Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: INTENSIFIED ATTRITION AND HYBRID THREATS

DTG: 021700Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. Confidence is high regarding the RF deep strike data and the confirmed use of Belarusian personnel. Confidence is medium regarding the specific scale of RF offensive maneuvers, pending UAF tactical reporting.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is characterized by persistent RF offensive pressure on the Donetsk and Kharkiv axes, coupled with continued deep kinetic strikes and active hybrid warfare elements (force generation and IO).

• Donetsk Axis (Lyman/Pokrovsk/Ivanopillya): RF forces are applying intense pressure. Counter-terrorism forces (DOZOR) neutralized 13 RF personnel near Lyman, confirming the presence of Belarusian passports alongside Russian military IDs. RF claims aggressive encirclement attempts around Krasnoarmiisk (Pokrovsk) and Dymytrov (Myrnograd), suggesting an operational objective to cut off UAF forces west of the main line of contact (MLOC). Previous reporting on successful RF destruction of UAF fixed fortifications near Ivanopillya is amplified by RF media claims of successful close-quarters combat footage.
• Kharkiv Axis (Kupyansk/Vovchansk): RF claims ongoing offensive thrusts near Kupyansk, suggesting an attempt to cut off UAF positions along the Oskil River. Ballistic missile threat confirmed against Kharkiv Oblast (021656Z NOV 25).
• Deep Rear (Pavlohrad, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast): Confirmed RF UAV attack resulted in civilian casualties (one fatality, three injured, including an 8-year-old child). This validates the MLCOA from the previous SITREP: persistent targeting of logistics and civilian resilience.
• Deep Rear (Central/East): Air Force reports UAV activity moving from Dnipropetrovsk toward Lozova (Kharkiv Oblast) and multiple ballistic missile threats originating from the East. (Dempster-Shafer Belief: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Weather reports indicate incoming rain and fog for the next week.

• Impact: Poor visibility (fog) and low cloud ceilings (rain) will degrade RF fixed-wing CAS/UAV ISR effectiveness but may favor low-altitude, mobile ground operations and precision short-range UAVs (FPV). Muddy conditions (rain) will constrain heavy RF mechanized movement, favoring UAF defensive positions.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Counter-Reconnaissance: UAF specialized units (State Border Guard Service "DOZOR") are actively conducting successful counter-reconnaissance raids, resulting in high-value intelligence (Belarusian personnel confirmation).
• RF Force Composition: Confirmation of Belarusian passports among neutralized enemy personnel suggests either direct Belarusian military involvement, increased use of Belarusian private military company (PMC) operatives, or mobilization of Belarusian citizens residing in Russia. This is a critical indicator of RF expanding foreign fighter recruitment.
• UAF Air Defense: AD forces are actively engaging kinetic threats. NEW RF reports on the delivery of additional Patriot systems to Ukraine, regardless of veracity, indicate RF concern over UAF improving deep-strike defense.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Multi-National Force Generation (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has demonstrated the capacity to integrate non-Russian personnel (DPRK, now confirmed Belarusian presence) into frontline combat roles, expanding their manpower pool and complicating UAF rules of engagement.
• Targeted Attrition (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF retains effective fire coordination to prioritize the destruction of UAF fixed defenses (blindages) and C2 nodes, particularly in the Donetsk region.
• Hybrid Warfare/IO (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains a sophisticated, institutionalized IO campaign (Leopard trophy display, historical revisionism via propaganda, amplification of UAF "setbacks").

Intentions:

1. Isolate and Encircle: Intensify efforts to achieve localized encirclements (Krasnoarmiisk/Kupyansk) to force UAF high-cost withdrawals and claim strategic momentum.
2. Degrade Resilience: Continue deep kinetic strikes against logistics and population centers (Pavlohrad) to drain UAF AD resources and pressure civilian morale.
3. Complicate UAF Force Protection: Use remote mining (WarGonzo footage) to create complex obstacles and deny UAF freedom of movement during counterattacks or withdrawals.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Integration of Belarusian Personnel (NEW): The documented presence of Belarusian passports in frontline units is a significant tactical shift. These individuals may be used in specialized roles (reconnaissance, infiltration) or simply as high-attrition infantry.
• Increased Focus on Deep Logistics: The repeated deep strikes on Pavlohrad suggest RF intelligence has identified a critical bottleneck or high-value UAF asset in that region.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The use of MLRS systems (Tornado-S) is confirmed by MoD Russia footage. This high-value asset, seen deploying from covered positions, confirms RF priority on protecting and utilizing long-range precision fires. The logistical burden of equipping, sustaining, and controlling multi-national, low-quality forces (DPRK, mobilized Ukrainians, Belarusians) remains a critical weakness for the RF.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF media, specifically through military correspondents (Podoubny), demonstrates high fidelity in reporting alleged UAF vulnerabilities (encirclement attempts, C2 node strikes), suggesting effective RF ISR and synchronized C2 across multiple offensive axes (Kupyansk, Krasnoarmiisk).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains high operational readiness, demonstrated by successful localized counter-reconnaissance raids (DOZOR near Lyman). UAF is actively managing the deep strike threat (Air Force alerts) and maintaining economic resilience (Kryvyi Rih business grants).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Intelligence/Tactical): The elimination of 13 enemy personnel near Lyman and the confirmed acquisition of Belarusian passports provide immediate, high-value tactical and geopolitical intelligence. This must be exploited immediately.
• Setback (Deep Strike): Confirmed civilian casualties in Pavlohrad underscore persistent vulnerability in defending major logistics hubs against massed UAV strikes.
• Setback (Attrition): RF claims of success in attriting UAF fixed defenses near Ivanopillya suggest UAF defensive lines in that sector may be vulnerable to concentrated fire.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

1. Force Protection (Eastern Axes): Urgent need for increased counter-battery capabilities and EW systems in the Ivanopillya sector to suppress RF fires targeting UAF fixed positions.
2. SHORAD Reallocation: Increased SHORAD/Mobile AD asset deployment around deep logistics hubs (Pavlohrad) to counter the persistent UAV threat.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO Focus (External): RF is aggressively using the "trophy hardware" narrative (Leopard components in the Kremlin) to signal Western aid futility, attempting to erode international support.
• RF IO Focus (Internal/Frontline): RF media focuses heavily on claims of encirclement (Krasnoarmiisk, Kupyansk) to project operational success and demoralize UAF forces. Pro-Russian channels are also amplifying historical revisionism concerning Ukrainian nationalism (Fighterbomber content).
• Hybrid Threat IO: RF is leveraging internal security issues (criminal RF military personnel) and amplifying reports of deteriorating Ukrainian-Polish relations, aiming to destabilize internal cohesion and bilateral support.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is stressed by persistent deep strikes (Pavlohrad casualties) but is buoyed by visible government support (social payments, grants) and confirmed tactical successes against RF infiltration.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The confirmation of Belarusian citizens fighting for the RF necessitates immediate diplomatic action to present this evidence to NATO and the EU, increasing pressure on Minsk and potentially justifying further sanctions against the Lukashenko regime.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will sustain the high-intensity ground attrition in the Donetsk Oblast (Ivanopillya, Pokrovsk) and Kharkiv Oblast (Kupyansk), focusing on small, continuous advances supported by heavy artillery and FAB/KAB strikes. RF will conduct further synchronized deep strikes (UAV/Ballistic Missile) against logistics hubs in Central Ukraine (Pavlohrad, Dnipro, Kharkiv) to capitalize on the confirmed vulnerabilities. Simultaneously, RF will utilize the incoming fog and rain to launch low-visibility infiltration/reconnaissance probes, possibly utilizing the newly confirmed Belarusian personnel.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt a rapid, localized breakthrough on the Kupyansk or Ivanopillya axes. This MDCOA involves a rapid increase in kinetic fires (MLRS, thermobaric systems) to suppress UAF defenses, followed by a concentrated push of mobilized/low-quality infantry (including possibly DPRK/Belarusian personnel) intended to overwhelm a specific, weakened UAF defensive sector. The goal would be to gain sufficient ground to establish new RF fire control over a key UAF logistics route (e.g., cutting off the road into Krasnoarmiisk or Kupyansk).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J2/J7 (Geopolitical Counter-IO - IMMEDIATE): EXPLOIT BELARUSIAN AND DPRK POW INTEL PUBLICLY. Coordinate with GUR to rapidly package the evidence of Belarusian and DPRK combatants and disseminate it to international media and diplomatic channels, framing it as proof of RF manpower desperation and expanding aggression.
2. J3/JFS (Donetsk Attrition Defense): INSTITUTE FIRE SUPPRESSION ZONE (FSZ) IN IVANOPILLYA. Allocate 40% of available counter-battery radar coverage and allocated deep strike assets to suppress all observed RF indirect fire in the Ivanopillya-Pokrovsk corridor for the next 48 hours to prevent localized breakthrough.
3. J4/J6 (Force Protection/Logistics): ESTABLISH ANTI-DRONE SCREENS AT KEY LOGISTICS HUBS. Immediately task EW and mobile SHORAD teams to maintain continuous 24-hour coverage of the Pavlohrad rail and storage facilities to defeat MLCOA kinetic strikes.

//END SITREP//