Situation Report

TACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

DTG: 030600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational tempo (OPTEMPO) has slightly decreased in the immediate aftermath of the multi-directional deep strike campaign detailed in the previous SITREP (030630Z NOV 25). The focus has now shifted to continuous kinetic pressure on the frontline and persistent asymmetric warfare against Southern infrastructure.

• Frontline Kinetic Pressure (Donetsk Oblast): RF tactical aviation is confirmed to be employing Guided Aerial Bombs (GABs/KABs) against targets in Donetsk Oblast (0239Z). This indicates sustained, high-intensity fires supporting ground maneuver, likely focused on the Ivanopillya/Pokrovsk axes where RF has recently had success against UAF fortifications.
• Asymmetric Warfare (Southern Axis): Confirmed damage to civilian infrastructure in the Inhulskyi Raion of Mykolaiv following a "moped" (Shahed UAV) attack (0247Z). This confirms the ongoing, geographically distributed effort to attrit UAF AD and inflict damage on civilian targets.
• Deep Strike Abatement: The ballistic missile threat from the North-Eastern and Southern axes has temporarily abated, with the all-clear being issued for ballistic threats (0246Z) and the air raid alert ending in Zaporizhzhia (0252Z).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No specific weather constraints reported. UAV operations in Mykolaiv indicate suitable conditions for low-altitude flight.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Posture: RF tactical air assets are active over the Donetsk sector. RF C2 is synchronizing fixed-wing operations with persistent UAV strikes against key nodes in the South.
• UAF Posture: UAF AD is transitioning from high-alert status following the ballistic threat to localized engagement of UAVs (Mykolaiv). UAF ground forces in Donetsk are under sustained attack from RF GABs.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• GAB Dominance: RF maintains the capability for high-volume employment of GABs via tactical aviation in the Donetsk sector, enabling effective destruction of fixed UAF fortifications. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Persistent Asymmetric Harassment: RF maintains the capability to execute geographically widespread, low-cost UAV attacks to degrade civilian infrastructure and force resource expenditure by UAF AD. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Internal Information Control: RF internal media (TASS, Colonelcassad) retains effective capacity to disseminate domestic propaganda supporting social initiatives (economic relief) and undermining UAF mobilization efforts (TCC narrative). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

Intentions:

1. Exploit Frontline Success: RF intends to leverage its recent success in destroying UAF blindages near Ivanopillya by continuing GAB strikes to soften defenses for subsequent ground assaults.
2. Sustain Psychological Pressure: The persistent UAV attacks on population centers like Mykolaiv aim to inflict psychological fatigue and consume UAF AD resources required for the defense of more critical hubs.
3. Domestic Narrative Consolidation: RF C2 is ensuring domestic focus remains on internal stability (mortgages, economic policy) while concurrently disseminating narratives (TCC violence) aimed at undermining Ukrainian state legitimacy and morale.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The immediate shift from the high-tempo, multi-directional ballistic strike (previous SITREP) to sustained GAB pressure in Donetsk suggests RF is alternating between deep strike and frontline attrition phases to maximize confusion and resource depletion on the UAF side.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The continuous employment of GABs indicates a steady supply of these munitions and successful sustainment of tactical aviation sorties in the Donetsk area.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating tactical aviation strikes and synchronizing internal/external information campaigns.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF ground forces in Donetsk are actively engaged in defending against GAB strikes, necessitating the dispersal or hardening of remaining fortifications. AD units in the South remain vigilant against persistent UAV threats.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

TACTICAL SETBACK: Confirmed damage to civilian infrastructure in Mykolaiv from UAVs. Sustained GAB pressure in Donetsk suggests UAF defenses are under severe kinetic stress, potentially limiting tactical maneuverability.

STRATEGIC SUCCESS: The continued strategic focus on exploiting the captured DPRK personnel and leveraging favorable geopolitical shifts (Germany/Turkey, previous daily report) remains the critical strategic opportunity.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the vulnerability of fixed fortifications in the face of GAB employment. Immediate requirements include increased counter-battery/SEAD capabilities to disrupt RF tactical aviation and launch platforms near the frontline.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• Domestic Focus (TASS): RF is prioritizing domestic economic stability narratives (mortgage proposals, social benefits) to maintain internal support and project a veneer of normalcy and care for the civilian population.
• Undermining UAF Mobilization (Colonelcassad): RF state-affiliated channels are actively disseminating footage and narratives designed to portray TCC (Territorial Centre for Recruitment) personnel as abusive and violent, directly targeting the legitimacy and effectiveness of UAF mobilization efforts.
• Historical Revisionism: RF state media is highlighting the UAF's Institute of National Memory's classification of Catherine II as "Russian imperialism," framing the conflict as a defense of Russian historical heritage, furthering the ideological justification for the war.
• International Political Framing (Trump/RBC): Coverage of former US President Trump's comments regarding Putin and trade creates a narrative of potential future US appeasement/disengagement, potentially undermining Western resolve.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The successful UAV strike on civilian infrastructure in Mykolaiv will temporarily lower local morale, while the concurrent stream of domestic RF propaganda targeting mobilization efforts may cause hesitation or resentment among draft-eligible Ukrainian citizens.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The international information environment is currently dominated by political conjecture (Trump commentary), creating an element of uncertainty regarding future US policy and trade engagement with Russia.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to prioritize frontline attrition in the Donetsk sector:

1. Sustained GAB/Artillery Barrages: RF will concentrate high-volume GAB strikes on known UAF strong points and C2 nodes in the Ivanopillya/Pokrovsk area to achieve localized material superiority and force UAF forward element withdrawal.
2. Exploitation of Mobilization IO: RF will immediately increase the volume of propaganda depicting TCC abuse and forced mobilization to degrade UAF recruitment and create internal friction.
3. Hybrid Strike Continuation: RF will return to high-tempo multi-directional ballistic strikes within the next 24-36 hours, following the temporary lull, likely targeting high-value infrastructure or UAF AD systems that have been forced to reposition following the previous strikes.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF achieves a decisive ground breakthrough or political/diplomatic isolation:

1. Local Breakthrough in Donetsk: Successful, concentrated GAB strikes enable an RF mechanised assault in the Ivanopillya sector, achieving a depth of penetration that forces UAF to commit strategic reserves from other axes, thereby weakening the overall defensive posture.
2. Pre-emptive DPRK Counter-IO: As predicted previously, RF launches a major, coordinated international disinformation campaign claiming the DPRK POWs are being mistreated or that the capture is a fabrication, successfully poisoning the intelligence well before exploitation can yield strategic results.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Fires (Donetsk SEAD): PRIORITIZE COUNTER-GAB CAPABILITIES. Immediately dedicate all available long-range/deep strike fire assets (e.g., ATACMS, drones) to Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) and counter-battery fire against RF aviation forward staging and known launch positions near the Donetsk front line. This is necessary to mitigate the high rate of GAB attrition. (URGENT)
2. J7/Strategic Communications (Domestic): COUNTER TCC NARRATIVE. J7 must immediately develop and launch a comprehensive domestic media campaign utilizing highly trusted figures (e.g., combat veterans, unit commanders) to address the TCC videos, reaffirming legal standards for mobilization and emphasizing the national security imperative.
3. J2/GUR (Exploitation Shielding): PROTECT DPRK POW EXPLOITATION. J2/GUR must implement enhanced security and communications blackout protocols around the DPRK POW exploitation process to deny RF intelligence the ability to interfere or pre-emptively discredit the valuable intelligence being gathered.

//END SITREP//