Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 230700Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 2)

ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH. The strategic operational environment remains dominated by the RF's successful CNI strikes and corresponding hybrid pressure. New intelligence confirms RF kinetic focus on deep CNI targets and persistent tactical gains in the Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk axes, specifically mentioning Poltavka.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current operational picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The CNI degradation (ГПВ) remains the dominant strategic factor, creating widespread operational friction.

• Deep Rear CNI Strike (NEW): Confirmed drone attack targeting the Kamenskoye (Kamianske) HPP (Hydroelectric Power Plant) in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. AJ: This confirms RF intent to escalate damage beyond thermal power generation and substations, targeting hydroelectric facilities which require extensive time and resources to repair, directly impacting long-term energy security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia Axes (NEW): RF Ministry of Defence (MoD) claims the capture of Poltavka (Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia border region) after forcing a river crossing (Yanchur River). RF claims of destroying a US-supplied Stryker APC near Konstantinovka (Donetsk Oblast) are circulating. AJ: If Poltavka's capture is confirmed, it represents a minor but tactically significant RF gain, potentially setting conditions for further localized advances toward Huliaipole or in the rear of the Vuhledar salient. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Key Terrain Confirmation: The Kamianske HPP is now confirmed as a high-priority RF target, necessitating enhanced AD coverage.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The nationwide power rationing (ГПВ) is the primary constraint. Low visibility conditions overnight facilitated the RF drone attack on the Kamianske HPP.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF (Red Force):

1. Kinetic Posture: Executing continuous, synchronized deep strikes, transitioning the target set to HPPs. Tactical forces are postured for localized assaults and river crossing exploitation (Poltavka).
2. Hybrid Posture: Renewed emphasis on IO targeting US political division (Trump statements) and internal UAF security weaknesses (alleged "nazi-traitor" IO targeting a UAF commander).

UAF (Blue Force):

1. Defensive Posture: Stretched AD assets are focused on CNI defense. Ground forces must immediately verify the situation at Poltavka and allocate reserves if the Yanchur crossing threat is credible.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Targeted CNI Destruction: RF has demonstrated the capability to precisely strike critical hydroelectric infrastructure (HPPs) via drone assets, suggesting robust target intelligence and successful AD penetration.
• Tactical Maneuver: RF "Vostok" Group of Forces maintains the capability to execute minor river crossings and localize assaults (Poltavka).

(INTENTIONS):

1. Systemic Grid Collapse (ESCALATED): RF intends to paralyze Ukraine's CNI by targeting the most resilient components (HPPs) in addition to thermal plants, maximizing operational friction.
2. Operational Shaping: Maintain limited, opportunistic advances on the ground (Poltavka) to stretch UAF reserves and distract from the main effort (Pokrovsk, MLCOA 1/MDCOA 1 from previous report).
3. Strategic Deterrence/IO: Exploit US political divisions (Trump) and target the legitimacy and morale of UAF commanders ("Colovrat" narrative).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift in the deep strike target set to include HPPs (Kamianske) is the most significant tactical adaptation since the initial CNI strike wave. This indicates RF is utilizing the window of grid vulnerability created by the initial attacks to strike targets of strategic national importance. The claims of destroying US equipment (Stryker) near Konstantinovka reinforce the ongoing focus on Western aid attrition.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmation of tactical advances involving river crossings (Poltavka/Yanchur) suggests RF logistical support is adequate to sustain localized offensive actions, likely utilizing existing forward supply points.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, synchronizing deep strike assets (drones/missiles) with ground IO and strategic political messaging.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness remains challenged by CNI degradation. Immediate AD redeployment or reinforcement is required for hydroelectric infrastructure. Ground forces must execute rapid reconnaissance to verify the Poltavka situation and prevent any RF exploitation of a successful river crossing.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: Confirmed successful RF strike on the Kamianske HPP. Potential tactical setback at Poltavka (unverified RF claim of capture).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate resource constraint is the availability of AD systems capable of protecting large, fixed CNI targets (HPPs) across multiple oblasts simultaneously, while maintaining protection for AD/C2 nodes during the predicted follow-on missile strike.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

1. Political Interference (Trump Statements): RF channels are amplifying US political figures (Trump) suggesting negotiations are needed because "Putin wants to take everything." AJ: This is a clear strategic IO effort designed to inject instability into the US-Ukraine relationship and pressure Kyiv towards premature peace negotiations under unfavorable terms. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
2. Targeting UAF Legitimacy ("Colovrat"): RF is circulating narratives labeling a UAF commander in Ternopil as a "runaway Russian Nazi-traitor" involved in crime. AJ: This aims to discredit UAF leadership, fuel internal dissent regarding mobilization, and reinforce the domestic RF narrative that the war is against "Nazis" and criminals. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
3. Ground Success Amplification (Poltavka/Stryker): RF media is quickly disseminating footage and claims of tactical victories, including the destruction of high-value US equipment, to bolster domestic morale and project military success abroad.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The combined effect of systemic CNI damage (HPP strike) and amplified political uncertainty (Trump IO) risks further straining public sentiment regarding the war's trajectory and international support.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Follow-on Strategic Strike Wave - T+0-24 - REFINED): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF will execute the predicted large-scale CNI strike. The target set will now include a higher proportion of hydroelectric facilities (HPPs) and their associated substations, aimed at achieving a nationwide, uncontrolled blackout. This wave will be supported by continued UAV attrition (as seen at Kamianske HPP).

MLCOA 2 (Exploitation of CNI Disruption - T+0-72): (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) RF will use the CNI-induced operational chaos to launch localized offensive actions to fix UAF reserves. The Pokrovsk axis remains the most dangerous, but sustained pressure will continue in the Vuhledar/Poltavka sector to expand recent gains, potentially aiming for a shallow pocket west of the Yanchur River.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Synchronization of CNI Collapse and Penetration - T+0-48): (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Unchanged. Successful systemic CNI collapse coinciding with a major armored breakthrough in the Pokrovsk sector. The inclusion of HPPs in the target set increases the severity of the operational impact should this MDCOA materialize.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0-3 Hours (AD/HPP Alert): Immediate alert for all AD assets protecting hydroelectric power facilities (HPPs). Decision Point: Initiate emergency contingency plans to utilize non-grid power for all HPP internal controls.
• T+0-6 Hours (Poltavka Verification): Immediate reconnaissance must confirm or deny the RF claim of capturing Poltavka and securing a crossing of the Yanchur River. Decision Point: Deploy immediate reserve counter-attack force if a bridgehead is confirmed.
• T+0-12 Hours (Strategic Strike Window): Peak alert for the predicted large-scale RF missile strike (MLCOA 1, now targeting HPPs).

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate AD Redeployment for HPP Protection (STRATEGIC/OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Immediately re-prioritize and dedicate a minimum of one short-range AD system (e.g., Gepard, Avenger, or equivalent Manpad battery) to protect each remaining critical HPP along the Dnipro cascade from drone attack.
   • Action: Mitigate the escalating threat to Ukraine's long-term energy generation capacity and prevent systemic grid failure.

2. Verify Poltavka and Prepare Counter-Attack (OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Dispatch a high-speed reconnaissance element to verify the RF claim regarding Poltavka and the Yanchur River crossing. If confirmed, prepare the nearest tactical reserve element for an immediate counter-attack to neutralize the bridgehead and prevent consolidation.
   • Action: Prevent RF from expanding localized gains in the Vostok sector that could stretch UAF operational control.

3. Counter-IO Targeting Political Coercion (STRATEGIC/IO - HIGH PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: StratCom should issue strong, unified messaging across all platforms, explicitly rejecting the notion of negotiations under duress and countering the RF narrative exploiting US political figures. Address the "Colovrat" narrative by emphasizing UAF adherence to the Geneva Conventions and internal accountability.
   • Action: Shield domestic and international audiences from RF strategic IO intended to coerce and destabilize political support.

//END REPORT//