Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 010600Z NOV 25

DTG: 010600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (Operational picture on Pokrovsk Axis is clearer due to RF promotion, but the intensity of the deep strike threat (ballistic) has temporarily diverted focus.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate counter-ISR/EW measures on the Pokrovsk Axis to facilitate logistics restoration, concurrent with active defense against RF ballistic missile threats on the Southern Axis.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast) remains the center of gravity (COG) for RF kinetic and information operations. New RF IO confirms operational success, linking the destruction of the Vovcha River bridge to the claimed destruction of a UAF GUR Black Hawk insertion team near Pokrovsk. This indicates RF is consolidating its narrative of decisive victory in this sector.

• Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia/Mykolaiv): High-speed targets (likely ballistic missiles) are confirmed launched from Temporary Occupied Territory (TOT) of Crimea toward Mykolaiv, forcing immediate air defense response. This confirms RF intent to maintain multi-domain pressure and prevent UAF defensive consolidation on the main axis.
• Polozhsk/Zaporizhzhia Axis: RF forces (35th Army, Group Vostok) continue drone operations against UAF logistics and personnel, demonstrating sustained FPV/UAV attrition capability in the south.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from previous reporting. Wet ground conditions continue to favor RF aerial ISR/precision strike.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Forces (Pokrovsk): Forces are critically focused on immediate logistics triage and defense of the forward line. The high-profile RF claim regarding the destruction of GUR Spetsnaz (even if unverified) necessitates increased force protection and OPSEC review for elite units operating in the sector.
• RF Forces (Technological): RF continues to promote its EW/Robotics superiority. The public glorification of Major Permyakov (Deputy Commander of a UAV Detachment) serves as a potent morale booster and recruitment tool, signaling continued prioritization of technological warfare assets (ZALA, Supercam, Lancet).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• Integrated Multi-Domain Strike: RF successfully synchronizes deep ballistic strike (from Crimea toward Mykolaiv) with persistent drone/attrition warfare (Polozhsk/Zaporizhzhia) and decisive tactical interdiction (Pokrovsk logistics bridge). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Tactical UAV Superiority (Reinforced): The demonstrated capability to successfully target and destroy high-value UAF assets (Artillery, GUR insertion claim) near Pokrovsk validates the effectiveness of their integrated ISR/Strike loop (e.g., FSTH-LD, ZALA, Lancet). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Exploit Pokrovsk Paralysis (PRIMARY): Use the logistics disruption and claimed tactical success (GUR Spetsnaz) to force UAF operational pause or localized withdrawal in the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad sector.
2. Pressure Deep Rear (SECONDARY): Force UAF to expend air defense resources and divert attention via high-speed ballistic threats against Southern CNI and urban centers (Mykolaiv).
3. Reinforce Technological Legitimacy (IO): Use high-profile awards and media features (Major Permyakov) to legitimize and encourage the growth of EW and UAV specialized forces.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The explicit RF claim of neutralizing a GUR Black Hawk insertion near Pokrovsk (Operation Z/RVvoenkor) is a significant development. If confirmed, this indicates:

1. RF possesses high-quality, real-time ISR capability to detect tactical air transport operations near the front.
2. RF has effective, quick-reaction strike platforms (e.g., Lancet) to prosecute these fleeting targets. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain adequately sustained, particularly the decentralized supply chain for high-value items like drone systems, as evidenced by the persistent operations of the 35th Army (Vostok Group) drone operators.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in linking tactical operational success (Pokrovsk bridge/GUR claim) directly to strategic IO and domestic policy (EW decree, Permyakov award).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Force posture is highly reactive due to confirmed ballistic missile threats from Crimea. This high operational tempo degrades long-term readiness. On the ground, immediate focus must remain on the Pokrovsk logistics bottleneck.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (ISR/OPSEC): The high-profile RF claim regarding a GUR loss near Pokrovsk requires immediate investigation. Regardless of verification, the RF ability to generate a plausible narrative of elite force destruction impacts morale and OPSEC confidence.
• Setback (Infrastructure): Continued high-intensity conventional and ballistic strikes on Zaporizhzhia Oblast (720 strikes reported) and the threat to Mykolaiv demonstrate sustained RF attrition against UAF civilian and military infrastructure.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement is for enhanced ground-based air defense and EW packages to shield logistics corridors and high-value transport nodes (like the Vovcha River crossings) from the demonstrated RF integrated ISR/Strike capability.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Narrative (Decisive Tactical Victory): RF media heavily promotes the destruction of UAF logistics and the claimed destruction of GUR Spetsnaz near Pokrovsk. This aims to portray the Pokrovsk Axis as collapsing and UAF elite forces as ineffective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Narrative (Technological Dominance): The feature on Major Permyakov (UAV expert) is designed to normalize RF technological overmatch and motivate the RF technological force multiplier.
• RF Narrative (Financial Strength): TASS reporting on the growing wealth of Russian billionaires serves to project an image of a robust, sanctions-proof economy supporting the war effort.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The persistent threat of ballistic strikes on major cities (Mykolaiv) combined with high-volume strikes on frontline regions (Zaporizhzhia) may induce public fatigue and demand for enhanced protective measures, potentially fueling the internal instability narratives previously identified.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF condemnation of Canada’s attempt to seize a Volga-Dnepr aircraft (TASS) indicates continued RF focus on countering international legal and economic pressure, suggesting they will maintain aggressive legal challenges to sanctions enforcement.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Sustained Attrition and Interdiction): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will continue to leverage its EW/UAV assets to conduct persistent attrition warfare on the Pokrovsk Axis, specifically targeting UAF engineer teams, logistics convoys, and reserve movements attempting to stabilize the front. The goal is to force a UAF tactical decision based on supply starvation.

MLCOA 2 (Ballistic Pressure Maintenance): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will maintain a high tempo of ballistic missile and long-range drone strikes on Southern and Central Ukrainian cities (Mykolaiv, Zaporizhzhia rear areas) to compel UAF to allocate critical SAM resources away from the Pokrovsk operational area.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Coordinated Penetration on Pokrovsk): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF mechanized forces (supported by reinforced EW/C-UAS teams) execute a rapid, concentrated assault on a critically undersupplied sector of the UAF line near Pokrovsk within the next 48 hours. The objective is to achieve a deep tactical penetration before emergency logistics routes are operational, potentially forcing the encirclement or collapse of a forward UAF brigade.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0 to T+24H (Counter-ISR/EW Priority): UAF must achieve tactical parity in the EW domain over the Vovcha River crossing points to allow safe passage for engineer recce and initial logistics flow. (DECISION POINT: J3/J6 - Immediate allocation of tactical EW support to engineer elements.)
• T+24H to T+48H (A2/AD Deployment): UAF must establish forward ground-based air defense (GBAD) assets in the Mykolaiv/Odesa approach corridors to deter or neutralize the persistent ballistic threat originating from Crimea. (DECISION POINT: J3/J2 - Prioritization of GBAD deployment over other front-line resupply.)

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate Counter-Reconnaissance Screening (J2/J3 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Deploy layered, active electronic screening (low-power directional jamming, anti-drone netting) across all identified alternative Vovcha River crossing points immediately. All engineer movements must be conducted under EW/C-UAS escort.
   • Action (J2/J3): Mandate all UAF logistics convoys within 20km of the Pokrovsk line to utilize highly dispersed movement patterns and operate exclusively under cover of darkness or poor visibility to defeat RF thermal/ISR capabilities.
2. Ballistic Threat Mitigation (J3/J6 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Reallocate short-range air defense systems (SHORAD/VSHORAD) to critical infrastructure and staging areas in Mykolaiv and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts to protect against confirmed ballistic threats and continuous UAV attacks.
   • Action (J3): Initiate a 72-hour operational readiness surge for all available Patriot/NASAMS batteries within range of Crimea-launched missiles.
3. OPSEC Review and Information Counter-Action (GUR/J7 Priority):
   • Recommendation: Conduct an immediate, internal review of tactical air insertion OPSEC and communications in the Pokrovsk sector following the RF GUR Spetsnaz claim.
   • Action (J7): Prepare a preemptive public statement to counter the RF narrative regarding the GUR/Black Hawk incident, emphasizing UAF operational secrecy and avoiding confirmation or denial to prevent giving RF further intelligence.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//