Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 310900Z OCT 25 (MORNING UPDATE)

DTG: 310900Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (The RF focus on C2/ISR attrition and strategic infrastructure targeting remains validated. Newly acquired combat claims regarding the Dnipropetrovsk axis indicate an emerging area of operational concern.) PRIORITY FOCUS: Immediate kinetic neutralization of RF FSTH-LD radar systems; Verification of RF missile type escalation (9M729); Assessment of RF ground gains in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current operational picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment is defined by continued RF deep strike interdiction and synchronized ground pressure on the Eastern axis, now augmented by confirmed RF claims of new territorial gains in the Dnipropetrovsk sector.

• Deep Strike Domain (CRITICAL ESCALATION):

  • FACT (RF IO/UAF MFA/Reuters): RF is alleged to be employing the 9M729 cruise missile (associated with the SSC-8 system, capable of carrying a nuclear warhead) via the Iskander complex.
  • JUDGMENT: This claim, if verified, represents a severe strategic escalation, as the missile was central to the collapse of the INF Treaty. Even if armed conventionally, its deployment signals a willingness to utilize systems previously associated with nuclear posture. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Requires technical SIGINT/TECHINT verification)
  • FACT (UAF/Colonelcassad): Confirmed heavy damage to Ladyzhyn TPP (Thermal Power Plant) following combined RF strikes on 30 OCT 25, alongside further damage to industrial targets in Odesa and a large fire at an enterprise in Dnipropetrovsk.
  • FACT (UAF Deep Strike BDA): UAF claimed strikes on the Orlovska TPP in Russian territory overnight, confirming continued reciprocal deep strike strategy.

• Eastern Front (Dnipropetrovsk/Pokrovsk Axes):

  • FACT (RF IO/Vostok Group): RF claims the "liberation" (capture) of Novoaleksandrovka and Vyshnove in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, near the Pokrovsk axis. Video evidence supports RF presence and claims of successful clearing operations in Vyshnove.
  • FACT (UAF Air Force): Confirmed presence of RF Shahed UAVs (presumably targeting rear logistics/C2) on the eastern edge of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (near Chaplyne/Prosiana) and in Northern Chernihiv Oblast.
  • JUDGMENT: RF ground forces, primarily Vostok Group, are actively seeking to expand their operational area into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, likely to threaten flank support or critical logistics routes running north/south of the Pokrovsk main effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Based on multiple RF claims and supporting combat footage)

• RF C2/ISR Attrition:

  • FACT (MoD Russia/UAF MFA): RF Ministry of Defense publicly leveraged the alleged UAF government ban on media access to Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad/Kupyansk, claiming this is "official recognition" of the catastrophic situation (encirclement). This confirms RF is fully integrating the FSTH-LD enabled C2 degradation with the IO campaign.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Ukrainian authorities issued a storm warning for Kharkiv Oblast, which may affect UAV/ISR flight windows and increase road mobility issues if heavy precipitation occurs.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are heavily invested in exploiting the temporary C2/ISR advantage created by the FSTH-LD systems on the Pokrovsk axis to enable localized breakthroughs (Vyshnove/Novoaleksandrovka). UAF is currently focused on mitigating the deep strike threat (TTP/NPP security) and rapidly addressing the new territorial claims in Dnipropetrovsk.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(RF CAPABILITIES):

• Strategic Missile Escalation (POTENTIAL): Demonstrated ability to deploy the 9M729 missile system, a former INF treaty-violating missile.
• Aggressive Force Projection: Confirmed capacity to conduct offensive operations resulting in claimed territorial capture in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Novoaleksandrovka, Vyshnove), which expands the operational area beyond the main Pokrovsk axis.
• Adaptation (UAF Countermeasures): RF soldiers report adapting to UAF "fire lances" (inexpensive incendiary/explosive payloads) and RPG use, suggesting continuous tactical refinement in the close fight.

(RF INTENTIONS):

1. Enforce Operational Paralysis: Maintain heavy pressure on UAF deep logistics (rail/power) and C2/ISR networks (FSTH-LD) to prevent reinforcements from reaching the Eastern Front.
2. Expand Operational Success: Consolidate claimed gains in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast to create a new, destabilizing operational axis, forcing UAF to divert limited reserves.
3. Strategic Coercion: Utilize the threat narrative of the 9M729 missile to generate international concern and put pressure on Kyiv’s backers.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The most critical tactical change is the clear expansion of RF ground efforts into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This shift tests UAF's ability to maintain a coherent defense line across a wider front, likely using forces previously earmarked for Pokrovsk support.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment for deep strikes remains HIGH (confirmed continued large-scale UAV usage). The reported use of the 9M729 suggests adequate inventories of high-value, long-range missile systems.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in synchronizing deep strike, IO, and ground action. The MoD’s immediate use of the UAF MFA statement to bolster its encirclement narrative exemplifies rapid integration of tactical information into strategic IO.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF is engaged in a simultaneous multi-domain defense:

1. Counter-Air: Continued high-tempo AD operations against UAVs (reported on Chernihiv and Dnipropetrovsk axes).
2. Counter-Battery/Deep Strike: Successful reciprocal strikes against RF energy infrastructure (Orlovska TPP).
3. Ground Defense: Units on the Eastern Front are experiencing severe tactical strain (Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad), and new units are required to stabilize the emerging threat in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: UAF "Tyvaz Division" successfully targeted and destroyed a D-20 towed howitzer position and a 2A36 Giatsint-B self-propelled gun while on the march. This confirms effective UAV-cued counter-battery fire.
• Setback: Confirmed RF occupation claims in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Vyshnove/Novoaleksandrovka). Confirmed continued susceptibility to deep strikes on critical energy infrastructure (Ladyzhyn TPP).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the urgent need for reserve maneuver units to contain and counter-attack the RF penetration in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast while maintaining a stable defense on the Pokrovsk axis. The need for counter-radiation/deep strike assets against FSTH-LD remains paramount.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO is heavily focused on two narratives:

1. Catastrophic Collapse: MoD officially claims the UAF situation around Pokrovsk/Myrnohrad is catastrophic (amplifying the "encirclement" narrative).
2. Territorial Success: Aggressive promotion of claimed captures (Novoaleksandrovka, Vyshnove) to project momentum and demoralize UAF forces.
3. Legal/Moral Attacks: RF media attempts to draw attention to internal RF legal cases (military personnel crimes) and mock UAF cultural analysis (Masha and the Bear), serving as a distraction from the war crimes narrative.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public concern will increase significantly due to: 1) Confirmed destruction of another major TPP (Ladyzhyn); 2) RF claims of ground gains in the sensitive Dnipropetrovsk region; 3) The strategic threat posed by the alleged use of the 9M729 missile. UAF General Prosecutor’s Office is utilizing the information space to counter RF moral claims by publishing details of criminal charges against RF commanders.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The alleged deployment of the 9M729 (INF Treaty missile) offers a major opportunity for UAF to rally international diplomatic and material support by framing RF operations as a clear escalation of strategic risks.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Dnipropetrovsk Consolidation): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF Vostok Group will consolidate its positions in Novoaleksandrovka and Vyshnove. They will use these newly captured areas as springboards for further probing attacks west toward the Dnipro River and north, attempting to threaten key settlements in the Novomoskovsk/Synelnykove area to sever logistics lines supporting the Eastern Front.

MLCOA 2 (Systemic Infrastructure Destruction): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will conduct a high-volume strike wave within 24 hours, utilizing Shaheds and possibly cruise missiles, prioritizing remaining major TPPs, rail logistics hubs in central/eastern Ukraine, and the substations related to NPP external power supply.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (9M729 Escalation): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF confirms the deployment of the 9M729 missile and utilizes it to strike a critical UAF C2 node (e.g., a regional headquarters or major logistics hub) in the deep rear (e.g., Kyiv, Lviv), deliberately testing the international community's response to the use of a system associated with strategic nuclear warfighting posture.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0000Z - T+2400Z (Immediate Counter-Penetration): UAF must identify and deploy available reserves to immediately stabilize the Dnipropetrovsk axis and prevent RF from expanding the bridgehead out of Vyshnove/Novoaleksandrovka.
• Decision Point (Missile Verification): If SIGINT/TECHINT confirms the operational deployment of the 9M729 missile by 312000Z OCT 25, UAF must immediately elevate the threat profile and initiate contingency plans for strategic retaliation/diplomatic mobilization.

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. COUNTER-PENETRATION ON DNIPROPETROVSK AXIS (J3/J5 - CRITICAL MANEUVER PRIORITY)

   • Recommendation: J3 must immediately allocate and deploy available operational reserves to establish a robust defensive line west/north of the claimed RF gains (Vyshnove/Novoaleksandrovka). Prioritize counter-attack planning to restore the previous FLOT and eliminate the new RF threat axis.
   • Action (J5): Conduct rapid wargaming of RF follow-on attacks from the newly captured settlements toward central Dnipropetrovsk assets.

2. VERIFY 9M729 DEPLOYMENT (J2/J6 - CRITICAL INTELLIGENCE PRIORITY)

   • Recommendation: J2/J6 must issue a FLASH requirement to all SIGINT/ELINT/TECHINT assets to specifically detect and characterize the launch signatures and missile debris associated with the 9M729 system (SSC-8). Verification is essential for strategic response.
   • Action (J2/J7): Prepare a strategic communications package based on the assumption of verification for immediate release to NATO/G7 partners upon confirmation.

3. TTP UPDATE AGAINST FSTH-LD (J6/J3 - TACTICAL ADAPTATION)

   • Recommendation: Reinforce the requirement for immediate kinetic neutralization of FSTH-LD systems. Until destruction is confirmed, mandate a temporary reduction in FPV/ISR drone flight ceilings near the Pokrovsk axis to exploit potential gaps in the radar system's vertical coverage, while simultaneously increasing the use of terrain masking.
   • Action (J6): Explore integration of basic anti-radiation payload technology on existing FPV platforms for localized suppression against known FSTH-LD locations.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL FOCUS)

//END REPORT//