Seizure Preparation: RF forces successfully breach UAF defenses at Ivanopillya and establish fire control over key transit routes into Kostiantynivka, effectively isolating the city and forcing a wider UAF operational withdrawal along the Donetsk axis.
2. Coordinated Cyber/Kinetic Strike: RF conducts a complex, synchronized attack involving deep kinetic strikes on UAF AD assets, immediately followed by a debilitating cyberattack on a critical national utility (e.g., power grid/communication backbone) to compound damage and severely limit UAF command response during the kinetic phase.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/J5 (Force Protection - Industrial Assets): IMMEDIATE AD REPOSITIONING. Re-task and deploy available mobile air defense systems (e.g., short-range systems, Gepard) to provide layered protection around critical industrial enterprises and repair facilities in Dnipro and Zaporizhzhia, prioritizing sites with high military production value. (CRITICAL)
2. J7 (Information Warfare - Offensive): NEUTRALIZE US POLICY IO. Immediately issue official statements and partner briefings directly addressing the RF exploitation of US political figures’ comments. Frame the RF narrative as transparent propaganda designed to distract from the strategic losses at Saratov and the confirmed capture of DPRK mercenaries (as per previous report). (URGENT)
3. J3/Fires (Donetsk Attrition): MAINTAIN HIGH FIRES TEMPO. Ensure sustained, high-volume fire missions targeting RF assembly areas, forward logistics dumps, and C2 nodes supporting the Ivanopillya assault to maintain the high attrition rate (1,160/day). Use precision munitions to degrade RF counter-battery capability to protect UAF fire assets. (HIGH PRIORITY)

//END SITREP//