Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 121700Z OCT 25 (UPDATE 9)

SUBJECT: Immediate Ballistic Threat to Kyiv Confirmed. Borispil Power Restored. RF Forces Advance on Severodonetsk-Siversk Axis. Continued RF IO Targeting Western Support and Internal Ukrainian Stability.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture remains dominated by the RF deep strike campaign, transitioning from shaping operations to imminent kinetic action.

• Kyiv Axis (CRITICAL - IMMEIDATE THREAT): The threat level has escalated. UAF Air Force (AF) confirms the Threat of Ballistic Missile Deployment from the North (FACT - UAF AF; CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This directly reinforces MLCOA 1 (Massed Strategic Strike Execution) predicted in the previous SITREP.
• Kyiv Logistics/Infrastructure: Power supply has been fully restored in the Boryspilskyi Raion following the morning enemy drone attack (FACT - OBA; CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This demonstrates rapid UAF capacity for damage recovery and resilience against infrastructure attacks.
• Eastern Front (Siversk Sector): RF sources claim forces are engaging Siversk from three directions (North, South, East), aiming for a partial encirclement (FACT - TASS/RF Expert; CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM). This suggests RF is maintaining high-tempo attritional pressure on the Donbas front, potentially capitalizing on UAF PPO resource diversion to the deep rear.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes to the forecast. Continued expectation of sharp cooling next week (near 0°C) will impact logistical requirements.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF PPO resources are currently tasked with responding to the confirmed ballistic threat. Air Raid Alerts are active across central and southern Oblasts (Zaporizhzhia, etc.). UAF forces demonstrate capacity for precision strikes (drone footage of successful strike on RF personnel in rubble) and effective defense against immediate infrastructure degradation (Boryspil power restoration).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Ballistic Missile Capacity: Confirmed readiness for deployment from Northern axes, strongly suggesting short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs) such as Iskander, or medium-range systems (e.g., modified S-300/S-400), are prepared for launch against high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Conventional Maneuver (East): RF forces maintain the ability to conduct synchronized advances on critical points like Siversk, utilizing multi-directional pressure to force UAF withdrawal or costly defense. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Information Warfare Integration: RF continues its multi-domain approach by immediately amplifying information that sows distrust in Western support (Trump-Ukraine impeachment narrative) and promotes the idea of inevitable conflict escalation (WWIII by 2028 narrative).

(INTENTIONS):

1. Execute Strategic Ballistic Strike (Kyiv/North): Exploit the immediate PPO vulnerability by launching ballistic missiles IMMEDIATELY, targeting C2 and military infrastructure.
2. Pressure Siversk (Eastern Attrition): Maintain or increase operational tempo around Siversk to tie down UAF reserves and achieve localized tactical success, capitalizing on UAF resource diversion to the deep rear.
3. Exploit Internal Western Divisions: Use Western political figures and historical narratives (Trump impeachment) to erode Congressional and public support for Ukraine.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The confirmed ballistic threat from the North indicates RF is transitioning to the exploitation phase of its shaping operation, moving from attritional UAV strikes to high-impact SRBM use against fixed targets.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF's ability to coordinate and launch the confirmed Ballistic Missile threat suggests strategic missile and launcher logistics remain robust. However, the operational impact of the UAF deep strike on the Belgorod fuel station (previous SITREP) and the Ministry of Energy’s need to manually support fuel stability in Russia (TASS report) suggests continued localized logistical friction near the border and in the domestic fuel market.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating highly effective synchronization of kinetic operations (UAV shaping, ballistic readiness) with sophisticated, timely IO campaigns (immediate amplification of political news).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF forces are on high alert, confirming the ballistic threat. The rapid restoration of power in Boryspil demonstrates effective civil-military cooperation and infrastructure resilience planning following the initial drone attack. UAF drone operators continue to conduct effective localized strikes on RF personnel (confirmed fatality in a forward position).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success: Effective restoration of power in Boryspilskyi Raion mitigates the immediate strategic effect of the morning drone attack on critical civilian infrastructure. Confirmed kinetic attrition of RF personnel by UAF FPV/loitering munitions.
• Setback: The confirmed ballistic threat from the North indicates UAF PPO assets are currently unable to deter or conceal RF preparations for the most dangerous strike package.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate constraint is the availability of high-end PPO interceptors (Patriot/SAMP-T) capable of reliably engaging SRBMs and MRBMs, particularly in the North. There is an urgent requirement for rapid, highly-dispersed deployment of SHORAD/MRAD systems to protect critical infrastructure nodes outside the immediate capital region (e.g., in Zaporizhzhia, where alerts are active).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF External Political Erosion: RF milbloggers (Colonelcassad, ASTRA) are amplifying international political narratives (Trump's call to investigate 2019 "Ukrainian impeachment") to sow political discord in the US and undermine the integrity of US support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Escalation Narrative: RF sources are promoting long-term conflict narratives ("WWIII starting by 2028") to foster fatalism in the West and encourage immediate de-escalation/negotiations on RF terms. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• RF Internal Morale Focus: RF regional leaders (Lipetsk, Chechnya) are broadcasting highly sanitized, positive economic and development reports (agricultural success, new medical equipment) to project stability and normalcy domestically, diverting attention from kinetic losses and logistical failures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Identity Warfare: The video featuring Buryat soldiers of the 37th Motor Rifle Brigade delivering a surrender message to UAF forces highlights the use of distinct ethnic units in the IO sphere, potentially aiming to segment and demoralize UAF forces by demonstrating the diversity of the RF military. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment in the rear is focused on resilience and recovery (Boryspil power restoration). RF continues to attempt to portray Ukraine's national ideology as "self-destructive" (Podubnyy).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF IO actively targets international support by focusing on Western political vulnerabilities (Trump, Macron's perceived weakness).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Immediate Ballistic Strike Execution): RF forces, leveraging the confirmed threat from the North, will initiate the massed ballistic and cruise missile strike against Kyiv, Chernihiv, and potentially Dnipro Oblasts within the next 1-4 hours (NLT 122100Z OCT). The immediate threat level is now the highest observed in this operational cycle. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Siversk Encirclement Attempt): RF forces will increase the tempo of localized ground attacks, aiming to complete the half-encirclement of Siversk (North, South, East axes) to force an operational withdrawal from the city within the next 24-48 hours. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Simultaneous Multi-Front Ballistic Strike and C2 Targeting): RF executes MLCOA 1 (Ballistic Strike on Kyiv) while simultaneously launching secondary, large-scale missile strikes against high-value logistics and reserve assembly areas in the West (e.g., Lviv, Khmelnytskyi), overwhelming strategic PPO capacity nationwide and achieving temporary C2 decentralization. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Strategic Missile Launch Window: IMMEDIATE to 122100Z OCT.
• Siversk Criticality Window: 130000Z OCT to 140000Z OCT.
• Decision Point (Strategic Alert): IMMEDIATE. UAF High Command must confirm that all available SRBM/MRBM engagement systems are operational and actively targeting North/Northeast launch corridors.
• Decision Point (Eastern Front): NLT 130400Z OCT. Confirm whether UAF forces around Siversk possess sufficient counter-battery and logistical support to sustain defense against multi-axis pressure, or if a planned operational withdrawal is necessary to preserve combat power.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute Maximum Ballistic Defense Protocols (OPERATIONAL URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Immediately place all PPO assets capable of intercepting ballistic missiles (Patriot/SAMP-T) on maximum alert and activate pre-planned engagement zones covering Kyiv and priority military C2 nodes.
   • Action: Direct a temporary shift of mobile PPO units (NASAMS, IRIS-T) to protect key logistical hubs in the Central/Eastern Oblasts (Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia) currently under high alert status, mitigating MDCOA 1.

2. Reinforce Siversk Counter-Strike Capacity (TACTICAL URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Prioritize allocation of counter-battery fire resources (e.g., M777/CAESAR) to support the Siversk-Bakhmut corridor to disrupt the claimed multi-directional RF pressure (MLCOA 2).
   • Action: Conduct aggressive aerial reconnaissance (UAV) over the claimed North/South/East vectors of RF advance to accurately confirm or deny the alleged encirclement maneuver, preventing UAF forces from being tied down unnecessarily.

3. Counter RF Destabilization IO (COGNITIVE DOMAIN):

   • Recommendation: Proactively launch IO campaigns countering the RF "WWIII" and "Western Corruption" narratives, focusing on Ukraine's demonstrated resilience (e.g., Boryspil power restoration) and documented RF logistical failures (public appeals for body armor).
   • Action: Direct UAF IO assets to highlight the hypocrisy of RF regional leaders celebrating economic success while frontline RF troops lack basic gear.

//END REPORT//