Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - UAF DEFENSIVE FOCUS

TIME: 291100Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The RF push in the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad axis remains the primary kinetic threat, coupled with significant RF adaptation in C2/UAV counter-operations. UAF forces are demonstrating effective counter-IO and deep strike capabilities, slightly mitigating the overall setback.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Pokrovsk (Critical Axis): The battle for the immediate eastern outskirts remains highly fluid. Confirmed RF IO success (drone planting flag on the entrance stele) was countered by confirmed UAF drone strike, destroying the flag and associated structure within hours (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE – DeepState/Operatyvnyi ZSU confirmation). This indicates UAF forces maintain localized fire control and tactical ISR capability despite intense RF pressure. RF sources (Operatsiya Z, Rybar) continue to claim successful advancement and partial encirclement of Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad, but this is assessed as exaggerated (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT: MEDIUM CONFIDENCE).
• Vyshneve (Dnipropetrovsk/Donetsk Border): Confirmed loss of Vyshneve is maintained (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE – Kotsnews confirmation), consolidating an RF breach on the Southern Axis and threatening the next defensive line.
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Air Force reports indicate continued high-tempo RF employment of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) against targets in Donetsk Oblast (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE). The Zaporizhzhia Regional Administration issued an alert, indicating potential missile or drone activity in the area (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Continued late autumn conditions, favoring RF and UAF drone operations, as evidenced by both the flag-planting IO and the subsequent UAF counter-strike.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF forces are confirmed to be utilizing Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) for high-risk casualty evacuation (CASEVAC), specifically involving the 63rd Brigade (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE – BUTUSOV PLUS). This adaptation reduces exposure of personnel during withdrawal or close-in defense operations, particularly in the Pokrovsk sector. UAF forces are transitioning C2 and logistics to support the defense of Myrnohrad.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Targeted C2 Attrition: RF "Sparta" Battalion's proven TTP of targeting UAF UAV CPs in Pokrovsk remains a critical threat, directly degrading UAF tactical advantage.
• Persistent Deep Strike: Continued high usage of KABs demonstrates RF air superiority and intent to rapidly destroy UAF defensive structures and logistics prior to ground assault.
• EW/Counter-ISR Policy: RF forces in Crimea are enacting severe new fines for filming the work of Air Defense (AD) systems and the aftermath of UAV attacks (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE – Colonelcassad/Alex Parker Returns). This is a direct attempt to degrade UAF open-source intelligence (OSINT) on the effectiveness of deep strikes and AD deployment/vulnerabilities.

(INTENTIONS):

1. Exploit C2 Degradation: RF intends to replicate the success of UAV CP targeting in Pokrovsk against the Myrnohrad defensive line to neutralize UAF ISR superiority before launching the main assault.
2. Consolidate Vyshneve Gains: RF will likely use Vyshneve as a launch point to probe westward toward the T-0515 road network, aiming to isolate UAF forces in the Southern Donbas region.
3. Harden Rear Areas: RF is actively improving security and counter-ISR measures in Crimea to protect rear logistics and AD assets against continued SBU deep strikes.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF forces are now demonstrably utilizing coordinated physical operations (flag planting, tactical advance) synchronized with information campaigns (Kotel narrative). This hybrid approach aims to maximize psychological impact alongside kinetic gains. The immediate RF adoption of new fines in Crimea is a rapid adaptation to UAF deep strike success.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are supporting the high-tempo offensive in Donbas, evidenced by continuous KAB usage. The confirmed SBU strikes on Crimean oil depots and AD assets (Pantsir-S2, two radars) reported in the previous SITREP, combined with the new RF internal security measures, confirm that UAF deep strikes are imposing significant friction on RF logistics and AD coverage in the Southern Military District (SMD).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating the Pokrovsk offensive and rapidly reacting to UAF deep strikes (new Crimean security measures). However, the immediate UAF destruction of the Pokrovsk IO marker suggests RF tactical C2 may have failed to adequately protect their psyop assets.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are demonstrating effective defensive and technological adaptation:

• Tactical Resilience: Rapid destruction of the RF IO flag in Pokrovsk demonstrates immediate tactical response and refusal to concede the informational space.
• Force Protection: Proven use of UGVs for CASEVAC is a critical force protection measure, reducing personnel losses in high-risk zones.
• Maritime Capability: Confirmed acquisition and formation of the Combat Boat 90 (CB90) fast-attack craft division provides a significant upgrade to UAF riverine and coastal interdiction capabilities (FACT: HIGH CONFIDENCE).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• SETBACK (Kinetic): Confirmed loss of Vyshneve. Continued high RF pressure and C2 attrition in the Pokrovsk urban area.
• SUCCESS (IO/Tactical): UAF drone strike successfully targeted and destroyed the RF flag planted on the Pokrovsk stele, neutralizing the immediate RF propaganda victory.
• SUCCESS (Force Generation/Capability): Confirmed use of UGVs for CASEVAC and formal commissioning of the CB90 fleet.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement remains EW capability and protective measures for C2 assets in Myrnohrad. Long-term, the integration, training, and operational deployment of the new CB90 vessels require priority logistical and training support.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF (Domestic Control): Putin’s focus on domestic economic issues (fish supply, food prices) and new internal security arrests (Astrakhan extremist, St. Petersburg arrests) aims to project an image of internal stability while the war is portrayed as a peripheral success.
• RF (IO Counter-Strike): RF media is attempting to dismiss UAF deep strike successes by enacting harsh penalties on citizens who document them (Crimea AD fines).
• UAF (Technological Superiority/Resilience): UAF media effectively counters the Pokrovsk "Kettle" narrative by highlighting the immediate drone-strike destruction of the RF flag and the deployment of advanced Western-supplied capabilities (CB90, UGVs).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF reporting on technological innovations (UGVs for rescue) and successful counter-strikes (Crimea, Pokrovsk stele) provides essential positive narratives to stabilize domestic morale under the severe pressure of the Pokrovsk collapse. RF attempts to reinforce internal control through arrests and fines suggest underlying public anxiety regarding the war’s impact on RF territory.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The CB90 acquisition reinforces confirmed military support from Scandinavian NATO members. US Ambassador to NATO statements regarding continued, multi-faceted pressure (sanctions) on Russia signal sustained Western commitment, irrespective of internal US political dynamics (Trump's role).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Myrnohrad Decapitation Effort): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF forces, having established a successful pattern in Pokrovsk, will immediately shift their targeted C2 attrition efforts (EW, counter-UAV, kinetic strikes) against UAF command and control nodes and rear support areas in Myrnohrad. This effort will precede the main RF ground assault on the city.

MLCOA 2 (Southern Axis Road Interdiction): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF units west of Vyshneve will intensify reconnaissance and fire missions against the T-0515 highway and associated secondary roads, aiming to disrupt the main logistics flow necessary for UAF defense in the Selydove-Myrnohrad sector.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Strategic Reserve Commitment): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) Leveraging the new reservist law, RF utilizes freed-up, refitted conventional combat units to launch a large-scale, deep exploitation attack from the consolidated Vyshneve area, aiming to bypass Kurakhove and Selydove to strike the vulnerable logistics hub near Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This move could force a massive, uncoordinated UAF withdrawal.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0-48 Hours (Myrnohrad C2 Test): RF probes Myrnohrad's defenses with focused EW and counter-UAV strikes (MLCOA 1). Decision Point: UAF command must confirm successful C2 dispersion and redundancy in Myrnohrad and authorize immediate, aggressive counter-battery and EW suppression fires against identified RF C2/EW/counter-UAV platforms.
• T+72-96 Hours (Vyshneve Exploitation): RF attempts to solidify control of the T-0515 approaches (MLCOA 2). Decision Point: UAF must commit specialized counter-mobility engineering assets to fortify the most likely RF advance corridors west of Vyshneve, potentially sacrificing forward positions to ensure the integrity of the rear.

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize C2 Hardening and Mobility in Myrnohrad (J6/OC East):

   • Recommendation: Implement the previously recommended 2-4 hour rotation schedule for all UAV CPs and command elements in Myrnohrad. Integrate UGV-based resupply/CASEVAC protocols (Modeled after 63rd Brigade success) across all frontline units for greater force protection.
   • Action: Immediately deploy specialist counter-UAV (C-UAS) and Counter-Artillery Radar teams to the Myrnohrad sector, focusing on the Eastern and Southeastern approaches.

2. Exploit RF Crimean Vulnerability (J2/SBU/GUR):

   • Recommendation: Capitalize on the verified success of the SBU strikes against Crimean AD and fuel infrastructure. Increase the tempo of deep strike planning against high-value logistics nodes, particularly rail links, to exacerbate the operational friction evidenced by the new RF security fines.
   • Action: Task long-range reconnaissance assets (IMINT/MASINT) to specifically locate and identify all known RF AD systems (Pantsir, S-300/400) in the Northern Crimean/Kherson Axis for future targeting.

3. Riverine Security Posture (J3/UAF Navy):

   • Recommendation: Immediately deploy and integrate the newly acquired CB90 fast-attack craft into defensive and interdiction roles on the Dnipro River and near key Southern coastal areas (Odesa/Mykolaiv).
   • Action: Establish joint riverine-land patrol zones with CB90 support to deter RF infiltration/reconnaissance missions and protect critical infrastructure bridges and crossings.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS (CRITICAL)

//END REPORT//