Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 190600Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 11)

SUBJECT: UAF Deep-Strike Campaign Sustained (Novokuybyshevsk Refinery, Gazprom Plant); RF Forces Maintain High-Intensity Assault on Pokrovsk; UAF General Staff Reports 40 RF UAVs Intercepted/Suppressed.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current operational picture)

TIME: 190600Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Confirmation of major strikes deep inside the RF rear combined with official UAF operational data regarding air defense success and persistent kinetic engagement on the Donetsk Axis.)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The strategic conflict is defined by the high-attrition ground battle in Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk) and the deep, high-impact counter-value targeting inside the Russian Federation (RF) rear.

Key Development (RF Rear - Critical): Multiple open-source reports (ASTRA, RBK-Ukraine) and UAF sources confirm successful drone strikes overnight against two significant RF energy targets:

1. Novokuybyshevsk Refinery (Samara Oblast): Confirmed large fire, likely disabling key processing units. This confirms the sustained deep-strike campaign targeting RF fuel logistics (Belief: 0.52).
2. Gazprom Plant (Orenburg): Confirmed attack on a Gazprom facility (likely the GPP mentioned in the previous report). This is the second confirmed strike on this target type within the operational period, indicating persistence in targeting RF natural gas processing infrastructure.

Key Development (Donetsk Axis - Critical): UAF General Staff maps and briefings (08.00 19.10.2025) confirm the continuation of heavy combat along the Pokrovsk direction and Kostiantynivka direction. The UAF defensive line is holding despite the high-intensity assault (MLCOA 1 confirmed).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from previous reports. High winds forecasted in the Donetsk sector are expected to degrade tactical UAV/FPV operations for both sides in the next 24-48 hours.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: Forces remain offensively committed to the Pokrovsk assault. The RF C2 system (as noted by milbloggers Dva Mayor) is demonstrating significant failure in detecting and countering UAF deep-strike platforms, even 1500 km from the front. RF forces are actively utilizing ground maneuver elements and combined arms for the Pokrovsk assault.

UAF: UAF maintains the multi-domain approach. Air Force (AFU) reports a significant success in air defense, stating 40 enemy UAVs were shot down or suppressed overnight. This represents a substantial volume of engagement, potentially mitigating the MDCOA 2 (Coordinated Missile/Drone Wave) initiated in the previous period. Ground forces are holding lines in Pokrovsk and maintaining counter-fire capabilities.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• High-Volume Drone Attack Capability: RF retains the capacity to launch massed Shahed/UAV waves (40 platforms intercepted/suppressed), maintaining the ability to saturate UAF Air Defense systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Logistical Vulnerability (Critical): RF Air Defense over strategic rear assets (Samara/Orenburg) is demonstrably porous against UAF deep-strike UAVs. This vulnerability is acknowledged by influential RF milbloggers (Dva Mayor). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sustained Ground Attrition: RF forces continue to apply overwhelming pressure and preparatory fires against the Pokrovsk defensive belt. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(INTENTIONS):

1. Achieve Breakthrough at Pokrovsk (Primary Kinetic): Unchanged. RF will continue to commit reserves and fire support to force a territorial gain in Donetsk.
2. Degrade UAF Rear Area (Retaliatory): RF will continue massed drone and missile strikes against UAF energy and population centers in retaliation for the deep strikes. The 40 UAVs intercepted/suppressed suggests a significant attempt to execute MDCOA 2.
3. Minimize Domestic Disruption (IO/C2): RF C2 must find a mechanism to counter UAF deep strikes to prevent systemic fuel shortages and public morale collapse, which are openly discussed by RF milbloggers.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF Adaptation (IO): RF milbloggers (Dva Mayor) are publicly lamenting the lack of accountability and countermeasures against UAF deep strikes ("burning factories 1500 km from the front"). This represents a rare instance of public strategic self-criticism within the RF information space, indicative of the severity of the UAF deep-strike campaign.

UAF Adaptation (Active Air Defense): The successful interception/suppression of 40 UAVs indicates effective execution of UAF Air Defense protocols, particularly in the protection of rear areas post-retaliatory strike (Dnipropetrovsk).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

CRITICAL IMPACT: Confirmed damage to Novokuybyshevsk Refinery and the Orenburg Gazprom plant significantly impacts RF's domestic fuel and gas processing capacity. This will compound the logistical strain and necessitates a PRIORITY 1 collection requirement on damage assessment (see Section 5). The long-term impact on front-line fuel supply is still developing, but the strategic effect is confirmed.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF Strategic C2 is failing to protect critical infrastructure against deep-strike assets. RF Tactical C2 on the front line remains effective in coordinating high-volume kinetic assaults (Pokrovsk).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Defense is performing at high operational tempo, successfully engaging a significant volume of RF UAVs. Ground forces are holding key sectors, particularly in the face of the Pokrovsk push, which is confirmed by AFU General Staff reports of continued fierce fighting.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Success (Strategic): Confirmed, successful dual strikes on Novokuybyshevsk Refinery and the Gazprom Plant represent a highly effective strategic-level counter-value operation. Success (Defensive): Interception/suppression of 40 RF UAVs demonstrates robust Air Defense effectiveness against saturation attacks. Setback: The high intensity of the Pokrovsk assault continues to place extreme strain on defending UAF units (Previous reports noted high attrition).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The defense of Pokrovsk remains the primary constraint. The need for additional mobile air defense (SHORAD) remains critical, despite the success of the AFU, as the RF intent to saturate rear areas persists.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

RF IO (Damage Control): RF state media (TASS) is prioritizing unrelated domestic soft-power stories (US blogger interviews, local searches) to divert attention from the infrastructure failures. Milbloggers (Dva Mayor) are unintentionally supporting the UAF narrative by publicly criticizing the failed RF air defense, highlighting the depth of the UAF strategic reach.

UAF STRATCOM: UAF sources (Sternenko, Hayabusa) are aggressively confirming and celebrating the deep strikes, framing them as justified and effective military operations. This narrative directly supports force morale and international calls for continued assistance.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

RF Domestic Sentiment (Deterioration): Open discussion of fuel problems (Belgorod) and the inability to defend against strikes 1500 km deep suggests a crack in the domestic narrative of RF security and competence.

UAF Sentiment (High): Sustained strategic successes (deep strikes) and tactical defensive successes (40 UAVs downed) are likely boosting UAF morale and confidence.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The continued deep strikes reinforce the UAF position that offensive capabilities (long-range drones) are necessary to shift the strategic balance and hold RF targets at risk.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Pokrovsk Grind Continues): RF will maintain the high-intensity combined arms assault on Pokrovsk, utilizing high volumes of kinetic fire to force UAF withdrawal. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Massed Retaliation Posture): Despite the high rate of interception, RF will attempt to launch subsequent, perhaps larger or more complex, retaliatory strike waves (missile/drone) against UAF rear area infrastructure in the Central/Eastern/Southern oblasts in direct response to the Novokuybyshevsk and Orenburg strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Operational Severance - Pokrovsk): (Unchanged) RF achieves a rapid breakthrough in Pokrovsk and exploits the gap with reserves to sever key UAF north-south MSRs, leveraging the tactical momentum created by overwhelming preparatory fires. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

MDCOA 2 (Targeted Air Defense Degradation): RF adapts its retaliatory strike pattern to specifically target known or suspected UAF mobile air defense positions and C2 nodes that enabled the 40 UAV suppressions, aiming to blind and degrade the AFU's ability to defend against future strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Elevated due to proven UAF effectiveness.)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• T+0-24 Hours (Immediate Retaliation): UAF Air Defense units must remain at maximum readiness for an immediate, high-volume follow-on retaliatory strike (MLCOA 2/MDCOA 2). Decision Point: Prioritize dispersal or hardening of mobile Air Defense assets.
• T+24-72 Hours (Pokrovsk Crisis): The high-attrition rate in Pokrovsk will necessitate a decision regarding commitment of strategic reserves to prevent MDCOA 1.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Exploit RF Logistical Paralysis (STRATEGIC/OPERATIONAL):

   • Recommendation: Maintain the tempo of the deep-strike campaign. Immediately task long-range assets to secondary and tertiary RF fuel storage/processing targets within the Samara/Orenburg operational range to maximize the logistical shock.
   • Action: Leverage confirmed RF vulnerability and internal criticism to accelerate RF logistical failure.

2. Adaptive Air Defense Counter-Strike (TACTICAL/FORCE PROTECTION):

   • Recommendation: Proactively disperse and increase EMCON for all successful mobile Air Defense units immediately. Prepare pre-planned quick reaction force (QRF) counter-fire missions against suspected RF loitering munition/ISR launch sites and C2 nodes if MDCOA 2 is detected.
   • Action: Mitigate the predicted RF MDCOA 2 (Targeted Air Defense Degradation) by increasing survivability of high-value AD assets.

3. Prioritize Pokrovsk Attrition (OPERATIONAL):

   • Recommendation: Continue high-volume counter-fire against RF assault waves in Pokrovsk. Given the confirmed deep-strike success, sustain the defense long enough for RF logistical failures to degrade their ability to reinforce the assault. Do not prematurely commit strategic reserves unless MDCOA 1 (MSR Severance) is confirmed.
   • Action: Exploit the strategic-level pressure to weaken the RF tactical ground assault.

//END REPORT//