Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 011800Z NOV 25

DTG: 011800Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (High confidence in RF Information Operations (IO) intent and observed gains; Medium confidence in RF kinetic claims regarding specific UAF encirclements. Confidence in UAF internal stability is reinforced by anti-corruption messaging.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate analysis of the reinforced RF IO campaign regarding Pokrovsk/Kupiansk and the confirmed persistent RF operational tempo, juxtaposed with UAF internal resilience messaging and confirmed monthly territorial losses.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

RF forces are maintaining consistent, incremental territorial gains while employing deep strike capabilities and intense psychological operations.

• Pokrovsk/Kupiansk Axis (RF Claim): RF Ministry of Defence (MoD) explicitly claims readiness to cease hostilities for 5-6 hours near Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk), Dymitrov, and Kupiansk to allow journalists access to "blocked large groupings of UAF" (12:04:57, 12:20:36). ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT: This claim is highly likely a psychological operation aimed at disrupting UAF C2, demoralizing local forces, and justifying future advances by framing them as relief efforts for trapped forces. No credible independent evidence supports the claim of large-scale encirclements in these areas.
• Monthly Territorial Loss (Confirmed Data): UAF intelligence (DeepState) reports RF occupied 267 sq km of Ukrainian territory in October, a figure identical to September (12:23:01). IMPLICATION: This confirms RF forces are sustaining a high, predictable rate of attrition warfare, preventing stabilization of the defensive line, particularly in the Donetsk sector.
• Deep Strike Threat (ONGOING): UAF Air Force confirms a hostile UAV movement toward Zaporizhzhia from the south (12:19:34). This reinforces the MLCOA of an extended deep strike campaign against CNI or rear military assets.
• Southern Axis (Dniprovsky Islands): RF sources claim continuous, methodical fire against UAF positions on Karantynnyi Island (12:15:15). This indicates RF is determined to prevent UAF force accumulation on the Dnipro River islands and secure the lower river access points.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Ground conditions remain standard for late autumn. The focus on riverine and island operations (Karantynnyi Island, Dnipro River) suggests water levels and local hydrography remain critical factors for both ISR and maneuver.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are heavily invested in psychological operations to exploit the logistics crisis caused by the Vovcha River bridge loss. UAF forces are focused on counter-attrition, maintaining the defensive line, and utilizing precision strikes against RF riverine assets (destroyed vehicle and boat on the Dnipro, 12:19:52). UAF is simultaneously attempting to bolster internal resilience through IO regarding anti-corruption efforts (12:03:47).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• Strategic IO Integration (Confirmed): RF MoD is synchronizing kinetic claims (Pokrovsk encirclement) with high-level media statements (ceasefire offer for journalists) to maximize psychological effect and gain diplomatic leverage (12:04:57).
• Diplomatic/Influence Operations (Confirmed): RF Deputy Minister of Defence is actively engaging ASEAN partners, attempting to frame the conflict as a consequence of NATO expansion and positioning Russia as a counter-Western security partner (12:13:02).

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Deceive and Disrupt UAF C2: Exploit the logistics stress on the Pokrovsk axis by creating a false narrative of encirclement, forcing UAF commanders to divert resources or attention away from genuine threats.
2. Sustain Attrition: Maintain the established operational tempo that results in approximately 267 sq km of monthly territorial gain, focusing efforts on sectors near critical rail/road infrastructure (Pokrovsk/Konstantinovka).
3. Project Normalcy and Strength: Continue promoting internal security and economic stability (e.g., legal action against corrupt figures in Kursk, 12:07:21) and project military professionalism (Spetsnaz calendar, 12:11:12) to domestic and foreign audiences.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The RF shift from simply claiming tactical victories to offering conditional ceasefires for media access is a sophisticated information warfare adaptation. It forces UAF into a defensive communications posture: either deny the claim and risk being accused of hiding losses, or ignore it and allow the narrative to solidify.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment remains stable, supporting the continuous advance rate. The internal focus on integrating the military-industrial base (Osmakov appointment, previously noted) and rewarding EW/robotics personnel indicates a systemic effort to secure long-term technological and logistical superiority.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high effectiveness in coordinating deep political messaging (MoD statements) with operational pressure (Pokrovsk claims). The continued use of propaganda merchandise (2026 Spetsnaz Calendar, 12:11:12) suggests effective integration of IO into internal troop morale efforts.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is stressed by the consistent, measurable monthly territorial losses and the immediate logistics crisis. However, the confirmed action by the 30th Marine Corps destroying RF riverine assets (12:19:52) indicates continued localized offensive capability and awareness of RF presence on water obstacles.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Attrition Rate): The confirmed rate of 267 sq km/month territorial loss (12:23:01) is a critical operational indicator of sustained pressure that must be addressed at the strategic level.
• Success (Internal Stability): High-profile anti-corruption actions (Dnipropetrovsk Eco-Inspectorate seizure, 12:03:47) and formal recognition of combat excellence (Zelensky awarding "Cross of Combat Merit" to an Azov sergeant, 12:32:55) serve to bolster internal morale and domestic support for the war effort, counteracting RF narratives of institutional decay.
• Success (Local Firepower): Destruction of an RF vehicle and boat on the Dnipro (12:19:52) demonstrates effective ISR and precision targeting capability in the Southern operational zone.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The constraint on bridging equipment remains acute (from previous report). The strategic resource requirement is a shift in external aid to provide the volume of defensive systems (air defense, counter-battery, EW) necessary to fundamentally disrupt the RF's 267 sq km monthly attrition rate.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Core Narrative: Encirclement Imminent: The MoD's specific, highly visible claim of "blocked large groupings of UAF" near Pokrovsk and Kupiansk (12:04:57) is a high-impact narrative designed to sow panic and preemptively justify a major RF assault.
• RF Secondary Narrative: Leadership Incompetence: RF military bloggers are actively mocking the Chief of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR), accusing him of incompetence and failure in high-risk operations (e.g., the alleged Pokrovsk special forces defeat and previous border raids) (12:05:04). This targets strategic UAF C2 leadership credibility.
• UAF Counter-Narrative: Resilience and Integrity: UAF is using high-level official channels to communicate institutional strength through anti-corruption actions and public recognition of combat heroes (12:03:47, 12:32:55).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment requires constant reinforcement given the sustained territorial losses and the high-volume RF IO campaign. The focus on underground schools in Zaporizhzhia (12:15:47) and honoring soldiers demonstrates an attempt to communicate institutional functionality and civilian resilience under fire.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

Ukraine is actively pursuing strategic sanctions, notably calling for measures against Rosatom following attacks on NPP substations (12:04:18). This links RF kinetic aggression against CNI to diplomatic and economic pressure, attempting to disrupt a key RF revenue stream and technological provider.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Feint and Fix on Pokrovsk): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF units will leverage the logistics interdiction and the MoD's IO campaign to launch localized probing attacks on the Pokrovsk axis (in the vicinity of the Matrona Mine, if confirmed lost). The goal is to fix UAF reserves and determine the success of the logistics paralysis, preparing for a larger-scale, albeit short-duration, offensive thrust.

MLCOA 2 (Increase Deep Strike Volume): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Following the confirmed UAV launch toward Zaporizhzhia (12:19:34) and the persistent use of quality components, RF will conduct multiple, coordinated deep strikes within the next 48 hours targeting high-value infrastructure (energy substations, logistics hubs, or communication relays) in Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk, or Poltava Oblasts.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Exploitation of C2 Disruption): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF assesses the combination of logistics stress and IO regarding "encirclement" has caused localized command paralysis or resource misallocation within a UAF Brigade/Regiment. RF commits two reinforced Battalion Tactical Groups (BTGs) to a narrow-front breakthrough near Pokrovsk or Kurakhove, supported by coordinated EW jamming, aiming to exploit the seam between two UAF units before C2 can recover.

• Trigger Condition: Sustained UAF communication failure or evidence of disorganized local counterattacks on the Pokrovsk axis over a 6-hour period.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+24H (IO Reversal Point): UAF must issue a coordinated, high-level denial and counter-narrative to the RF MoD's Pokrovsk/Kupiansk encirclement claim. Failure to do so allows the narrative to solidify, complicating the deployment of reserves.
• T+48H (Deep Strike Defense): Air Defense Command must confirm effective dispersal and layered defense for CNI sites in central-east Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia, Dnipro) to mitigate the anticipated increase in deep strike volume (MLCOA 2).

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Direct Refutation of RF IO (J7/GUR - IMMEDIATE ACTION):

   • Recommendation: J7/GUR must issue a coordinated, aggressive rebuttal to the RF MoD's "encirclement/ceasefire" claim (12:04:57).
   • Action (J7): Use military leadership and frontline personnel to directly refute the claim, providing video evidence of freedom of maneuver and resupply (even if via bypasses), framing the RF claim as a desperate attempt at psychological warfare.

2. Reinforce Frontline C2 Security (J3/J6 - URGENT ACTION):

   • Recommendation: Due to RF's sophisticated C2 targeting (FSTH-LD threat, previously reported) and the current IO focus on leadership (Budanov attacks, 12:05:04), all Brigade and higher HQs in the Pokrovsk/Konstantinovka sectors must implement maximum dispersion and minimize electronic signatures.
   • Action (J6): Initiate a 72-hour period of "silent running" for all non-essential communications in the Donetsk critical zone, relying on secure landline/fiber optic where possible, to counter potential SIGINT/Decapitation strike MDCOA.

3. Prioritize Air Defense for CNI (Air Force Command - URGENT ACTION):

   • Recommendation: Allocate mobile air defense assets (Gepard, Avenger, or ManPADS) to protect key energy infrastructure (substations, transformers) within the confirmed UAV threat range (Zaporizhzhia axis) to mitigate MLCOA 2 and the Rosatom-related attacks (12:04:18).

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//