Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 122300Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 20)

SUBJECT: RF Kinetic Shaping Escalates with New Multi-Axis UAV Attack on Odesa and Kharkiv; Strategic Strike Window Narrows; Tomahawk IO Campaign Intensifies.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is dominated by the RF's continued kinetic shaping operations, now focused on three axes: Odesa, Kharkiv, and the Eastern Contact Line. The objective remains the depletion and fixation of UAF PPO assets ahead of the imminent strategic missile strike (MLCOA 1).

• Odesa Axis (CRITICAL NEW KINETIC ACTIVITY): UAF Air Force (AF) confirms multiple waves of Shahed-type UAVs launched from the Black Sea, targeting Odesa. Initial reports indicated approximately 17 UAVs, with 10 remaining airborne, and several penetrating air defenses over the city and near Velykyi Dalnyk. Explosions are confirmed in Odesa. (FACT - UAF AF/Local Reports; CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kharkiv Axis (Kinetic Activity): UAF AF confirms UAV activity from the north directed toward Kharkiv city, and later confirms UAVs on the north of Kharkiv Oblast moving south. This sustains pressure on the Eastern Operational Zone. (FACT - UAF AF; CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Donetsk Axis (Kinetic Activity): UAF AF reports UAV activity in Western Donetsk Oblast moving north, indicating continued localized attrition strikes behind the immediate contact line. (FACT - UAF AF; CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Feodosia BDA (CONFIRMATION): New video evidence further confirms the large-scale, high-intensity fire event at the Feodosia oil depot (НПЗ), reinforcing the success and lethality of the UAF deep strike campaign. (FACT - Visual Imagery; CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear, dry conditions prevail across the Southern and Eastern Operational Zones. Night conditions facilitate low-altitude UAV penetration, particularly over the Black Sea approach to Odesa.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF PPO assets are currently engaged across three major vectors: Odesa, Kharkiv, and the standing threat to Kyiv (as detailed in the previous SITREP). This forced multi-vector engagement is achieving the RF objective of exhausting PPO assets and creating systemic resource allocation dilemmas.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Multi-Domain Synchronization: RF C2 is effectively synchronizing kinetic operations (UAV attacks on Odesa/Kharkiv) with simultaneous high-value IO campaigns (Tomahawk signaling, internal friction narratives).
• Target Saturation: RF maintains the capability to launch sufficient UAV numbers to saturate local PPO defenses in coastal cities like Odesa.

(INTENTIONS):

1. Forced PPO Expenditure (IMMEDIATE): Maximize UAF PPO expenditure on low-cost Shahed UAVs in Odesa and Kharkiv to degrade interception capability against the main strategic missile strike (MLCOA 1).
2. Sustain Logistical Friction: Continue to absorb UAF deep strikes against logistical nodes (Feodosia BDA) while maintaining high operational tempo to prevent UAF force regeneration.
3. IO Domination: Leverage the Tomahawk/Putin signaling to directly challenge the credibility of US support and create deep strategic uncertainty ahead of the expected kinetic escalation.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The inclusion of Odesa in the multi-vector UAV shaping operation is a tactical adaptation, expanding the RF target set beyond the Kyiv/Dnipro/Kharkiv triangle. This forces UAF to further stretch its limited PPO resources to defend critical port and infrastructure assets.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The confirmed damage to the Feodosia depot (visual BDA) represents a sustained and effective UAF counter-logistics operation, placing renewed pressure on RF fuel distribution across the Southern Operational Zone.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, demonstrated by the synchronized launch windows across multiple axes (Odesa, Kharkiv) and the immediate integration of high-impact international political signals into the information domain.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are under increasing strain due to the multi-vector PPO requirement. Readiness remains high, but resource allocation is reaching a critical inflection point due to the immediate, concurrent threats to Odesa, Kharkiv, and the anticipated mass strike on Kyiv/Dnipro.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Deep Strike): Visually confirmed, large-scale destruction at the Feodosia oil depot (via video), reinforcing the counter-value campaign success.
• Setback (PPO Strain): Confirmed UAV penetration over Odesa, forcing PPO engagement and expenditure of limited interceptors in a new, high-priority coastal defense sector.
• Setback (Morale/IO): Reports from captured RF personnel (Russian soldier expressing extreme distress and poor conditions) offer a slight morale boost to UAF forces, but the overall cognitive domain remains under heavy RF pressure.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PPO Resource Crisis: The immediate constraint is the need for sufficient Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) and SHORAD systems to counter the current, concurrent UAV waves in Odesa and Kharkiv, while simultaneously conserving high-value interceptors for the MLCOA 1 strategic missile strike.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Exploitation of Tomahawk Signaling (CRITICAL IO FOCUS): The RF is aggressively promoting the narrative that US aid (Tomahawks) is conditional and subject to negotiation with Putin. Ukrainian sources are also widely disseminating this audio/video, indicating the message has achieved broad penetration, but potentially increasing public anxiety about the consistency of US commitment. (FACT - Multi-source amplification; CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Internal Narrative: RF military experts (Andrey Marochko, TASS) are providing commentary reinforcing the difficulty for RF forces to capture territory, likely designed to manage domestic expectations while maintaining the narrative of sustained Ukrainian attrition.
• Internal RF Morale Degradation (UAF Exploitation): UAF-affiliated channels (BUTUSOV PLUS) are actively disseminating video of a highly distressed RF soldier reporting severe abandonment, lack of food/water, and command refusal to evacuate the wounded. This is a targeted counter-IO effort to reduce RF unit cohesion. (FACT - Video dissemination; CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The simultaneous UAV attacks on major cities (Odesa, Kharkiv) combined with the extreme political uncertainty generated by the Tomahawk statement will likely lead to high levels of public anxiety and increased pressure on the government to demonstrate effective PPO defense and diplomatic stability.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Massed Strategic Missile Strike - Kyiv/Dnipro/Sumy): The kinetic shaping operations are nearing completion. The forced engagement of UAF PPO in Odesa further confirms the RF intent to exhaust air defenses. The launch window for the multi-layered missile strike is now assessed to be within the next 6-16 hours. Strike window remains NLT 131800Z OCT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Sustained Coastal and Eastern Attrition): RF will maintain multi-axis UAV attacks on Odesa (coastal logistics/infrastructure) and Kharkiv (industrial/military targets) to keep PPO fixed, synchronized with continued high-volume KAB and artillery fire along the Eastern Contact Line. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Strategic Air Interdiction/Decapitation - Synchronized Multi-Role Strike): No change. The threat remains that RF integrates long-range, high-supersonic assets (e.g., Kinzhal) targeting national/military C2 nodes while simultaneously launching a high-volume UAV/cruise missile attack to saturate and neutralize PPO defenses. The goal is to maximize C2 degradation during the critical time window. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Strategic Strike Initiation: MLCOA 1 launch window begins 130400Z OCT (adjusted forward due to accelerated shaping).
• Decision Point (PPO Allocation - Odesa): IMMEDIATE PPO deployment decisions are required to balance current UAV engagement in Odesa (critical port infrastructure) against the conservation requirements for the imminent MLCOA 1 (Kyiv/Dnipro).
• Decision Point (IO Counter): Immediate action required to counter the Tomahawk/Putin signaling to prevent a collapse in strategic confidence among partners and the public.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize PPO Allocation to Critical Infrastructure (CRITICAL URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Given the immediate, multi-vector threat, central command must issue clear directives prioritizing PPO engagement:
     • Kyiv/Dnipro: Maintain strict PPO Conservation Protocol for high-value interceptors, reserving them exclusively for MLCOA 1 against C2 nodes.
     • Odesa/Kharkiv: Immediately surge Mobile Fire Groups (MFGs) and low-cost SHORAD (e.g., MANPADS, ZSU-23-4) to counter current UAV waves. Use high-value interceptors only to protect confirmed high-value military or port infrastructure. Avoid engaging UAVs over low-value civilian areas to conserve assets.
   • Action: Direct UAF Air Command to redistribute available MFG/SHORAD assets to the Odesa sector within the next 4 hours.

2. Immediate Strategic IO Counter-Signaling (HIGH INFORMATION URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Execute the previously recommended IO counter-signaling plan. The Presidential Administration/MFA must release a strong statement NLT 122330Z OCT clarifying that the strategic partnership with the US is based on official government channels and ratified agreements, not on hypothetical political speculation. The message should emphasize that deep strike capabilities (implicitly referencing the Feodosia success) will continue, regardless of RF efforts to create uncertainty.
   • Action: Utilize OSINT/HUMINT to track the success of the counter-narrative (CR Priority 3) within 6 hours of release.

3. Harden Odesa Port Infrastructure (OPERATIONAL URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Given Odesa's inclusion in the kinetic shaping and its critical role in grain and military logistics, immediately deploy robust point defenses (heavy machine guns, light AAA) around key port facilities and logistics hubs near the waterfront to enhance defense against low-flying UAVs.
   • Action: Local Military Administration (OVA) and UAF Southern Command to implement port hardening measures and active patrolling protocols within the next 4 hours.

//END REPORT//