Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE: INTENSIFIED RECIPROCAL ATTRITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE STRIKES

DTG: 020600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH. New data confirms a significant escalation of reciprocal deep-strike operations, with both RF and UAF prioritizing attacks on critical national infrastructure (CNI) and operational depth logistics. RF retains ground parity on the FLOT but is increasing kinetic pressure on civilian targets in the immediate rear.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is marked by high-volume deep strikes against strategic targets and persistent, localized kinetic activity on the southern and eastern FLOT.

• RF Deep Rear (Targeted):

  • Tuapse Port Terminal (Confirmed BDA): Local RF authorities confirm that the oil loading terminal and a tanker sustained damage from the "fall of UAV debris" (UAF Deep Strike). This confirms the severe disruption to RF Black Sea fuel logistics (CRITICAL SUCCESS).
  • Lipetsk Oblast (NEW STRIKE): Local channels report strikes on a power substation (CNI). This expands the UAF deep strike area further north and targets RF energy resilience.
  • Bryansk Oblast (Defensive Action): RF MoD claims 20 hostile UAVs were detected and destroyed over Bryansk, indicating sustained UAF pressure on RF border regions.
  • Overall RF Air Defense Claim: RF MoD claims 164 Ukrainian UAVs destroyed/intercepted over RF regions overnight, a hyperbolic but indicative figure of the scale of UAF deep-strike efforts.

• UAF Operational Depth (Targeted):

  • Zaporizhzhia Oblast (CRITICAL STRIKE): RF attacks struck a residential sector, causing one death and three injuries, damaging 17 private houses. This confirms RF intent to maintain pressure on urban centers near the front (Zaporizhzhia city and Polohy district).
  • Kherson Region (Kinetic Activity): Dniprovsky district of Kherson was attacked at 05:30Z, injuring one civilian.
  • Dnipro/Pavlohrad (NEW AIR THREAT): UAF Air Force reports UAVs moving toward Pavlohrad, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, from the east and south, confirming a multi-directional air threat against a key logistics and industrial hub.
  • Samarivskyi Raion, Dnipropetrovsk (CRITICAL CASUALTY REPORT): The casualty count from a recent RF attack has risen to four dead, including two children (11 and 14 years old). This raises the moral and political cost of RF deep strikes.

• FLOT (Ground Action):

  • Vostok Group of Forces (Confirmed Kinetic): RF sources publish video of "FAB-ing" (UMPK glide bomb use) in the area of responsibility of the Vostok Group. This confirms the continued reliance on high-destructive precision munitions on the eastern and southeastern axes.
  • RF Artillery Propaganda: RF propaganda features an Uragan MLRS crew claiming successful destruction of a "well-fortified concrete object" allowing infantry advance. This highlights the RF doctrinal reliance on massed artillery to prepare for or enable localized ground assaults.
  • UAF Attrition: UAF General Staff reports 840 RF personnel losses in the past 24 hours, suggesting high efficacy of UAF defensive attrition.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night-time visibility favored air domain operations, as evidenced by the high volume of reciprocal UAV/drone strikes (Tuapse, Lipetsk, Bryansk, Pavlohrad approach). Ground conditions remain conducive to mechanized movement on established roads but challenging off-road, favoring the observed RF use of glide bombs and MLRS (Uragan) against fixed fortifications.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF is sustaining its campaign of asymmetric attrition against RF logistics and CNI deep in the rear (Tuapse, Lipetsk). RF is responding by synchronizing its own deep-strike campaign against UAF logistics and civilian morale centers (Zaporizhzhia, Dnipro area). UAF defensive posture on the FLOT remains focused on maximizing attrition (840 reported RF losses) while managing the tactical and strategic fallout from RF air strikes.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

Capabilities:

• Deep Strike Capability (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains the capability to execute complex, multi-platform, multi-axis kinetic strikes against critical infrastructure and urban centers across UAF operational and strategic depth (Pavlohrad, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson).
• Artillery Precision (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): RF continues to use heavy, precision artillery (MLRS, glide bombs) to neutralize fortified UAF positions prior to attempted infantry advance (Uragan propaganda).
• Air Defense Capacity (LOW CONFIDENCE): RF claims of 164 intercepts highlight the scale of the defensive effort but conceal actual BDA. The confirmed hits on Lipetsk and Tuapse demonstrate that RF AD remains permeable to UAF deep strike systems.

Intentions:

1. Reciprocal Punishment: RF intends to punish UAF deep strikes against Russian CNI by intensifying strikes against UAF urban centers and CNI (Zaporizhzhia, Pavlohrad).
2. Degrade UAF Logistical Hubs: RF seeks to disrupt key logistics nodes, specifically targeting the Pavlohrad area which is vital for resupply to the eastern axis.
3. Bolster Domestic Morale: RF IO (Uragan footage, high claimed intercept rates) aims to project military strength and competency to the domestic audience, counteracting the psychological impact of UAF deep strikes.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Targeting Priority Shift (CNI): The confirmed strike on the Lipetsk substation, following the earlier Pokrovske Mining Administration strike, indicates a deliberate RF shift toward crippling Ukrainian industrial and energy capacity rather than solely kinetic-military assets.
• Sustained MLRS Use: The featured use of the Uragan MLRS for bunker-busting operations confirms that the RF is prioritizing rapid, high-yield destruction of fixed fortifications over sustained infantry/AFV attrition in certain sectors.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed damage to the Tuapse fuel terminal and tanker represents a significant blow to the logistics of the Southern Group of Forces (SGF). While RF AD claims high intercept rates, the successful strikes into Lipetsk and Tuapse indicate UAF is imposing real, rising costs on RF energy and supply chains. RF forward logistics (Pokrovsk axis) remain under pressure, necessitating continued reliance on heavy kinetic support (MLRS/FABs) to clear infantry paths.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating adequate effectiveness in coordinating a high-volume reciprocal deep strike campaign and running simultaneous IO campaigns, indicating centralized control over strategic resources.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF maintains an aggressive strategic posture focused on deep-strike attrition. Defensive ground forces are highly effective in inflicting casualties (840 reported RF losses), indicating high readiness and morale. AD units are currently stressed by the multi-axis UAV threat (Pavlohrad approach).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Strategic Reach): Confirmed strikes on Tuapse (fuel) and Lipetsk (power substation) demonstrate sustained ability to hold vital RF CNI at risk.
• Success (Attrition): High reported RF loss rate sustains the pressure on RF manpower reserves.
• Setback (Civilian Impact): The attacks on Zaporizhzhia and the tragic deaths in Samarivskyi Raion highlight the persistent vulnerability of UAF civilian population centers and the AD gap in central regions.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is mobile AD capacity, specifically for defending logistics hubs like Pavlohrad, and SHORAD systems to counter low-flying UAVs attacking urban centers (Zaporizhzhia). There is a continued need for highly precise long-range strike assets to exploit the demonstrated vulnerability of RF strategic CNI (Lipetsk, Tuapse).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Damage Control/Deflection (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF channels (TASS, MoD) immediately jump to maximalist claims of intercept success (164 UAVs) to minimize the psychological impact of the actual hits on Lipetsk and Tuapse.
• RF Glorification of Firepower (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The profiling of the Uragan MLRS crew emphasizes RF superiority in firepower and the destruction of UAF fortifications, aiming to motivate RF ground forces.
• RF Atrocity Fabrication (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF state media (TASS) features reporting on alleged HIMARS strikes against a convent in occupied DNR, utilizing clergy to humanize claims of UAF war crimes, aimed at discrediting UAF action to international religious audiences.
• UAF Morale Focus (HIGH CONFIDENCE): UAF media prioritizes confirmed deep strikes (Tuapse) and high RF casualty figures (840) to reinforce the narrative of offensive reach and successful defense.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Ukrainian public sentiment is likely volatile: bolstered by strategic victories in the deep rear (Tuapse) but severely strained by the tragic civilian casualties and damage in key cities (Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk). RF attempts to demoralize the population via CNI strikes are having a measurable, negative impact.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF Vice-Premier Chernychenko's visit to China (TASS) is relevant as it signals ongoing high-level diplomatic and potential economic/military alliance maintenance. This counters the narrative that RF is strategically isolated.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will execute a coordinated wave of retaliatory strikes (likely missiles and UAVs) targeting energy infrastructure and known logistics hubs in the Dnipropetrovsk and Poltava Oblasts, specifically focusing on the Pavlohrad rail hub and supporting energy nodes. This direct retaliation is in response to the Lipetsk and Tuapse strikes. Simultaneously, ground forces will continue probing attacks on the Pokrovsk axis, leveraging UMPK glide bombs and heavy artillery (Uragan) to degrade fixed UAF positions.

• Indicators: Sustained UAV traffic toward Pavlohrad; increased ELINT activity targeting energy infrastructure across Central Ukraine; increased reports of heavy shelling near Kostiantynivka.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA) - Next 24-48 Hours

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will attempt to execute a covert saturation strike against a major AD complex protecting a crucial city (e.g., Kyiv or Odesa) or military facility. This MDCOA exploits the resources diverted to defend the eastern and central regions (Pavlohrad) from the coordinated UAV campaign. RF uses the Lipetsk/Tuapse retaliation wave as cover for a high-value AD suppression mission, potentially using loitering munitions combined with electronic attack.

• Indicators: Sudden, significant drop in UAF AD radar efficacy in a critical region (SIGINT); confirmed launch of high-end cruise missiles (e.g., Kalibr, Kh-101) alongside UAV saturation waves.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. J3/Air Force (AD Prioritization): IMMEDIATE AD REDEPLOYMENT. Divert available mobile SHORAD and AD assets to establish a layered defense of the Pavlohrad logistics hub and surrounding critical infrastructure in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This is assessed as the MLCOA retaliatory target.
2. J7 (Information Warfare): AGGRESSIVE COUNTER-IO. Immediately launch a highly visible, multi-lingual international media campaign centered on the confirmed civilian fatalities, especially the children in Samarivskyi Raion. This must be used to directly contrast RF claims of UAF war crimes (monastery) and maintain international political pressure.
3. J3/Ground Forces (Counter-Battery): MLRS INTERDICTION. Increase ISR and counter-battery efforts focused on destroying high-value RF artillery platforms (Uragan, Pion) that are successfully enabling RF localized advances and destroying UAF fortifications on the Eastern FLOT. Use FPV and long-range precision fires immediately upon detection.

//END SITREP//