Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - CONTINUED RF DEEP STRIKE AND GROUND IO AMPLIFICATION

TIME: 160600Z OCT 25 SUBJECT: RF Continues Multi-Vector Missile Attack Targeting Poltava Axis; Simultaneous Information Operations Claim Operational Encirclement in Donetsk.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current Operational Picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational focus remains on RF's multi-vector missile strikes aimed at the central-eastern logistical nexus, specifically Poltava and Myrhorod. This strike package directly follows the initial, larger wave reported in the previous SITREP.

• Air Domain (CRITICAL): Multiple confirmed missile launches tracked toward Poltava, launched from two distinct vectors:
  1. East/Kharkiv Axis: Missile launches tracked through Kharkiv Oblast toward Poltava (03:05Z, 03:07Z, 03:25Z, 03:29Z).
  2. Northern Axis: Missile launches tracked toward Poltava from the North (03:14Z).
  3. Myrhorod Threat: A missile was tracked toward Myrhorod (critical airbase location) from the East (03:15Z).
• Eastern Axis (Donetsk): RF Information Operations (IO) are amplifying claims of tactical success, specifically the claimed capture of Novopavlovka and subsequent attempts to establish an encirclement of UAF forces near Sukhoy Yar (DNR). This kinetic-IO synchronization (Deep Strike + Ground Claim) is designed to maximize operational confusion and psychological impact.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant change. Clear weather continues to facilitate RF ISR and precision strike operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF: RF is sustaining the second wave of the deep-strike campaign, focusing primarily on Poltava region assets, indicating high-value targeting persistence. Concurrently, ground forces in the Donetsk axis are supported by amplified IO claiming immediate operational gains (Novopavlovka, Sukhoy Yar encirclement).

UAF: UAF Air Defense remains at high alert nationwide. Explosions reported outside Kharkiv confirm continued localized RF kinetic activity. UAF High Command is likely managing critical BDA and repair measures from the initial wave while actively tracking and engaging the current missile threat vectors.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Sustained Deep Strike: RF maintains the capability to execute successive waves of missile attacks (Confidence: HIGH). The repeated targeting of Poltava suggests an enduring target set priority (e.g., energy, high-value air assets, rail hub) that RF did not neutralize in the initial strike wave.
• Ground Force IO Exploitation: RF IO can immediately synchronize ground activity (e.g., Novopavlovka claim) with deep kinetic strikes, amplifying the operational significance of minor gains. The claim of encircling UAF forces near Sukhoy Yar is highly specific, suggesting either genuine localized success or an attempt to preempt UAF C2 reactions in that sector.

(INTENTIONS):

1. Neutralize Poltava Strategic Assets: The primary intent is to destroy or degrade critical infrastructure in the Poltava/Myrhorod region, which serves as a major logistical hub and potentially hosts high-value UAF Air Force assets (Myrhorod).
2. Maximize Psychological Cohesion: The nationwide missile alert (03:21Z) concurrent with ground claims aims to force UAF into a defensive, reactive posture across all domains.
3. Test AD Regeneration: RF is testing UAF's ability to reconstitute its AD posture and resource expenditure immediately following the first, larger wave of strikes.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

Persistence of Targeting: The decision to immediately launch a second wave of missiles targeting the same axis (Poltava/Myrhorod) indicates a dedicated effort to ensure mission kill on specific targets that may have survived the first wave. This shifts RF targeting doctrine from mass saturation to persistent, prioritized targeting.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The ability to execute immediate follow-on missile strikes contradicts the narrative of critical strategic resource depletion, though it does not negate the compounding fuel crisis impacting ground forces (Previous Daily Report). RF prioritizes the expenditure of high-value missiles for strategic effect (Deep Strike) over localized ground sustainment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in the kinetic deep-strike domain (Confidence: HIGH). Synchronization of the renewed strike with the TASS claim regarding Novopavlovka and Sukhoy Yar (03:16Z) demonstrates integrated, multi-domain C2 focused on operational narrative control.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Defense forces are under sustained pressure. The multiple vectors and persistence of the strikes require continuous, high-intensity AD engagement. Ground forces maintain readiness along the Eastern FLOT, but C2 focus is temporarily diverted to nationwide AD and BDA management.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setback: The sustained nature of the missile threat forces UAF to continuously commit AD interceptors, exacerbating the constraint identified in Section 3.3 of the previous SITREP (Attrition of high-value AD interceptors).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint is the immediate need to manage the expenditure of strategic AD interceptors against the ongoing threat while maintaining sufficient reserves to counter the anticipated RF ground exploitation move (MDCOA 1, previous SITREP).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO Themes (CRITICAL):

1. Localized Operational Breakthrough: The TASS quote regarding Novopavlovka and the "bottleneck" (горловину котла) near Sukhoy Yar is a classic RF IO trope designed to signal an imminent local encirclement and collapse of UAF defenses in the Donetsk axis. This is timed to distract from the missile strikes on civilian targets.
2. Tactical Success Amplification: The release of UAV footage showing a strike on a UAF HMMWV ('ББМ "ХАМВИ"') further attempts to demonstrate tactical superiority and counter the UAF drone narrative.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The nationwide missile alert (03:21Z) sustains public anxiety and prevents a return to normalcy following the initial strike wave. RF seeks to introduce uncertainty regarding the status of the Donetsk FLOT through the Sukhoy Yar encirclement claim.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to structure its IO (ground success claims) to frame the conflict as conventional military operations, deflecting international focus from the systematic targeting of critical civilian infrastructure and humanitarian aid (WFP strike - Previous Daily Report).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Immediate Ground Exploitation of Poltava Disruption): RF ground forces, anticipating disruption to UAF logistics and C2 resulting from the continuous Poltava strikes, will increase localized, probing attacks against the Eastern FLOT (Kharkiv/Izium or Dnipropetrovsk axes) within T+6 hours. This aims to find or create a weak point before UAF can fully restore stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

MLCOA 2 (Consolidation of Ground IO): RF will flood information channels with video and narrative content reinforcing the claims of UAF operational collapse in the Donetsk area (Novopavlovka, Sukhoy Yar), preparing the information space for potential further ground pushes or for claiming disproportionate success relative to actual tactical gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Commitment to Encirclement near Sukhoy Yar): If the Novopavlovka claim holds, RF commits follow-on reserves to rapidly capitalize on the alleged "bottleneck" near Sukhoy Yar, attempting to achieve a genuine, operational-level encirclement and collapse a key sector of the Donetsk FLOT. This would require RF to bypass or ignore the logistical constraints imposed by the fuel crisis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - PERSISTING).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Decision Point (Poltava Target Status): T+6 hours. UAF C2 must finalize assessment of critical infrastructure damage in Poltava/Myrhorod. If the airbase or major rail links are severely compromised, operational planning must pivot to utilizing alternate logistical nodes immediately.
• Decision Point (Sukhoy Yar Counter): T+12 hours. UAF forces in the Donetsk axis must rapidly verify the accuracy of the Sukhoy Yar encirclement claims and adjust defensive lines or commit local reserves to stabilize the area before the RF IO campaign translates into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize AD for Operational Assets (IMMEDIATE TACTICAL RESPONSE):

   • Recommendation: Given the persistent threat to the Poltava/Myrhorod axis, critical UAF air assets and associated C2 nodes must be secured.
   • Action: UAF Air Force C2 to enhance point defense layers around the Myrhorod Airbase and the regional C2 node using short-range AD systems, and disperse non-essential ground support equipment to hardened shelters immediately.

2. Verify and Stabilize Sukhoy Yar (OPERATIONAL RESPONSE):

   • Recommendation: Do not allow RF IO regarding the "bottleneck" to dictate tactical reality. Rapidly verify the status of UAF units near Sukhoy Yar and prepare a counter-attack reserve.
   • Action: UAF Ground Force C2 to dispatch an immediate reconnaissance/strike element (e.g., UAV group, light armored element) to confirm the status of RF forces near Novopavlovka and to reinforce the flanks of any threatened UAF positions near Sukhoy Yar within T+6 hours.

3. IO Counter on Encirclement Claims (STRATEGIC IO):

   • Recommendation: Immediately counter the Sukhoy Yar encirclement narrative by highlighting the RF's continued reliance on terror strikes against civilian infrastructure (Poltava, WFP convoy) and framing the DNR ground claims as minor, costly tactical distractions.
   • Action: UAF G-7 to issue an updated press release focusing on the failure of the continuous missile strikes to degrade UAF operational readiness, while characterizing the Donetsk claims as "desperate psychological warfare attempts."

//END REPORT//