Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 172300Z OCT 25 (UPDATE)

SUBJECT: RF Deep Strike Campaign Focuses on Central/Southern Rear; Persistent RF IO Exploitation; Renewed UAF Counter-Air Operations.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

TIME: 172300Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Air Operations/Strike Confirmation); MEDIUM (Ground Truth/RF Intentions)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational environment remains defined by RF’s multi-axis deep strike campaign aimed at Central and Southern CNI/C2, coupled with aggressive Information Operations. The immediate focus is now on the maritime approaches to Odesa and the ongoing suppression of Russian air capability over the Black Sea.

• Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia/Odesa):
  • Confirmed Strike (FACT): The Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration confirmed an attack on Zaporizhzhia, supported by multiple photo messages. (JUDGMENT): This confirms the continuity of the multi-axis deep strike campaign (Poltava/Cherkasy/Zaporizhzhia) reported at 2230Z. Dempster-Shafer analysis supports an 18% belief in a missile or airstrike in the area.
  • UAV Threat (FACT): Air Force confirmed UAV activity (likely Shahed 136/131 'Geran-2') operating from the Black Sea towards Odesa Oblast. (Source: AFU).
  • Immediate Threat (FACT): Confirmed deployment of 2x UAVs approaching Chornomorsk/Odesa. (Source: Mykolaiv Vaniok). (JUDGMENT): The maritime corridor remains a high-threat axis for low-flying loitering munitions, demanding high readiness from coastal AD units.
• RF Deep Rear (Airspace Control):
  • Airspace Restriction (FACT): Temporary flight restrictions imposed at Sochi Airport. (Source: TASS). (JUDGMENT): This is a standard RF reaction to confirmed or potential UAF long-range UAV/Deep Strike operations targeting the Southern RF Federal Districts (e.g., Krasnodar Krai, Crimea). This confirms UAF’s deep strike actions are successfully imposing defensive resource costs on the RF rear.
• Northeastern Axis (Kharkiv):
  • Explosion Heard (FACT): An explosion was reported near Kharkiv, possibly outside the city limits. (Source: Suspilne). (JUDGMENT): This suggests continued RF indirect fire or short-range missile activity, likely targeting forward UAF positions or logistics near the Kupiansk/Slobozhanske sectors, in line with RF milblogger reports (Rybar).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear night conditions in the Black Sea and Central Ukraine favor continued low-altitude UAV/drone operations, making target acquisition difficult for UAF AD systems reliant on visual confirmation or ground-based radar tracking against sea clutter.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: Forces are primarily engaged in synchronizing deep strikes against the Central/Southern Ukrainian rear while maintaining intense artillery and air pressure on the Eastern (Donetsk/Kharkiv) front lines. UAF: AD units are actively engaged in both deep-strike interception (Central Oblasts) and countering UAV swarms approaching the Southern coast. UAF deep strike forces remain active, compelling RF AD responses in their deep rear.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Shahed Maritime Launch (HIGH): RF maintains high capability to launch loitering munitions from the Black Sea, exploiting the maritime approach to maximize penetration against coastal defenses.
• Multi-Front Targeting (HIGH): RF demonstrates the ability to simultaneously engage high-value CNI/C2 in Central Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia, Cherkasy) and maintain pressure on the Eastern/Northeastern ground lines.

(INTENTIONS):

1. Sustain Rear Area Pressure (Kinetic Priority): RF intends to maintain high-tempo deep strikes (MLCOA 1) to disrupt CNI and governance across the rear.
2. Degrade UAF Deep Strike Capability: The forced closure of Sochi airport is a reaction, confirming RF intent to prioritize the suppression of UAF long-range strike capabilities.
3. Validate Ground Narratives (IO Priority): RF milbloggers (Rybar) continue to propagate maps of the Slobozhanske, Siversk, and Kupyansk directions, consistently showing perceived tactical gains and heavy UAF losses, aimed at internal RF consumption and global perception.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The immediate shift of a confirmed strike back to Zaporizhzhia (following Poltava/Cherkasy strikes) suggests the deep strike target selection is rotational and opportunistic, designed to maximize AD resource dissipation across a wide area rather than sequential, focused attacks on a single region.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment for loitering munitions (Shahed) remains robust, supporting ongoing attacks from the Black Sea.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective, capable of immediate activation of AD protocols (Sochi airport closure) in response to UAF deep strikes, validating the threat posed by UAF deep strike actions.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Force and coastal AD units are at a high state of readiness. The confirmation of incoming UAV threats and the successful reporting and tracking by OSINT channels indicate strong sensor-to-shooter C2 effectiveness in the Southern Operational Zone.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes: UAF deep strikes are confirmed to be disrupting RF air operations in the deep rear (Sochi closure). Effective real-time tracking of incoming UAVs towards Odesa. Setbacks: Confirmed penetration of air defenses in Zaporizhzhia (following Poltava/Cherkasy strikes), resulting in further damage to rear infrastructure.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement remains the saturation of AD assets, particularly against low-flying maritime threats (UAVs) along the Black Sea coast.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

RF milbloggers (Rybar) are continuing the internal information campaign by publishing detailed, heavily biased operational maps of the Eastern front (Kupyansk, Siversk, Slobozhanske directions) which visually reinforce the narrative of RF initiative and UAF defensive collapse. These maps are used to counter UAF ground truth reporting (e.g., 63rd Mech Bde success near Pokrovsk).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The continued deep strikes in Central/Southern Ukraine will likely elevate public concern, but the immediate and accurate reporting of incoming threats by UAF authorities helps to maintain trust and adherence to safety protocols.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Sustained/Expanded Deep Strike Campaign): RF will continue to utilize long-range strike assets against the Central/Southern rear, primarily employing UAVs via the Black Sea maritime route and missiles against C2/CNI targets within the Zaporizhzhia/Cherkasy/Poltava triangle. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Indicator: Continued air alerts across Central Oblasts accompanied by confirmed UAV launches from Crimean/Black Sea areas.

MLCOA 2 (Heightened Ground Pressure in Northeast): RF ground forces, supported by continued artillery/air strikes (as indicated by the Kharkiv explosion and Rybar maps), will increase local probing attacks, particularly in the Kupyansk and Siversk directions, to tie down UAF reserves and prevent redeployment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Strategic Ballistic Strike on Logistics Hub): As previously assessed, RF maintains the capability for a massed ballistic missile strike (Iskander/Kinzhals) against a critical, irreplaceable UAF logistics hub (major rail yard or aid storage) in the Central or Western Operational Zone. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Immediate Action (T+0-4 Hours): Successful interception of 2x UAVs approaching Chornomorsk/Odesa.
• Decision Point (T+12 Hours): UAF Command must assess if the renewed deep strikes necessitate a broader redeployment of AD assets from the Eastern front to the Central Operational Zone.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. High Alert for Maritime UAV Threat (URGENT / TACTICAL):

   • Recommendation: Immediately raise all AD units in the Odesa/Chornomorsk sector to maximum readiness. Prioritize engagement of the confirmed 2x inbound UAVs. Utilize available electronic warfare (EW) assets to disrupt navigation and C2 links for subsequent UAV waves.
   • Action: Defeat immediate MLCOA 1 threat and protect critical port/logistics facilities in the Southern Operational Zone.

2. Proactive Counter-AD Deployment (HIGH / OPERATIONAL):

   • Recommendation: Deploy rapid-response mobile AD teams (especially those capable of countering loitering munitions and cruise missiles) to pre-designated, rotating defensive positions in Cherkasy and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. Focus on protecting known administrative centers and identified logistics chokepoints.
   • Action: Increase AD density to mitigate continuous deep strike penetration.

3. Personnel OPSEC Enforcement (PERSISTING / OPERATIONAL):

   • Recommendation: Given the recent targeted strikes on personnel (LTC Borkov claim) and C2 infrastructure, reinforce the "Silent Watch" protocol across all C2 and specialized technical units (C4ISR, EW, UAV). Any personnel confirmed or suspected to be high-value targets must undergo mandatory physical relocation.
   • Action: Protect essential command personnel from high-value targeting cycles.

//END REPORT//