Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 121200Z OCT 25

SUBJECT: RF Continues Deep Strike Campaign Focusing on Southern/Eastern Logistics; UAF Achieves Localized Gain in Zaporizhzhia; Strategic Vulnerability from Patriot Degradation Remains Critical.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is characterized by continuous RF standoff strikes in the deep rear, primarily targeting logistics, concurrent with high-intensity, attritional ground combat in the Donbas.

• Zaporizhzhia Axis (UAF Localized Advance): UAF forces, specifically the 24th Separate Assault Battalion 'Aidar', claim the liberation of Mali Shcherbaky (Small Shcherbaky) on the Zaporizhzhia front. This suggests localized tactical initiative and successful counterattack in a previously contested area. (FACT - UAF Claim; JUDGEMENT - Tactical Success: HIGH). Air raid alert in Zaporizhzhia is concluded, indicating the immediate threat has passed (Zaporizhzhia OVA).
• Donetsk Axis (Attritional Combat):
  • UAF 3rd Guard Battalion of the 101st Brigade is confirmed engaged in effective drone-guided fire missions against entrenched RF positions near Chasiv Yar, resulting in the destruction of enemy shelters and equipment caches. This confirms sustained RF pressure and UAF effective defense-in-depth leveraging FPV/UAV assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • RF sources (Colonelcassad) are actively disseminating claims that a UAF strike hit an RF arms depot within the "SIGMA" shopping center in Donetsk, framed as a "Fake." This IO suggests UAF may have conducted a successful deep strike on a sensitive military target within occupied territory. (JUDGEMENT - UAF Deep Strike Attempt: MEDIUM).
• Eastern Logistics (RF Interdiction): RF "Zapad" Grouping drone operators claim a powerful attack on a key transport artery near Kupiansk-Vuzlovyi, specifically targeting vehicles near active railway tracks. This confirms RF prioritization of disrupting UAF logistics along the critical Kupiansk rail hub. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Northern UAV Activity (Change in Vector): A new RF Shahed UAV track is confirmed moving over Eastern Kharkiv Oblast, kursing towards Donetsk Oblast. This suggests a possible shift in deep strike vector, moving air assets along the internal front line rather than the northern border, potentially targeting eastern logistics or C2 nodes supporting operations in the Donbas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Clear autumnal weather supports continued UAV/ISR operations by both sides.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: Dispositions confirm a continued multi-domain effort: deep strike focused on logistics (Kupiansk-Vuzlovyi), sustained ground attrition (Chasiv Yar/Siversk), and extensive use of IO to manage domestic and international perceptions.
• UAF: Active defense posture maintains localized offensive capability (Mali Shcherbaky). The immediate priority remains mitigating the strategic PPO gap caused by the reported Patriot degradation.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITIES):

• Precision Logistics Interdiction: RF is capable of synchronized FPV/drone attacks targeting specific logistical chokepoints (rail tracks, roads) near key hubs like Kupiansk-Vuzlovyi, indicating effective real-time targeting via dedicated UAV groups. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Warfare Integration: RF utilizes its IO channels to immediately deny UAF claims of strategic success (Donetsk depot strike) while promoting narratives of internal stability and infrastructure development (Shukhov Tower opening). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

(INTENTIONS):

1. Exploit PPO Degradation: Capitalize immediately on the reported strategic air defense vulnerability by striking static, high-value military targets previously protected by Patriot systems.
2. Disrupt Eastern Logistics: Continue targeting rail and road transport infrastructure feeding UAF ground forces in the Donbas/Kharkiv region, especially around Kupiansk.
3. Sustain Ground Attrition: Maintain offensive pressure at Siversk and Chasiv Yar to fix and deplete UAF ground reserves.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• UAV Re-vectoring: The confirmed Shahed movement from Eastern Kharkiv toward Donetsk suggests RF may be adapting its deep strike launch profiles to avoid anticipated PPO in the north-central regions, opting for routes closer to the front line where UAF PPO is more concentrated on tactical targets.
• Targeting of Military Assets in Urban Areas: The RF denial of the Donetsk SIGMA strike suggests they are utilizing civilian infrastructure (e.g., shopping centers) for military storage, complicating UAF targeting and maximizing potential IO benefit from successful strikes.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are sustaining high-intensity strikes and localized advances. NATO ally Poland's announced inclusion into the Central European Pipeline System (CEPS) is a long-term strategic decision by NATO to improve its resilience and logistical depth, but it does not immediately impact current RF sustainment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains robust, coordinating deep strike assets with localized ground force information operations (Donetsk denial). The focus on major transport nodes (Kupiansk) indicates continued centralized strategic targeting oversight.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Local Offensive Capability: The confirmed liberation of Mali Shcherbaky by the 24th Assault Battalion 'Aidar' demonstrates that UAF retains the readiness and morale to execute localized, successful offensive operations on the defensive axes.
• UAV Dominance (Tactical): UAF units (101st Brigade at Chasiv Yar) show continued excellence in integrating UAV/FPV assets for precision fire guidance and enemy position neutralization, a critical advantage in attritional combat.
• Leadership Engagement: President Zelenskyy's call with President Macron confirms continued high-level diplomatic efforts to secure crucial aid ("protecting life").

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes: Confirmed liberation of Mali Shcherbaky (Zaporizhzhia). Confirmed successful UAV-guided strikes resulting in destruction of RF shelters/equipment near Chasiv Yar. Possible successful deep strike on a significant RF depot in Donetsk (pending BDA confirmation).
• Setbacks: RF continues to successfully interdict key UAF logistical routes (Kupiansk-Vuzlovyi). Confirmed casualties (FPV-related injury to UAF soldier).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The most pressing constraint remains the strategic PPO gap created by the reported Patriot system degradation (Reference: Previous Daily Report). The need for immediate, multi-layered strategic air defense cover is paramount.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF IO (Cultural Conflict): RF channel WarGonzo attempts to frame Ukrainian de-Russification efforts (removing monuments) as irrational cultural aggression ("Чем Украине не угодили Пушкин...").
• RF IO (Denial/Distraction): Colonelcassad immediately flags the UAF strike claim on the Donetsk SIGMA center as "Fake," attempting to control the narrative surrounding successful UAF deep strikes.
• UAF IO (Morale/Progress): UAF channels emphasize local victories (Mali Shcherbaky) and operational effectiveness (Chasiv Yar drone strikes) to maintain domestic and international morale.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale is reinforced by confirmed tactical gains and effective drone warfare footage. Public sentiment remains fragile due to continuous air raid alerts and the implied threat of increased RF strikes (Zelenskyy quote: "Russian strikes have become more insidious").

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• France/Ukraine: Zelenskyy's call with Macron reinforces continued bilateral security cooperation.
• China/DPRK: China's statement of strategic cooperation with North Korea (Reuters) is a geopolitical development that distracts international attention and potentially enhances RF strategic leverage/supply options (DPRK munition provision).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Exploitation of PPO Vulnerability): RF will launch a combined arms deep strike (ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and UAVs) against strategic military targets (F-16 airfields, major C2 centers, large depots) within the next 24-72 hours, capitalizing on the confirmed Patriot system degradation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

MLCOA 2 (Eastern Logistics Interdiction): RF will intensify FPV/drone and indirect fire operations against logistical lines in the Kupiansk-Donetsk axis, aiming to slow the flow of reinforcements and supplies to UAF units engaged in high-attrition battles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Strategic Airbase Neutralization): RF conducts a synchronized ballistic missile saturation attack aimed at cratering runways and destroying maintenance/support infrastructure at a primary or secondary UAF airbase. This attack will be immediately followed by persistent Shahed and glide bomb strikes designed to suppress repair crews and destroy any remaining high-value air assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Timeframe for MLCOA 1 (Strategic Strike): Within 121800Z OCT to 150000Z OCT.
• Decision Point (PPO Contingency): Command must finalize and deploy the emergency non-Patriot PPO reallocation plan (NASAMS/IRIS-T/SHORAD) to high-value static military sites (MDCOA 1 targets) NLT 122400Z OCT.
• Decision Point (Frontline Logistics): Command must implement immediate countermeasures (EW jamming, enhanced air patrol) along the Kupiansk logistical corridor to mitigate the confirmed increase in RF FPV/drone interdiction efforts.

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute Immediate PPO Contingency Plan (STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE):

   • Recommendation: Prioritize the defense of high-value static military targets (especially known or potential F-16 sites and National C2) by immediately re-tasking non-Patriot strategic air defense assets (NASAMS, IRIS-T) to create a layered defense net.
   • Action: Direct the immediate initiation of a 72-hour period of maximum asset dispersal and deception measures across all vulnerable military air and ground infrastructure.

2. Enhance Counter-Drone Measures on Eastern Logistics (OPERATIONAL URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Combat the increased RF FPV/drone interdiction efforts around Kupiansk-Vuzlovyi by deploying dedicated mobile EW/C-UAS teams along the main road and rail arteries.
   • Action: Implement rolling EW coverage for all high-value logistical convoys moving through the targeted corridor and designate a permanent C-UAS QRF (Quick Reaction Force) for the rail hub area.

3. Exploit Zaporizhzhia Tactical Momentum (TACTICAL PRIORITY):

   • Recommendation: Capitalize on the successful liberation of Mali Shcherbaky by the 24th Brigade.
   • Action: Reinforce the newly secured ground with artillery/UAV fire control teams and reconnaissance assets to ensure the gain is consolidated and prevent immediate RF counterattacks or counter-battery fire.

//END REPORT//