Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: FOCUSED HYBRID ATTRITION AND DOMESTIC INSTABILITY

DTG: 021400Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. Confidence remains high on the Information Warfare (IO) and tactical air threat, with medium confidence in specific RF ground maneuver intentions (Pokrovsk counter-attack).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment is characterized by multi-domain attrition, with RF intensifying both deep strike operations against rear infrastructure and psychological operations (PSYOPS) targeting Western and domestic Ukrainian morale.

• Deep Strike/Infrastructure: UAF drone operations are confirmed to have impacted infrastructure targets deep within the RF (Sochi airport, Lipetsk Oblast). The resulting operational delays (90 flights) demonstrate the tactical utility of UAF deep-strike capability against RF economic and logistical nodes.
• Eastern FLOT (Pokrovsk Axis): RF Milblogger reports suggest UAF forces are drawing reserves from various sectors to execute a potential counter-attack near Pokrovsk/Mirnohrad to relieve pressure on the beleaguered garrison. This is a critical area for observation.
• Air Activity (Northeast): Confirmed launch of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) by RF tactical aviation targeting Northern Kharkiv Oblast, and active UAV usage in Chernihiv Oblast. This confirms the sustained RF strategy of utilizing stand-off munitions to degrade UAF forward positions and AD capabilities.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change from previous reporting. Low autumn visibility continues to favor UAV and UAS operations by both sides, contributing to the high-tempo air attrition (e.g., UAF detection of UAVs near Kulikivka).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces (Air/UAV): High tempo of tactical aviation operations (Kharkiv) and confirmed use of large drones in the RF rear (Lipetsk, Sochi). This reflects RF prioritization of air assets to maintain offensive momentum and suppress UAF AD.
• RF Forces (IO/PSYOPS): RF-aligned channels are immediately leveraging civilian-focused narratives (closure of Berlin refugee center) to reinforce the IO theme of waning Western support, synchronizing with the strategic IO of the Kremlin "trophy display."
• UAF Forces (Air/UAV): Sustained and successful deep-strike operations against strategic RF nodes (Sochi airport, Lipetsk infrastructure), demonstrating improved targeting and operational reach.
• UAF Forces (Ground - Pokrovsk): UAF reserves are reportedly being mobilized for a potential localized counter-attack effort, signaling a strategic commitment to stabilize the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad axis.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Strategic IO Amplification (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains a highly reactive and adaptable IO apparatus, immediately integrating new narratives (Berlin refugee closure) into their established theme of Western fatigue.
• Deep Air/UAV Defense Vulnerability (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The repeated successful UAF drone strikes on sensitive targets (Sochi, Lipetsk) suggest significant, persistent gaps in RF internal air defense and C2, despite official claims of successful interception.
• Psychological Operations (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF PSYOPS is actively exploiting internal European political developments (refugee policy) to undermine allied political cohesion.

Intentions:

1. Exploit UAF Counter-Attack Preparations: Identify and preemptively strike UAF reserve concentrations reportedly moving toward the Pokrovsk axis.
2. Sustain Attrition: Continue the high-volume use of KABs in the Kharkiv sector and massed artillery in Donetsk to force UAF consumption of scarce AD and fire support resources.
3. Undermine Political Support: Maximize dissemination of narratives suggesting the collapse of German/European support for Ukrainian refugees, linking this to the broader "war fatigue" narrative.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The most significant adaptation is the rapid and focused integration of Western domestic political vulnerabilities into RF strategic IO. The immediate use of the Berlin refugee center closure news confirms a sophisticated, real-time intelligence gathering and PSYOPS targeting cycle.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmation of UAF drone strikes impacting critical RF infrastructure in Lipetsk and air traffic in Sochi introduces measurable logistical friction for the RF. While not immediately critical to front-line sustainment, the repeated disruption forces the diversion of AD assets away from the FLOT and introduces economic instability.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing strategic IO and tactical air operations (KAB launches). However, the failure to secure high-value rear areas (Sochi, Lipetsk) against UAF drone attacks indicates fragmented C2 or resource deficits in domestic air defense coordination.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains high, supported by confirmed successful deep-strike missions that create strategic dilemmas for the RF. The reported movement of reserves towards the Pokrovsk axis indicates UAF is prepared to commit critical assets to stabilize key operational areas in Donetsk Oblast.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes (Deep Strike): Confirmed operational friction caused by UAF deep strikes (Sochi airport closures).
• Successes (Air Defense): Confirmed engagement of enemy UAVs in Chernihiv Oblast (Kulikivka).
• Setbacks (Air Offense): Continued high-volume use of KABs in Northern Kharkiv Oblast places UAF ground units under extreme pressure and requires maximum expenditure of limited AD resources.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The reported commitment of reserves to the Pokrovsk axis highlights the critical need for robust, layered AD and EW coverage along the maneuver corridors to prevent RF tactical aviation from interdicting the relief force with KABs or precision strikes.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO channels are actively promoting two key narratives:

1. Western Disunity/Fatigue: Emphasizing the closure of the Berlin refugee center (DW citation) to signal that European support for Ukraine's people is failing. This supplements the "Leopard trophy" IO.
2. Domestic Security: The public acknowledgment of drone attacks in Lipetsk Oblast by local RF officials attempts to manage domestic panic but inadvertently confirms UAF deep-strike success.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is supported by the visible success of deep strikes against RF territory. RF domestic morale is increasingly strained by public disruptions (Sochi flight delays) and the acknowledgment of security failures (Lipetsk attacks).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF diplomatic efforts (M. Zakharova commentary on Armenia/KGB) are focused on exploiting historical tensions to destabilize non-NATO partners, but this has no direct tactical impact on the current theater. The primary IO focus remains on German and EU policy.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-72 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF ISR assets will prioritize locating UAF reserve concentrations moving towards Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad, likely utilizing Orlan-10 and larger ISR UAVs. Once identified, RF will attempt focused deep strike interdiction using KABs and potential Iskander/KN-23 systems (if pre-positioned) to degrade the counter-attack capability before it can reach the front line.

• Indicators: Increased RF ISR activity (SIGINT/ELINT) focused on known logistics routes west of Pokrovsk; high-frequency RF tactical aviation sorties in the central Donetsk sector.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-72 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF recognizes the critical nature of the Pokrovsk garrison and the potential threat of a UAF counter-attack. The MDCOA is for RF to launch a preemptive, limited offensive push in the Ivanopillya sector (or adjacent area) before the UAF reserves arrive. This aims to force the UAF command to commit their reserves defensively and piecemeal, negating the intended concentration of force for the counter-attack.

• Indicators: Sudden, rapid increase in RF troop movements and fires saturation in Ivanopillya/Chasiv Yar, exceeding current attrition rates.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3 (Maneuver & Protection): PROTECT POKROVSK REINFORCEMENTS (CRITICAL). Immediately prioritize deployment of mobile AD (e.g., Gepard, Avenger) and Electronic Warfare (EW) assets along the expected movement corridors of UAF reserves heading toward Pokrovsk. This mitigates the MLCOA of RF aerial interdiction.
2. J7/GUR (Information Warfare): NEUTRALIZE WESTERN FATIGUE NARRATIVE. Task diplomatic and IO elements to coordinate with German counterparts to issue a unified statement refuting the RF refugee narrative, ensuring that any German policy changes are framed as optimization, not abandonment. This should be cross-platform (social media, traditional press).
3. J2 (Intelligence Exploitation): EXPLOIT RF REAR-AREA VULNERABILITIES. Utilize intelligence from successful deep strikes (Sochi, Lipetsk) to refine targeting packages for similar high-impact, low-cost critical infrastructure. Focus on targets that maximize logistical friction or force RF to divert AD/resources from the FLOT.

//END SITREP//