Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 010600Z NOV 25

DTG: 010600Z NOV 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confidence in the kinetic-operational picture remains high, reinforced by persistent RF information operations following the Vovcha River bridge destruction. Cyber/DIB risk is validated as critical.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Damage control and restoration of logistics flow on the Pokrovsk Axis, and immediate cyber defense response following the confirmed Motor Sich data breach.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The situation remains defined by the deliberate RF interdiction of the logistics corridor supporting the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad sector.

• Pokrovsk Axis (Donetsk Oblast): CRITICAL LOGISTICS CRISIS. The destruction of the Vovcha River bridge has resulted in severe sustainment constraints for forward UAF units. Krasnoarmiysk (Pokrovsk) remains the immediate focus of RF information operations (IO) claiming Spetsnaz attrition and targeting the local population.
• Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia - Orikhiv): RF claims of successful attacks on NATO-supplied equipment near Orikhiv reinforce persistent pressure on this axis, indicating RF capacity to maintain offensive momentum across multiple axes despite the focus on Pokrovsk.
• Strategic Air Defense: Confirmed large-scale RF air defense activity, claiming the shootdown of 98 Ukrainian UAVs over Russian regions (Astrakhan/MO RF sources). This likely reflects a coordinated, high-volume UAF strike attempt that was largely degraded by layered RF air defenses, suggesting continued UAF deep-strike capability but facing persistent EW/AA challenges.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from previous report. Wet, late-autumn conditions continue to complicate low-level crossing attempts (Vovcha River) and limit off-road maneuverability for heavy equipment.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Forces: UAF forces are currently focused on emergency logistical bypass and engineering efforts near the Vovcha River. UAF General Staff issued standard operational loss reports (01.11.25).
• RF Forces: RF forces are executing a synchronized multi-domain strategy:
  • Kinetic: Sustained anti-logistics interdiction on the Pokrovsk Axis.
  • Information: Heavy focus on undermining UAF domestic stability (displaced persons narrative, manpower crisis claims) and demonstrating tactical success (Orikhiv, Krasnoarmiysk claims).
  • Technological: Continued institutionalization and incentivization of EW/Robotics personnel (Confirmed Presidential decree), securing a long-term technological advantage.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• Logistics Interdiction: Demonstrated capability to conduct high-precision, high-impact kinetic strikes against critical UAF logistics infrastructure (Vovcha River bridge). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• IO Synchronization: RF is highly effective at linking tactical success (bridge destruction, claimed Spetsnaz attrition near Krasnoarmiysk) with strategic IO, immediately pushing narratives of UAF military collapse and civilian distress.
• Deep Air Defense: Confirmed capability to coordinate large-scale air defense responses, suggesting effective C2 integration across the Russian defense perimeter, despite high-volume UAF saturation attempts. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Exploit Logistics Paralysis: Maintain constant pressure on the Pokrovsk Axis, preventing UAF from establishing alternative supply routes and forcing forward units to consume reserves.
2. Destabilize Civilian Support (NEW EMPHASIS): Use localized humanitarian distress (Kostyantynivka/Zhdanivka shelter claims) to drive a wedge between UAF military/state authorities and the civilian population, promoting narratives of state neglect.
3. Reinforce Technological Dominance: Continue to frame all tactical successes through the lens of superior RF technology (EW/Robotics/FPV), reinforcing the strategic policy shift (Osmakov appointment, Presidential decree).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The integration of humanitarian crisis narratives (Colonelcassad) with localized kinetic claims (Spetsnaz attrition near Krasnoarmiysk, TASS) suggests a shift in RF IO focus to target the immediate rear of the Pokrovsk operation, aiming to create internal security and humanitarian crises that divert UAF resources from the front line.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics remain sufficient to sustain high-volume FPV/ISR operations and precision strikes. The confirmed evasion of sanctions (Swiwin engines) ensures continued quality sustainment for long-range UAV strike capabilities.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 demonstrates strong vertical integration: Strategic policy decisions (EW decree, MoD appointment) are immediately reflected in tactical messaging (FPV footage, TASS reports), confirming a unified, centrally directed operational tempo.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains highly dependent on rapid logistics restoration at Pokrovsk. Forward units are utilizing reserves, but sustained operations beyond 48 hours without resupply will critically degrade combat effectiveness.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Confirmed): Continued severe logistics constraint on the Pokrovsk Axis due to the Vovcha River bridge destruction.
• Setback (Information/Counter-Intelligence): RF is successfully promoting IO narratives targeting critical areas (Pokrovsk rear, DIB vulnerabilities).
• Success (Information/Diplomatic Potential): The potential transfer of the stranded Russian An-124 transport aircraft (RBC-Ukraine) provides a significant diplomatic/material win, though impact is non-immediate.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

CRITICAL: Immediate, secure, and low-signature engineering assets (multi-point bridging/ferry systems) and dedicated security detachments (C-UAS, AA) to protect those assets from persistent RF ISR/FPV interdiction.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Narrative (Humanitarian Weaponization): Colonelcassad's video detailing poor conditions in shelters near Kostyantynivka/Zhdanivka is a targeted IO effort to depict UAF authorities as incapable or uncaring toward displaced civilians. This is designed to generate local dissent and internal migration pressure.
• RF Narrative (Manpower Crisis): TASS report highlighting youth emigration reinforces RF claims that Ukraine lacks the manpower to sustain the conflict (aligning with previous MDCOA targeting mobilization centers).
• RF Counter-Strike Narrative: MO RF claims of shooting down 98 UAVs serve to minimize the impact of UAF deep strikes and reassure the Russian public of robust defense.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The confluence of military setbacks (Pokrovsk bridge) and high-impact IO (Motor Sich breach, shelter conditions) risks lowering civilian and front-line morale. UAF counter-IO must prioritize transparent communication on logistics restoration and demonstrate concrete efforts to support displaced persons.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The potential transfer of the An-124 cargo plane from Canada (RBC-Ukraine) provides a positive signal of continued Western material support and enforcement of sanctions.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Logistics Attrition and IO Amplification): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will continue to use the destroyed Vovcha River bridge as a focal point for precision fire and FPV drone attacks, prioritizing the destruction of engineer equipment and targeting logistics vehicles attempting bypasses. Concurrently, RF will intensify IO focused on civil instability in the immediate operational rear (Kostyantynivka, Myrnohrad).

MLCOA 2 (Orikhiv/Southern Pressure): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF forces will increase pressure on the Orikhiv sector (Zaporizhzhia) through sustained artillery and FPV attacks, seeking to fix UAF reserves and prevent their repositioning to the critical Pokrovsk Axis.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Coordinated Mechanized Breakthrough): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) Following 24-48 hours of successful logistics denial on the Pokrovsk Axis, RF commits a maneuver force (Bn-sized, potentially VDV) supported by intensive EW and FSTH-LD systems to breach the weakened UAF lines near Pokrovsk. The goal is to achieve an operational encirclement or force a large-scale, disorderly UAF withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0 to T+24H (Logistics Window): UAF must secure at least one tertiary supply route across the Vovcha River capable of sustaining daily minimum munitions requirements. (DECISION POINT: J4/Engineer - Requires commitment of maximum engineer resources under heavy EW cover.)
• T+24H to T+48H (RF Assault Window): If logistics constraints are not resolved, RF is highly likely to initiate MDCOA 1 on the Pokrovsk Axis, exploiting weakened, low-resupply UAF positions. (DECISION POINT: J3/Reserve Command - Requires pre-positioning of ready reserves to counter potential RF breakthrough.)

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Logistics Bridge Security (J3/Engineer Priority):
   • Recommendation: Immediately deploy specialized C-UAS (Electronic Warfare/Jamming) units and dedicated short-range air defense (MANPADS/light AA) to provide localized air cover over all planned Vovcha River crossing points and engineer staging areas. This protection must be dynamic and constantly shifting location to avoid RF counter-battery detection.
   • Action (J4): Initiate decentralized, small-unit logistics patrols using soft-skin vehicles on tertiary routes, prioritizing essential supplies (ammunition, fuel).
2. Counter-IO Humanitarian Response (J7/Civil-Military Admin Priority):
   • Recommendation: Immediately task local Civil-Military Administrations (CMA) in the Pokrovsk rear (Kostyantynivka, Myrnohrad) to conduct a transparent assessment of conditions in displaced persons shelters.
   • Action (CMA/J7): Provide immediate logistical support (blankets, water, heating) to documented shelters and widely publicize the state's efforts to counter the RF propaganda narrative of neglect (Colonelcassad's video).
3. DIB Security Hardening (J2/CERT-UA Priority):
   • Recommendation: Given the critical vulnerability confirmed by the Motor Sich breach, establish a mandatory, temporary (72-hour) air-gapping protocol for the most sensitive production and R&D networks across all Tier 1 Defense Industrial Base (DIB) enterprises, pending full forensic analysis.
   • Action (CERT-UA/SBU): Launch immediate proactive "hunting" for common intrusion vectors (e.g., VPN vulnerabilities, remote access tools) across the DIB ecosystem.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//