Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - TACTICAL FOCUS: POKROVSK CRISIS AND UAV COUNTER-ATTRITION

DTG: 022133Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH regarding the criticality of the Pokrovsk sector; MEDIUM regarding the immediate tactical impact of current UAF counter-attrition efforts.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational focus remains highly contested in Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk axis) and Kharkiv Oblast (Vovchansk), characterized by intense localized attrition via small tactical drones (FPV/Mavic drop munitions).

• Pokrovsk Axis (CRITICAL): RF sources are amplifying the previous UAF public assessment (Deynega) that Kyiv has "practically lost Pokrovsk" and that "holding Myrnohrad is pointless." This suggests the RF is aggressively framing the operational environment to demoralize UAF forces and set conditions for a potential strategic breakthrough. UAF 225th Separate Assault Battalion ("Black Swan") is confirmed to be conducting high-tempo counter-attrition operations in the Pokrovsk direction, claiming significant RF personnel and materiel losses (127+ personnel eliminated, 90+ wounded over the month). This indicates the sector is subject to intense fighting and attempts by UAF to prevent RF consolidation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE in critical status, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE in UAF claimed RF losses)
• Vovchansk Axis (Kharkiv Oblast): UAF 57th Separate Motorized Infantry Brigade ("Falcon Squad") is confirmed to be utilizing FPV drones for precision strikes against RF entrenched positions within heavily damaged structures and wooded areas in Vovchansk. This confirms continued close-quarters urban combat and effective UAF adoption of drone tactics to clear structures. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Contested Area (RF Drone Strike): RF sources published high-altitude UAV footage showing a successful strike on a concentration of materiel or a vehicle near a water body, claiming "Operational Space" ("ОПЕРАТИВНЫЙ ПРОСТОР"). The corresponding drone warning message concerning "Strong wind" highlights the ongoing impact of environmental factors on UAV operations and suggests a contested area where RF forces seek to interdict UAF logistics/reserves. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE in strike success, UNKNOWN LOCATION)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Confirmed reporting of "Strong wind" affecting high-altitude RF UAV operations suggests that environmental factors continue to impose limitations, particularly on high-endurance surveillance missions. However, the prevalence of FPV drone footage from both sides (Pokrovsk, Vovchansk) confirms that tactical-level drone warfare remains viable, though potentially constrained by localized wind gusts or precipitation.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Drone Dominance at the Tactical Edge: UAF units (225 OSHP, 57 OMBR) are effectively leveraging tactical UAVs/FPVs to target RF personnel and fixed positions, suggesting a successful decentralized counter-attrition model aimed at slowing RF advances in key urban (Vovchansk) and rural (Pokrovsk) areas.
• RF Deep Strike C2 Focus: RF air and IO assets are primarily focused on maintaining strategic pressure (KAB campaign, previous reporting) and reinforcing cognitive messaging (Pokrovsk loss narrative). Ground forces appear committed to attritional battles, particularly in Donetsk.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Propaganda Amplification: RF demonstrates a rapid and effective capacity to seize on sensitive UAF public assessments (e.g., Pokrovsk status) and amplify them across multiple platforms to maximize psychological effect and operational gain.
• Sustained Attrition: RF ground forces, supported by UAV ISR and fires, maintain the capability to execute successful strikes against UAF materiel concentrations, as evidenced by the "Operational Space" footage.

Intentions:

1. Exploit Pokrovsk Vulnerability: RF will continue to concentrate fire and maneuver in the Pokrovsk sector, aiming to validate the perception of a strategic collapse and compel a UAF operational withdrawal.
2. Degrade UAF Logistical/Reserve Capacity: RF ISR and deep strike assets will continue to target rear area logistics and materiel concentrations to reduce UAF counter-attack potential and sustainment (per previous KAB reports and new RF drone strike claims).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The RF is increasingly synchronizing its high-level strategic IO (Kremlin Leopard display, Pokrovsk narrative) with kinetic action on the ground, indicating a mature understanding of information-led warfare (ILW). The rapid amplification of the Pokrovsk crisis statement demonstrates a highly responsive C2 structure in the cognitive domain.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The high-volume use of FPV/UAVs by UAF confirms that RF forces face a significant logistics challenge in sustaining personnel and materiel against constant, decentralized drone attrition, particularly in complex terrain like Vovchansk's destroyed urban environment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing IO and kinetic operations. However, the confirmed UAF drone success against RF formations suggests localized tactical C2 is struggling to adapt to immediate threats, particularly in establishing effective drone-resistant tactical positions and counter-UAV measures.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is generally defensive, but with high-tempo, localized counter-attrition via specialized units. The operational reports from the 225th OSHP and 57th OMBR demonstrate high tactical readiness and proficiency in drone warfare, which is essential for mitigating RF fire superiority.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SUCCESS (Counter-Attrition): UAF drone units (225 OSHP, 57 OMBR) are successfully inflicting significant localized losses on RF personnel and materiel in the Pokrovsk and Vovchansk sectors. This slows RF momentum and increases the cost of ground advances.
• SETBACK (Information Integrity): The public commentary on the status of Pokrovsk is being aggressively exploited by the RF, creating a potential strategic disadvantage in the information domain.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Counter-UAS/EW: Critical requirement for short-range electronic warfare (EW) and Counter-UAS systems to protect forward operating bases and materiel concentrations from RF tactical drones, particularly in light of the RF claimed strike footage.
2. Drone/FPV Resupply: Sustained resupply of drones, munitions, and operator training is required to maintain the current effective rate of UAF counter-attrition.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Amplification of Defeatism: The RF is actively using credible UAF source material (Deynega quote) to amplify the narrative of a strategic defeat in Donetsk, aiming to pressure political leadership and further degrade UAF troop morale.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF reporting, such as the operational highlights from the 28th OMBR and the successful drone strikes by the 225th and 57th Brigades, are crucial for maintaining domestic morale by showcasing localized successes and professional military action amidst the pressure of strategic setbacks.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

(No new specific developments in this reporting period. Previous reports on German spending and Turkish oil shifts remain highly relevant as counter-narratives to RF IO.)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ground forces will intensify fire and probing attacks in the Pokrovsk sector, attempting to validate the "lost Pokrovsk" narrative and force a tactical withdrawal. RF ISR will prioritize identifying UAF reserve movement and materiel concentrations behind the Pokrovsk line to guide further KAB strikes. Simultaneously, RF IO assets will saturate local and international media with content emphasizing UAF losses and strategic failures in Donetsk.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF successfully executes a multi-pronged, mechanized assault in the Pokrovsk sector that penetrates the primary defensive line and achieves a significant exploitation phase toward Myrnohrad. This would necessitate a complex UAF maneuver under fire and risk the encirclement or catastrophic loss of forward defensive units. Such an action would be immediately preceded or accompanied by a high-volume deep strike (KAB/Iskander) on a key UAF logistical hub or reserve staging area.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Fires Command (Pokrovsk Stabilization): IMPLEMENT ACTIVE DEFENSE VIA UAV/FPV STRIKES. Provide priority allocation of FPV drone resupply and operational intelligence to frontline units like the 225th OSHP, tasked with maintaining a high rate of attrition against RF personnel and dismounted infantry attempting consolidation or penetration near Pokrovsk.
2. J7/Strategic Communications (Counter-Propaganda): IMMEDIATELY PUSH SUCCESS STORIES. Task J7 to coordinate the immediate release of the verified combat footage and loss figures from the 225th OSHP and 57th OMBR to counter the pervasive RF narrative of strategic defeat. Frame these operations as effective "tactical spoiling attacks" that are imposing unsustainable costs on the RF.
3. J2/GUR (Adaptation): UTILIZE DPRK INTEL FOR TACTICAL EW PRIORITIES. Integrate the intelligence derived from DPRK POW exploitation (CRITICAL GAP from previous report) with current threat analysis to identify and prioritize RF unit-level C2 and EW assets for immediate targeting by UAF Fires and FPV drones.

//END SITREP//